Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Methamphetamine and HIV: What Clinicians Need to Know Developed by members of the 2006-2007 AETC Substance Abuse: Stimulant Workgroup This slide set has been adapted from the HIV, Mental Health, and Stimulants Training of Trainers (TOT) developed in 2006 by Pacific AETC and the Pacific Southwest Addiction Technology Transfer Center (PS ATTC). 1 08/07 Educational Objectives At the end of this training exchange, participants will be able to: 2 Understand the epidemiology, neurobiology and medical consequences of methamphetamine (MA) use Comprehend the links between the HIV and MA epidemics See how the brains of MA users and MAabstainers are different from nonusers 08/07 Educational Objectives (con’t) At the end of this training exchange, participants will be able to: 3 Grasp the evidence for behavioral interventions that reduce MA-related risk behaviors Describe specific interventions HIV clinicians can use to improve health outcomes for MA users Utilize a “Tips for HIV Clinicians” fact sheet and other instruments in a “Meth Tool kit” 08/07 Overview Epidemiological concepts Meth and HIV: Why all the fuss now? Neurobiology and medical consequences What does MA do? Linkages between HIV and MA use Specific MA issues and implications for clinicians Sexual behaviors increase drug-related risks Interventions to reduce risks & improve outcomes Take Home Points 4 08/07 The Methamphetamine Family SPEED MA powder: white, yellow, orange, pink, or brown Color variations due to different chemicals used and expertise of the cook 5 ICE High purity MA crystals or coarse powder: translucent to white, sometimes with a green, blue, or pink tinge 08/07 6 08/07 Eastward Spread of Methamphetamine Admissions per 100,000 population 7 08/07 Eastward Spread of Methamphetamine Admissions per 100,000 population 8 08/07 Meth Use in Rural Areas Characteristics: Rural meth users mostly white Working class Similar involvement of both men and women Denial: “We don’t have HIV here” Structural factors 9 HIV stigma Marginalization Inadequate treatment services Limited testing and prevention Dreisbach, Susan, November 2006 08/07 Meth Use in Native Americans Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Survey: 74 % said meth was biggest drug threat they faced 43 % said powdered meth is highly available on their reservations 46 % said crystal meth is highly available 64 % said meth was responsible for an increase in domestic violence 48 % said child abuse and neglect cases were up because of meth 34 % said they have some prevention programs to address meth 10 U.S Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 2006 08/07 Methamphetamine in MSM Prevalence: Los Angeles (11%) of adult MSM used meth in past 6 months (Stall et al., 2001) MSM aged 15-22 (20.1%) used meth in past 6 months (Thiede et al., 2003) Los Angeles site (32.0%) Twice as many MSM (14.4%) used meth in 1996 NHSDA as MSW (7.3%; Cochran et al., 2004) 11 08/07 HIV and HCV seroprevalence by primary injection drug and MSM status in recently arrested male injectors, Seattle MSM status and primary injection drug Heroin Never-MSM Meth Never MSM Cocaine Never MSM Heroin MSM Meth MSM Cocaine MSM HIV n % HIV + 553 2.0 343 1.1 143 1.0 32 9.7 41 29.3 19 5.0 Hepatitis C n % HCV + 364 78.3 307 38.1 96 60.0 16 75.0 32 37.5 15 60.0 Public Health – Seattle & King County, KIWI Study, 1998-2002 12 08/07 Prevalence reflects risk networks MSM meth HIV MSM heroin HCV Sexual networks ? 13 Non-MSM heroin Drug/injection networks Non-MSM meth ? 08/07 Adult Tx Completion—WA State Adults 70% 60% 60% 54% 48% 50% 54% 54% 53% M eth Hero in Other 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% A lco ho l 14 Co caine M arijuana 08/07 Youth Tx Completion—WA State Youth 70% 62% 60% 55% 50% 50% 46% 52% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Alcohol 15 Cocaine Marijuana Meth Heroin Other 08/07 Adult Meth Outcomes Similar to Outcomes for Other Drugs Adjusted Post-Discharge Outcome Rates for Adults Adjusted Outcome Rates 60.0% 49.2% 49.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 18.9% 20.5% 12.7% 11.1% 10.0% 0.0% TX Readmission Employment Arrest Outcomes Meth User (n=1139) 16 Other Substance User (n=9145) 08/07 Seattle-King County HIV Prevalence Rates, 2004 HIV Prevalence 35 35% 30 25 20 20% 15 15% 10 5 3% 0 IDU (non-MSM) MSM (non crystal using) 17Public Health – Seattle & King County, 2004 MSM crystal users (non-inj) MSM crystal injectors 08/07 Meth and HIV Incidence in CA Background incidence is 1.55 per 100 ppy in California MSM (95% CI=1.23-1.95) (Buchbinder et al., 2005, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 39:82-9) Corresponds to 19.1% prevalence (95% CI=12.8% to 25.3%) Detuned assays of HIV-positive samples from 290 MSM meth users in San Francisco at anonymous testing sites showed incidence estimated at 6.3% (95% CI=1.9-10.6) (Buchacz et al., 2005, AIDS. 19:1423-4 ) This compared to 2.1% (95% CI=1.3-2.9) for 2701 nondrug using MSM tested in the same sites 18 08/07 Methamphetamine Addiction The brains of people addicted to Methamphetamine are different than those of non-addicts 19 08/07 20 08/07 21 08/07 dopamine reservoir synapse 22 08/07 23 08/07 MA or cocaine 24 08/07 Natural Rewards Elevate Dopamine Levels 200 % of Basal DA Output NAc shell 150 100 Empty 50 Box Feeding SEX 200 150 100 15 10 5 0 0 0 60 120 Time (min) 180 ScrScr BasFemale 1 Present Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Number Scr Scr Female 2 Present 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Mounts Intromissions Ejaculations Source: Di Chiara et al. Source: Fiorino and Phillips Copulation Frequency DA Concentration (% Baseline) FOOD Effects of Drugs on Dopamine Release METHAMPHETAMINE 1500 % Basal Release % of Basal Release Accumbens 1000 500 400 Accumbens COCAINE DA DOPAC HVA 300 200 100 0 0 1 2 0 3hr Time After Cocaine Time After Methamphetamine NICOTINE 200 Accumbens Caudate 150 100 0 0 1 2 3 hr Time After Nicotine % of Basal Release % of Basal Release 250 250 Accumbens ETHANOL Dose (g/kg ip) 0.25 0.5 1 2.5 200 150 100 0 0 1 2 3 Time After Ethanol Source: Shoblock and Sullivan; Di Chiara and Imperato 4hr PET Scan of Long-Term MA Brain Damage 27 08/07 Partial Recovery of Brain Dopamine Transporters in Methamphetamine (METH) Abuser After Protracted Abstinence 3 0 ml/gm Normal Control METH Abuser (1 month detox) METH Abuser (24 months detox) Source: Volkow, ND et al., Journal of Neuroscience 21, 9414-9418, 2001. Control > MA 4 3 2 1 29 0 08/07 MA > Control 5 4 3 2 1 30 0 08/07 Cognitive Impairment in Individuals Currently Using Methamphetamine Sara Simon, Ph.D. VA MDRU Matrix Institute on Addictions LAARC 31 08/07 number correct Longitudinal Memory Performance 25 20 control baseline 3 mos 6 mos 15 10 5 0 Word Recall 32 Word Recognition Picture Recall test Picture Recognition 08/07 Effects of Methamphetamine 33 08/07 Methamphetamine: Acute Physical Effects 34 Increases Heart rate Blood pressure Pupil size Respiration Sensory acuity Energy Decreases Appetite Sleep Reaction time 08/07 Methamphetamine: Acute Psychological Effects Increases Confidence Decreases Boredom Alertness Loneliness Mood Timidity Sex drive Energy Talkativeness 35 08/07 Methamphetamine: Chronic Physical Effects Tremor Sweating Weakness Burned lips; sore nose Dry mouth Weight loss Cough Sinus infection 36 Oily skin/complexion Headaches Diarrhea Anorexia 08/07 37 08/07 “Meth Mouth” Rotting of teeth around the gums Process may involve poor oral hygiene coupled with lack of saliva production and contact with MA or its constituents on dentition Smoking/snorting problems Bruxism; rampant caries http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8770112/site/newsweek/ 38 08/07 Methamphetamine: Chronic Psychological Effects 39 Confusion Irritability Concentration Paranoia Hallucinations Panic reactions Fatigue Depression Memory loss Anger Insomnia Psychosis 08/07 Methamphetamine vs. Cocaine Methamphetamine halflife: 10 hours Cocaine half-life: 2 hours Methamphetamine paranoia: 7-14 days Cocaine paranoia: 4 -8 hours following drug cessation Methamphetamine psychosis: May require medication/ hospitalization and may not be reversible 40 08/07 Hep C, Cognitive Deficits, HIV Infection and Methamphetamine Neurocognitive assessment of 430 subjects along risk factors: HIV status HCV status Methamphetamine dependence Global and domain-specific impairments increased with number of risk factors HCV infection predicted deficits in learning, abstraction, motor skills; no effects on attention, working memory verbal fluency 41 Cherner et al., 2005 08/07 42 08/07 Drug Abuse Problem – Public Health Problem In Los Angeles County, heroin injectors at low risk; gay male meth users at extreme risk Outpatient clinic, hetero meth dependent 0 Outpatient clinic, gay/bi meth dependent 61 Heroin addicts in methadone clinics 10 7 Street heroin addicts 0 20 40 60 80 % HIV Positive 43 LAC HIV Epidemiology (1999-2004); Social Construction of a Gay Drug. Available at http://www.uclaisap.org/documents/final-report_cjr_1-15-04.pdf. 08/07 www.aidsmeds.com/images/cmwg.htm 44 08/07 History of Sexually Transmitted Diseases by Reported HIV Serostatus STD HIV Serostatus Positive Negative (n=98) (n=64) % % Statistic Genital warts 41.1 19.4 2 (1) = 8.05, p=.005 Syphilis 28.4 8.2 2 (1) = 9.32, p=.002 Genital Gonorrhea 53.1 30.6 2 (1) = 7.72, p=.005 Yeast infection 14.9 0.0 2 (1) = 10.14, p=.001 Hepatitis B 41.5 17.7 2 (1) = 9.67, p=.002 Shoptaw et al., 2003 Lifetime Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Methamphetamine Using MSM by HIV Serostatus HIV Serostatus STD Genital warts Positive Negative (n=98) (n=64) % % 41.1 19.4 Statistic 2(1)=8.05, p=0.005 Syphilis 28.4 8.2 2(1)=9.32, p=0.002 Genital gonorrhea 53.1 30.6 2(1)=7.72, p=0.005 Hepatitis B 41.5 17.7 2(1)=9.67, p=0.002 46 Shoptaw et al., 2003, J Psychoactive Drugs, 35 (Suppl 1), 161-168 08/07 Intervention: Prevention and Treatment Approaches 47 08/07 Treatment as Prevention 1. Substantial HIV risk decreases with intervention 2. Reductions begin soon after intervention starts 3. Lapses to unsafe sex are common 4. Individual factors can affect outcomes 5. AIDS prevention programs cannot reach all at risk Stall et al., 1999 48 08/07 Methamphetamine and HIV in MSM: A Time-to-Response Association? 49 Shoptaw & Reback, 2006, Journal of Urban Health. 83:1151-7 08/07 Meth and HIV spread Meth Use Promotes spread of HIV 1 virus in infected users Increases production of docking protein Meth: “Doubly Dangerous”? Meth reduces inhibitions, thus increasing the likelihood of risky sexual behavior and the potential to introduce the virus into the body Meth also allows more virus to get into the cell 50 Medical Research News, Aug 4, 2006 Research from the University of Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences 08/07 Tips for Clinicians – 5 A’s Ask Implement an office-wide system that ensures that, for every meth using MSM at every clinic visit, meth use status is queried and documented Advise In a clear, strong, and personalized manner, urge every patient to quit Assess Ask every meth using MSM if he is willing to make a quit attempt now (next 30 days) Assist Help the patient plan, provide practical counseling, recommend meds, be supportive Arrange Provide for follow-up support, phone calls Adapted from Fiore et al., 2000, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Smoking Cessation 51 08/07 Behavioral/Cognitive Behavioral Treatments 52 Cognitive/Behavioral Therapy-CBT Motivational Interviewing-MI Contingency Management-CM Community Reinforcement Approach-CRA Matrix Model of Outpatient Treatment 08/07 Behavioral Therapies 1. Some patients need more help than brief clinician assessment and intervention 2. 12-Steps is the most common talk therapy 53 Highest effectiveness with saturation in every community 3. Motivational Interviewing – 4 brief sessions over 2 months 4. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy – weekly meetings with therapist over several weeks/months 5. Treatments help 25%-40% to achieve sustained abstinence 6. Depth psychotherapy is not recommended for treating meth abuse or dependence 08/07 Substance Abuse Treatment 54 08/07 Findings: Contingency Management Significantly longer retention Significantly more “clean urine” Significantly longer stretches of consecutive clean urine samples Shoptaw et al., 2005 55 08/07 Contingency Management 1. Contingency management involves provision of increasingly valuable reinforcers in exchange for successive biological samples documenting drug abstinence. 2. Elements of this potent treatment method used with gay and bisexual methamphetamine abusers involves providing vouchers in exchange for drug-free urine samples. 56 3. The method has been used with efficacy in controlled clinics and also in non-clinic settings, such as public health clinics. 08/07 Sex Risks Reduced with Treatment: UARI Past 30 Days 3.5 3 2.5 CBT CM CBT+CM GCBT 2 1.5 1 0.5 57 12 -M os os M 6- ks 16 -W ks 12 -W 8W ks 4W ks Ba se l in e 0 2(3)=6.75, p<.01 08/07 Take Home Points 58 08/07 Take Home Points: Clinicians (MDs, Nurses, PAs) Review/Post --“Tips for HIV Clinicians working with Meth Users” Know – your local resources Remember— meth use and meth users are treatable Prevention, Prevention, PREVENTION 59 08/07