Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Implicit Differentiation Lesson 4.5 Another Differentiation? So far, we have been differentiating explicitly, which applies to functions in explicit form (solved for in terms of the variable differentiated with respect to). Equations may also be in implicit form. implicit form explicit form dy dx x–y=6 y=x–6 dy/dx = 1 xy = 1 y = 1/x dy/dx = -x-2 4y – 5x2 = -15 2 y = 5x – 15 4 dy/dx = 5x/2 4y – x2 = y3 ??? ??? Functions that can be solved in terms of x can be differentiated explicitly, but equations that cannot be solved for x shall be differentiated implicitly. So, What’s the Process? 4y – x2 = y3 1) Differentiate both sides with respect to x. dy dx 2) Solve for dy/dx: dy dx [4y – [4] – x2] = 2x = dy 3 dx [y ] dy 2] [3y dx a) Move dy/dx terms to the left and all other terms to the right. dy dx [4] - dy 2] = [3y dx 2x b) Factor dy/dx out of the left side of the equation. dy 2) = 2x (4 – 3y dx c) Solve for dy/dx. dy dx = 2x 4 – 3y2 Um, What Did We Just Do? The Short Answer: The Chain Rule. I did! Wait...who just said that? We are, with the Chain Rule. I thought we were differentiating. I’m Not Following. Using the Chain Rule is easy when we know all the parts of the composite function. For example, y = (3x + 2)2... I know that one… that’s u=3x+2, u’=3, So f(u) = u2, so f’(u) = 2u • u’, And y’ = 2(3x+2)(3) = 18x+12 Now say we did a new problem. I told you that y = u2, then told you to differentiate with respect to x. But there’s no x ! That doesn’t need to stop you. Look at your work above. You said f ’(u) = 2u • u’, right? Yea, so? So, not knowing what the derivative is doesn’t prevent it from existing, and it doesn’t prevent you from using it as a variable. This isn’t helping… Alright, alright. Let’s look at something else. Say y is a function, and f (x) = y3. Find f ’(x). Again, there’s no x ! So, just “simplify” as far as you can... Okay, um, I can differentiate f with respect to y… Right! Keep going... So, f’(y) = 3y2… But I can’t differentiate y with respect to x … But that derivative still exists... So, notate it, then multiply that to 3y2? Yep, f ’(x) = 3y2 dy dx , and that’s as far as you can go. Wait... Not y’ ? Not in this lesson. What’s wrong with y’? That notation only assumes that you’re differentiating explicitly. It doesn’t allow for notating implicit differentiation with respect to other variables. Then why do we use it? Why not just use one notation? Thank Isaac Newton. Newton invented Calculus to solve physics problems. Since most all the work he did involved time as an independent variable, all his differentiating was explicit and didn’t require additional notation. And he was too good a mathematician for his work to be ignored. Too much information. You asked. Back to Implicit Differentiation And how does Got it! this all relate to implicit differentiation? So, let’s study that first problem... 4y – x2 = y3 1) Here, we differentiate both sides w/ respect to x. dy dx 2) Then we apply the Difference Rule, and the Chain Rule. 3) Then we add & subtract terms: 4) Then we factor out dy/dx (which we treat like any other variable): 5) And finally, we solve for dy/dx. dy dx [4y – [4] – x2] = 2x = dy 3 dx [y ] dy 2] [3y dx dy dx [4] – dy dx (4 – 3y2) = 2x 2x = 4 – 3y2 dy dx dy 2] [3y dx = 2x Let’s Try Some More Find the equation of a line tangent to the graph of x2 + y2 = 1 at the point (½, √3/2). x2 dy dx + y2 = 1 (½, √3/2) dy [x2 + y2] = dx [1] 2x + dy dx [2y] dy dx [2y] = dy dx 1 = 0 -2x -1 1 -2x -x = = 2y y So, at (½, √3/2), the rate of change = -1/2 ÷ √3/2 = -1/√3, then using point-slope, our equation is: -1 y – 3 2 = -1 3 (x –½) Incorporating Second Derivatives Given the equation x2 + y2 2y d = 1, find . 2 dx -x dy We know that = dx y Then, differentiating a second time, and using the quotient rule… g(x) = -x , so g’(x) = -1 h(x) = y , so h’(x) = (1)dy/dx = -x/y d2 y So, = dx2 -y 1 – = g’(x)h(x) – h’(x)g(x) [h(x)]2 x2 1 y y2 = = -y2 – x2 1 y y2 (-1)(y) – (-x/y)(-x) (y)2 = -(x2 + y2) y3 = -1 y3 Lesson Practice 1) Given the equation 4x – 6y2 dy = 3y, find . dx Exercises Pg. 297 (1, 5, 8, 24, 29, 31, 37, 38, 41, 42)