Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Okishio's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Chinese economic reform wikipedia , lookup
Post–World War II economic expansion wikipedia , lookup
Economic growth wikipedia , lookup
Long Depression wikipedia , lookup
Now Playing: The Biggest Hit in Economics: The Gross Domestic Product 1 Starring Irving Fisher (Yale) 2 Starring Simon Kuznets (Harvard) 3 Starring Steve Landefeld (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis) 4 What do these have in common? • • • • • • 5 Real GDP Consumer price index Unemployment rate Exchange rate of the dollar Inflation rate Real exchange rate Answer…. They are all “indexes” that require some economic theory to construct. Indeed, for most of human history (99.9%), we did not know how to construct them. Understanding the construction of price and output indexes is our main analytical task today. But first, some recent macro data…. 6 7 BEA, Survey of Current Business, August 2013 Personal savings rate [Savings/disposable personal income] 8 An important inflation measure (corrected) 14 Inflation rate, price of personal consumption 12 10 8 6 Fed target 4 2 9 F-12 J-10 D-07 N-05 O-03 S-01 A-99 J-97 J-95 M-93 A-91 M-89 F-87 J-85 D-82 N-80 O-78 S-76 A-74 J-72 J-70 M-68 A-66 M-64 -2 F-62 J-60 0 Overview of national accounts “While the GDP and the rest of the national income accounts may seem to be arcane concepts, they are truly among the great inventions of the twentieth century. Like a satellite that can view the weather across an entire continent, so the GDP can provide an overall picture of the state of the economy.” A leading economics textbook. 10 Major concepts in national economic accounts 1. GDP measures final output of goods and services. 2. Two ways of measuring GDP lead to identical results: • Expenditure = income 3. Savings = investment is an accounting identity. • We will also see that it is an equilibrium condition. • Note the advanced version of this includes government and foreign sector. 4. GDP v. GNP: differs by ownership of factors 5. Constant v. current prices: correct for changing prices 6. Value added: Total sales less purchases of intermediate goods - Note that income-side GDP adds up value addeds 7. Net exports = exports – imports 8. Net v. gross investment: • Net investment = gross investment minus deprecation 11 Now to our puzzler! GDP? 12 How to measure output growth? Now take the following numerical example. • Suppose good 1 is computers and good 2 is shoes. • How would we measure total output and prices? period 1 Real output q1 q2 Prices p1 p2 13 Ratio: period 2 to period 2 period 1 1 1 100 1 100 1 1 1 0.010 1.00 0.010 1.00 The growth picture for index numbers: the real numbers! Sector Computers Non computers Output (billions 2005$) 1960 2012 0.0000337 87.94 3,105.8 15,382.8 Computers Non computers Price (2005 = 1) 1960 2012 5,935.7 0.9006 0.1749 1.0560 Source: Bureau of Economics Analysis 14 Some answers • We want to construct a measure of real output, Q = f(q1,…, qn ;p1,…, pn) • How do we aggregate the qi to get total real, GDP(Q)? – Old fashioned fixed weights: Calculate output using the prices of a given year, and then add up different sectors. – New fangled chain weights: Use new “superlative” techniques 15 Old fashioned price and output indexes Laspeyres (1871): weights with prices of base year Lt = ∑ wi,base year (Δq/q)i,t Paasche (1874): use current (latest) prices as weights Πt = ∑ wi,t (Δq/q)i,t 16 Start with Laspeyres and Paasche period 1 Real output q1 q2 Prices p1 p2 Nominal output = ∑piqi Quantity indexes Laspeyres (early p) Paasche (late p) 17 Ratio: period 2 to period 2 period 1 1 1 100 1 100 1 1 1 0.010 1.00 0.010 1.00 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.000 1.010 101.000 2.000 50.50 1.98 HUGE difference! What to do? Solution Brilliant idea: Ask how utility of output differs across different bundles. How to implement: Let U(q1, q2) be the utility function. Assume have {qt} = {qt1, qt2}. Then growth is: g({qt}/{qt-1}) = U(qt)/U(qt-1). For example, assume “Cobb-Douglas” utility function, Q = U = (q1)λ (q2) 1- λ Also, define the (logarithmic) growth rate of xt as g(xt) = ln(xt/xt-1). Then Qt / Qt-1 =[(qt1)λ (qt2) 1- λ]/[(qt-11)λ (qt-12) 1- λ] g(Qt) = ln(Qt/Qt-1) = λ ln(qt1/qt-11) + (1-λ) ln(qt2/qt-12) g(Qt) = λ g(qt1) + (1-λ) g(qt2) The class of 2nd order approximations is called “superlative.” This is a superlative index called the Törnqvist index. 18 period 1 Real output q1 q2 Prices p1 p2 Ratio: period 2 to period 2 period 1 1 1 100 1 100 1 1 1 0.010 1.00 0.010 1.00 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.00 10.00 10.00 2.000 1.010 101.000 2.000 50.50 1.98 Nominal output = ∑piqi Utility = (q1*q2)^.5 Quantity indexes Laspeyres (early p) Paasche (late p) 19 What do we find? 1. L > Util > P [that is, Laspeyres overstates growth and Paasche understates relative to true. Currently used “superlative” indexes Fisher* Ideal (1922): geometric mean of L and P: Ft = (Lt × Πt )½ Törnqvist (1936): average geometric growth rate: (ΔQ/Q)t = ∑ si,T (Δq/q)i,t, where si,T =average nominal share of industry in 2 periods (*Irving Fisher (YC 1888), America’s greatest macroeconomist) 20 period 1 Real output q1 q2 Prices p1 p2 Nominal output = ∑piqi Utility = (q1*q2)^.5 1 1 Ratio: period 2 to period 2 period 1 100 1 100 1 1 1 0.010 1.00 0.010 1.00 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.00 10.00 10.00 Quantity indexes 21 Fisher (geo mean of L and P) 1.421 14.213 10.00 Törnqvist (wt. average growth rate) 1.000 10.000 10.00 Now we construct new indexes as above: Fisher and Törnqvist Superlatives (here Fisher and Törnqvist) are exactly correct. Usually very close to true. Current approaches • Most national accounts used Laspeyres until recently – Why Laspeyres? Primarily because the data requirements are less stringent. • CPI uses Laspeyres index (sub-par approach!). • US moved to Fisher for national accounts in 1995 • BLS has constructed “chained CPI” using Törnqvist since 2002 • China still uses Laspeyres in its GDP. – Who knows whether Chinese data are accurate? 22 Who cares about GDP and CPI measurement? Some examples where makes a big difference • • • • 23 Social security for grandma Taxes for you Target for monetary policy (2 percent per year inflation goal) Estimated rate of productivity growth for budget – and, therefore, Congress’s spending inclinations