Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Hall-Littlewood positive homomorphisms of the algebra of symmetric functions Alexey Bufetov Department of Mathematics, Higher School of Economics, Moscow May 25, 2015 Algebra of symmetric functions {xi }∞ i=1 — formal variables. Newton power sums: pk := ∞ X xik . i=1 The algebra of symmetric functions Λ := R[p1 , p2 , . . . ]. We shall consider homomorphisms ( = multiplicative functionals ) π : Λ → R. Examples. P 1) x1 , x2 , . . . are nonnegative numbers such that i xi ≤ 1. 2) π(p1 ) = 1, π(pk ) = 0 for k ≥ 2. Homomorphisms are in one to one correspondence with a sequence {π(pk )}k=1,2,... . Hall-Littlewood and Schur functions Let λ = λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ λk be a partition (= Young diagram). For t ∈ [0; 1) a Hall-Littlewood function is determined by Qλ (x1 , . . . , xn ; t) := cλ,t X λk λ1 λ2 xσ(1) xσ(2) . . . xσ(k) σ∈Sn Y xσ(i) − txσ(j) i<j xσ(i) − xσ(j) For t = 0 Hall-Littlewood functions turn into Schur functions: λj +k−j n det xi i,j=1 Qλ (x1 , . . . , xn ; 0) = sλ (x1 , . . . , xn ) := Q (x − xj ) 1≤i<j≤n i One can define Qλ ∈ Λ, sλ ∈ Λ. . Hall-Littlewood positive homomorphisms We shall say that π : Λ → R is a Hall-Littlewood positive homomorphism if for any partition λ the value π(Qλ ) is nonnegative. We shall say that π : Λ → R is a Schur positive homomorphism if for any partition λ the value π(sλ ) is nonnegative. HL-positive homomorphisms. P 1) x1 , x2 , . . . are nonnegative numbers such that i xi ≤ 1. 2) π(p1 ) = 1, π(pk ) = 0 for k ≥ 2. Classification We are interested in the description of all Hall-Littlewood positive homomorphisms. This question arises in different contexts: Schur case: representation theory of the infinite symmetric group. Schur case: totally positive Toeplitz matrices. Hall-Littlewood case: asymptotic representation theory of the general linear groups over a finite field. Also Schur (or Macdonald) positive homomorphisms play an important role in the construction of Schur (or Macdonald) processes. Schur case: Thoma theorem Theorem (Thoma ’64, Edrei’53, Vershik-Kerov’81) All Schur-positive homomorphisms of Λ are parameterized by γ ≥ 0, and α = (α1 ≥ α2 ≥ . . . ≥ 0),P β = (β1 ≥ β2 ≥ . . . ≥ 0), such that ∞ i=1 (αi + βi ) < ∞, and ∞ X πα,β (p1 ) = (αi + βi ) + γ, i=1 πα,β (pk ) = ∞ X i=1 αik k−1 + (−1) ∞ X i=1 βik , k ≥2 Kerov’s conjecture Conjecture (Kerov’93) For 0 ≤ t < 1 all Hall-Littlewood positive homomorhpisms are parameterized by γ ≥ 0, and α = (αP 1 ≥ α2 ≥ . . . ≥ 0), β = (β1 ≥ β2 ≥ . . . ≥ 0), such that ∞ i=1 (αi + βi ) < ∞, and ! ∞ ∞ X X 1 πα,β (p1 ) = , αi + γ + βi 1 − t i=1 i=1 πα,β (pk ) = ∞ X i=1 αik + ∞ (−1)k−1 X k β , 1 − t k i=1 i k ≥ 2. Probability measures Yn — the set of all Young diagrams with n boxes. Let w = {αi , βj , γ} denote our set of P parameters. Without βi γ loss of generalization we assume that i (αi + 1−t ) + 1−t = 1. wPl corresponds to γ = 1 − t; αi = 0, βj = 0. Let πw be a HL-positive homomorphism. Let us define a probability measure on Yn by HLwn (λ) := n!πwPl (Pλ )πw (Qλ ), where Pλ is a “P”-Hall-Littlewood function (a constant multiple of Qλ ). It turns out that the probabilistic properties of these measures are closely related to Kerov’s conjecture. Law of Large Numbers: Schur case Schur case:t = 0. Parameters w = {αi , βj , γ} have the following probabilistic meaning Theorem (Vershik-Kerov’81) Let λ(n) be the random Young diagram with n boxes distributed according to HLwn . As n → ∞, we have λi (n) → αi , n λ0j (n) → βj , n convergence in probability. where λi (n) is the length of the i-th row of λ, and λ0j (n) is the length of the j-th column of λ. LLN: Hall-Littlewood case w = {αi , βj , γ}. Let λ be a random Young diagram distributed according to HLwn , and let γ = 0. Theorem (Bufetov-Petrov’14) As n → ∞, we have λi (n) → αi , n λ0j (n) βj → , n 1−t convergence in probability. Method of proof: — new dynamics (generalization of RSK) which samples HLwn ; it is constructed with the use of Borodin-Petrov’13 (similar dynamics were constructed in O’Connell-Pei’12; related to q-Whittaker functions). — Analysis of this dynamics. (r, c) λ (i, j) (r, c) λ̂ (î, ĵ) µ (i, j) µ̂ (î, ĵ) Figure: An example of λ, λ̂ and µ, µ̂. Here the gray box is ˆ j) ˆ = (4, 2). (r , c) = (1, 6), and (i, j) = (2, 4), (i, 1N stands for (1, 1, . . . , 1). Assume that N 1. | {z } N Conjecture (Bufetov-Gorin’14) Let λ, λ̂ ∈ Yn and µ, µ̂ ∈ Yn−1 be two pairs of Young diagrams such that both λ,λ̂ and µ,µ̂ differ by the move of box (i, j) ˆ j) ˆ with iˆ > i. Further, assume that into the position (i, λ \ µ = λ̂ \ µ̂ = (r , c). If r < i, then 1−t λ̂0c −λ̂0c+1 Q (1N ; t) N µ̂ λ0c −λ0c+1 Qµ (1 ; t) ≥ 1 − t . Qλ̂ (1N ; t) Qλ (1N ; t) Proposition (Bufetov-Gorin’14) The conjecture above implies Kerov’s conjecture. Schur case Proposition (Bufetov-Gorin’14) Let λ, λ̂ ∈ Yn and µ, µ̂ ∈ Yn−1 be two pairs of Young diagrams, such that both λ,λ̂ and µ,µ̂ differ by the move of ˆ j) ˆ with iˆ > i. Further, assume box (i, j) into the position (i, that λ \ µ = λ̂ \ µ̂ = (r , c). If r < i, then sλ (1N )sµ̂ (1N ) ≥ sλ̂ (1N )sµ (1N ). This proposition and considerations of Bufetov-Gorin’14 give a new proof of Thoma theorem. More information More details can be found in A. Bufetov, L. Petrov, “Law of Large Numbers for Infinite Random Matrices over a Finite Field”, arXiv:1402.1772, to appear in Selecta Mathematica. A. Bufetov, V. Gorin, “Stochastic monotonicity in Young graph and Thoma theorem”, arXiv:1411.3307, to appear in IMRN.