Download Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Women's medicine in antiquity wikipedia , lookup

Rhetoric of health and medicine wikipedia , lookup

Patient safety wikipedia , lookup

Electronic prescribing wikipedia , lookup

Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Administrative Policies and Procedures
ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION (OPPE)
Policy Number:
Origination Date:
Medical Staff President :
Chief Executive Officer:
Board President:
Page 1 of 5
Reviewed:
Revised:
PURPOSE:
The purpose of ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) is to identify professional practice trends that impact
quality of care and patient safety, utilizing medical staff approved triggers or indicators based on each area of
practice represented on the medical staff (and by and licensed independently practicing allied health professionals)
and the six areas of general competencies developed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Educations
(ACGME) and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) joint initiative and adopted by The Joint
Commission (TJC).
OPPE is the continuous evaluation of the LIP’s professional performance in order to identify and resolve any potential
problems with a LIP’s performance. OPPE information is factored into the decision to maintain existing privilege(s),
to revise existing privilege(s), or to revoke an existing privilege(s), or to revoke an existing privilege prior to or at the
time of reappointment.
GOALS
A. To establish a systematic, data based process for evaluation of privilege-specific LIP competence and
performance as well as accountabilities for addressing opportunities for improvement.
B. Assure that the process for professional practice evaluation is clearly defined, objective, equitable, defensible,
timely and useful
POLICY:
Scope: All members of the medical staff, and allied health professionals who are licensed in the State of (your state)
to provide care, treatment, and services without direct supervision (i.e., APRNs, PAs), hereafter referred to
collectively as “Licensed Independent Practitioners or LIPs” in this policy.
It is the policy of (your facility name) to comply with regulatory requirements regarding ongoing professional practice
evaluation and focused professional practice evaluation. Ongoing data review and findings about LIP practice and
performance are evaluated by the Medical Staff Leadership with the focus on improvement. The findings are used to
assess the quality of care of each LIP every eight months and at the time of reappointment.
PROCEDURE
1. ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION (OPPE)
A. Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) requires that the medical staff conduct an ongoing
evaluation of each LIP’s professional performance. This process allows any potential problems or trends
identified with a LIP’s performance that impact the quality of care and / or patient safety to be addressed
and resolved in a timely manner. The OPPE also fosters an efficient, evidence-based privilege renewal
process. The information resulting from the OPPE is used to determine whether to maintain existing
privilege(s), to revise existing privilege(s), or to revoke an existing privilege prior to or at the time of
renewal.
B. Every eight (8) months, an OPPE will be performed on all LIP’s, defined as any individual who is licensed
and qualified to practice a healthcare profession independent of direct supervision (i.e. physician,
advanced practice nurse, social worker, clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, or respiratory therapist) and is
engaged in the provision of care, treatment, or services.
Administrative Policies and Procedures
ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION (OPPE)
Policy Number:
Origination Date:
Medical Staff President :
Chief Executive Officer:
Board President:
Page 2 of 5
Reviewed:
Revised:
C. The type of information and the process for evaluation of each LIP has been approved by the individual
Departments through the Medical Executive Committee (MEC). The process is defined as follows:
a. The review will be factored into the decision to maintain existing privileges, to revise existing
privileges or to revoke an existing privilege(s) prior to or at the time of reappointment. The fact that
an LIP doesn’t fall out during the screening process does not meet the requirement for
performance data review, although zero data is in fact data and can be evidence of good
performance, (e.g. no returns to the OR, no complaints, etc.) Review of privileges are evaluated at
reappointment and consideration of the reason for zero or low volumes is taken into consideration,
(e.g. no longer performing the procedure, taking patients elsewhere for the procedure or privilege is
typically a low volume procedure, etc.)
b. The criteria used in the in the OPPE may include the following, as applicable:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
Review of operative and other clinical procedure(s) performed and their outcomes
Pattern of blood and pharmaceutical usage
Requests for tests and procedures
Length of stay patterns
Morbidity and mortality data
LIP’s use of consultants
Other relevant criteria as determined by the organized medical staff
c. Information in the OPPE may be acquired through the following:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Periodic chart review
Direct Observation
Monitoring of diagnostic and treatment techniques
Retrospective Chart Review
Discussion with other individuals involved in the care of each patient including consulting
physicians, assistants at surgery, and nursing and administrative personnel
d. Data will be collected for each LIP and pertinent findings will be documented.
i.
At time of reappointment, Allied Health Professionals (AHP) who are authorized by license
to practice independently, data collected will include the following:
1. With activity less than the required number of patient contacts as determined
by the individual Medical Staff Department during the review period, obtain
references from a hospital staff person from their primary hospital, and a
physician who is not their sponsoring physician who can attest to the AHP’s
competency; or
2. With activity that meets or exceeds the required number of patient contacts as
determined by the individual Medical Staff Department during the review
period, provide the information for a hospital staff person from (YOUR
FACILITY NAME), and the name of a physician on staff at (YOUR FACILITY
NAME), who is not their sponsoring physician that can attest to their
competency.
ii.
At time of reappointment, data collected for physicians will include the following:
Administrative Policies and Procedures
ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION (OPPE)
Policy Number:
Origination Date:
Medical Staff President :
Chief Executive Officer:
Board President:
Page 3 of 5
Reviewed:
Revised:
1. With activity less than the required number of patient contacts as determined
by the individual Medical Staff Department during the review period, obtain
peer references from the Department Chair and/or Peer Review Chair at their
primary hospital, and review of available (YOUR FACILITY NAME) quality,
performance improvement and Peer Review data, or
2. With activity that meets or exceeds the required number of patient contacts as
determined by the individual Medical Staff Department during the review
period, and review of available (YOUR FACILITY NAME) quality, performance
improvement, and Peer Review data.
The findings will be evaluated by the Department Vice-Chair as the designated reviewer for OPPE
data and documented using the OPPE Evaluation Form (Attachment A). The following
recommendations regarding the LIP‘s competence and ability to safely perform the privileges as
requested will be forwarded to the Credentials, MEC, and Governing Board
i.
Maintain or continue the privilege(s) unchanged: the LIP’s clinical privileges will
continue without interruption and his / her performance will be routinely evaluated through
the peer review and general competency data collection processes. The LIP will then be
reviewed again at their next eight-month OPPE cycle
ii.
Direct FPPE: Review of the LIP’s OPPE data indicates a question about the LIP’s
competence. An FPPE is recommended.
iii.
Revise, Modify or Revoke an existing privilege: Review of the LIP’s OPPE data
indicates existing privileges should be modified due to insufficient activity or failure to
meet competency requirements.
iv.
Zero Performance /Strategic Privileges – (medical staff identified office-based
specialties, or privileges which fulfill the organization’s mission to provide the privilege)
Zero performance indicates a focus review will be triggered whenever the practitioner
actually performs the privilege.
e. The review process will continue until the Department Chairperson or designee is satisfied with the
information received, or recommendations are made to the Peer Evaluation/Chart Review
Committee, Credentials, and MEC to initiate Corrective Action per the Medical Staff Bylaws.
Request for immediate action can be taken at anytime during the OPPE process, which may
include, but is not limited to, forwarding concerns to the following Committees:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Peer Evaluation / Chart Review Committee
Credentials Committee
Medical Staff Health/Well Being Committee
Medical Executive Committee
D. The LIP will receive written notice every eight months of their ongoing professional practice evaluation
monitoring results.
E. The information gained by the review of the above information will be filed in the LIP’s quality file and
incorporated into the reappointment process. Single incidents or trending of quality and / or safety issues
that impact the safety of patients may require immediate action as defined in the Medical Staff Bylaws.
Administrative Policies and Procedures
ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION (OPPE)
Policy Number:
Origination Date:
Medical Staff President :
Chief Executive Officer:
Board President:
Page 4 of 5
Reviewed:
Revised:
F. “Trigger” – There may be circumstances where a single incident, evidence of a clinical practice trend, or
not performing within acceptable or excellence range may be identified through the OPPE process. The
trigger threshold is determined by each department. When identified, this will trigger a Focused
Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE), which will be conducted according to the FPPE (AM 112.17)
and Peer Review (AM 112.05) Policy & Procedure.
G. If behavior is identified as a possible issue, the Management of the Disruptive Practitioner Policy &
Procedure (AM 112.04) will be followed as a component of the OPPE.
H. Physicians have access to the Medical Staff fair hearing and appeal process should the intervention result
in corrective action.
I.
Relevant information obtained from the ongoing professional practice evaluation is integrated into
performance improvement activities. These activities adhere to the hospital’s policies and procedures
intended to preserve any confidentiality or legal privilege of information established by law.
This form is provided for the Vice-Chairman’s convenience to document appropriate findings as they relate to patient evaluations for F/OPPE
Attachment A
Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation
Department of ____________
Name
Facility Number
Active/Courtesy/Allied Health
Provider’s Primary Specialty
NAME
ID NUMBER
STAFF GATEGORY
SPECIALTY
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs Attention
(Data Range) From:
Activity: Admits/Procedures
Date range
Acceptable
Patient Care
OPPE 1
0
Complications (across all Bone Marrow Biopsies)
OPPE 2
OPPE 3
0
Complications (across all bone marrow transplants)
System
Average
To:
Comparisons
Excellence
Cohort Top
Quartile
Specialty
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.21
0.23
Medical Clinical Knowledge
Mortality Rate
0
% Complications of Care
0
1.17
0.08
1.01
0.04
0.7
0.03
0
1.10
0.09
1.00
0
2.5
2.0
1.98
0
90.0
98.0
98.0
Practice-based Learning
Average Consultants Used
System-Based Practice
% 30 Day Readmits w/ Excludes (Any APR-DRG)
Interpersonal Communication/Skill
Date/Time/Signature of all orders
Professionalism
Total Peer Reviews
Ratings:
__0___
OPPE 1
OPPE 2
OPPE 3
Behavior Utilization Quality Documentation
Behavior Utilization Quality Documentation
Behavior Utilization Quality Documentation
B1/U1/Q1/D1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
B2/U2/Q2/D2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
B3/U3/Q3/D3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RECOMMENDATION:
[
[
[
[
[
Additional comments:
] Recommend focus review
] Continue (Maintain) privilege(s) unchanged
] Limit existing privilege(s) (Explanation required below)
] Revoke existing privilege(s) (Explain below)
] Zero performance/strategic priv. Focus review is
triggered when the privilege is performed.
Explanation:
Signature:
Print Name:
Date reviewed
Department Chair/Vice Chair