Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Inflation Targeting in Brazil Meeting of Governors of Latin America and Spain Henrique de Campos Meirelles Washington October 2004 1 Inflation Targeting in Brazil I. Background II. 1999-2000: Building Credibility III. 2001: Target Miss IV. 2002: Sudden Stop V. 2003-2004: Disinflation Strategy VI. What Have We Learned? 2 Inflation Targeting in Brazil I. Background 3 Background In 1994, successful monetary reform reduced annual inflation from nearly 2,500% to single-digit rate; Monetary reform was accompanied by incomplete fiscal adjustment; Deepening external disequilibrium (overvalued exchange rate); External crises in the mid-90s (Mexico, Southeast Asia and Russia) gradually increased vulnerability of the Brazilian economy, with significant losses of international reserves to sustain the peg. 4 Consumer Inflation Rate: 1992-1998 % 2,477.1 1,119.1 916.4 1992 1993 1994 22.4 9.6 5.2 1.7 1995 1996 1997 1998 5 Consolidated Public Sector Primary Surplus: 1992-1998 6 5.0 5 % of GDP 4 3 2.3 2.6 2 Incomplete fiscal adjustment 1 0.4 0.0 0 -0.1 -1 -0.9 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 6 Current Account: 1992-1998 2 1.6 1 % of GDP 0 -0.2 -0.3 -1 -2 -2.6 -3 -3.0 -4 -3.8 -4.2 -5 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 7 Inflation Targeting in Brazil II. 1999-2000: Building Credibility 8 1999-2000: Building Credibility January 1999: Floating exchange rate regime search for a new nominal anchor Inflation Targeting regime formally adopted in June 1999. Initial targets established when regime was implemented implied strategy of fast disinflation: • 1999: 8% +/- 2% • 2000: 6% +/- 2% • 2001: 4% +/- 2% 9 1999-2000: Building Credibility Inflation rate stood at 8.9% in 1999 and 6.0% in 2000, within target range. However, fulfilment was not an easy task due to: Initial inflation expectations well above target; Exchange rate depreciation of 48% during 1999, and of 9.3% during 2000. Pressure from backward-looking regulated prices (utilities representing about 30% of consumption basket), with rises of 20.9% in 1999, and of 12.9% in 2000. 10 Nominal Exchange Rate: 1999-2000 2.25 2.00 R$/US$ 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 Jul 94 Jan Jul 95 95 Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul 96 96 97 97 98 98 99 99 00 00 11 Consumer Inflation Rate: 1999-2000 Central inflation targets 1999: 8.0% 2000: 6.0% 10 8 % 6 4 2 0 Jan 97 Jul 97 Jan 98 Jul 98 Jan 99 Jul 99 Jan 00 Jul 00 12 Inflation Rate, Regulated and Market Prices: 1999-2000 Market Prices Consumer Inflation Regulated Prices 25 20.9 % 20 15 12.9 10 8.9 6.4 6.0 5 3.7 0 1999 2000 13 1999-2000: Building Credibility Causes for low pass-through and initial success of IT regime: • Widespread anticipation of devaluation; • Currency clearly overvalued before floating; • Low initial inflation level. • No significant currencies mismatch in the private or banking sector due to provision of hedge by Government main cost of devaluation was the increase of debt/GDP ratio; 14 Debt/GDP Ratio: 1999-2000 52 % of GDP 47 42 37 32 27 Jul 94 Feb 95 Sep 95 Apr 96 Nov 96 Jun 97 Jan 98 Aug 98 Mar 99 Oct 99 May 00 Dec 00 15 Inflation Targeting in Brazil III. 2001: Target Miss 16 2001: Target Miss 2001 marked by external shocks (Argentinian crisis, 9/11, increase in risk aversion) and a domestic adverse supply shock (energy rationing) ; Exchange rate depreciation by nearly 44% in the peak of the year and 19% on average for the calendar year; Like in previous years, inflation also pressured by regulated prices changes, especially electricity rates; Inflation at 7.7% missed the 4% + 2% target. 17 Nominal Exchange Rate : 2001 3.00 2.75 2.50 R$/US$ 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 Jul 94 Mar 95 Nov 95 Jul 96 Mar 97 Nov 97 Jul 98 Mar 99 Nov 99 Jul 00 Mar 01 Nov 01 18 Consumer Inflation Rate: 2001 10 8 Central inflation target 2001: 4.0% % 6 4 2 0 Jan 97 Aug 97 Mar 98 Oct 98 May 99 Dec 99 Jul 00 Feb 01 Sep 01 19 Inflation Targeting in Brazil IV. 2002: Sudden Stop 20 Capital Inflows (US$ billion) 61.7 52.8 US$ 8.9 billion GAP US$ 28.0 billion GAP 24.8 2000 2001 2002 21 2002: Sudden Stop Confidence crisis triggered by uncertainties regarding macroeconomic policies of new government; Exchange rate depreciation by 53% over the year, concentrated in the 2nd half; As in 2001, large exchange rate depreciation jeopardized inflation target; Inflation peaked in the last quarter and contaminated long-term inflation expectations. Consumer inflation ended the year at 12.5%, missing the 3.5% + 2% target; 22 Brazil Risk: 2002 23 Nominal Exchange Rate: 2002 4.25 3.75 R$/US$ 3.25 2.75 2.25 1.75 1.25 0.75 Jul 94 May 95 Mar 96 Jan 97 Nov 97 Sep 98 Jul 99 May 00 Mar 01 Jan 02 Nov 02 24 Consumer Inflation Rate: 2002 Central inflation target 2002: 3.5% 13 11 % p.a. 9 7 5 3 1 Jan 97 Aug 97 Mar 98 Oct 98 May 99 Dec 99 Jul 00 Feb 01 Sep 01 Apr 02 Nov 02 25 Inflation Expectations: 2002 13 2002 %% 11 2003 2004 9 7 5 3 Jan 02 Feb Mar 02 02 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Nov Dec 02 02 26 Inflation Targeting in Brazil V. 2003-2004: Disinflation Strategy 27 2003-2004: Disinflation Strategy New government committed to fiscal sustainability (target for consolidated primary surplus at 4.25% of GDP for 2003 and at 4.5% of GDP for 2004). Government pursued agenda of reforms: social security, tax reform, new bankruptcy law, among others. Continued FX depreciation since 1999 reduced the current account deficit by nearly 6.5% of GDP in 2001- 2004, especially due to substantial increase in exports (current account went from a 4.6% of GDP deficit to a 1.8% of GDP surplus). 28 Consolidated Public Sector Primary Surplus: 1999-2004 4.9 % of GDP 5 4.4 4 3.3 3.5 3.7 4.0 3 2 1 0 1999 2000 2001 * 2004: 12 months up to August 2004 2002 2003 2004* 29 Current Account: 1999-2004 1.8 2 % of GDP 0.8 0 -2 -1.7 -4 -4.0 -4.6 -4.7 -6 1999 2000 2001 * 2004: 12 months up to August 2004 2002 2003 2004* 30 Brazil Risk: 2003-2004 2,400 Basic Points 2,100 1,800 1,500 1,200 900 600 300 Jan 95 Jul 96 Jan 98 Jul 99 Jan 01 Jul 02 Jan 04 31 Nominal Exchange Rate: 2003-2004 4.0 3.5 R$/US$ 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Jul Jun May Apr Mar Feb Jan Dec Nov Oct Sep Aug 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 00 01 02 03 04 32 2003-2004: Disinflation Strategy Credibility challenge use of adjusted inflation target methodology (accommodation of 2/3 of inertia from previous year and first round effect of supply shocks during the year). Adjusted target set at 8.5%; Central targets for 2004 and 2005 at 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively, with tolerance intervals of +/-2.5%. Inflation fell to 9.3% in 2003, compared to market inflation expectations of around 12.5% in beginning of the year. 33 Consumer Inflation Rate: 2003-2004 17.5 Adjusted inflation target 2003: 8.5% Central inflation target 2004: 5.5% 15.5 13.5 % p.a. 11.5 9.5 7.5 5.5 3.5 1.5 Jan Aug Mar Oct May Dec Jul Feb Sep Apr Nov Jun Jan Aug 97 97 98 98 99 99 00 01 01 02 02 03 04 04 34 Inflation Rate, Regulated and Market Prices: 2001-2004 Market Prices Consumer Inflation Regulated Prices 18 16 15.3 14 12 % 13.2 12.5 10.8 11.5 10 8 9.3 7.7 7.8 6.8 7.2 6.6 8.1 6 4 2 0 2001 2002 * 2004: 12 months up to August 2004 2003 2004* 35 Inflation Expectations: 2003-2004 13 2003 2004 2005 12 11 %% 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep 03 03 03 03 03 03 04 04 04 04 04 36 2003-2004: Disinflation Strategy Fast improvement in fundamentals enabled the Government to actively reduce public sector’s FX exposure; Also, Government started a process of international reserve accumulation. 37 FX-Linked Domestic Debt Outstanding: 2003-2004 Since Jan/2003, FX-linked 78 debt decreased 74 70 US$31.6 billion 66 62 58 54 50 46 42 38 34 Nov 99 Jul 00 Mar 01 Nov 01 Jul 02 Mar 03 Nov 03 Jul 04 38 Net International Reserves: 2003-2004 35 US$ billion 30 25 20 15 10 Nov 99 May 00 Source: Bacen Nov 00 May 01 Nov 01 May 02 Nov 02 May 03 Nov 03 Aug 04 39 Inflation Targeting in Brazil VI. What Have We Learned? 40 What Have We Learned? Disinflation requires continuous effort; Brazil has experienced large adverse shocks in the recent past, which made the attainment of inflation targets more difficult; A high degree of transparency and a good communication strategy can maintain credibility even in such environment. 41 Inflation Targeting in Brazil Meeting of Governors of Latin America and Spain Henrique de Campos Meirelles Washington October 2004 42