Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Case Study loveLife makes its move By David Harrison In its continuing efforts to crack the AIDS epidemic, loveLife took a new leap with the launch of its ‘Make your move’ campaign in March 2008. This approach goes beyond promoting healthy sexuality among young people to trying to change their perception of day-to-day opportunity. Lesson: Good advertising must force people to think. N ot averse to controversy, loveLife’s aim is to prevent HIV among teenagers, but has always resisted compliance with communication strategies shown to have little effect. Its premise is that HIV prevention should start with young people, not where we expect them to be; and that the major gains in HIV prevention lie in doing things differently – even if the outcomes are less certain. The World Health Organization recognizes loveLife as the only national youth programme that has gauged its impact in terms of reductions in HIV. It can claim a robust association between participation in loveLife and lower rates of HIV, supporting evidence of a slow but steady decline in prevalence among 5-24-year-olds over the past three years. Yet loveLife is constantly chastened by the enormity of the epidemic and the modest dent it has had on overall infection rates. This self-discontent led us to look at the available evidence differently. Our point of departure was the perplexing question: Why, despite almost universal knowledge of HIV and how to prevent its transmission, do people still have unprotected sex? This question almost inevitably ends in cul-desacs, such as ‘despite all our efforts, they fail to personalize and internalize the risk’; or, ‘poverty prevents them from responding appropriately to the message’. But what if we framed the question differently? For instance, who gets the message and doesn’t have unprotected sex? It turns out that the strongest differentiator is school attendance. Young people in school are far more likely than their same-age peers to protect themselves from HIV and teen pregnancy by using condoms. In fact, condom use peaks at age sixteen. Clearly, the message has got through. As young people leave school, condom use declines, and HIV and teen pregnancy both skyrocket in 8-9-year-old women. An intuitive explanation is that school-leavers April / May 2008 want to have a baby. However, two-thirds of 824-year-olds say that their last pregnancy was unwanted. Neither can the decline in condom use be explained by the duration of relationships or higher rates of marriage – less than 5% of 82-year-olds are married. The most plausible explanation for greater risk tolerance seems to be their profound lack of opportunity, with only a third likely to secure a regular job in the next fifteen years. Where school provided a place of relative safety, aspiration and belonging, school-leavers enter a state of limbo with no end in sight – a time of life aptly described by rap artist Sista Bettina as living ‘in the meantime’. Often, in the marketplace of personal trade- offs, future wellbeing is exchanged for short-term security. No matter how idyllic their dreams for the future, they are inevitably trumped by the insistent desire for food and safety. With no assurance that tomorrow will be any different, many young people acquiesce to immediate pressures and social expectations that lead to HIV infection. By implication, we must build the belief that life could be a little better tomorrow - not only in ten years’ time. These insights take us beyond rational choice theories of individual decision-making that have dominated behaviour change constructs. We now know that inequality predisposes to HIV infection; thus at some point in the chain, structural factors trigger behavioural effects. We argue that perception of opportunity is the pivotal mediator of structural influence on individual behaviour [Figure ]. Through this cognitive link, the constrained choices and low solidarity inherent in polarized societies predispose to high risk. ‘Make your move’ aims to cultivate a look-foropportunity mindset — encouraging young people to think outside the limits of their immediate environment; promoting personal initiative, motivation and responsibility; building their ability to navigate day-to-day pressures and expectations, and linking them to information about new prospects for further education, personal development, careers and jobs. As part of an expanded offering, loveLife will continue to provide its healthy sexuality programmes to younger adolescents in particular. This new approach will kick off with a high-intensity television, radio and outdoor campaign – initially seeking to position ‘Make your move’ part of everyday language The second phase will engage young people in frank discussion about their personal expectations and the role of personal initiative and responsibility in shaping life opportunities. The third phase will develop a ‘life navigator’ - a motivational and personal skills tool designed to help identify and link to opportunities for personal development. A mobile ‘Make your Move’ social network will enhance communication and interaction. Over the next year loveLife will integrate this new approach across all its platforms including inclass programmes in 3,800 schools, the loveLife Games involving half a million participants in events across the country, and in partnership with 30 community-based organizations. loveLife’s media campaign is supported by its tollfree helpline (0800 2 900) attracting over 50,000 callers a month, and face-to-face programmes reaching over 300,000 young people a month. David Harrison is CEO of loveLife Journal of Marketing 47