Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Identifiability of Scatterers In Inverse Obstacle Scattering Jun Zou Department of Mathematics The Chinese University of Hong Kong http://www.math.cuhk.edu.hk/~zou 1 Inverse Acoustic Obstacle Scattering D: impenetrable scatterer Acoustic EM 2 Underlying Equations • Propagation of acoustic wave in homogeneous isotropic medium / fluid : pressure p(x, t) of the medium satisfies • Consider the time-harmonic waves of the form then u(x) satisfies the Helmholtz equation with Direct Acoustic Obstacle Scattering • Take the planar incident field then the total field the Helmholtz equation : • solves satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation condition: Physical Properties of Scatterers Recall Sound-soft : (pressure vanishes) Sound-hard : (normal velocity of wave vanishes) Impedance : (normal velocity proport. to pressure) or mixed type 5 Our Concern : Identifiability Q : How much far field data from how many incident planar fields can uniquely determine a scatterer ? This is a long-standing problem ! 6 Existing Uniqueness Results A general sound-soft obstacle is uniquely determined by the far field data from : 7 For polyhedral type scatterers : Breakthroughs on identifiability for both inverse acoustic & EM scattering 8 Existing Results on Identifiability • Cheng-Yamamoto 03 : A single sound-hard polygonal scatterer is uniquely determined by at most 2 incident fields • Elschner-Yamamoto 06 : A single sound-hard polygon is uniquely determined by one incident field • Alessandrini - Rondi 05 : very general sound-soft polyhedral scatterers in R^n by one incident field 9 Uniqueness still remains unknown in the following cases for polyhedral type scatterers : sound-hard (N=2: single D; N>2: none), impedance scatterers; when the scatterers admits the simultaneous presence of both solid & crack-type obstacle components; when the scatterers involve mixed types of obstacle components, e.g., some are sound-soft, and some are sound-hard or impedance type; When number of total obstacle components are unknown a priori, and physical properties of obstacle components are unknown a priori . A unified proof to principally answer all these questions. 10 Summary of New Results (Liu-Zou 06 & 07) One incident field: for any N when no sound-hard obstacle ; Inverse EM Obstacle Scattering D: impenetrable scatterer 12 Reflection Principle For Maxwell Equations (Liu-Yamamoto-Zou 07) Reflection principle : hyperplane Then the following BCs can be reflected w.r.t. any hyperplane Π in G: 13 Inverse EM Obstacle Scattering (Liu-Yamamoto-Zou 07) • Results: Far field data from two incident EM fields : sufficient to determine general polyhedral type scatterers 14 Identifiability of Periodic Grating Structures (Bao-Zhang-Zou 08) • Diffractive Optics: Often need to determine the optical grating structure, including geometric shape, location, and physical nature periodic structure 15 Time-harmonic EM Scattering q: downward q s S S: entering angle Identification of Grating Profiles q: entering angle S Q: near field data from how many incident fields can uniquely determine the location and shape of S ? 17 Existing Uniqueness for Periodic Grating Hettlich-Kirsch 97: C2 smooth 3D periodic structure, finite number of incident fields Bao-Zhou 98: C2 smooth 3D periodic structure of special class; one incident field Elschner-Schmidt-Yamamoto 03, 03: Elschner-Yamamoto 07: TE or TM mode, 2D scalar Helmholtz eqn All bi-periodic 2D grating structure: recovered by 1 to 4 incident fields 18 New Identification on Periodic Gratings (Bao-Zhang-Zou 08) For 3D periodic polyhedral gratings : no results yet We can provide a systematic and complete answer ; by a constructive method. For each incident field : We will find the periodic polyhedral structures unidentifiable ; Then easy to know How many incident fields needed to uniquely identify any given grating structure 19 Forward Scattering Problem Forward scattering problem in Radiation condition : for x3 large, With Important Concepts A perfect plane of E , PP : S PP: always understood to be maximum extended, NOT a real plane Technical Tools (1) Extended reflection principle : (2) Split decaying & propagating modes : CRUCIAL : lying in lying in Technical Tools (cont.) 23 Technical Tools (cont.) 24 Crucial Relations Equiv. to Find all perfect planes of Find all perfect planes of E 27 Find all perfect planes of E Need only to consider Then Part I. Part II. 28 Find all perfect planes of E Part II. 29 Find all perfect planes of E 30 Find all perfect planes of E The above conditions are also sufficient. Have found all PPs of E, so do the faces of S . 31 Class I of Gratings Unidentifiable Have found all PPs of E, so do the faces of S . 32 Class 2 of Gratings Unidentifiable By reflection principle & group theory, can show 33 Class 2 of Gratings Unidentifiable Have found all PPs of E, so do the faces of S . 34 Uniquely Identifiable Periodic Gratings IF IF 35 36