Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Section 6 Statistical Tables 163 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Introduction Reason for inclusion Preparation and review Section 6 contains an overview of diagrammatic and statistical data relating to the county with comparative national data shown where relevant. This research data was pulled together at the very beginning of the planning process as part of an in-depth exercise to identify the big issues facing the county, to understand the current and likely future needs of communities, and to inform our priorities as an organisation. The data is included here in this documentation as evidence that the formulation of the Business Plan and in particular the identification of priorities, our choice of investments and the activity of the organisation is informed by research and analysis. The context in which decisions were made and how resources were allocated are key to understanding how the plan was formed and what it is trying to achieve. The information on the tables has been prepared by the County’s Research Team with input from other officers. The information has been fed into planning workshops and other meetings during the formation of the Plan (June through December). The research team continually updates its intelligence and analysis, as up-to-date data becomes available. The data was presented in the informal workshops at the start of the planning cycle, and was used by Members and officers to shape our vision and corporate priorities (Section 1). The data then played a key role in developing the Strategic Framework (Section 2). Through a more robust understanding about the economic well-being of the county, the life chances and quality of life experienced by our communities, and how we might best target our support for the vulnerable, we were able to ensure that our activity as an organisation flowed from a clear evidence base and towards specific outcomes. Structure of tables The research intelligence then continued to inform the development of proposals and choice of investments throughout the process, ensuring that any decisions taken were underpinned by a robust understanding of the county and its needs. 164 Each table has the following characteristics: • a title bar • a map, chart or table (with key) • key points of interpretation and analysis • a hyperlink is provided to the full research data and report Statistical Tables Section 6 Index Cambridgeshire local government boundaries 166 Political representation on Cambridgeshire County Council 167 Political representation in Parliament 168 Population structure - Census 2011 169 Population structure aged over 75 by ward - Census 2011 170 Population structure aged over 85 by ward - Census 2011 171 Forecast population change 2011-16 172 Population density - Census 2011 173 Population urban/rural split on standard classification 174 Population urban/rural split on Output Area Classification (OAC) 175 Economy - Gross Value Added 176 Economy - employment rate 16–64 years old 177 Economy - employment rate over 65s 178 Economy - businesses in Cambridgeshire 179 Economy - priority investment sites 180 Housing - stock and tenure 181 Housing - need and future supply 182 Indices of Multiple Deprivation 183 Deprivation - percentage of all children in poverty 184 Benefit - claimant rates working age 185 Benefits - pupils eligible for free school meals 186 Health - recorded prevalence of diseases 187 Education - GCSE and equivalent results 188 Skills in Cambridgeshire - percentage of population with qualifications 189 Libraries 190 165 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Overview - Cambridgeshire map Key points Cambridgeshire covers five district councils: Cambridge, East Cambridgeshire, Fenland, Huntingdonshire, South Cambridgeshire 166 Statistical Tables Section 6 Political representation on the County Council Key points • The County Council has a majority Conservative Administration – 41 out of 69 councillors. • Fenland electoral divisions are all Conservative. • There are no Conservative electoral divisions in Cambridge City; the majority are Liberal Democrat. • 21 councillors are Liberal Democrats; the majority being in Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire. • There are three Labour councillors, all in Cambridge. • In terms of other parties: • 2 UKIP councillors in Ramsey and Bourn • 1 Green councillor in Abbey • 1 Independent councillor in Petersfield Link http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/council/ 167 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Political representation in Parliament Political representation in Parliament Key points Key points • Five of the six parliamentary constituencies in Cambridgeshire are currently Conservative MPs. Cambridge is currently Liberal Democrat. Fiverepresented of the sixby parliamentary constituencies in • Cambridgeshire are currently represented by Conservative MPs. Cambridge is currently Liberal Democrat. 168 Statistical Tables Section 6 Population - county population structure, Census 2011 Key points • There were 621,200 people living in Cambridgeshire in March 2011. • The county has a significant ageing population causing pressure on services. • The 40-49 bulge represents the relatively high levels of births in the 1960s. • The 20-24 bulge represents the high student and young professional population in and around Cambridge. Link http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ Source: Census 2011 169 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Population aged over 75 by ward, Census 2011 Key points • In South Cambridgeshire, around Ely and Littleport and in Fenland, the proportion of the population aged over 75 is higher than other areas. Link http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ Source: Census 2011 170 Statistical Tables Section 6 Population aged over 85 by ward, Census 2011 Key points • Around March, Ely and Littleport and in wards around Cambridge, the proportion of the population aged over 85 is higher than other areas. Link http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ Source: Census 2011 171 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Forecast population change, 2011-16 Forecast Population Change, 2011-16 Key points 85+ Key points 80-84 • The population in most age groups is projected to increase. • The population in most age groups is to increase • projected The age groups with the biggest increase over the next five years are those 75-79 70-74 aged 65-69, 70-74 and 50-54. 65-69 • The age groups with the biggest increase • over The increase in five the 5-9 age group will require the next years are those aged the 65-provision of more primary school accommodation with later impact on secondary places. 69, 70-74 and 50-54. 60-64 55-59 50-54 • •The in the ageage groups is likely Theincrease increase in older the 5-9 group willto put more pressure on adult social care services. 45-49 require the provision of more primary school accommodation with later impact on secondary places. Link 40-44 35-39 30-34 • The increase in the older age groups is 25-29 http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ likely to put more pressure on adult social 20-24 care services 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 -10,000 -5,000 0 5,000 10,000 Source: Research and Performance Team Population Forecasts, 2010 base Source: Research and Performance Team Population Forecasts, 2010 base Hyperlink http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ Section 6 172 Page 10 Statistical Tables Section 6 Population density, Census 2011 Key points Urban areas and large villages have the highest population densities. Many rural wards have relatively low population densities. Link http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ Source: Census 2011 173 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Population - rural : urban split based on standard classification Key points On this standard classification based on population density: • The centre of Cambridgeshire is dominated by wards in the Town and Fringe category (orange). • Cambridge, Wisbech area, Ely area and the three market towns in Huntingdonshire are in the Urban category (grey). • The Village category (green) covers less area than might be expected based on other classifications, such as a social classification. 174 Statistical Tables Section 6 Population - rural : urban split based on standard classification (OAC) Key points OAC is a social classification tool developed by the Office of National Statistics (ONS). It offers sociodemographic data for local neighbourhoods and allows public services to understand local areas and improve upon their service delivery. The geography of Cambridgeshire is dominated by three social classifications in OAC - people who live in: • Village life • Accessible Countryside • Agriculture These are shown by the shades of green on the map. The geography of Cambridge is dominated by: • City Living (yellow) • Prospering Suburbs (red) People in the Prospering Suburbs category (red) are represented across the county. Based on Census 2001 data. Link: http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/ Social+Classification.htm 175 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Economy Gross Value Economy - Gross-Value Added (GVA), £Added per head (GVA), £ per head Key points £30,000 • Cambridgeshire has performed consistently better than the East of England regional average Keyand Points the UK average. Trends suggest that this is •Cambridgeshire likely to continue.has £25,000 GVA per head £20,000 England East of England £15,000 Cambridgeshire CC Peterborough Norfolk £10,000 Suffolk performed consistently • GVAthan per head better the reduced East ofslightly in 2009 and resumed an upward trend in 2010. England regional average and the UK average. Trends suggest that this is likely to continue. •GVA per head reduced slightly in 2009 and resumed an upward trend in 2010. £5,000 20 10 (p ro vi si on al ) 20 11 20 09 20 08 20 07 20 06 20 05 20 04 20 03 20 02 20 01 20 00 19 99 19 98 19 97 £0 Year Source: Regional Gross Value Added (Income Approach), Office for National Statistics Source: Regional Gross Value Released: 12 December 2012 Added (Income Approach), Office for National Statistics Released: 12 December 2012 http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/regional-accounts/regional-gross-value-added--income-approach-/december-2012/stb-regional-gva-2011.html http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/regional-accounts/regional-gross-value-added--income-approach-/december-2012/stb-regional-gva-2011.html Section 6 176 Page 14 Statistical Tables Section 6 Economy - Employment Rate among Working Age Adults (16–64 years old) (%) Economy - employment rate among working age adults (16–64 years old) (%) Key points 90.0 85.0 Cambridgeshire Cambridge Percentage (%) 80.0 East Cambridgeshire Fenland 75.0 Huntingdonshire South Cambridgeshire 70.0 England East 65.0 60.0 Apr 2004Mar 2005 Apr 2005Mar 2006 Apr 2006Mar 2007 Apr 2007Mar 2008 Apr 2008Mar 2009 Apr 2009Mar 2010 Apr 2010Mar 2011 Apr 2011Mar 2012 Key Points • Cambridgeshire (dashed line) has a consistently • Cambridgeshire (dashed line) has a consistently higher employment higher employment raterate compared to the England compared to the England average. average. • Overall the employment rate in the county has been since 2004. • decreasing Overall the employment rate in the county has • East and South Cambridgeshire currently have the been decreasing since highest employment rates of the county. 2004. • Fenland has seen the sharpest decrease in • employment East and South rate since 2004, dropping by over 10%. Cambridgeshire currently have the highest employment rates of the county. • Fenland has seen the sharpest decrease in employment rate since 2004 dropping by over 10%. Source: Annual Population Survey ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012] Source: Annual Population Survey https://www.nomisweb.co.uk ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012] Section 6 https://www.nomisweb.co.uk Page 15 177 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Economy - Employment Rate among over 65s (%) Economy - employment rate among over 65s (%) Key points 14.0 • Employment in the over 65s has been increasing the county. This suggests that people are Key in Points continuing to work for longer throughout the • Employment in the county. 12.0 Percentage (%) 10.0 8.0 Cambridgeshire England United Kingdom 6.0 • Cambridgeshire has a higher percentage of over 65s working than the national average. 4.0 2.0 0.0 over 65s has been increasing in the has a higher percentage of over • Cambridgeshire county. This suggests 65s working than the national average. that people are continuing to work for longer throughout the county. Apr 2004- Apr 2005Mar 2005 Mar 2006 Apr 2006Mar 2007 Apr 2007- Apr 2008Mar 2008 Mar 2009 Apr 2009Mar 2010 Apr 2010- Apr 2011Mar 2011 Mar 2012 Source: Annual Population Survey Source: Annual Population Survey ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012] https://www.nomisweb.co.uk ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012] Section 6 https://www.nomisweb.co.uk 178 Page 16 Statistical Tables Section 6 Economy - Businesses in Cambridgeshire Economy - businesses in Cambridgeshire Agriculture, forestry & fishing Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire Fenland Huntingdonshire South Cambridgeshire Cambridgeshire County 100 455 425 515 540 2,035 Production 200 255 290 560 485 1,790 Construction 340 605 540 900 910 3,295 Motor trades 90 150 175 255 225 895 Wholesale 190 190 190 460 365 1,395 Retail 695 305 390 635 430 2,455 Transport & storage (inc. postal) 65 165 210 310 215 965 Accommodation & food services 485 175 200 365 315 1,540 Information & communication 675 220 125 575 730 2,325 Finance & insurance 130 60 70 150 120 530 Property 180 115 80 240 240 855 1,060 520 300 1,155 1,450 4,485 Business administration and support services 385 265 210 550 540 1,950 Public administration and defence 80 40 30 85 70 305 Education 400 90 70 190 205 955 Health 330 135 175 330 345 1,315 Arts, entertainment, recreation and other services 445 275 195 495 430 1,840 5,850 4,020 3,675 7,770 7,615 28,930 Professional, scientific & technical TOTAL Key points • Huntingdonshire has the highest number of registered businesses within the county. Key Points • The highest proportion of businesses within • Huntingdonshire has the the county is in the professional, scientific and highest number of technical sector. registered businesses •within Therethe are relatively county.few businesses in financial services across all districts. • The highest proportion of businesses within the county is in the professional, scientific and technical sector. • There are relatively few businesses in financial services across all districts. Source: Analysis of UK Local Units in VAT and/or PAYE Based Enterprises (Number of active businesses), March 2012, Office for National Statistics Released: 03 October 2012 Source: Analysis of UK Local Units in VAT and/or PAYE Based Enterprises (Number of active businesses), http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-254601 March 2012, Office for National Statistics, Released: 03 October 2012 Section 6 http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-254601Key Page 17 179 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Economy - priority investment sites The Enterprise Zone proposal for Alconbury is designed to: • encourage investment • attract innovative companies • create around 8,000 jobs. Benefits • 100% business rate discount (worth up to £275,000 over a five year period) for businesses that move into the site. • All business rates growth within the zone for at least 25 years retained and shared by the LA in the LEP area. • Government and LA help to develop the planning approaches in the zone. • Government support to ensure roll out of superfast broadband. Links Alconbury Enterprise Zone | Local Enterprise Partnership http://www.yourlocalenterprisepartnership.co.uk/alconbury-enterprise-zone-success RAF Alconbury Environmental Impact Assessment http://tinyurl.com/alconburyEIA 180 Housing - Stock and Tenure Statistical Tables Section 6 Housing - stock and tenure Total dwelling stock, March 2011 Total dwelling stock, March 2011 Cambridge City 100% 90% 48,130 80% Cambridge City 48,130 70% East Cambridgeshire 36,270 50% Fenland Huntingdonshire 42,200 71,800 30% South Cambridgeshire Huntingdonshire 61,220 71,800 10% East Cambridgeshire Fenland South Cambridgeshire 36,270 42,200 61,220 17% 15% 67% 17% 15% 13% 14% 12% 13% 14% 70% 71% 72% 72% East Cambridgeshire Fenland Huntingdonshire South Cambridgeshire 49% 20% 0% 16% 24% 60% 40% 28% Cambridgeshire Cambridge Owner Occupiers Social tenants Private tenants Key points Key points •The graph above shows the tenure split in 2011. 67% of households in Cambridgeshire are owner-occupied. The proportion • Theoccupiers graph aboveisshows tenureinsplit in 2011. 67% households Cambridgeshire owner-occupied. Thetenants. proportion of owner occupiers is much lower in of owner muchthelower Cambridge Cityof(49%), andinthere are moreare private and social Cambridge City (49%), and there are more private and social tenants. • Nationally, the number and proportion of households in the private rented sector has increased in the last ten years and•thisNationally, has alsothebeen reflected locally.of households in the private rented sector has increased in the last ten years and this has also been reflected locally. number and proportion •Affordable housing includes social rented, affordable rented and intermediate housing provided to eligible households whose • are Affordable housing includes social rented, affordable rented and intermediate housing provided to eligible households whose needs are not met by the market. needs not met by the market Source: Source: Dwelling stock: Live tables on dwelling stock, CLG, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/live-tables-on-dwelling-stock-including-vacants TenureDwelling split: Census 2011Live tables on dwelling stock, CLG, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/live-tables-on-dwelling-stock-including-vacants stock: Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/housing/ Tenure split: Census 2011 Section 6 Page 19 Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/housing/ 181 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Housing - Need and Future Supply Housing - need and future supply Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire Fenland Dwellings Completed 2002-12 (net) 4,871 5,248 5,584 Affordable Dwellings Completed 2002-12 (gross) 1,465 1,079 667 331 370 209 875 Area Dwellings Completed 2011-12 (net) South Cambridgeshire Cambridgeshire 7,255 7,834 30,792 1,809 2,452 7,472 696 2,481 Huntingdonshire Affordable Dwellings Completed 2011-12 (gross) 67 82 7 256 192 604 Planned future dwellings (total commitments) 10,366 1,239 3,239 3,386 16,699 34,929 Current affordable housing need 1,744 535 641 921 1,272 6,857 196 65 80 179 230 750 Total affordable housing stock available Current annual net need for affordable housing 1,548 470 561 742 1,042 4,363 Newly arising need for affordable housing (annual) 1,151 509 519 720 740 3,639 559 319 345 460 309 1,992 592 190 174 260 431 1,647 2,140 660 735 1,002 1,474 6,011 Annual supply of affordable housing (average of proposed for next 2 years) Projected net need for affordable housing Total net need Key Points • Thepoints number of total dwellings completed in 2011-12 was slightly lower than the previous year. Key • In 2011-12, the percentage of affordable dwellings built was 23%, slightly lower than the previous year when it was 29%. • The number of planned developments throughout the county will see a significant increase in the dwelling stock in next 10 years. • the The number of total dwellings completed in 2011-12 was slightly lower than the previous year. • Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire have the highest levels of affordable housing need. These are the areas the highestthe house prices and • with In 2011-12, percentage of rents. affordable dwellings built was 23%, slightly lower than the previous year when it was 29%. Source Need (based of on 2009-10 figures): Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) http://www.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/housing/consultation-shma-chapters •Affordable The number planned developments throughout the county will see a significant increase in the dwelling stock in the next 10 years. Dwelling Completions: Cambridgeshire County Council Research and Monitoring, http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/environment/planning/policies/monitoring/Housing+development.htm • Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire have the highest levels of affordable housing need. These are the areas with the highest house prices and rents. Section 6 Page 20 Source: Affordable Need (based on 2009-10 figures): Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) http://www.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/housing/consultation-shma-chapters Dwelling Completions: Cambridgeshire County Council Research and Monitoring, http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/environment/planning/policies/monitoring/Housing+development.htm 182 Statistical Tables Section 6 Deprivation - Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) –2010 Key points The pattern of deprivation has remained largely the same over previous years concentrated in Fenland and urban areas. Fenland (most deprived) • Since 2007 Fenland’s relative national rank has increased. • 11 of the 20 most deprived Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Cambridgeshire are in Fenland, some of which are in the 20% most deprived nationally. • 3 Wisbech wards are amongst the most deprived 10% of the country. Cambridge City • Since 2007 Cambridge City’s relative national rank has increased. • 7 of the 20 most deprived LSOAs in Cambridgeshire are in Cambridge City, some of which are in the 20% most deprived nationally. East Cambridgeshire • Since 2007 East Cambridgeshire’s relative national rank has decreased. Huntingdonshire • Since 2007 Huntingdonshire’s relative national rank has increased. • 2 of the 20 most deprived LSOAs in Cambridgeshire are in Huntingdonshire. South Cambridgeshire (Least Deprived) • Since 2007 South Cambridgeshire’s relative national rank has remained the same. Links http://atlas.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/IMD/AllDeprivation/atlas.htmlv http://www.cambridgeshirejsna.org.uk/ 183 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Deprivation - percentage of all children in poverty (2010) Key points This map shows the geographical distribution of child poverty in Cambridgeshire. The number of children in poverty is defined as the number of dependent children under the age of 20 living in families in receipt of Child Tax Credit (CTC) whose reported income is less than 60 per cent of the median income or in receipt of Income Support or (Income-Based) Job Seekers Allowance, divided by the total number of children in the area (determined by Child Benefit data). The concentration of poverty varies significantly across Cambridgeshire. The concentration of poverty is mostly in urban areas for example, St Neots, March, Huntingdon, and the north of Cambridge City. Fenland in particular has a high percentage of children in poverty, especially in the ward of Waterlees in Wisbech. Links http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/statistics/child-poverty-stats.htm 184 Statistical Tables Section 6 Benefits - claimant rates – working age Key points Figures are for all benefits claimants age 16–64 including: • job seekers • lone parents • disabled people and others Rates vary from 0.5% in one Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) in the ward of Newnham in Cambridge to 32% in an LSOA in the ward of Staithe in Wisbech. • There are pockets of benefit dependency across the county, but in general there is more in the north and less in the south. • The five most ‘benefit dependant’ LSOAs are in Fenland. Links http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/ 185 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Benefits - pupils aged 4 -15 eligible for free school meals District Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire Fenland % Eligible in 2009 % Eligible in 2010 % Eligible in 2011* % Eligible in 2012** 14.0 15.2 14.9 15.3 6.9 8.7 8.8 9.8 13.3 15.6 16.3 17.4 Huntingdonshire 8.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 South Cambridgeshire 5.2 6.8 7.2 7.3 Source: January Pupil Level Annual School Census Key points Data for 2009 and 2010 is for all pupils living in Cambridgeshire and attending a Local Authority maintained school in either Cambridgeshire or Peterborough. • Percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals varies across the county: *Note the 2011 data is only for pupils living in Cambridgeshire and attending a Cambridgeshire Local Authority maintained school, and does not include pupils on roll at Crosshall Infant or Junior School. ** Note: 2012 data is for children living in Cambridgeshire and attending Cambridgeshire schools only. 186 • lowest in South Cambridgeshire – 7.3 % in January 2012 • highest in Fenland – 17.4% in January 2012 (over double the proportion in South Cambridgeshire) • Overall it appears that the % eligible for free school meals is increasing. Statistical Tables Section 6 Asthma Atrial Fibrillation Cancer Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Primary Prevention Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (ages 18+) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Dementia Depression (ages 18+) Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes) (ages 17+) Hypertension Mental Health Obesity (ages 16+) Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attacks (TIA) 6.2 6.0 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.0 3.6 3.2 1.7 1.3 3.2 2.5 0.5 0.7 14.2 11.3 5.7 4.0 14.5 11.0 0.6 1.0 11.7 7.9 1.6 1.4 Wisbech Isle of Ely Hunts Health Hunts Care Partnership Total CATCH South Villages North Villages Herts Granta City Suburb Prevalence (%) by LCG / Locality CATCH Cambridge City CamHealth Integrated Care Disease/Condition Borderline* Health - recorded prevalence of diseases by Localof Commissioning Health - recorded prevalence diseasesGroup by (LCG) LCG2010-2011 2010/11 4.9 6.0 6.1 7.7 6.3 7.4 6.3 7.4 6.8 6.8 6.2 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.2 2.2 1.4 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.8 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.7 1.5 3.0 2.3 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.4 4.7 4.8 4.7 3.7 0.7 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.6 1.6 2.3 1.7 3.0 1.6 2.8 2.7 3.4 2.5 3.6 3.2 3.3 4.0 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 8.8 9.9 11.3 13.9 8.3 10.4 10.3 14.2 15.5 13.7 16.5 2.4 4.3 3.0 4.4 4.3 4.9 3.8 5.9 5.4 5.9 6.7 7.6 12.2 7.7 13.2 12.5 14.0 10.9 14.7 14.7 13.2 15.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 4.8 6.6 7.0 10.2 9.5 7.3 7.0 10.7 11.2 12.0 13.7 1.0 1.6 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.9 Source: NHS Information Centre - Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Notes: Notes: LCG - Local Commissioning Group CATCH - Cambridgeshire Association LCG - Local Commissioning Group to Commission Health * The Borderline Local Commissioning Group (LCG) includes data from two practices in Northamptonshire CATCH - Cambridgeshire Association to Commission Health It is important to note that these data are not age-standardised and so LCGs/localities with older populations will have higher prevalences of diseases that are associated with old age. * The Borderline Local Commissioning Group (LCG) includes data from two practices in Northamptonshire QOF data are based on general practice ascertainment and recording of disease, which may be affected by a range of factors. This may result in an underestimate of the true prevalence in the population. Key points Key Facts, Figures and Issues •The most prevalent diseases •The most prevalent diseases and conditions in and conditionsamong in Cambridgeshire, those presented, are depression (among people aged 18 and over), Cambridgeshire, among those hypertension, and obesity (among presented, are depression people aged 16+ years). people aged 18 and (among over), hypertension, and obesity disease/ •The LCG/locality in which a particular (among people aged 16+ years). condition is most prevalent varies, but Wisbech often has the highest prevalence. •The LCG/locality in which a •The prevalence of many diseases/conditions is particular disease/condition is associated with wider determinants of health such most prevalent but as lifestyle choicesvaries, and deprivation. Wisbech often has the highest prevalence. Links •The prevalence of many diseases/conditions is associated APHO General Practice Profiles: with wider determinants of health http://www.apho.org.uk/pracprof/ such as lifestyle choices and deprivation. JSNA website homepage: http://www.cambridgeshirejsna.org.uk/ It is important to note that these data are not age-standardised and so LCGs/localities with older populations will have higher prevalences of diseases that are associated with old age. Links QOF data are based on general practice ascertainment and recording of disease, which may be affected by a APHO General Practice Profiles: http://www.apho.org.uk/pracprof/ range of factors. This may result in an underestimate of the true prevalence in the population. JSNA website homepage: http://www.cambridgeshirejsna.org.uk/ 187 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Education -GCSE and equivalent results, % of pupils achieving 5+ A*-C Education - GCSE and Equivalent Results, % of Pupils achieving 5+ A*- C Key points 95 • Results in Cambridgeshire are generally similar to the average for the East of England and England. 85 Cambridge 75 East Cambridgeshire Fenland Huntingdonshire 65 South Cambridgeshire Cambridgeshire Links East 55 England Source: Department for Education, GCSE 45 35 http://www.education.gov.uk/inyourarea/results/ lea_873_pconlas_3.shtml 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Key points •Results in Cambridgeshire are generally similar to the average for the East of England and England. •Results in Fenland are much lower than other areas in Cambridgeshire. Results in South Cambridgeshire are higher than other areas in Cambridgeshire. Hyperlinks Source: Department for Education, GCSE http://www.education.gov.uk/inyourarea/results/lea_873_pconlas_3.shtml Section 6 188 • Results in Fenland are much lower than other areas in Cambridgeshire. Results in South Cambridgeshire are higher than other areas in Cambridgeshire. Page 26 Statistical Tables Section 6 Skills in Cambridgeshire - percentage of population with qualifications NVQ4+ NVQ3+ NVQ2+ NVQ1+ Qualifications Other None Cambridge City 52.2 67.3 76.4 86.1 6.7 7.1 East Cambridgeshire 36.3 59.1 71.7 83.7 10.8 5.5 Fenland 18.4 35.2 48.8 72.2 14.5 13.3 Huntingdonshire 30.4 49.7 67.3 85.6 5.5 8.9 South Cambridgeshire 38.9 61.8 79.1 90.4 5.2 4.4 Cambridgeshire 36.4 55.7 70.0 84.6 6.6 9.6 East 29.2 49.9 68.5 83.8 6.6 9.6 United Kingdom 32.9 52.7 69.7 82.7 6.7 10.6 Note: NVQ levels are defined as follows: Level 1: Foundation GNVQ; 4-5 GCSEs grade D-E or equivalents Level 2: Intermediate GNVQ; 5 GCSEs A*-C; 2 A/S Levels or equivalents Level 3: 2 A Levels A-E; 4 A/S Levels or equivalents Key points • A larger proportion of people in Cambridgeshire are qualified to a higher NVQ level than in the East or the UK. This is likely to continue. • Over half the population of Cambridge is qualified to level 4+ making it one of the highest of all local authorities in the country. • Fenland has the highest percentage of individuals with no qualifications and also just 49% of people have level 2 qualifications which is well below the national average. • There is a great deal of inequality in terms of high level qualifications within the county. Level 4+: Foundation or first degree; degree level professional qualifications; HNC/HND; higher degrees Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics Date: Jan 2011-Dec 2011 https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/ 189 Section 6 Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014 Cambridgeshire County Council libraries, December 2012 Key points • There are 32 libraries, four mobile library vehicles and ten library access points in Cambridgeshire. • Roughly one in four of the population uses a library service. Links Libraries http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/leisure/libraries/ 190