Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Triadic Semiotic Theory of Peirce. T HREE G ENERAL P RINCIPLES Peirce developed a semiotic theory that is at once general, triadic and pragmatic. It is general: in that it takes into consideration emotional, practical and intellectual experience; it includes all of the components of semiotics; it broadens the concept of the sign. It is triadic: in that it is founded upon three philosophical categories: firstness, secondness and thirdness; it brings three terms into relation: the sign or representamen, the object and the interpretant. It is pragmatic: in that it takes into consideration the context in which signs are produced and interpreted; it defines the sign by its effect on the interpreter. A Sign is Something (A) which stands to somebody (B) for something (C) in some respect or capacity. A sign is something, A, which brings something, B, its interpretant sign determined or created by it, into the same sort of correspondence with something, C, its object, as that in which itself stands to C. I define a sign as anything which is so determined by something else, called its Object, and so determines an effect upon a person, which effect I call its interpretant, that the later is thereby mediately determined by the former To Charles Sanders Peirce, Anything in the universe can be brought to anyone of three and only three modes of being Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness: Firstness is the mode of being which consists in its subject's being positively such as it is regardless of aught else. That can only be a possibility… The mode of being a redness, before anything in the universe was yet red, was nevertheless a positive qualitative possibility. And redness in itself, even if it be embodied, is something positive and sui generis. Firstness is the mode of being of the category of the Object. Secondness is the mode of being of the actual fact. Facts also concern subjects which are material substances. They resist our will and compel us to consider their hic and nunc nature. Secondness is the mode of being of the Sign or Representamen. Thirdness is the mode of being which consists what we call laws when we contemplate them from the outside only, but which when we see both sides of the shield we call thoughts. (Interpretant). First, second and third are by no means linear categories. The first is that whose being is simply in itself, not referring to anything nor lying behind anything. The second is that which is what it is by force of something to which it is second. The third is that which is what it is owing to things between which it mediates and which it brings into relation to each other. The conception of being arises upon the formation of a proposition. For example, the weather / is fine. A proposition always has, besides a term to express the substance, another to express the quality of that substance; and the function of the conception of being is to unite the quality to the substance. Quality, therefore, in its very widest sense, is the first conception in order in passing from being to substance. A Proposition consists in: A theme (What we talk about) and A predicate (What we say about it) e.g. the weather (theme) / is fine (predicate). This also means to establish a correspondence, an equivalence between A and B or X and Y. i.e.: X (the weather) = is Y (fine). Or X = Y. Third, let us imagine that our now-awakened dreamer, unable to shut out the piercing sound, jumps up and seeks to make his escape by the door, which we will suppose had been blown to with a bang just as the whistle commenced. But the instant our man opens the door let us say the whistle ceases. Much relieved, he thinks he will anything to do with it; and once more opens the mysterious portal. As he opens it, the sound ceases. He is now in a third state of mind: he is Thinking. That is, he is aware of learning, or of going through a process by which a phenomenon is found to be governed by a rule, or has a general knowable way of behaving. He finds that one action is the means, or middle, for bringing about another result. This third state of mind is entirely different from the other two. In the second there was only a sense of brute force; now there is a sense of government by a general rule. In Reaction only two things are involved; but in government there is a third thing which is a means to an end. The very word means signifies something which is in the middle between two others. Moreover, this third state of mind, or Thought, is a sense of learning, and learning is the means by which we pass from ignorance to knowledge. As the most rudimentary sense of Reaction involves two states of Feeling, so it will be found that the most rudimentary Thought involves three states of Feeling.