Download Instanton representation of Plebanski gravity

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup

Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup

Instanton wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Instanton representation of
Plebanski gravity
Hilbert space structure and proposed
resolution of the Kodama state
Eyo Eyo Ita III
GR19 Conference, Mexico City 2010
Motivation and Outline
• Motivation:
– Quantization of the physical D.O.F. for general relativity
– Construction of a Hilbert space of states for gravity with a
well-defined semiclassical limit
– Addressal of the issues surrounding the Kodama state
•
•
•
•
•
Plebanski starting action
Instanton representation
Canonical structure and quantization
Hilbert space of states
Proposed resolution of the Kodama state
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Starting Plebanski action
• Variables: CDJ matrix, SO(3,C) connection and 2-forms
• Define spatial components of SO(3,C) curvature and 2-forms
• Plebanski equations of motion imply Einstein equations
• Equation #1 is simplicity constraint: time gauge implies that
• Put back into action and perform 3+1 decomposition
Plebanski action in time gauge
Covariant form of the action
• Diffeomorphism constraint implied symmetric CDJ matrix
• Physical interpretation of inverse CDJ matrix
–
–
–
–
Self-dual part of Weyl curvature plus trace part
Fixes Petrov classification of spacetime
Principal null directions
Radiation properties
• CDJ matrix admits polar decomposition (θ are complex SO(3) angles)
• Would like to use eigenvalues as basic momentum space variables
• But canonically conjugate `coordinates’ do not generically exist!
Reduction to kinematic phase space
• Canonically conjugate coordinates can exist only for
– Reduced phase space under Gauss’ and diffeomorphism constraints
– This defines the kinematic phase space
– Six distinct configurations with 3 D.O.F. (Ex. Diagonal connection)
• Perform polar decomposition of configuration space
• This implies the 3+1 decomposition
– Note spatial gradients and SO(3,C) angles have disappeared
– Yet this is still the full theory with 6 phase space D.O.F. per point
– Apply temporal gauge (as in Yang-Mills theory)
Define densitized variables
• Dimensionless configuration space variables
• Momentum space: Uses densitized eigenvalues of CDJ matrix
• This yields an action with globally defined coordinates
Quantization of the Kinematic Phase space
• Symplectic two Form on each 3-D spatial hypersurface
• Canonical Commutation Relations
• Holomorphic functional Schrodinger Representation
Auxilliary Hilbert space
• Discretization
of
into lattice cells of characteristic volume
• States are normalizable in Gaussian measure
• Overlap between two states inversely related to Euclidean distance in C2
• Continuum limit (Direct product of states at each lattice site)
• States are eigenstates of momentum operator
Hamiltonian constraint on
• Classical constraint on densitized eigenvalues
• Quantum constraint in polynomial form
• Act on auxilliary Hilbert space
• Rescaled to dimensionless eigenvalues
Hilbert space for Λ=0
• Two-to-one correspondence with C2 manifold
•
for all Λ=0 states
• Plane wave evolution w.r.t. time T
Hilbert space for Λ≠0
•
•
•
Three-to-one correspondence with C2 manifold
only for Kodama state
Hypergeometric evolution w.r.t
Main Results
• Regularization independent Cauchy complete Hilbert space in continuum
limit for Λ=0 (e.g. same as discretized version)
• States are labelled by the densitized eigenvalues of the CDJ matrix (encode
algebraic classification of spacetime: This characterizes the semicalssical
limit of the quantum theory)
• For Λ≠0, the Kodama state is the only regularization independent state in
the continuum limit (same as discretized version). Semiclasical limit of
Petrov Type O spacetimes
• The remaining Λ≠0 states (e.g. Petrov Type D and I) are regularization
dependent, which implies that space is discrete on the scale of the inverse
regulating function. Discretized version of the state annihilated by the
constraint but the continuum limit is not part of the solution space
• These state are labelled by two independent eigenvalues of CDJ matrix
• Instanton representation appears well-suited to quantization procedure
Conclusion
• Performed quantization of the kinematic phase space
of instanton representation
– Quantized physical degrees of freedom of GR
– These encode the algebraic classification of spacetime
• Constructed Hilbert space of states for Type I,D,O
• Proposed resolution of Kodama state normalizability:
– Quantum state with semiclassical limit of Petrov Type O
– Purely a time variable on configuration space
– One does not normalize a wavefunction in time
• New series of papers on instanton representaion
Special Acknowledgements
US Naval Academy. Annapolis, MD
Division of Mathematics and Sciences USNA
Physics Department
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical
Physics, Center for Mathematical Sciences.
Cambridge, United Kingdom
QUESTIONS?
• Email addresses
– [email protected][email protected]