* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Evolution: Simulating Adaptation by Natural Selection
Survey
Document related concepts
Hologenome theory of evolution wikipedia , lookup
Natural selection wikipedia , lookup
Genetics and the Origin of Species wikipedia , lookup
Theistic evolution wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
BIO 101L: Principles of Biology Laboratory Evolution: Simulating Adaptation by Natural Selection Introduction The theory of evolution by natural selection is one of the greatest products of modern science. The name most commonly associated with this theory is Charles Darwin. However, the idea of the evolution of species had been around a long time before Darwin. For example, the biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck proposed (incorrect) mechanisms for evolution before Charles Darwin was born, and Georges-Louis Leclerc wrote treatises on evolutionary change long before that. Even natural selection was not a wholly new concept; rudimentary forms of the idea first appeared in the writings of Aristotle. The major contribution of Charles Darwin and his contemporary, Alfred Russel Wallace, was to incorporate all of these ideas and produce a coherent and mechanistic model of how change over time might occur within a species, and how new species might arise from this change. Their model of evolution by natural selection proved to be a powerful tool for explaining many patterns found in the living world. Since Darwin’s time, knowledge of genetics and inheritance has been incorporated into the theory of natural selection to produce the ‘modern evolutionary synthesis.’ Modern evolutionary theory has become the bedrock of biology, and has been so thoroughly corroborated by many independent lines of evidence that it is accepted as ‘fact’ as much as anything can be in science. Despite minor tweaks arising from modern biological research, the work of Darwin and Wallace still forms the core of evolutionary theory. In this lab, we will examine some of the basics of evolutionary theory. We will focus purely on Darwin and Wallace’s proposed mechanisms and criteria for evolution by natural selection. To accomplish this, we will use a computer-based simulation available on the web. Topics like genetic drift and random mutation will be covered in lecture, and you will learn about genetics in BIOL 102. Evolution by Natural Selection Natural populations do not grow infinitely; as they approach the carrying capacity of their environment, the population growth rate slows to zero. In a closed population, a decrease in population growth can occur by two means: (1) a decrease in the birth rate, or (2) an increase in the death rate. In the real world, ‘voluntary’ reduction of the birth rate by populations approaching their carrying capacity is rare. Thus, the growth of most real populations is checked by only increased death rates. The fact that more offspring are produced than can survive forms part of the theory of evolution by natural selection. Charles Darwin noticed that most living things produce far more offspring than the environment can support. Most of these offspring die before producing young of their own, and even those who reach adulthood have widely varying success in producing offspring. Darwin also noticed that which individuals died and which lived long enough to produce offspring was not determined by chance. Rather, organisms struggle with each other and with their surroundings, and some individuals are better equipped to ‘win’ this struggle than others. The ability to survive and produce offspring is what Darwin termed ‘fitness.’ Since offspring tend to resemble their parents, Darwin concluded that this repeated process of overproduction of young followed by unequal survival could slowly change the nature of a population. This led Darwin (1859) to propose three criteria for evolution by natural selection to occur: 1. Variation must exist within a population. Individuals within a population must exhibit variation in phenotype (e.g. differences in wing coloration or beak size). 2. This phenotypic variation must be heritable. Individuals must be able to pass their traits on to their offspring, at least to some degree. 3. Variation must be linked to fitness (number of successful offspring produced). The ways in which individuals differ from each other must influence their relative ability to survive and reproduce. Simulating Evolution by Natural Selection To better understand how evolution by natural selection operates, you will use an online computer program to simulate how changing environmental conditions affect populations. This program is called EvolutionLab, and it simulates populations of Darwin’s finches (Geospiza spp.) on two islands in the Galapagos. Darwin’s voyage on the Beagle in the mid 1800’s played a strong role in the development of his theory of evolution by natural selection. His observations of the different finch species in the Galapagos served to illuminate the role environmental factors and competition in shaping the evolution of species. Thus, for historical reasons, today’s simulation imitates the situation found on these islands. The species of Darwin’s finches we are focusing on feed on plant seeds. The seeds available to foraging birds vary depend on the environment. During rainy periods, plants that produce small seeds reproduce well, so there are many small seeds available for the finches to eat. However, during dry periods, plants that produce large, hard seeds that are resistant to desiccation reproduce well, so there are many large, hard seeds available for the birds to eat. The finches cannot eat all the seeds easily, however. Finches with small beaks have trouble breaking open large seeds, and so do much better when there are a lot of small seeds in the environment. Individuals with large beaks are good at breaking open large seeds, but have difficulty manipulating small seeds, and forage better when there are a lot of large seeds in the environment. Because rainy periods result in a lot of small seeds, small-beaked finches do well under wet conditions. Conversely, because dry periods result in a lot of large seeds, big-beaked birds do well during dry periods. Moderate rainfall leads to a lot of medium-sized seeds, and favors individuals of intermediate beak sizes. EvolutionLab simulates this evolutionary situation. The program tracks digital birds feeding on digital seeds on two islands - Darwin and Wallace Islands in the Galapagos. For each population, the program creates a set of birds of varying beak sizes and has them forage on the available seeds. Finches that end up eating a lot of food will have increased survival and reproduction relative to individuals who eat less, and the whole process is repeated for another generation. Whether or not an individual finch eats well depends on if it has an effective beak size for the seeds that are available, and, since there is a random component, a bit of luck. Beak size is heritable in Darwin’s finches; thus, the digital finch babies tend to have beak sizes close to their parents. If you look back at the criteria for evolution by natural selection, you should see that each criterion is met in the Darwin finch scenario. There is variation in beak size, the variation in beak size is tied to survival, and the variation in beak size is passed on to offspring. EvolutionLab gives you the power to control parameters like the starting average beak size of the finch populations, how much rain the islands receive, and how much variability there is in beak size. Thus, you have the ability to control natural selection on these populations of finches, and you can use this ability to learn about how natural selection works. First, let’s get familiar with the program. EvolutionLab Using your laptop computer, go to the web site http://biologylab.awlonline.com/. Register at the site using the code available in your book by clicking on the green “Register” button and following the directions. Once you have an account name and password, click on the EvolutionLab button and log in. Click the blue Start Lab button right away. A second window will open up; maximize this window by clicking the box in the upper right corner of the window (right next to the ‘X’ which would close it). On the screen you should see two columns, one labeled “Darwin Island” and the other labeled “Wallace Island;” these represent the two finch populations you will be toying with. Below them, you should see the parameter values currently set for each island (e.g., Beak Size = 12 mm, Variance = 1.00). 1. On the left hand side, you should see a drop down box which currently reads “100.” Change this to “300” and leave it there for the rest of the lab. This means that when you hit the “Run Experiment” button, it will run for 300 years, which corresponds to 300 generations in this simulation. 2. Click the Run Experiment button now. You will briefly see two figures depicting the finches and their beak sizes, along with numeric indications of beak and population sizes. A graph will then pop up. This graph shows the beak sizes (vertical axis) on the two islands (red is Darwin Island, blue is Wallace Island) as they change through time (horizontal axis). In this case, you should see the average beak size rising on each island. This is because the default parameter settings were for small initial beak size but for low annual rainfall, which would produce large seeds favoring large beaks. Thus, the two finch populations both evolved larger beaks over 300 generations. You just imposed directional selection on the finches, and both populations responded. 3. Click on the Population tab at the top. This should reveal a graph which shows the population sizes of the two finch populations changing through time. If you ever see one of the beak size lines in the Beak Size tab get cut short, the population probably died out. Checking out this tab will let you verify if this has occurred. 4. Next click on the Field Notes tab at the top. Here, you will see a table which gives you the average beak size, the standard deviation (square root of the variance), and the population size on each island for each year. Note the beak mean sizes for each population in the first year, then scroll all the way to the bottom and note the beak mean sizes in the last year. There should be about a 12 millimeter difference, give or take a couple millimeters due to randomness. Make sure you remember how to find this difference between starting and ending beak sizes, because you will have to do it later in this lab. Changing the Parameters in EvolutionLab 1. Click on the New Experiment button in the lower left corner; this resets everything afresh and puts you on the starting page. 2. Click the Change Inputs button. You now have access to all the parameters which might influence the adaptation of finch beaks. You can alter parameters by clicking on the corresponding button on the left hand side, then moving the blue bars at the bottom of the screen left and right. The pictures and numeric representations of the parameters should change as you shift the blue bar around. 3. Notice that you can alter the parameters for each island separately. For instance, click on the beak size button. Next, click and hold on the diamond in the blue bar for the Darwin Island birds. Moving this left and right will change the average beak size that the Darwin Island population starts out at when you run the experiment. Move the blue bar all the way to the right so that the Darwin Island finches start with a beak size of 30 mm. Click Done, then click Run Experiment. You should see that the Wallace Island population evolved as per the previous simulation because you did not change the initial beak size for that population. However, the Darwin Island population did not seem to evolve at all. This occurred because the 30 mm beak size they started with was already the best beak size for the available seeds, therefore they experienced no selection for larger or smaller beaks. In fact, any individual finches that happened to have beaks larger or smaller than 30 mm in this population would have been worse off than those with the average beak size. Thus, you just imposed stabilizing selection on the Darwin Island birds. 4. Click on New Experiment, then on Change Inputs. Go ahead and mess with some of the other parameter values for a while to become more familiar with the program. Predicting Evolutionary Change in Beak Size 1. When you know the selection pressures, you can predict evolution. Conversely, when you know how evolution occurred, you can often predict the selection pressures that caused it. Remember, the capacity to produce testable predictions is one characteristic of a good scientific hypothesis or theory. Let’s try this out. 2. When you are ready, click New Experiment and Change Inputs again. Reduce the initial beak size of the Darwin finches to 10 mm, and increase the initial beak size of the Wallace population to 30 mm. Change the variance of each population to 1.99. 3. Now, suppose you want to end up with finches with beaks that are 20 mm. This is a medium beak size right in between the starting beak sizes of 30 mm for the Darwin finches and 10 mm for the Wallace finches. You know that the amount of precipitation affects what seeds are available to the finches, and the size of available seeds exerts selective pressure on finch beak size. Thus, you should be able to predict what amount of precipitation (the same for both islands) will result in both the Darwin and Wallace populations ending up with beaks at around 20 mm in size by the end of 300 generations. Write this below Precipitation: ______________ cm 4. Change the precipitation to this value one each island and run the experiment. Did both populations end up with a beak size around 20 mm? If not, click the Revise Experiment button and change the precipitation value to another number. Don’t just guess though; try to predict the proper amount of rain beforehand. Keep doing this until you are successful. Predicting the Effects of Heritability and Variance 1. The term “heritability” refers to how much offspring tend to resemble their parents. In other words, it tells you on average how good the value of parents’ traits (beak size, in this case) is at predicting the value of the offspring traits. When heritability is high, offspring tend have trait values that are close to the average of their two parents. When heritability is low, offspring trait values tend to be closer to the average of the trait value for the whole population than to the average of their two parents’ trait value. Since evolution requires that offspring traits be somehow related to parental traits (criterion #2), heritability should affect how evolution occurs. 2. Let’s set up two populations that are different only in terms of heritability. Click New Experiment, then Change Inputs. Change the heritability of the Darwin population to 0.90, and change the heritability of the Wallace population to 0.20. Before you run the experiment, though, you must make a prediction about what will happen. Both populations have some heritability for the trait, so evolution will occur in each population over 300 generations. However, the rate of evolution might be different for each population. Below, write a prediction about which, if any, of the two populations will evolve faster. Also write down why you predict this, because you will need to support your prediction when you write up your lab report. Prediction: ___________________________________________________________ Why:________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ 3. Now click done and run the experiment. If one of your populations went extinct, rerun the experiment by clicking Revise Experiment then Run Experiment. Examine the graph showing beak size. Are there differences in how fast they changed? Go to the Field Notes tab. The beak sizes for each population should be pretty close in the first year. Scroll down to the last year and compare the beak sizes. Are the two populations still pretty close to each other, or are they fairly different? Is this what you predicted? 4. Remember, however, that you cannot draw conclusions just based on a single trial of an experiment. You need to do multiple trials and use statistics. In the table below, record the beak sizes for each population in the first year and the last year, then calculate how much the beak sizes changed for each population. Now you can re-run the experiment. 5. Click Revise Experiment (not New Experiment, otherwise you will reset the heritability values), then click Run Experiment again. Go to Field Notes, and record the beak sizes in the first and last years for each population again, and calculate the differences. Repeat this until you have 10 total trials and have filled up the table below. Darwin Island (heritability = 0.90) Wallace Island (heritability = 0.20) Starting Beak Size (mm) Starting Beak Size (mm) Final Beak Size (mm) Change (Final-Starting) Final Beak Size (mm) Change (FinalStarting) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 6. Using this data, you should be able to run a t-test to test for differences in the change in beak size between the Darwin and Wallace populations. Open up Excel, and enter the changes in beak size into two columns, one for the Darwin population and one for the Wallace population. Click on Tools->Data Analysis. Select “t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances,” then click OK. Click on the text box next to Variable 1 Range, then select the 10 cells which contain the beak size change data for your Darwin population. Next, click on the text box next to Variable 2 Range, then select the 10 cells which contain the beak size change data for your Wallace population. In the Hypothesized Mean Difference, enter the value ‘0’ (this is your null hypothesis). Click OK. A new sheet will open up which, among other things, tells you the means, the variances, the degrees of freedom (df), the t Statistic, and the p-value for your data. Record these below. Use the one-tailed p-value (probably in row 11) because you had a predicted direction of evolutionary change for the populations. If your p-value is very small, just record it as ‘p<0.01.’ Did you support your prediction? Darwin population mean: _________ Darwin population variance: ___________ Wallace population mean: _________ Wallace population variance: ___________ df: ___________ t-statistic: ______________ p-value: _____________ Now you will plot a bar graph of the heritability data for your lab report. Go to the 101 lecture website at http://mama.indstate.edu/angillet/BIOL101/links.htm and click on ‘Creating Graphs in Excel 2007’ for instructions on making bar graphs. Plot the mean starting and final beak size on each island and include ± standard deviation error bars. The Effect of Variance: 7. Variance in a population represents how different individuals are from each other within a population. If there is no variation within a population, then evolution cannot occur (criterion #1) because there are no differences to be favored by selection. However, variation, like heritability, is not an all-or-nothing trait. Some populations have low variance and most individuals within these populations have trait values pretty close to the average. Some populations have high variance, however, which means that a lot of individuals have trait values that are much higher or lower than the average. Variation also affects how evolution occurs. 8. Let’s set up two populations that are different only in terms of variance. Click New Experiment, then Change Inputs. Change the variance of the Darwin population to 1.99, and change the variance of the Wallace population to 0.50. Before you run the experiment, though, you must make a prediction about what will happen. Both populations have some variance for the trait, so evolution will occur in each population over 300 generations. However, the rate of evolution might be different for each population. Below, write a prediction about which, if any, of the two populations will evolve faster. Also write down why you predict this, because you will need to support your prediction when you write up your lab report. Prediction: ___________________________________________________________ Why:________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ 9. Run the experiment ten times like you did for the heritability experiment, and record the data below (remember, click Revise Experiment, not New Experiment). Run a ttest on this data in the same manner. Did you support your prediction? Darwin Island (variance = 1.99) Starting Beak Size (mm) Final Beak Size (mm) Change (Final-Starting) Wallace Island (variance = 0.50) Starting Beak Size (mm) Final Beak Size (mm) Change (FinalStarting) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Darwin population mean: _________ Darwin population variance: ___________ Wallace population mean: _________ Wallace population variance: ___________ df: ___________ t-stat: ______________ p-value: _____________ Make a bar graph for this data just like you did for the heritability experiment. Literature Cited Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray Publishers. London, England.