Download Management of Complicated Dysphagic Head and Neck Cancer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Psychedelic therapy wikipedia , lookup

Dysprosody wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Management of Complicated Dysphagic
Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Session Number: 2418
Saturday, November 22, 2008 -- 1:00 pm - 3:00 pm
Room: W183B McCormick Place West
Angela Campanelli, MS, CCC-SLP, BRS-S
Kettering Medical Center, Kettering, Ohio
The Entertainer
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
70 years old; non-smoker, non drinker
Husband
Avid Runner
Entertainer playing the accordion and singing
Action and results oriented
Medical History
‹ 2000 October Chemo Radiotherapy for T4N02cM0 squamous cell carcinoma of right
retromolar trigone CT showed no response after 4500cGy…Total 7000Gy
– PEG
– trismus
‹ 2005 March Completed voice therapy
‹ 2006 July Recurrence/Surgery
The Surgery
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Pectoralis mucocutaneous flap repair
Partial pharyngectomy
Partial palatal resection
Partial glossectomy
Hemi-mandibulectomy with Titanium
Preservation of CNXII.
PEG/NPO
Figure 1. Pectoralis Major Flap
in Composite Lateral Skull
Base Defect Reconstruction,
Vicente A. Resto; Michael J.
McKenna; Daniel G. Deschler,
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2007;133:490-494.
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
2
Comprehensive Therapy
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
2006 December – 2007 February
Tongue range of motion
Lip strength and closure
Suck swallow
Swallowing trials with water syringe
compliance was another matter…
Therabite 7x7
Vertical mandibular excursion increased from 11 to 22 mm
VFSS April 2007
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Impaired oral transit, improved lip closure
Delay of swallow reflex with silent aspiration of nectar thick
Absent pharyngeal stripping,
Tongue could not meet posterior pharyngeal wall due to debulking
Apparent high grade stricture of UES
He has not done his home program since February
Referrals
‹ Gastroenterologist for dilatation
‹ Primary Care Physician for Prevacid solutab (to reduce risk of edema and stricture of
UES due to GER)
‹ Physical Therapy for Neck Mobility
Esophageal Stricture
Clinical Observations
‹ Neck immobility and rigidity
‹ Velo-pharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) with hypernasal speech
‹ Left side of tongue barely touches teeth and right is mostly pectoralis flap with
accompanying dysarthria
‹ Sensory impairment tongue and lips
Therapy 2007 April
‹ Laryngeal Valving
– Effortful breath hold (improved from 2/5-5/5)
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
3
‹ Tongue/Lip Strengthening and Range of Motion
– lingual “tip” to roof of mouth and teeth; protrude, curl around teeth; back of
tongue “k”(best if supine), labial resistance, suck-swallow, Mendelsohn
maneuver, mid-tongue elevation (could not do), Shaker maneuver (had to
discontinue)
– Sensory Stimulation to facilitate motor (brushing, quick strokes, gentle touch to
soften tissue)
– Velo-pharyngeal Valving improved awareness and artic contact with nasal
occlusion
Progress and Problem Solving
‹ Good progress from April-June
– Range of motion of the tongue increased
(1to 3cm past midline to the right)
– UES dilated from12 to 15 mm diameter
(45 French is circumferential dimension)
– Increased neck range of motion
“I feel safer now when I ride my bike.”
– 0% to 50% produce t,d with nares occluded
‹ Referral to Prosthodontist for Maxillary Tx
…July “I haven’t done much.”
Palatal Prosthesis with Obdurator
Obtained early October 2007
Changes and with Wearing the Prosthesis
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
A-P transit and timing of swallow reflex improved
3 cc size bolus of nectar with Super-Supraglottic Swallow; 4/5 times effective
Sustain “e” improved from 26-35 sec.
Head turn left improved resonance balance and decreased nasal air emission
Improved tongue to alveolar ridge contact
Challenges
‹ Required about 30sec of Therabite to allow prosthesis to fit in mouth
‹ Pain on right side where metal attached
‹ Had to use a tool to loosen from teeth to remove
“My mouth is already sore and then when I put this in it’s worse.”
By November 13 use was discontinued as swallow was worse with increased choking,
and stasis at obdurator.
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
4
VFSS 2007 November 21
‹ Therapy break from July until prosthesis obtained in October
‹ Home feeding with syringe, poor oral-motor integration with worsened A-P transit
‹ Usually absent swallow reflex
Problems
‹ Pain and muscle spasm on right from base of neck up to top of head with increased
muscle effort (stopped Shaker)
‹ Therapy break December due to insurance limitations
Next
‹ At wife’s insistence they tried Vital Stim –
? Vagal reaction
‹ Still NPO
‹ “I made an attempt.” at oral trials.
‹ “I feel like it doesn’t go down.”
Epilogue
‹
‹
‹
‹
The Entertainer became an Advocate
Active in Support for Person’s with Oral Head and Neck Cancer
SPOHNC
Found a new normal
“I wished I would have been given an honest answer regarding my swallowing. I was
surprised that it never came back.”
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
5
Donna Lundy, Ph.D. CCC-SLP, BRS-S
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Florida
Organ Preservation:
Larynx
‹ Chemo-xrt protocols
‹ Partial Laryngectomy options:
– Supraglottic
– Hemi-vertical
– Supra-cricoid
– Near-total
– Other modifications
Case Presentation: JG
‹ 61 YOM with prior h/o T1 bil. VF treated with Radiation (2004); now w/increased
hoarseness and bx from ant. commissure c/w spindle cell cancer staged as T4No
recurrence (6/07)
‹ Medical hx:
– HTN
‹ Social Habits:
– Non-smoker
– Social alcohol usage
‹ Works as “tool man”; runs own business and needs voice
‹ Recommendation: Total Laryngectomy
– Pt refused
– Agreed to supra-cricoid if possible
Supracricoid Laryngectomy
‹ Bilateral glottic lesion
‹ Possible as surgical salvage
‹ May resect one arytenoid
Supracricoid Laryngectomy vs. TL & Dysphagia
‹ Retrospective study of 10 pts. s/p supracricoid vs. 10 s/p TL + TEP
‹ FEES in 7 & MBS in 3 (refusal of FEES)
‹ Results:
– Significant premature spillage into valleculae
– Chronic pooling of food residuals & secretions in hypopharynx w/intermittent
aspiration during respiration
– Excessive throat clearing & coughing
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
6
– Sensate aspiration w/adequate clearage
– Prolonged use of feeding tube & need for swallowing therapy
• Dworkin et al., 2003
JG continued
‹ 7/2/07: pt. underwent Supracricoid Laryngectomy, left neck dissection, & trach
‹ 7/25/07: 1st MBS: insert video
‹ 7/25 – 9/5/07: Intensive swallowing therapy
– Masako Maneuver
– Mendelsohn Maneuver
– Super-supraglottic swallow
– Resistance exercises
‹ 9/5/07: Repeat MBS & Endoscopic view
‹ 10/9/07: Stridor noted during Rx; ENT contacted; emergency trach
– Recurrence found during procedure
‹ 10/29/07: Total Laryngectomy, right neck dissection, TEP
‹ Story is not over…
INDICATIONS FOR TL
‹ After failure of organ preservation therapy
‹ For pt.’s with host or tumor characteristics that prevent non-surgical treatment or
conservation resection
‹ For pt.’s that desire surgical vs. non-surgical approach
All TLs are not created equal
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
TL after radiation therapy
TL after radiation therapy and prior surgery
TL with BOT extension
TL with partial pharyngectomy
Laryngopharyngectomy with myocutaneous flap
Laryngopharyngectomy with jejunal free flap
Laryngopharyngectomy with radial forearm free flap
Laryngopharyngectomy with esophagectomy (gastric pull-up)
Removal of Larynx Results in:
‹ Increased resistance to flow from loss of sup & ant laryngeal movement
‹ Reduced opening of the UES
‹ Loss of sub-atmospheric pressure needed to move bolus
through collapsed pharynx
‹ PTTs double (McConnel et al., 1986)
‹ Tracheostoma results in increased tortuosity of pharynx
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
7
JG continued
‹ 11/12/07: T-E prosthesis placed and therapy begun; soft diet
‹ 11/21/07: stomal breakdown w/stenosis
‹ 12/28/07: recurrence found at esophageal juncture; T-E prosthesis removed; swallowing
reduced to liquids only
‹ 1 – 4/08: Chemo and repeat XRT
‹ 6/6/08: stomal recurrence
‹ 6/08: outside consultation & more chemo
‹ 7/08: pt. expired
Summary
‹
‹
‹
‹
H&N pts. are becoming more complicated
Status may continue to change
Goals and outcomes need to be continually modified to reflect pt’s changing status
Quality of Life is everything!
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
8
Mario Landera, M.A., CCC-SLP
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Florida
Case Presentation: LA
‹
‹
‹
‹
62 yo male diagnosed with a T1N2a SCC of the right base of tongue
Medical hx: bilateral herniorraphies, rhinoplasty, laminectomy
Social hx: h/o smoking 1/2 ppd x 30+ years (quit 1994); social drinker
Retired businessman, very active runner
Medical Treatment
‹ March 2003:
– Transhyoid base of tongue resection with bilateral neck dissection and pharyngeal
reconstruction
‹ April 2003:
– First MBS performed
MBS Results April 2003
‹ Oral prep:
– Unremarkable
‹ Oral phase:
– Delay in triggering swallow reflex
– Premature spillage
‹ Pharyngeal Phase
– Incomplete epiglottic inversion
– ↓ Tongue base retraction 2° defect
– ↓ Laryngeal elevation
– ↓ Cricopharyngeal opening
– Pharyngeal residue
– Inconsistent sensate aspiration during and after the swallow
– Effect of Strategies/ Maneuvers/Postures
‹ Chin tuck: not beneficial
‹ Left head turn: partially beneficial
Recommendations/Plan
‹ NPO
‹ Convert enteral feeding from NG to PEG
‹ Enroll & participate in swallowing therapy
– ↑ Tongue base retraction
– ↑ Laryngeal elevation
– ↑ Cricopharyngeal opening
– Airway protection exercises
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
9
Treatment Exercises
‹ Masako (tongue-hold)
– Purpose: Improve tongue base retraction and pharyngeal wall contraction
– Evidence: (Lazarus, Logemann, Song, Rademaker, & Kahrilas, 2002; Fujiu &
Logemann, 1996)
‹ Mendelsohn
– Purpose: Increase extent and duration of laryngeal elevation; Increase duration
and width of cricopharyngeal opening
– Evidence: (Boden, Hallgren, & Witt Hedstrom, 2006; Ding, Larson, Logemann,
& Rademaker, 2002; Lazarus, Logemann & Gibbons, 1993; Logemann &
Kahrilas, 1990; Dodds, Man, Cook, Kahrilas, Stewart, & Kern, 1988)
‹ Shaker Exercise
– Purpose: Increase UES opening
– Evidence: (Shaker, Kern, Bardan, Taylor, Stewart, Hoffmann, Arndorfer,
Hofmann, & Bonevier, 1997; Shaker, Easterling, Kern, Nitschke, Massey,
Daniels, Grande, Kazandjian, & Dikeman, 2002; Easterling, Grande, Kern, Sears,
& Shaker, 2005)
‹ Postural Techniques
– Purpose: Redirect bolus flow and change pharyngeal dimensions
– Evidence: (Horner, Massey, Riski, Lathrop, & Chase, 1988; Logemann, Kahrilas,
Kobara, & Vakil, 1989; Rasley, Logemann, Kahrilas, Rademaker, Pauloski, &
Dodds, 1993; Logemann, Rademaker, Pauloski, & Kahrilas, 1994)
Medical Treatment (continued)
‹ May 2003:
– Adjuvant radiation treatment
‹ February 2004:
– Repeat MBS
MBS Results (February 2004)
‹ Oral prep:
– Unremarkable
‹ Oral phase:
– Slight delay in triggering swallow reflex
– Premature spillage
‹ Pharyngeal phase:
– Incomplete epiglottic inversion
– ↓ Tongue base retraction 2° defect
– Slight ↓ Laryngeal elevation
– ↓ Cricopharyngeal opening
– Pharyngeal residue
– Minimal sensate aspiration
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
10
– Effect of Strategies/ Maneuvers/Postures
‹ Left head turn: beneficial
Recommendations/Plan
‹ 100% PO with all consistencies, using a left head turn
¾ LA noted to be noncompliant with using postural techniques
‹ Continue swallowing exercises and follow up
Medical Treatment (continued)
‹ August 2007:
– Recurrent SCC of BOT
– Partial laryngectomy/total laryngectomy recommended; LA declined
‹ October 2007-May 2008:
– Receives radiation and chemotherapy at outside facility
– Tracheotomy performed secondary to edema
– “Failed” multiple swallow studies
‹ NPO and had PEG placed
‹ No swallowing therapy
‹ September 2008:
– Returns to our clinic
– MBS performed
MBS Results (September 2008)
‹ Oral prep:
– Unremarkable
‹ Oral:
– Slight delay in triggering swallow reflex
– Premature spillage
‹ Pharyngeal phase:
– Incomplete epiglottic inversion
– ↓ Tongue base retraction 2° defect
– ↓ Laryngeal elevation
– ↓ Cricopharyngeal opening
– Pharyngeal residue
– Inconsistent sensate aspiration during and after the swallow reflex
– Effect of Strategies/Maneuvers/ Postures
‹ Left head turn: partially beneficial
‹ Left head turn + chin down: beneficial
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
11
Recommendations/Plan
‹ Gradually begin oral intake of nectar thick up to semi-solid consistencies with a left head
turn and chin down
‹ Gradually wean from his PEG tube
‹ Re-initiate swallowing therapy
– ↑ Tongue base retraction
– ↑ Laryngeal elevation
– ↑ Cricopharyngeal opening
– Airway protection exercises
Summary
‹ Find what works best for your patient
– Be realistic
‹ In many cases the anatomy and integrity of muscles and tissues are
changed
‹ Combination of postural and rehabilitative exercises
– Consider quality of life
‹ Sometimes you have to reach a compromise
‹ Education is key!
– Be your patients biggest cheerleader
– Involve the family
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
12
Linda Stachowiak, MS, CCC-SLP
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida
Case Study: Head and Neck patient with complications
¾ 59 yr. old male
¾ T4N2c squamous cell carcinoma of the right base of tongue
¾ Initial treatment: Chemoradiation
completed early 2006
¾ PEG placed prophylactically
¾ Speech Pathology Pre-treatment clinical swallowing evaluation and education not done
(treated elsewhere)
Case study
¾ Residual disease treated with sx at another institution 3/13/06: right lateral pharyngeal
wall, right modified neck dissection and pectoralis myocutaneous flap reconstruction
¾ First MBS done at same facility as sx, significant for aspiration per patient, recommended
for tx; however pt unable to travel the distance to the facility
¾ Home Health SLP services recommended; however, never scheduled per patient
¾ First seen at our facility 9/14/06:
– Tongue deviation to the right with atrophy
– Significantly reduced strength and ROM of the tongue on the right
– Surgical defect of right soft palate and right lateral pharyngeal wall
– Moderate hypernasality with nasal emission
– Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) study completed
FEES results
‹ Questionable area noted upon scoping, requiring MD evaluation
‹ Good instrumental tool to assess deviations in anatomy
‹ Poor instrumental tool to comprehensively assess the physiology of the swallow due to
the severity of the deficits
‹ Modified Barium Swallow Study planned
Initial MBS results
‹ Oral transit functional with liquids – required slight head tilt to assist in transfer
posteriorly
‹ Repetitive AP lingual stripping with puree which slowed oral transit but overall
functional with no significant oral residue
‹ No masticated consistencies provided due to edentulous state
‹ Reduced VP closure but no nasal regurgitation
‹ Reduced hyolaryngeal elevation
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
13
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Reduced BOT retraction towards PPW
Reduced epiglottic inversion
Penetration of all consistencies
Trace silent aspiration after the swallow
Residue in valleculae and pyriform sinuses increased as the consistency increased
Liquid residue cleared with subsequent dry swallow
Puree residue cleared with a liquid wash
Aggressive swallowing therapy recommended
Treatment Plan
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Super-supraglottic swallow maneuver
Effortful Swallow
Mendelsohn Maneuver
Tongue- holding maneuver
Shaker Exercise
Oral trials with above strategies
Super-supraglottic maneuver
¾ Place the bolus in the oral cavity
¾ Hold your breath while bearing down (like you are going to the bathroom)
¾ Swallow
¾ Cough immediately after the swallow
Purpose: Volitional airway protection (holding breath brings TVC’s together, bearing down
increases airway protection by increasing tilting of the arytenoids and retraction of the BOT,
cough redirects any penetrants or aspirants)
Effortful swallow
¾ Swallow normally, but squeeze hard with your tongue muscles and “throat” muscles
throughout the swallow
Purpose: improve tongue base retraction and reduce residue in the valleculae after the swallow
Mendelsohn maneuver
¾ Swallow normally
¾ Feel your “voice box” or Adam’s apple lift during the swallow
¾ On the next swallow, hold the “voice box” up with your neck muscles for several seconds
during the swallow
¾ When you feel your “voice box” go up, grab it with your neck muscles and don’t let it
down
Purpose: To accentuate and prolong laryngeal elevation and anterior movement, increasing
the extent and duration of the cricopharyngeal opening
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
14
Tongue holding maneuver
¾ Put your tongue between your teeth
(or gums if edentulous)
¾ Swallow
¾ If the patient can’t protrude the tongue out of the mouth, have him try to push it behind
the teeth and gradually attempt to protrude it further from the mouth
Purpose: Exercise the glossopharnygeal muscle and improve BOT to PPW retraction
Shaker exercise
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
Lay flat on your back on the bed or floor.
Raise your head and look at your toes for one minute.
Do not raise your shoulders off the bed or the floor as you raise your head.
Lay your head flat and rest for one minute.
Repeat this sequence a total of three times.
The amount of time you hold your head up should be the same as the amount of time you
rest. At first you may only be able to hold it up for 5 secs…then you should rest it for 5
secs. Until you can build up to one full minute.
¾ Next raise your head thirty times consecutively without holding it. Again, do not raise
your shoulders while looking at your toes.
¾ Once again, you may need to gradually build up to thirty times.
¾ Do the entire exercise three times per day for six weeks.
Purpose: The Shaker exercise, was developed to increase upper esophageal sphincter (UES)
opening. It is based on the fundamental principle that the UES opening is a mechanical event,
consisting of a series of external forces applied to the UES combined with relaxation of the
sphincter musculature.
Complications/Issues
‹
‹
‹
‹
Significant deficits to begin with
Lengthy time frame between surgery, first MBS and initiation of swallowing therapy
Limited educational level of patient
Questionable patient motivation:
o Religiously attended therapy; however:
o Limited home practice of both exercises and PO trials as instructed
‹ Patient told that he must be committed to program or else can’t continue with attending
therapy sessions
‹ Break in intervention
‹ SLP contacts patient after 3 months, states that he “is ready”
‹ Patient becomes committed to working on home practice as instructed by SLP
‹ Making great gains
‹ Begins weaning from PEG tube feeds
‹ Working jointly with dietician to wean patient….getting realistically close to goal of
removing tube
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
15
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Patient noted to have a suspicious lesion on his cheek
Basal cell lesion diagnosed
Patient has lesion surgically removed
No SLP intervention for several weeks
Patient backslides with PO intake
Swallowing therapy resumed
Patient agrees to follow through with home program
Repeat modified barium swallow study
Repeat MBS results
‹ Pt continues with moderate to severe pharyngeal dysphagia BUT with improvement in
airway protection. This allows patient to use aggressive compensatory swallowing
strategies in order to swallow liquid and puree consistencies safely.
‹ Goal: partial PO nutrition with reduced PEG tube feedings due to chronic severe
dysphagia
Final outcomes
¾
¾
¾
¾
Patient resumes complete PO nutrition
All medications PO
Maintains weight for one month, no PEG use
PEG tube removed!
Key points to ponder
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Therapy goal was not functional restoration, all COMPENSATORY
Patients may not always be motivated when we are!
No Practice = no gains
Practice= gains!
A break in treatment not always seen in a positive light, but may be what some folks
need. There may be a window for functional restoration but not necessarily in
compensatory restoration as this case points out!
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
16
Bernice K. Klaben, Ph.D. CCC-SLP, BRS-S
University of Cincinnati, Department of Otolaryngology
The Person
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
44 yr old female
Hair stylist/nail tech
Two teenage girls
Married
Supportive family
Active
Medical History
‹ Hx of smoking 1 ½ ppd x 25 yrs, No ETOH abuse
‹ 2006 Sept dx T2N2MO SCCa R aryepiglottic fold & medial R pyriform sinus
‹ 2006 Oct to 2007 March concurrent chemoradiation
‹ PEG secondary to XRT related dysphagia
‹ 20 lbs weight loss
‹ Throat soreness/odynophagia (started July 2007)
‹ Hoarseness (started Aug 2007)
‹ History of heartburn
‹ Medications
‹ Protonix 2 x daily
‹ Requip
‹ Lexapro
‹ Ambien
‹ Iron supplement
‹ Referred to Univ of Cincinnati ENT Specialists (Oct 2007)
‹ Confirmed chemoradiation failure
‹ R ear pain
‹ Recurrent CA – poorly differentiated SCCa
‹ Vocal folds mobile
‹ Moderate edema bilateral arytenoids and epiglottis
‹ Surgery (Oct 2007)
‹ Tracheotomy
‹ Supraglottic laryngectomy
Post Surgical
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Pharyngocutaneous fistula became persistent
Poor healing (neck edema/facial edema)
Referred for HBO (initial Nov 07)
Decanulated (12-07-07) following 17 treatments
Referred for voice & swallowing eval (Dec 2007)
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
17
Hyperbaric Chamber
‹ Received 60 dives (b/t Nov 07 to Feb 08)
‹ Tissue termed “Triple-H”
– Hypo-vascular
– Hypo cellular
– hypoxic
‹ Increases the pressure of O2 in surrounding chamber
allowing for greater absorption of O2 in all body tissues
Evaluation
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Neck/facial edema
Limited head/neck ROM
Fibrosis of neck (digastric, supra-hyoid)/scarred tracheal area
Poor posture (chin down)
Severely restricted laryngeal elevation
Restriction of jaw opening
Decrease lingual ROM and strength
Severe dysphonia (wet vocal quality)
Audible inhalation (increased edema)
Increased thick mucus
Mild xerostomia
Treatment
‹
‹
‹
‹
Voice exercises (sustain phonation w/kazoo)
Lingual ROM and Strengthening
Head ROM
Swallowing exercises
– Supraglottic swallow
– Breath hold
– Suck swallow
– 1 to 2 ml of water trials with syringe
‹ Humidification
‹ Received PT (Flexion/Extension, Manual therapy)
Progress
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Sustain phonation 2 secs to 7 secs/vocal range improved (161 Hz to 237 Hz)
Noted improvement in vocal quality
Management of secretions
Improved laryngeal elevation
Supraglottic swallow
– 2 ml of water
‹ Improved cervical ROM
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
18
‹ Improved subcutaneous tissue mobility
‹ Decreased pain
Set Back
‹ Increased dysphagia (March 2008)
– “feels like my neck is tight and swollen”
‹ Increased dypnesa
‹ PET/CT – hypermetabolic activity in R lobe of thyroid, R jugular neck node
‹ Surgical biopsies, dilatation of cervical esophagus to 50FR Maloney
‹ FNA – positive for SCCa
Surgery
‹ 2008 May – R RND with R pectoralis major myofascial flap
– Removal of jugular vein
– Sacrificed spinal accessory nerve
– Tracheotomy
‹ Biopsy result
– Soft tissue disease measuring 3 cm in size
Current Treatment
‹ Chemotherapy
– Palliative
– Response rate in irradiated field 30-35%
– Taxotere, carboplatin, & 5-FU, Erbitux
‹ Pain management
‹ Able to communicate with occlusion of trach
‹ Able to manage secretions
‹ Continues to do some of the swallowing and voice exercises
‹ Awaiting next PET/CT scan
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
19
Amy Kelly, MA, CCC-SLP
NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
Initial Presentation
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
57 y/o male
30 yr h/o tobacco use (quit 2000); daily ETOH use
s/p CABG 2000
L carotid occlusion s/p stent 2003
L base of tongue mass (SCCA) resected 2001 at an outside facility
Resection included partial mandibulectomy with partial fixation
Further treated with chemoradiation (not clear at what level/protocol)
‹
‹
‹
‹
Follow up via serial CT scans – unremarkable until 2007
Pt developed oozing and pain from R mandible 2007 after molar extraction
2007 scan revealed R mandibular osteonecrosis
Asymmetry/soft tissue prominence of the R posterior floor of mouth, genioglossus,
hyoglossus and pterygoid muscles – further w/u revealed post-operative changes vs.
recurrence of disease
‹ Pt was treated with hyperbaric oxygen and antibiotics for acute infection and mandibular
osteoradionecrosis
‹ 4/08 developed severe trismus; recommendation is for osteitic bone and fibular
microvascular free tissue reconstruction
‹ Pt also developed dysphonia
‹ Videostroboscopic findings by SLP were decreased abduction of the TVCs bilaterally;
significant edema of the endolarynx and epiglottis consistent with radiation changes
‹ Pt underwent R mandibular ramus reconstruction with osteocutaneous R fibular free flap
to R oral/mandibular buccal sulcus; performed by maxillofacial surgeon and plastic
surgeon 5/08
‹ Postoperatively; pt demonstrated decreased mental status and L hemiplegia
‹ Workup revealed R occipital stroke
Decision Making Process for Therapy Plan
‹ Problem 1: pt unable to take any nutrition orally
‹ Problem 2: pt unable to verbally communicate
‹ Factors impeding treatment for both problem 1 and 2
– Decreased cognition due to R occipital stroke
– Minimal jaw opening due to trismus
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
20
Acute Rehabilitation
‹ One week postoperatively, transferred to acute rehabilitation unit at Evanston Hospital
‹ Pt was 95% unintelligible; h/w full oral-motor exam was not possible due to severe
trismus
‹ Difficulty with secretion management; unable to deep suction due to trismus
‹ Pt attempted to communicate via writing; however limited due to severe L hemiinattention and visual-spatial deficits
‹ Patient presented with moderate cognitive-linguistic deficits characterized by decreased
attention, impulsivity, concrete reasoning
‹ Patient demonstrated premorbid psychological issues (anxiety, need for control) which
interfered with participation in therapy initially
Acute Rehabilitation
Trismus
‹
‹
‹
‹
Trismus had to be dealt with as primary goal for speech and swallowing
Initially, mandibular excursion was not adequate for insertion of Therabite
Followed Therabite protocol (7/7/7) with gentle jaw ROM exercise
Progressed to using tongue blade as a bite block/target goal for opening
‹ Systematically added tongue blades as mandibular ROM increased
‹ When pt reached 10-15 mm. of opening, Therabite was initiated
‹ When mandibular excursion adequate for lingual examination; pt’s wife indicated that R
hypoglossal nerve had been “cut”
‹ No lingual movement bilaterally; tongue was completely flaccid with atrophy beginning
to be evident
Trismus
‹ Therabite measuring scale
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
21
Acute Rehabilitation
Dysphagia
‹ Pt was kept strict NPO postoperatively
‹ Initially fed via DHT; PEG inserted prior to transfer to rehabilitation unit
‹ Pt underwent VFS approximately 2 weeks postoperatively (could not fit syringe into oral
cavity prior to that time)
‹ VFS revealed severe oropharyngeal dysphagia; pt inconsistently bit down on syringe due
to cognitive deficits
‹ Administered 3 ml thin liqs via syringe
‹ Copious anterior spillage due to inability to propel or control bolus
‹ After passive spillage to pharynx, swallow was initiated with decreases in strength of all
pharyngeal events (BOT retraction, elevation of hyolaryngeal complex and A-P vestibule
closure)
‹ Trace aspiration occurred after the swallow due to pharyngeal residue; pt unable to clear
with cued cough
‹ Swallow rehabilitation initiated
‹ 3 sets, 10 repetitions of BOT retraction exercises, laryngeal elevation including Shaker,
and effortful breath hold ex for vestibule closure
‹ Pt continued to require maximum cues due to cognitive deficits
‹ Managed secretions via frequent Yankur suction
‹ Thorough oral care provided and supervised by RN, albeit difficult due to trismus
‹ Follow up VFS in 2 weeks revealed slight improvement
‹ Pt tolerated small sip (2-3ml) via medicine cup with head tilt L and then back; better
passive control than via syringe
‹ Continued to demonstrate significant pharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration; SSGS
attempted but unsuccessful due to cognitive deficits
‹ Recommendation was continued NPO with trials with speech only to train on SSGS
‹ Pt did not attempt verbal communication, but wrote on a dry erase board
‹ Written expression characterized by decreased linear formation, L neglect and decreased
attention to detail which negatively impacted legibility of message
Acute Rehabilitation
Communication
‹ Trained pt to continue to attempt to verbalize all messages
‹ Utilized dry erase board with alphabet for indicating initial sound and clarifying
responses
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
22
Outpatient Rehabilitation
‹
‹
‹
‹
The patient was at a great geographical distance from our facility (+50 miles)
Came in for 3 sessions at our outpatient voice lab
Attempted to train him on the SSGS using nasal endoscopy for biofeedback
Pt unable to sequence SSGS despite multiple attempts due to his cognitive deficits
Outpatient Rehabilitation
Trismus
‹ Mandibular excursion at the beginning of outpatient treatment was 20-25 mm.
‹ Continued therapy program with Therabite (7/7/7 protocol) as a home program
Outpatient Rehabilitation
Dysphagia
‹ Reviewed and updated home program of dysphagia exercises
– Masako maneuver
– Mendelsohn maneuver
– BOT exercises
– Laryngeal elevation exercises
– Shaker exercise
– Added lingual resistance exercise with tongue blade in an attempt to stimulate
regeneration
Outpatient Rehabilitation
Current Status
‹
‹
‹
‹
Pt began seeing an SLP closer to his home following our treatment plan
Taking small amounts (3-5ml) liquids via medicine cup up to 5 trials/3x per day
Good tolerance to date, no PNAs
Continuing to try SSGS sequencing, as theoretically pt would be able to increase oral
intake if successful
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
23
Jeri A. Logemann, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, BRS-S
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Patient
¾
Patient was a 46-year-old man
¾
Suffered a salivary gland malignant squamous cell tumor removed with reportedly no effect
on swallowing
¾
2 years later, he suffered a recurrence
¾
Second surgery in the same region did result in severe dysphagia and unilateral facial
weakness
At the time of initial evaluation:
¾
Small diameter nasogastric tube in place at the time of his evaluation and used for his
nutritional intake since his second surgery 6 weeks earlier
¾
Visible droop of the left corner of his lips
¾
Regular loss of saliva
¾
Oral control revealed mild left lingual weakness
¾
Moderate difficulty in reaching the left lower sulcus
¾
Oral tongue on the left was weak when tested against resistance.
At the time of the initial MBS evaluation:
¾
Modified barium swallow revealed some difficulty in controlling liquid boluses in his mouth
¾
Pharyngeal swallow triggered well
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
24
¾
When the pharyngeal swallow triggered most severe swallowing disorders exhibited
themselves
¾
Nasogastric tube in place
¾
Severely reduced laryngeal and hyoid elevation
¾
Reduced upper esophageal sphincter opening
¾
Residue after the swallow and aspiration after the swallow
¾
Head rotation did contribute to improved but far from normal swallow. Other exercises were
needed
At the time of the initial MBS evaluation
The following treatments for this patient’s swallowing disorders were introduced:
¾
head rotation in an attempt to redirect food down the slightly stronger side of the pharynx
¾
tongue base exercises – gargle, pull tongue base back, yawn
¾
Mendelsohn maneuver
¾
Shaker exercise
¾
patient instructed to practice these exercises 10 times a day, 5 minutes each time
¾
Given exercises for laryngeal elevation including the falsetto exercise involving sliding
upscale as high as possible
¾
Instructed to use his hand as an assist and to pull up gently on his thyroid cartilage as he did
the sliding scale exercise.
o This should not be done during swallow as the hand may interfere with the
swallow
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
25
¾
Taught the super-supraglottic swallow to increase duration of airway closure
¾
Given no food or liquid
At the fourth therapy session
¾
At the fourth session patient again exhibited not only the ability to do his exercises without
looking at any instructions but to do them with greater apparent range of motion.
¾
Additional exercises for his facial weakness, including spreading the lips, rounding the lips,
and resistance against lip closure with tongue blades.
At the fourth therapy session, 2nd MBS
¾
At this session, the patient was able to increase the pitch with great success, all the way into
falsetto
¾
Second modified barium swallow using his super-supraglottic swallow and head rotation to
the left
¾
Capable of swallowing the bolus successfully.
¾
He did have to repeat swallow 3 to 5 times to clear the residue after the swallow
4 weeks later
¾
This MBS reveals better laryngeal lifting and anterior movement with the head rotated to one
side.
¾
Much less residue,
¾
Patient is aware of the residue
¾
Ready to attempt some oral intake on thin liquids
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
26
4 weeks later
¾
A month later, the patient is beginning full oral intake on thin and thick liquids and soft
foods.
¾
Head rotation improved the swallow at this time but is not continually necessary.
2 weeks later
¾
Patient had spontaneously begun to take swallows of small amounts of liquid with his head
turned, using his super-supraglottic technique.
¾
Stopped taking 3 cans of Ensure at lunch, replacing them with oral intake on soup.
¾
He was again reminded that the purpose of the exercises was to return him to oral intake but
not to achieve a certain amount of oral intake at this time.
Final modified barium swallow:
¾
Tested with all food consistencies: thin liquids, thick liquids, pudding and masticated
material
¾
Small amounts of residue in the pharynx
¾
Repeat swallows were used to clear the residue
¾
Patient was warned to call should he have any perceived changes in his swallow or in chest
congestion.
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
27
Presenters
Angela Campanelli, MS, CCC-SLP, is the Clinical Specialist of Dysphagia at
Kettering Hospital, a part of Kettering Health Network, in Dayton, Ohio. She
is a Board Recognized Specialist in Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders
with over 20 years experience in adult dysphagia therapy, specializing in
treatment of Head and Neck Cancer. She has taught in the area of
swallowing at Grand Rounds, peer in-services, and state and national
conventions. She contributed to data collection for Dr. Logemann, for the
“Effects of Swallowing Therapy on Head and Neck Cancer”.
Amy Kelly, MA, CCC-SLP, is a senior staff member and manager of the
speech pathology department at NorthShore University HealthSystem,
Illinois. Her clinical practice has focused on the areas of adult neurogenics,
head and neck cancer, and dysphagia in infant through adult populations.
Bernice Klaben, Ph.D. CCC-SLP, BRS-S is an associate professor in the
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery at the University of
Cincinnati. She co-authored Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and
Management. Dr. Klaben specializes in voice disorders, laryngectomy voice
restoration, paradoxical vocal cord dysfunction, dysphagia in neurogenic and
head and neck patients.
Mario A. Landera, MA, CCC-SLP is currently working at the University of
Miami Miller School of Medicine in the department of Otolaryngology. His
practice is limited to head and neck cancer rehabilitation and voice
disorders. Mario received his Master's degree in Communication Sciences
and Disorders from the University of Florida.
Jeri Logemann, PhD, CCC-SLP, BRS-S is Ralph and Jean Sundin Professor
of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Northwestern University, and
Professor of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery and Neurology at
Northwestern University Medical School. She has published and lectured
widely both nationally and internationally on evaluation and treatment of
swallowing disorders.
Donna S. Lundy, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of
Otolaryngology at University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. She
specializes in the care and management of individuals with head and neck
cancer, dysphagia, and voice disorders. Dr. Lundy actively participates in a
number of multi-institutional research grants.
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
28
Linda Stachowiak, MS, CCC-SLP BRS-S, is a Speech Pathologist at the MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida and adjunct instructor at the
University of South Florida. She is also a CAA site visitor for ASHA and
frequent presenter at state and national conferences. She has extensive
clinical experience in dysphagia and head and neck cancer and
tracheostomized and ventilator dependent patients. She also participates in
multi-institutional research which investigates functional outcomes in the
areas of speech and swallowing with head and neck cancer patients. She is a
Board Recognized Specialist in Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders.
1420_2418Logemann_Jerilyn_A._106563_Nov18_2008_Time_125055PM.doc
29