Download 2006 Data Feedback Report (PDF)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS
University of Denver
Denver, CO
The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is the core postsecondary
education data collection program for the NCES. It is a single, comprehensive system
designed to encompass all institutions and educational organizations whose primary
purpose is to provide postsecondary education. For additional information see
http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
September 07, 2006
Dear Institutional Executive:
The National Center for Education Statistics is pleased to provide you with your institution’s annual IPEDS Data Feedback Report. The
report compares data provided by your institution in 2005-06 through the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) to data
for a similar group of institutions. Like last year, your institution was given the opportunity to select its own comparison group. If your
institution did not submit its own group, IPEDS identified a comparison group for you.
I also encourage you to visit the Executive Peer Tool (ExPT) at http://nces.ed.gov/ipedspas/expt/. The ExPT allows you to download a PDF
of this report as well as to recreate the graphs using your comparison group or a different set of schools.
Thank you for all of your efforts to support IPEDS throughout the data collection process. Without your support and the high quality data that
you provide, these reports would not be possible. Should you have any comments on how we can improve the Data Feedback Report and
the ExPT, please send them to [email protected]
Best regards,
Elise S. Miller
IPEDS Program Director
as Puerto Rico, whose primary purpose is to provide
postsecondary education. IPEDS collects institution-level data on
students (enrollment and graduation rates), student charges,
program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. Each year
nearly 6,700 postsecondary institutions provide information to the
U.S. Department of Education through IPEDS. These data are
used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and
development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer
analysis; and by students and parents, through the College
Opportunities Online Locator (IPEDS COOL at
http://collegesearch.nces.ed.gov/), to aid in the college search
process. For more information about IPEDS, see
http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.
What Is The Purpose Of This Report?
The IPEDS Data Feedback Report is intended to provide
institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to the
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Our
goal is to produce a report that is useful to institutional executives
and that may help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS
data.
What Is In This Report?
The figures provided in this report are those suggested by the
IPEDS Technical Review Panel. They were developed to provide
selected indicators and data elements for your institution and a
comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data
collected during the 2005–06 IPEDS collection cycle and are the
most recent data available. Additional information about these
indicators is provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of
the report. Following the figures is a list of the institutions in your
comparison group and the criteria used for their selection. Please
refer to "Comparison Group" in the Methodological Notes for
more information.
Would You Like To Do More Analysis Of Your
IPEDS Data?
The information in this report can be produced for a different
comparison group using the IPEDS Executive Peer Tool (ExPT)
at http://nces.ed.gov/ipedspas/expt. If you would like to make
comparisons on a wider range of IPEDS variables, the more
comprehensive IPEDS Peer Analysis System (PAS) is available
at http://nces.ed.gov/ipedspas. In both systems, you may select
your own comparison group by institution name or by using
selected variables. Through the ExPT, you may also print
additional copies of this report.
What Is IPEDS?
The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is
a system of survey components that collects data from all
institutions in the United States and other jurisdictions, such
SELECTED FIGURES
These figures are based on 2005–06 IPEDS data submitted by your institution, University of Denver, and the comparison group listed
later in this report. The number of institutions in the comparison group from which the median is derived is shown as "(N = x)" in the
labels or in the legend at the bottom of the figure.
University of Denver
2
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
Figure 1. Unduplicated 12-month headcount of all students and of
undergraduate students, total FTE enrollment (academic
year 2004–05), and full- and part-time fall enrollment (Fall
2005)
Figure 2. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and
percent women: Fall 2005
NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see
“Calculating FTE” in the Methodological Notes at the end of this report. Total
headcount, FTE, and full- and part-time fall enrollment include both undergraduate
and postbaccalaureate students, when applicable. N is the number of institutions in
the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
NOTE: Median values for the comparison may not add to 100 percent. See "Use of
Median Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is
the number of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
Figure 3. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time, firsttime degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates: 2003–
04—2005–06
Figure 4. Percent of full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking
undergraduate students receiving financial aid, by type of
aid: 2004–05
NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from the
categories of in-district, in-state and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in the
comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2005.
NOTE: For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see
“Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates” in
the Methodological Notes at the end of this report. N is the number of institutions in
the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
University of Denver
3
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
Figure 5. Types and average amounts of financial aid received by
full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking
undergraduates: 2004–05
Figure 6. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificateseeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to
program completion, by race/ethnicity: 1999 cohort
NOTE: Average grant (or loan) values were calculated by dividing the total grants (or
loans) awarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number
of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
NOTE: The graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates. For more
information see the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. N is the number of
institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
Figure 7. Graduation rate cohort as a percent of all undergraduates
and as a percent of total entering students (Fall 2005);
graduation rate and transfer-out rate (1999 cohort); and
retention rates (Fall 2005)
Figure 8. Number of degrees awarded, by level: Academic year
2004–05
NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificateseeking undergraduate students. Entering class includes all students coming to the
institution for the first time. Only institutions with a mission to prepare students to
transfer are required to report transfers out. Graduation and transfer-out rates are
the Student Right-to-Know rates. 4-year schools report retention rates for students
seeking a bachelor's degree. For more information, see the Methodological Notes. N
is the number of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2005.
University of Denver
4
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
Figure 9. Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscal
year 2005
Figure 10. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscal
year 2005
NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the
comparison group that report finance data using the same accounting standards as
the focus institution. For a detailed definition of core revenues, see the
Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparison
group that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the focus
institution. Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, particularly
instruction, may be inflated because finance data includes all core expenses while
FTE reflects credit activity only. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a
detailed definition of core expenses, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number
of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2006.
Figure 11. Full-time equivalent staff by assigned position: Fall 2005
Figure 12. Average salaries of full-time instructional staff equated to
9-month contracts, by academic rank: Academic year
2005–06
NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included in this figure. N is the number of
institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2005–06.
NOTE: Average full-time instructional staff salaries for 11/12-month contracts were
adjusted to 9-month average salaries by multiplying the 11/12-month salary by .8182.
Salaries based on less than 9-month contracts are not included. Medical school staff
salaries are not included. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2005–06.
University of Denver
5
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
COMPARISON GROUP
Using some of your institution's characteristics, a group of comparison institutions was selected for you. The
characteristics include private, not-for-profit, 4-year, degree-granting, Carnegie Classification of Doctoral/Research
Universities—Extensive, and enrollment of a similar size. This comparison group includes the following 23 institutions:
American University (Washington, DC)
Brandeis University (Waltham, MA)
Brown University (Providence, RI)
California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, CA)
Carnegie Mellon University (Pittsburgh, PA)
Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, OH)
Catholic University of America (Washington, DC)
Lehigh University (Bethlehem, PA)
Loyola University Chicago (Chicago, IL)
Marquette University (Milwaukee, WI)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA)
Princeton University (Princeton, NJ)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY)
Rice University (Houston, TX)
Saint Louis University-Main Campus (Saint Louis, MO)
Southern Methodist University (Dallas, TX)
Tufts University (Medford, MA)
Tulane University of Louisiana (New Orleans, LA)
University of Notre Dame (Notre Dame, IN)
University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)
Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN)
Yale University (New Haven, CT)
Yeshiva University (New York, NY)
University of Denver
6
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
1974, as amended; the E-Government Act of 2002; the Education
Sciences Reform Act of 2002; and the USA Patriot Act of 2001.
Under law, public use data collected and distributed by NCES may
be used only for statistical purposes. Any effort to determine the
identity of any reported case is prohibited by law. In order to
preserve individuals’ confidentiality, data in the Graduation Rates
and Student Financial Aid components, and the Salaries and Fall
Staff sections of the Human Resources component of IPEDS are
perturbed. Only perturbed data are available in the Peer Analysis
System and the ExPT; the perturbed data were used in creating
this report.
METHODOLOGICAL NOTES
Overview
The statistics and indicators in this report are based on data
supplied by institutions to IPEDS during the 2005–06 survey year.
Once the data submissions were locked by the institution’s
keyholder (and others), they were reviewed by the Help Desk and
migrated to the IPEDS Peer Analysis System. Response rates for
2005–06 exceeded 99 percent for most surveys. Detailed
response tables are included in the appendices to the IPEDS E.D.
TABs. See http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds under "publications."
Descriptions of Statistics Used in the Figures
Comparison Groups
Calculating FTE Enrollment
Comparison group data are included to provide a context for
interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not
define a Custom Comparison Group for this report by June 30,
2006, NCES selected a comparison group for you based on the
institutional characteristics detailed immediately above the listing
of the comparison group institutions. (If the Carnegie Classification
of Institutions of Higher Education was used as an institutional
characteristic in the definition of a comparison group, the 2000
version was used.) The comparison group used in this report may
not reflect your institution’s peer group or you may wish to
compare your institution to multiple groups of institutions. The
Executive Peer Tool (ExPT) (see
http://nces.ed.gov/ipedspas/expt) can be used to produce the
figures in this report for different groups of institutions.
The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the
sum of the institutions’ FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE
graduate enrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 2005
Enrollment component) plus the estimated FTE of firstprofessional students. Undergraduate and graduate FTE are
estimated using 12-month instructional activity (credit and/or
contact hours). First-professional FTE is estimated by calculating
the ratio of full-time to part-time first-professional students from
the fall counts (Part A) and applying this ratio to the 12-month
unduplicated headcount of first-professional students. The
estimated number of full-time students is added to one-third of the
estimated number of part-time students. See “Calculation of FTE
Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDS Glossary at
http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/.
Use of Median Values for Comparison Group
Calculating FTE for Staff
The value for the focus institution is compared to the median value
for the comparison group for each statistic included in the figure. If
more than one statistic is presented in a figure, the median values
are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Where
percent distributions are presented, median values may not add to
100 percent. Through the ExPT, users have access to all of the
data used to create the figures included in this report.
The full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff is calculated by summing
the total number of full-time staff from the Employees by Assigned
Position (EAP) section of the Human Resources component and
adding one-third of the total number of part-time staff.
Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid
and Graduation Rates
Missing Statistics
Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and
Graduation Rates data are based on the reporting type of the
institution. For institutions that report based on an academic year
(those operating on standard academic terms), student counts
and cohorts are based on fall term data. Student counts and
cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on
standard academic terms) are based on unduplicated counts of
students enrolled during a full 12-month period.
If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission
indicates that one of the following conditions exists: (1) the value
of that statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were
not collected; or (2) the data required to compute the statistic for
your institution were reported combined with data from another
institution.
Use of Imputed Data
Core Expenses
All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for nonresponse—both
total (institutional) nonresponse and partial (item) nonresponse.
Imputed values are included for both your institution and any
institutions in your comparison group. For example, if an institution
in your comparison group did not complete the Enrollment
component, NCES imputed the data for that institution AND the
imputed data were used in determining the median values for
each comparison group statistic.
Core expenses for public institutions (using the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) standards) include
expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic
support, student services, institutional support, operation and
maintenance of plant, depreciation, scholarships and fellowships,
other expenses, and nonoperating expenses. Core expenses for
private, not-for-profit and public institutions reporting under the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) standards include
expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic
support, student services, institutional support, net grant aid to
students, and other expenses. For both FASB and GASB
institutions, core expenses exclude expenses
Data Perturbation and Confidentiality
Four laws cover protection of the confidentiality of individually
identifiable information collected by NCES—the Privacy Act of
University of Denver
7
IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT
for auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals,
and independent operations. Expenses for operation and
maintenance of plant for GASB institutions are included in other
core expenses, but are allocated to each of the other functions for
FASB institutions.
Core Revenues
Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB
standards include tuition and fees; government appropriations
(federal, state, and local); government grants and contracts;
private gifts, grants, and contracts; investment income; other
operating and nonoperating sources; and other revenues and
additions. Core revenues for FASB (primarily private, not-for-profit
and for-profit) institutions include tuition and fees; government
appropriations (federal, state, and local); government grants and
contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts; investment return;
sales and services of educational activities; and other sources.
Core revenues for private, for-profit institutions reporting under
FASB standards include tuition and fees; government
appropriations (federal, state, and local); government grants and
contracts; private grants and contracts; net investment income;
sales and services of educational activities; and other sources. In
general, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary
enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals, and
independent operations.
Retention Rates
Full-time retention rates are defined as the number of full-time,
first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students who
enter the institution for the first time in the fall and who return to
the same institution the following fall (as either full or part time),
divided by the total number of full-time, first-time,
degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates in the fall of first
entrance. Part-time retention rates are similarly defined. For 4year institutions offering a bachelor’s degree, this rate is reported
only for those students seeking a bachelor’s degree. For less than
4-year institutions, the rate is calculated for all degree- or
certificate-seeking students.
Total Entering (undergraduate-level) Students
Total entering (undergraduate-level) students are all students
coming into the institution for the first time. This includes students
who initially attended the prior summer term and returned again in
the fall; all first-time, first-year students; students transferring into
the institution at any undergraduate level for the first time; both
full-time and part-time students; and all degree/certificate-seeking
as well as non-degree/certificate-seeking students.
Tuition and Required Fees
Tuition is defined as the amount of money charged to students for
instructional services; required fees are those fixed sum charges
to students for items not covered by tuition that are required of
such a large proportion of all students that the student who does
Total salary outlays for full-time instructional staff (by rank) on
not pay the charge is an exception. The amounts used in this
11/12-month contracts were adjusted to 9/10-month outlays by
report are for full-time first-time degree/certificate-seeking
multiplying the outlay for 11/12-month contracted instructional staff undergraduates and are those used by the financial aid office to
by .8182. The “equated” outlays were then added to the outlays
determine need. For institutions that have differential tuition rates
for 9/10-month instructional staff to determine an average salary
for in-district or in-state students, the lowest tuition rate is used in
for each rank. Salaries for instructional staff on less than 9-month
the figure.
contracts are not included.
Additional Methodological Information
Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate
Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components
Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements
can be found in the publications available at
of the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) Act and are defined as the
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010#011.
Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found
total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, firsttime, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who completed a in the IPEDS online glossary available at
http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/.
degree or certificate within 150 percent of normal time (for the
degree or certificate) before the ending status date of August 31,
2005, divided by the entire cohort of full-time, first-time,
degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates minus any allowable
exclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the initial
cohort students who died or were totally and permanently
disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces; those
Robert D. Coombe, Chancellor
who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal
University of Denver (ID: 127060)
government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to
2199 S. University Blvd
serve on an official church mission. Transfer-out rate is the total
Denver, CO 80208
number of students from the cohort who are known to have
transferred out of the reporting institution within the same time
period, divided by the same adjusted cohort. Only institutions with
a mission that includes preparing students to transfer are required
to report transfers out.
Equated Instructional Staff Salaries (Salaries Equated to 9Month Contracts)