Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Time resolved images of an atmospheric pressure plasma bullet Dejan Maletić1,3, Saša Lazović1,3, Nevena Puač1,3, Gordana Malović1,3, Antonije Đorđević2 and Zoran Lj. Petrović1,3 1 2 Institute of Physics, Pregrevica 118, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Plasma bullet is a relatively new plasma source with a large field of potential applications, from biomedical to material processing and surface activation. Our plasma source was made of Pyrex glass tube with inner diameter of 4 mm and outer diameter of 6 mm. Electrodes were made of thin copper foil (13 mm wide) and the gap between the electrodes was 10 mm. The power supply was a waveform generator connected to an HF amplifier and custom-made HV transformer. The frequency that we used was 80 kHz and the applied voltage was in the range of 6-10 kVpeak-to-peak. In this paper, we will show time-resolved ICCD images of our plasma bullet device and how the emission changes with the applied power and flow of working gas. The power transmitted to the plasma was calculated and it was lower than 10 W. Keywords: plasma, atmospheric, bullet, ICCD camera, time resolved 1. Introduction In the last few decades, there has been a huge advance in plasma research; many atmospheric pressure plasma devices have been constructed and analyzed using various diagnostic techniques [1, 2, 3]. There is large potential use of atmospheric pressure plasmas in surface modification, plasma etching, thin film deposition, medicine and cosmetology. The low gas temperature is suitable for the treatment of thermo-sensitive samples like polymer materials and biological samples. Dimensions of plasma can be very different, from a few millimeters, suitable for microsurgery and stomatology, to large plasmas appropriate for treatment of large surfaces like wounds, textile and plant seeds [4, 5, 6]. Some of the well-known small-size plasma sources are: plasma needle [3, 7], APPJ [8], plasma bullet [9], plasma torch [10] and floating electrode dielectric barrier discharge plasma [11]. Their electrode configuration, voltages and excitation frequencies are very different; some of them work at 13.56 MHz and other at 5-120 kHz in sine or pulse regime. Some authors recently reported that the plasma jet that is formed with low excitation frequency is not continuous, but instead consisted of small plasma packages that are formed in positive and negative half cycle of the period [12]. The velocity of these packages is much larger than the speed of the flowing feed gas. In this paper, we will present our results of time-resolved images of plasma bullet obtained by using ICCD camera. 2. Experimental setup The atmospheric pressure plasma jet that we used is made of a Pyrex glass tube (I.D. 4 mm and O.D. 6 mm). Electrodes were made of a thin copper foil wrapped around the glass tube. The distance between the powered and the grounded electrode was 10 mm. The width of both electrodes was 13 mm. The experimental scheme is given in figure 1. The left electrode was grounded and the second electrode, closer to the end of the glass tube, was powered. The distance between the powered electrode and the end of the glass tube was 5.6 mm. The feeding gas was helium and the flow rates used in this work were 2, 3, 4 and 5 slm. The flow rate is adjusted with a mass flow controller (Omega FMA5400/5500). 3 Voltage no plasma 6 Voltage plasma Current no plasma Current plasma 2 4 2 0 0 U[kV] I[mA] 1 -2 -1 -4 -2 5slm 3.5Vpp Figure 1. Experimental setup. Pa = 3 W 55 For the current and voltage measurements, we used two commercial probes and two oscilloscopes (Agilent DSO3202A). The first probe, a highvoltage probe (Agilent N2771A), was connected to the HV-output and used for obtaining voltage waveforms. For the current waveforms we used the second probe (Agilent 10076A) which measured the voltage drop on a 100 kΩ resistor placed in the grounded branch of the electrical circuit (see Fig. 1). At the same place the third probe was connected (Agilent 10076A) for external triggering of the ICCD camera (Andor iStar DH734I). We have used camera’s internal delay generator for delaying camera gating and for external triggering of the oscilloscope. The working frequency was 80 kHz and the applied voltage was in the range 610 kVpeak-to peak. The power tranmited to the plasma did not exceed 8 W during all measurements. 65 70 75 Figure 2. Signals of the current and voltage without plasma and when the plasma is formed for 5slm and 3.5Vpp at the signal generator (Pa = 3W). 4.0 3.5 3.0 2slm - direct 2slm - reverse 3slm - direct 3slm - reverse 5slm - direct 5slm - reverse No plasma 2.5 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Irms [mA] Figure 3. Vrms as the function of Irms for different flows of helium. No plasma Plasma 4slm Difference 10 3. Results and discussion 8 Pa [W] Current and voltage waveforms when the plasma is formed and without discharge are shown in figure 2. When the plasma is off, the phase difference between the current and voltage is close to 90˚. In this case, we have a capacitive impedance of several MΩ, corresponding to the capacitance of about 0.5 pF. On the other hand, when plasma is formed, the current signal is larger, deformed and shifted in phase towards the voltage signal. The plasma ignition introduces a parallel nonlinear load into the electrical circuit and in this case the slopes of the VRMS–IRMS curves are lower (see Fig. 3.). 60 t[s] Vrms [kV] For powering the plasma jet, we used a signal generator (Peak Tech DDS function generator 4025) connected to a custom-made amplifier connected to an additional homemade step-up transformer. -6 -3 6 4 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Vpp signal generator [V] Figure 4. Dependence of the average power and the power difference when the plasma is on and off as the function of voltage at the signal generator. Figure 5. Plasma jet at 5 slm of helium, 6 W, exposure time 6 ms, gate width 5 ms. We calculated average powers from signal waveforms when the plasma is on and off and difference between them (see fig. 4). The mean power increases with the increase of the applied voltage. One can see (fig 4.) that power transmitted to the plasma was in the range from 1 to 8 W. For the exposure times larger than the cycle period (12.5 s), the plasma looks continuous, like a plume (see fig. 5). The length of the plasma plume is up to five centimeters, depending of the flow rate and applied voltage. For the time-resolved images, we have used integration on the chip because the light emission in a single shot is not always sufficient to obtain clear images with gate widths less than 25 ns. In figure 7 we show the propagation of the plasma for the entire period of excitation signal (12.5 s). All images are scaled to the same maximum intensity and they can be compared to each other. We can see that when the current and voltage signals are close to zero, the plasma is not visible. In the negative part of the current and voltage waveforms, the plasma is confined between the electrodes. During the positive part of the waveforms, the plasma is first confined between the electrodes (rising slope) and then, near the maximum of the curves, it leaves the glass tube in the form of a bullet. The dimensions of the bullet are very small, on the order of a few millimeters. We calculated the speed of the bullet at ~20 km/s, depending on the position from the end of the glass tube. The plasma bullet is much faster than the speed of the buffer gas flow (1 to 7 m/s). Figure 7. Plasma jet at 5 slm, exposure time 2 ms, gate width 25 ns and gate delay from 0.4 to 12.4 s. Fig. 8 shows plasma bullet images obtained for several different flows of gas. We can see that with the decrease in the He flow, the plasma bullet starts to be elongated, deformed and its intensity is much smaller. Figure 8. Plasma jet at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 slm. Exposure time 2 ms, gate width 25 ns, gate delay 10.8 s. 4. Conclusion In this paper we have presented current-voltage characteristics and ICCD images of the atmospheric plasma jet. The results show that our plasma source was not continuous, but it consisted of very small plasma packages that traveled at high speed. By varying the plasma parameters, the length and intensity of the plasma coming out of the tube can be adjusted. 5. Acknowledgement This research has been supported by the MNTR, Serbia, under the contract numbers ON171037 and III41011. References [1] V Schulz-von der Gathen, V Buck, T Gans, N Knake, K Niemi, St Reuter, L Schaper and J Winter, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 47 (2007) 7, 510 [2] E Stoffels, Y A Gonzalvo, T D Whitmore, D L Seymour and J A Rees, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 15 (2006) 501 [3] I E Kieft, E P v d Laan and E Stoffels, New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 149 [4] G Fridman, G Friedman, A Gutsol, A B Shekhter, V N Vasiletsm and A Fridman, Plasma Processes and Polymers 5 (2008) 503–533 [5] N Puač, Z Lj Petrović, M Radetić, A Djordjević, Materials Science Forum, 494 (2005) 291-296 [6] S Živković, N Puač, Z Giba, D Grubišić, Z Lj Petrović, Seed Science and Technology 32 (2004) 3, 693-701 [7] N Puač, Z Lj Petrović, G Malović, A Đordević, S Živković, Z Giba and D Grubišić,J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (2006) 3514–3519 [8] V Schulz-von der Gathen, L Schaper, N Knake, S Reuter, K Niemi, T Gans and J Winter, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 194004 [9] J Shi, F Zhong, J Zhang, D W Liu and M G Kong, Physics Of Plasmas 15 (2008), 013504 [10] S Yonson, S Coulombe, V Leveille and R L Leask, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (2006) 3508–3513 [11] G Fridman, A Shereshevsky, M M Jost, A D Brooks, A Fridman, A Gutsol, V Vasilets , G Friedman, Plasma Chem. And Plasma Process 27 (2007) 163–176 [12] James L. Walsh and Michael G. Kong, IEEE Trans. On Plasma Science, 36 (2008) 4