Download An application of the Stock and Watson methodology on the

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Steady-state economy wikipedia , lookup

Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup

Early 1980s recession wikipedia , lookup

Business cycle wikipedia , lookup

Recession wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Predicting recessions with leading indicators: An
application of the Stock and Watson methodology on
the Icelandic economy
Work in progress
Bruno Eklund
Central bank of Iceland
2
1
Outline of seminar
1. What is a business cycle?
2. General idea of the Stock and Watson method
3. Choice of coincident and leading variables
4. Model specification
5. Estimating recession and expansion probabilities
6. Results
7. Conclusions
1
2
What is a business cycle?
• Burns and Mitchell’s (1946) defined a business cycles to represent co-movements
in a set of macroeconomical series. They proposed that:
”... a cycle consists of expansions occurring about the same time in many economic
activities, followed by similarly general recessions, contractions, and revivals ...”
”Aggregate activity can be given a definite meaning and made conceptually measurable by identifying it with gross national product.”
• The cycle thus reflects co-movements in a broad range of macroeconomical aggregates such as output, employment, and sales.
2
10000
GDP growth rate
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
−2000
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
3
3
General idea of the Stock and Watson method
• Stock and Watson formalized Burns and Mitchell’s (1946) notion that business
cycles represent co-movements in a set of macroeconomical series.
• GDP could provide a reliable summary of the current economical conditions if
it were available on a monthly basis.
GDP can thus not be used directly in the modeling procedure.
• Choose a number of proxy variables that mimics the cyclical behavior of GDP,
called Coincident variables.
• Assume that a single common variable drives the evolution of many of the macroeconomical variables, called the ”state of the economy”
• Choose a number of variables that mimics the cyclical behavior of GDP but with
a lead, called Leading variables.
4
4
Choice of coincident and leading variables
• The choice of coincident and leading variables can be done by estimating the
correlation structure.
• 104 of Icelandic macroeconomical variables have been considered, some in both
level and in growth rate.
• Sample size: January 1999 - July 2005
Total number of observations: 79
• Consider as an example the variable Creditcards, total number of transactions.
Summary of Coincident and Leading variables:
5
Exports, total, food and beverages
Exports, marine products
Trade balance total
Imports, consumer goods, semi-durable
Imports, totals food and beverages
Creditcards, total number of transactions
Creditcards, total number of transactions in Iceland
Number of new work permits
Number of vacancies
Number of vacancies in greater Reykjavik area
Oil price
Cement sales
Real exchange rate
Real exchange rate
Yield spread of treasury bonds 5 years and 20 years
level
level
level
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
g.r.
level
g.r.
g.r.
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
lag
1
1
1
0
0
3
3
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
−0.62
−0.69
−0.62
0.72
0.67
0.64
0.63
0.72
0.65
0.69
0.60
0.68
0.70
−0.64
0.66
6
5
Model specification
A simple example of the model:
y1t
y2t
x1t
x2t
ct
u1t
u2t
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
µ1 + α1 ct + α2 ct−1 + u1t
µ2 + β1 ct + u2t
µ3 + γ1 ct−1 + γ2 ct−2 + γ3 x1t−1 + γ4 x1t−2 + γ5 x2t−1 + εx1 t
µ4 + λ1 ct−2 + λ2 x1t−1 + λ3 x2t−1 + λ5 x2t−3 + εx2 t
µ5 + δ1 ct−1 + δ2 ct−3 + δ3 x1t−1 + δ4 x2t−2 + εct
θ1 u1t−1 + θ2 u1t−2 + εu1 t
εu2 t
or expressed in state space form, the Kalman filter, as:
yt
ht
= zht + Axt + εt
= F ht−1 + Bxt−1 + wt .
The model is estimated, using the Kalman filter, under the assumption that the error
vectors, εt and wt , are normally distributed.
7
6
Estimating recession and expansion
probabilities
6.1
Stock and Watson’s approach
• Define two elementary recession patterns.
1. ct falls below a limit br,t for six consecutive months
2. ct falls below a limit br,t for seven of nine consecutive months including the first
and last months
D1t =
D2t
=
s = t − 5, ..., t : cs ≤ br,s ,
s = t − 8, ..., t : ct−8 ≤ br,t−8 , ct ≤ br,t ,
cs ≤ br,s , s = τ − 7, ..., t − 1 ≥ 5
#
s = t − 5, ..., t
cs ,
cs ,
Analogous for expansion. ct increase above a limit be,t .
8
• Analyzing ct for each time point t, the indicator vector Rt can be defined as the
recession event at time t. The expansion event, the indicator vector Et can be
defined in the same fashion.
9
• Estimation of recession probabilities
1. Stock and Watson suggests a resampling scheme by drawing e
ct from a N (mt , Ωt ),
where e
ct = (ct−8 , ..., ct , ..., ct+8 ).
2. Draw a realization of br,t and be,t .
3. Evaluate Rt and Et for each realization.
4. The probability of a recession is then defined as
Pr,t =
# (Rt )
.
# (Rt ) + # (Et )
• The limits br,t and be,t are modeled as
br,t = µr,t + εt ,
be,t = µe,t + εt ,
where εt ∼ N id 0, σ 2
• Stock and Watson propose to estimate the three parameters µr,t , µe,t and σ 2 by
P
2
(Rt − Pr,t ) .
minimizing the mean squared error
t
10
6.2
Alternative approach to Stock and Watson
• Draw a large number of realization c∗t from the estimated model of ct , that is
c∗t = µ
b5 + δb1 ct−1 + δb2 ct−3 + δb3 x1t−1 + δb4 x2t−2 + εct .
• The empirical distribution of ct can now be estimated at each time point t.
• Define the probability of a recession as
Pr,t =
P (cobs,t ≥
P (cobs,t ≥ c∗t ) P (cobs,t ≥ cs )
,
(cobs,t ≥ cs ) + P (cobs,t ≤ c∗t ) P (cobs,t ≤ cs )
c∗t ) P
where s = 1, ...T and cobs,t is the observed value at t.
• Main advantage over Stock and Watson is that it is no need for estimating any
extra parameters.
11
12
7
Results
6
State of the economy
1.00
Probability of expansion
4
0.75
2
0.50
0
−2
0.25
−4
−6
0.00
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
13
State of the economy
1.0
Probability of recession
6
0.8
4
2
0.6
0
0.4
−2
0.2
−4
0.0
−6
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
14
8
Conclusions
• Several other models can be considered
• Estimation of several alternative model specifications should be performed
• Even with this simple model, the cyclical behavior of the Icelandic economy has
been estimated with relatively good fit.
15