Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CmapTools Facilitates Alignment of Local Curriculum with State Standards: A Case Study Jane Heinze-Fry, Ph.D. Fran Ludwig, M.S. Context: USA Timeline • A Nation at Risk: the Imperative for Education Reform by the National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983 • Benchmarks for Science Literacy: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993 • National Science Education Standards, National Research Council, 1996 • No Child Left Behind Legislation, 2002 Context: Alignment • Align to Achieve, facilitates evaluation and improvement of academic standards and student achievement • Science Curriculum Topic Study, Page Keeley, 2005 facilitates teachers’ efforts to link to the standards and to current research on student learning about different science topics Context: Mapping Strategies • “Curriculum Mapping” Mapping the Big Picture: Integrating Curriculum & Assessment K-12 (Heidi Hayes, 1997) • “Content Mapping” New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics & Science (Blank, Porter, and Smithson, 2001) • “Strand Maps” Atlas of Science Literacy: Project 2061, 2001, American Association for the Advancement of Science Context: Lexington, Massachusetts • Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework, 2000 • Language and Mathematics currently required for High School Graduation. Science requirement becomes high stakes in 2010. • Lexington Elementary Science Benchmarks: goals and objectives of the Lexington Public Schools • Lexington Big Backyard: an interdisciplinary program integrating science and history concepts ? The Question ? Can CmapTools effectively demonstrate the alignment of the local life science curriculum with the state life science standards? Massachu setts Framework: Life Science Con cepts Grades K-2 Characteristics of Living Things Livin g things Animals (humans) Plants Livin g functions Grow Reproduce Livin g needs Food, air, water Distinguish living/nonliving Characterize groups of living things: ins ects, birds, fish, ma mmals Lif e cycles Animals: butterfly, frog Plants: tree Heredity Resemblance parents and offspring: inherited characteristics Evolution and Biodiversity Fossils give us an idea of what lived before: extinctions Environme nt Animals (including humans) interact with environment through senses (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste) Seasonal changes (fall, winter, spring) Habitat provides needs: air, water, nutrients (food) Plants: light Animals: shelter Grades 3-5 Characteristics of Plants and Animals Classify plants, animals using dichotomous key Plant/Animal Structures and Functions Leaf, root, flower, stem, bark, wood Functions:food production, support, water transport, reproduction, growth, protection Plant/Animal life cycles includes: birth, growth, development, reproduction, death. Animals sometimes go through metamorphosis (butterfly, frog) Distinguished between observed characteristics that are inherited and those that are affected by the environment. Adaptations of Living Things Livin g things can adapt (through change in inherited characteristics) over time to environmental changes (beak, feet, eyes, neck length, teeth) Livin g things can migrate in response to environmental change (drought, cold) Behavior is a pattern of activities. Animal behaviors help meet animalsΥneeds. Some behaviors are instinctive; some are learned. Plants have responses to light and gravity. Environme nt There is interaction between organisms and their environment. They modif y each other. . . . .: Many plants and animals can survive harsh environments because of seasonal behaviors: shed leaves, hibernation, migration Organisms can change environment to ensure survival. Energy flo w from sun through food chain. Producer to consumer to decomposer. Massachusetts Template Lexington E lementary Science Benchmarks: Life Science Conc epts Kindergarten Animals and Plants Needs: food, water, place to live Lif e Processes: Animals Breathing, movement, taking in nourishment, growth, reproduction, senses environment Plant structures: roots, stems, leaves, flo wers, seeds Livin g vs nonliving Grade 1 Organisms Plants Needs: water, light, nutrients, air Reproduction: seeds, growth Development Animals Needs: food, water, space, shelter Seasonal changes Habitats meet particular needs of particular organisms Woodlands Freshwater Grade 2 Lif e Cycle of the Butterfly Insect structures Lif e cycle: egg, larva, chrysalis, adult Needs of caterpillar vs butterfly Relationship of structure (mouthparts) to function (type of food) Compare to human development Soils: remains of plants, animals Vary i n holding water; therefore in plant support Role of worms Grade 3 Food chains Sun as source of all food energy Food chain/ food web Producer (green plants): make own food Primary consumer Secondary consumer Decomposers: break down dead plant and animal matter in soil Endangered species happen if food is threatened; can be by habitat disturbance Grade 4 Animal Behavior Relates structure/ function Fossils: evidence of earlier life forms and changes over time Grade 5 Human Body Skeletal system: bone types; joint types Muscular system Structure/ function Alignment: Lexington Benchmarks Results: % Alignment Benchmark Alignment Map Core Livin g Things Food Chains Plants Total Number of Green Concepts (G) [in state and local] Number of Red Concepts (R) [in state, not in lo cal] Number of Yellow Concepts (Y) [in local, not in state] % Alignment [G/ (G +R)] X 100 30 13 12 7 62 10 18 1 8 37 9 1 3 5 18 75 42 92 47 62 Table 1. Analysis of Alignment of Lexington Benchmark Concepts with State Framework Concepts. Bowman Υs Big Backyard: Li fe Science Concepts (Grade Level (K-5) Indicated After Each Concept) Senses: Look, l isten, smell and touch K Self, environme nt K Environme ntal seasonal change: fall, winter, spring K,1 Wildlife seasonal change K, 1 Animal activity K,1 Cold adaptations: migr ate (esp. birds), hibernate, die leaving eggs, larva 1 Plant changes: leaf drop K,1 Plant parts: roots, stem, leaf, flower, seed K Livin g K,5 Nonliving K,5 What animals need to live: water, warmth, air, food, shelter 1,3 Bird s 1,3 Habitat 1: (meets needs) 3 Types: field, forest, stream 3 Soil 2 Minerals 2 organic or humus 2 Earthworms 2 Stream qualities 3 pH (acid, alkaline) 3 color 3 cloudiness 3 odor 3 Plant Physical Identity 3,4 Seeds 3,4 Leaves 3,4 Wetland plant structures and functions 3 Animal Physical Identity 1,3 Bird s 1 Aquatic organisms 3 Wetlands structure and function 3 Watershed 3 Ecosystem 5 Changing constantly 5 Food chain 5 Producer 5 Green plants 5 Makes own food (photosynthesis) 5 Needs only nonliving things: sunlight, air, minerals 5 Consumer 5 Decomposer (e.g. Fungi) 5 Food material cycles 5 Interdependence: nonliving and living [producer, consumer (including humans), decomposer] 5 Alignment: Big Backyard Conclusions • Concepts from state science frameworks can be transformed into template concept maps. • Color coding concept maps visually clarifies alignment of school content with the frameworks. • Patterns of areas of alignment indicate areas of nonalignment and extensive areas beyond the framework. • Connectivity of concept maps indicate where changes can easily be made. Caveats • The propositional linkages in standards are not always clearly defined. • The depth to which a concept is to be understood is not always clear. • Consequently, interpretation of particular linkages may be subject to question. Specific Recommendations • Green concepts are areas of alignment and should be kept. • Red concepts should be added to the curriculum or clarified if already enacted. • Yellow concepts indicate areas of strength for the local curriculum and may be considered for addition by the State and/or considered optional by the local system. • Some categorizations by the State need to be reconceptualized. ( e.g. Animal functions should not go under plant headings.) Recommendations: Alignment • This analysis could be extended to science process concepts such as questioning, hypothesizing, data collecting, analyzing, concluding, and communicating. Support Atlas work. • Indicating grade level and sharing with teachers and volunteers would integrate community members to see how their work supports the whole curricular structure. Support SCTS work. • Apply to interdisciplinary work such as the North American Association for Environmental Education Guidelines for Excellence. Beyond Alignment When curriculum clarifies, students can create their own maps as they experience both indoor and outdoor science activities and as they carry out their own scientific experiments using scientific methods. Imagine the growth from K-12 that CmapTools can demonstrate in individual portfolios. 2006: C3M Pilot Work • CmapTools will be introduced to two high school science classes for students to create their own maps. • A special needs teacher will use concept mapping strategies with special needs students working in life science and/or earth science.