Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation as a Method for Quantifying the Amount of Empty Virion Particles in AdenoAssociated Virus Preparations Christopher Sucato, Libo Wang, and Mario DiPaola Blue Stream Laboratories, 8 Henshaw Street, Woburn, MA 01801 [email protected] 617-234-0001 ABSTRACT Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a small, benign virus which infects humans, and is a promising delivery system for gene therapy applications. While AAV vector systems have been used in many clinical trials worldwide, and promising results have been obtained for a number of diseases, certain aspects of the efficiency of vector transduction remain to be well characterized. During the production of recombinant AAV vectors for gene therapy, empty virions are present after the packaging process, which can result in vector lots with mixtures of full and empty virions at variable ratios. Further, it has been shown that the presence of empty virions correlates with suppression of transduction in human tissue. In this presentation we show that analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a powerful analytical assay for the quantitation of structural heterogeneity in recombinant AAV preparations, allowing for the characterization of empty-to-full virion ratios. The results of sedimentation velocity AUC are presented here on AAV therapeutic product samples and on control empty capsids. The resulting size distributions are evaluated in the calculation of empty-to-full ratios. Figure 1, below, depicts the AAV virion and its mechanism of action as a therapeutic vector. The presence of empty virions in a therapeutic drug product has been shown to correlate with suppression of transduction in human tissue. In order to eliminate any possible buffer mismatch effects, a portion of the two samples were also dialyzed against the DP buffer and diluted in the AV997 buffer for testing. The SV AUC assay was performed by taking radial scans of the concentration profile, sequentially by absorbance at 220 nm, until no further sedimentation was observed. The resulting data sets were analysed using the program SEDFIT with a continuous c(s) distribution model, yielding best-fit distributions for the number of sedimenting species and the effective molecular weights. Figure 2: Present methods for quantifying the amount of AAV protein and nucleic acid, and therefore the empty-full ratio. Protein is often quantified by ELISA, while nucleic acid by qPCR. A more recent method utilizes the A260/A280 ratio of processed AAV samples [1]. Image courtesy of www.progen.de. Figure 6: Comparison of three independent SV AUC assays on the AAV DP material, and another assay after dialysis. The empty-full ratios, as shown in the data of Table 1, indicate that the method has good reproducibility. Figure 5A: Size distribution profile by SEDFIT c(s) fitting of the SV AUC data of a sample of empty AAV2 virus particles. Sample was obtained commercially from Applied Viromics, and the centrifugation was conducted at 20 C and 20000 rpm until sedimentation had ceased. Sample test concentration was approximately 2×1010 vp/mL. Figure 4: Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV AUC) is a promising method as applied to measurement of empty-full AAV ratios, because both empty and full particles are in principle resolved in the same experiment, and requires minimal sample manipulation. Image courtesy of Beckman Coulter. Figure 1: Left: space filling illustration of the AAV virion. Three proteins (VP1, VP2, and VP3) make up the capsid, which packages a single-stranded DNA genome. Right: illustration of therapeutic strategy involving the AAV virus as a gene vector. Image courtesy of boettcher.bio.ed.ac.uk. BACKGROUND Several methods for the quantitation of vector genome and/or capsid particle titers have been developed, which can be used to calculate the ratio of empty-to-full virions. Such methods include measurement of capsid protein concentrations by ELISA, vector genome levels by quantitative PCR, and recently a method of determining the empty-to-full virion levels by the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm versus 280 nm. These strategies are shown schematically in Figure 2. Because the empty-to-full virion ratio is a critical parameter for assessing the quality of an AAV drug product, a method which is simple, rapid, and accurate is highly desirable. The strategies depicted in Figure 2, for measurement of the empty-to-full virion ratio, while useful, can have some drawbacks that leaves open the possibility for improved methods. A recent study, wherein the A60/A280 method is compared to quantitation by ELISA and qPCR, illustrates some of these drawbacks (refer to Figure 3). RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com In order to investigate whether a method is possible that can more simply, rapidly, and accurately measure the empty-to-full virion ratio in AAV samples, we turned to sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV AUC). The SV AUC method is widely used as a characterization of higher order structure in protein drug products, and is well suited to resolving species by mass, in the size regime covered by empty and full AAV virions (Figure 4). The details of our SV AUC method as applied to AAV samples is shown below. METHODS The samples used in this study were as follows: AAV2-Empty virions from Applied Viromics, 4x1011 vp/mL in 1 x PBS, 0.001% Pluronic F68, pH 7.4; and an AAV drug product (DP) under development, at a concentration of 5x1012 DRP/mL and formulated in Lactated Ringers Solution, 0.3 M NaCl, 0.001% Pluronic F-68. AAV2-Empty sample was diluted by the AAV2-Empty buffer 20-fold to 2 x 1010 vp/mL, and the AAV drug product was diluted by the DP Buffer 3fold to about 1.7 x 1012 DRP/mL for SV AUC testing. The SV AUC assay provides a series of sedimentation profiles, which are then deconvoluted to produce a size distribution plot. The fitting algorithm used in our analysis is from the program SEDFIT, making use of a c(s) distribution model. The c(s) distribution functions for empty virions and an AAV drug product are shown in Figure 5. These results indicate that the completely empty capsids are correctly identified by the AUC assay, as only a single main peak. The AAV drug product sample studied here is shown to have a majority species of higher molecular weight than the putative empty species, at about 60% main peak abundance and roughly 40% empty species. These results are notable, because when currently employed methods for measuring the empty-full ratio---such as ELISA combined with qPCR---are employed on the same AAV sample type, a much higher abundance of empty capsids are found. However, indications from the manufacturer are that the amount of empty capsids found by the standard methods are overestimated (data not shown, personal communication). Therefore the AUC method we present here has potential as a more accurate means of quantifying the empty-full ratio. Furthermore, as compared to the assays illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, the AUC method is relatively simple to perform on a single instrument with minimal sample manipulation. AAV DP Sample Major Peak 2 (P2) ff0 P2 /P1 ratio s-value % area MW (MDa) s-value % area MW (MDa) Rep 1 60.41 36.84 4.40 93.80 51.37 8.28 1.55 1.39 Rep 2 60.65 34.47 2.54 93.67 57.03 4.85 1.09 1.65 Rep 3 60.41 33.81 4.88 94.08 53.96 8.93 1.62 1.60 Rep 4 (after dialysis) 59.52 37.03 3.84 91.84 59.30 7.29 1.45 1.60 Average 60.25 35.54 3.92 93.35 55.42 7.34 1.43 1.56 Std. Dev. 0.50 1.64 1.01 1.02 3.47 1.79 0.24 0.12 Table 1: SV AUC assay results on AAV DP material. The ratio of peak areas, as shown at the far right, is the full-empty ratio. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Figure 3: The current most frequently employed assays for determining the empty-full ratio in AAV preparations suffer from some drawbacks. The combination of ELISA and qPCR can be susceptible to large errors as shown plot. Also, the newer A260/A280 method cannot be applied above a certain ratio, due to inherent limits in the method [1]. Major Peak 1 (P1) CONCLUSIONS Figure 5B: Size distribution profile by SEDFIT c(s) fitting of the SV AUC data of an AAV drug product preparation. Sample test condition are the same as in Figure 5A, allowing for direct comparison with the empty AAV control. Test concentration of the DP material was 1.7×1012 DRP/mL. We have shown here that sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation can be used to measure the ratio of empty to full AAV virus particles in a method that is relatively simple to perform, requires minimal sample manipulation, and is reproducible and may be more accurate than current best practices for determining values for this important variable in AAV therapeutic vector development. The next steps in moving this method forward for use in characterizing AAV drug products will be to fully assess the performance of the assay to ensure that the method is accurate, specific, reproducible and rugged over the specified range that a target analyte will be analysed. REFERENCES To further investigate the utility of our SV AUC assay on AAV virions, we have looked at the day-to-day reproducibility of the results, and also the effect on the results from small changes to the method (robustness), in this case from dialysis of the samples into a common buffer followed by subsequent re-analysis by AUC. The data in Figure 6 indicates that results remain consistent in terms of the empty-full ratio, after day-to-day reproducibility challenge and after dialysis. [1] Sommer, Smith, Parthasarathy, et al. (2003) Quantification of Adeno-Associated Virus Particles and Empty Capsids by Optical Density Measurement, Molecular Therapy, 7, 1, 123. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge all the members of Blue Stream Laboratories for their support. The work described herein is intended for research purposes only; not intended for any human or animal therapeutic or diagnostic use, unless otherwise stated. The trademarks or copyrights mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.