Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Pediatric Obesity Prevention & Treatment National Hurdles & Opportunities Stephen Cook, MD, MPH, FAAP, FTOS Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics Disclosures Grant funding: • NYS Dept of Health • Greater Rochester Health Foundation • NIH CBPR project • CDC Prevention Research Center Data Safety Monitoring Boards • ATN & Novo Nordisk Boards: ABOM, AAP IHCW ..…and I used to work at a TJ’s Big Boy Objectives • Discuss the impact of early childhood obesity • Discuss recommendations for prevention and treatment • Review possible community / clinical linkages to address childhood obesity • Discuss innovative care delivery & payment models to address childhood obesity 3 CDC Framework for Addressing Obesity 5 Can you see risk? YES! We are not asking you to deal with this Can you see risk? • This girl is 4 years old. • What is her BMI-for-age? • < 85th percentile Normal • >85th to <95th percentile: Overweight • > 95th or Obese Photo from UC Berkeley Longitudinal Study, 1973 Plotted BMI-for-Age BMI BMI Measurements: Age=4 y Girls: 2 to 20 years Height=99.2 cm (39.2 in) Weight=17.55 kg (38.6 lb) BMI=17.8 BMI-for-age= between 90th –95th percentile Overweight BMI BMI One city’s communities of solution Note: Political boundaries, shown in solid lines, often bear little relation to a community’s problem-sheds or its medical trade area. Reproduced and adapted with permission from: Folsom M. Health is a Community Affair: Report of the National Commission on Community Health Service. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1967:3, Fig 1. Annals Family Medicine, May/June 2012 Vol. 10 no. 3 p 250-260 9 Severe Obesity (>99th %tile) among US Children & Teens, or 3.8% or 2.7 million 10 Mismatching between directly measured and parental perceived body weight status. Andrew R. Hansen et al. Pediatrics 2014;134:481-488 Obesity: Health Risks Now and Later Psychosocial Eating disorders Poor self-esteem Social isolation and stigmatisation Depression Pulmonary Exercise intolerance Obstructive sleep apnea Asthma Gastrointestinal Gallstones Gastro-esophageal reflux Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease • Obese children Neurological are more likely to Pseudotumour cerebriobese adults become o (idiopathic intracranial Children (age 12) with BMI>99% hypertension) followed into adulthood (age 27) Cardiovascular 100% BMI>30 Hypertension 90% with BMI>35 Dyslipidaemia Coagulopathy 65% with BMI>40 Chronic inflammation Endothelial dysfunction • Adult obesity is associated with a Endocrine resistance conditions number of seriousInsulin health Impaired fasting glucose or Renal including: glucose intolerance Glomerulosclerosis Musculoskeletal Ankle sprains Flat feet Tibia vara Slipped capital femoral epiphysis Forearm fracture Type 2 diabetes o Precocious puberty Menstrual irregularities Polycystic ovary syndrome (females) Heart disease o Diabetes o Cancers Freedman et al., 2007, J Pediatr; Ebbeling, 2002, Lancet Prevalence & Incidence of Obesity BOYS between Kindergarten & Eighth Grade. Cunningham SA et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370:403-411. Adolescents’ Perceptions of Peers Being Teased or Bullied: Observed Frequency 14 Percentage of teen girls who report frequent weight teasing Neumark-Sztainer. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:206-213. 15 Weight Bias Persists in Universities Candidates for undergraduate admission • Identical but for weight status • Candidates with obesity judged less qualified Study of graduate psychology programs • Interviews favored thinner candidates • Regardless of qualifications Five Fruits and Vegetables per day Assess Behaviors & Attitudes Assess Medical Risks - Eating, Physical Activity, Sedentary Time, Motivation Family History, Review of Systems, Physical Examination (BMI, BP) Overweight Healthy Weight BMI 85 - 95%ile Obese BMI 5 - 84%ile BMI 95 - 98%ile BMI >=99%ile Health Risks? No Yes Prevention Counseling Maintain Weight Velocity Empathize/Elicit - Provide - Elicit Stage 1 Prevention Plus & Reassess Annually Maintain Weight or Decrease Velocity & Reassess Every 3-6 Months Maintain Weight or Gradual Loss & Reassess Every 3 - 6 Months Gradual to Moderate Weight Loss & Reassess Every 3 -6 Months Stage 2 Structured Weight Management Assessment Prevention Stage 3 Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Intervention Treatment Stage 4 Tertiary Care Intervention Health Risks?(1) No Yes Assess ALT, AST, Fasting Glucose(2) Overweight Healthy Weight BMI 85 - 95%ile BMI 5 - 84%ile Obese >=99%ile Other as IndicatedBMI by Health Risks BMI 95 - Tests 98%ile Prevention Counseling - Empathize/Elicit - Provide - Elicit Stage 1 Prevention Plus(3) Maintain Weight Velocity & Reassess Annually Maintain Weight or Decrease Velocity & Reassess Every 3-6 Months Primary Care Setting ? Maintain Weight or Gradual Loss(4) & Reassess Every 3-6 Months Gradual to Moderate Weight Loss(5) & Reassess Every 3-6 Months Stage 2 Structured Weight Management(3) Stage 3 Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Intervention(3) Assessment Prevention Treatment Stage 4 Tertiary Care Intervention Stages of Care from Guidelines Weight Loss Targets Age 2-5 Years BMI 85-94%ile BMI 85-94%ile BMI 95-98%ile No Risks With Risks Maintain weight Decrease weight Weight velocity velocity or maintenance weight maintenance BMI >= 99%ile Gradual weight loss of up to 1 pound a month if BMI is very high (>21 or 22 kg/m2) Age 6-11 Years Maintain weight velocity Age 12-18 Years Maintain weight velocity. After linear growth is complete, maintain weight Decrease weight velocity or weight maintenance Decrease weight velocity or weight maintenance Weight maintenance or gradual loss (1 lb per month) Weight loss (average is 2 pounds per week)* Weight loss (average is 2 pounds per week)* Weight loss (average is 2 pounds per week)* * Excessive weight loss should be evaluated for high risk behaviors 21 US Preventive Services Task Force RECOMMENDATION. The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen children aged 6 years and older for obesity and offer them or refer them to intensive counseling and behavioral interventions to promote improvements in weight status (grade B recommendation.) Pediatrics Recommended Interventions Refer patients to comprehensive moderate- to high-intensity programs (>25 contact hours) that include dietary, physical activity, and behavioral counseling components Height and weight, from which BMI is calculated, are routinely measured during health maintenance visits . USPSTF, 2010, Pediatric. The Affordable Care Act Improves Prevention and Obesity Coverage ACA includes several provisions that promote preventive care including obesityrelated services and coverage. These provisions include an enhanced federal match for states that cover all U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade A and B recommended preventive services with no cost-sharing. Obesity screening and counseling for children, adolescents and adults is a USPSTF recommended service. The law calls for states to design public awareness campaigns to educate Medicaid enrollees on the availability and coverage of preventive services, including obesityrelated services. To help states, CMS will host calls and webinars regarding coverage and promotion of preventive services, develop fact sheets that address Medicaid coverage of preventive services, and share examples of state Medicaid program efforts to increase awareness of preventive services. http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Quality-ofCare/Reducing-Obesity.html Treating Overweight & Obesity Stage 1 – a prevention program managed by a primary care physician Stage 2 – a structured weight management program managed by a primary care physician together with a pediatric health care provider, such as a dietitian Stage 3 – a comprehensive intervention involving a multidisciplinary obesity care team that can provide structured monitoring, counseling and assessment at specified intervals and interventions as needed, often at a children’s hospital. ** Stage 4 – tertiary care interventions that can include medication, very low calorie diets or bariatric surgery Treatment Goals - Weight Loss Targets Age 2-5 Years BMI 85-94%ile BMI 85-94%ile BMI 95-98%ile No Risks With Risks Maintain weight Decrease weight Weight velocity velocity or maintenance weight maintenance BMI >= 99%ile Gradual weight loss of up to 1 pound a month if BMI is very high (>21 or 22 kg/m2) Age 6-11 Years Maintain weight velocity Age 12-18 Years Maintain weight velocity. After linear growth is complete, maintain weight Decrease weight velocity or weight maintenance Decrease weight velocity or weight maintenance Weight maintenance or gradual loss (1 lb per month) Weight loss (average is 2 pounds per week)* Weight loss (average is 2 pounds per week)* Weight loss (average is 2 pounds per week)* * Excessive weight loss should be evaluated for high risk behaviors Treatment of Obesity in Children and Adolescents Stage Delivery Treatment of Obesity in support, with Stage 1 – Office-based Children Prevention Plusand Adolescents scheduled follow-up Behaviors 5 fruits and vegetables About 15% of 2< 2 hrs of screen time 19 yr olds > 1 hr of physical activity Stage 2 – Structured Weight Management Specially-trained staff in office with support from referrals (RD) Stage 3 – Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Intervention Dedicated weight management program or registered dietician referral; weekly follow-up for 8-12 weeks More frequent contact, more f If 1/4th continue, 1/3rdstructured monitoring, then ~ 1% goal-setting Stage 4 – Tertiary Care Pediatric weight management center with multidisciplinary team; clinical or research protocol Medication, meal If 1/4th surgery, continue, replacement, ongoing behavior then ~ 0.2% change Reduced-calorie If 1/4th w/eating Ob plan < 1 hr of screen time come / follow up Monitoring = 4% (>6yr) Adapted from Barlow 2007 Think Global / Act Local 27 Parents estimation of child’s weight status vs. measured weight, 2-9yo Estimation of weight 193 parent/child dyads from Strong Pediatrics Tschamler, et al, Clin Peds, 2010;49:470 28 Children and Adolescents age 2 to 18 yo, 2007 29 Retail Food Environment Index (RFEI) • RFEI measure used for local food environment1 RFEI = Fast Food + Convenience stores Grocery Stores + Produce Vendors 30 1. Designed for Disease, April 2008 Results Monroe County, NY Unhealthy Food Source RFEI = Healthy Food Source Obesity by Neighborhood 5.0% - 10.0% 10.1% - 15.0% 15.1% - 20.0% 20.1% - 24.0% 31 Results: Individual Odds of obesity for a 5 unit increase in RFEI 1.50 Odds Ratio 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 * P < 0.05 32 Unadjusted * Urban * Income Children and Adolescents age 2 to 18 yo, 2012 Percent of Obese Children in Monroe County by Towns 33 Obesity Study 2012: Table 5: Comparison of Obesity Rates by age group, gender and location in Monroe County 2007 to 2012. 2007 2012 Normal 5,468 69.9% Over Weight 1,189 15.0% Obese 1,193 15.1% Normal 5,287 68.1% Over Weight 1,253 16.4% Obese 1,215 15.2% P‐value Age 2‐10 yrs. 11‐18 yrs. 71.2% 67.4% 14.3% 16.2% 14.5% 16.5% 68.0% 68.1% 16.4% 16.5% 15.6% 15.4% 0.008 0.60 Gender Male Female 68.9% 70.3% 14.9% 15.4% 16.2% 14.3% 67.4% 68.6% 17.0% 15.9% 15.6% 15.5% 0.07 0.31 Practice Location Suburban 74.5% Urban 60.7% 13.8% 17.5% 11.7% 21.8% 71.0% 62.2% 16.1% 17.1% 12.9% 20.7% 0.001 34 0.58 N All 0.08 Community Policy strategies Childhood Obesity Community Coalition for Policy Change HEALTHI Kids: Healthy Eating and Active Living THrough policy and practice Initiatives for Kids 36 Partnerships: •Finger Lakes Health System Agency •University of Rochester • Dept of Pediatrics • Center for Community Health •Children’s Agenda Photo Source: The Prevention Institute 37 5 Main Policy Approaches 1. Improve the safety of, the perception of safety of, and access to recreational facilities, bike trails, parks, and green spaces, while expanding after-hour access to schools and promoting safe play. 2. Require that K-12 grade students are provided with 45-minutes of moderate to intense physical activity daily. 3. Create policies that are supportive of breastfeeding throughout the community and all hospitals in Monroe County meet the WHO Baby Friendly Hospital Criteria (Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding for Hospitals). 39 Before 40 ……after 41 5 Main Policy Approaches 4. Eliminate the availability of food in schools that compete with the national school breakfast and lunch program. Mandate the development and execution of nutritional standards so all food available on school campuses is consistent with a set of community standards. 5. Mandate the development and execution of nutritional standards for preschools, childcare centers, and school-age childcare programs, so that food and drinks available comply with Dietary Guidelines for Americans or equivalent community standards. 42 When can policy Back Fire???? 43 We need safer parks Rec on the Move What does Recreation on the Move offer? The Recreation on the Move vehicles and their engaging staff bring recreation and much more to underserved neighborhoods: • Sports and group games like Jurassic Park, a dino-sized version of capture the flag! • Read-aloud program & free book giveaways • Health and wellness info and free fresh and healthy snacks • Homework help • Arts, music, and creative fun • Environmental and horticultural projects and games • Information about City R-Centers and youth programs, libraries, and other City 45 facilities and services • And more! What other community partners can do Screen for Food Insecurity in Medical Home Add to EHR Refer to community resources 46 Childcare level strategies Good resources: Childcare standards 48 Toddler Food Images Breakfast for Toddler Lunch for Toddler Dinner for Toddler Snack for Toddler 49 Infant Food Images Breakfast for Infant Lunch for Infant Dinner for Infant 9month old foods 50 Screen time Clinical level strategies The Expanded Care Model • Build healthy public policies • Create supportive environments • Strengthen community action Activated Community Community Health System • Information • SelfSystems Management • Delivery System Support/Develop Design/Reorient • Decision Support personal skills health services Informed, Activated Patient Productive Interactions & Relationships Prepared Proactive Practice Team Population Health Outcomes / Functional & Clinical Outcomes Prepared Proactive Community Partners 53 Drink and Cereal Display BMI Charts on the back of exam room door Smaller size laminates for easy reach at desk Food Models! Parents remark about portion size, realizing that the portions served are much larger than recommended. 57 What other community partners can do 58 Newer Clinical Tools There’s an APP for that Change Talk: Childhood Obesity 60 61 Pediatric e-Practice: Optimizing Your Obesity Care WHERE DOES PAYMENT REFORM FIT? Transition in Both Payment and the Delivery systems 64 What is FFS and what is total capitation Fee for service: Puts all the risk on the Payer / rewards the provider for high volume Full Capitation: Puts all the risk on the payer, provide all the care needed for one price, whether it’s enough or not. If you have healthy population = great, if you have a sick population = NOT great. Leads to cherry picking and lemon dropping 65 The Medical Home model to promote coordinated care • A “medical home” or “health home” -- clinical setting that serves as a central resource for a patient’s ongoing care. • Currently no Medicare payment for many activities that facilitate the provision of patient-focused, longitudinal, coordinated care • Payment reforms – Per-member, per-month medical home fee, in addition to fee-for service payments. – Payment would vary depending on the severity of illness of the enrolled patient. – Support increased access to primary care services, more time spent with patients, and a team approach to care. • Allows for physicians to get paid for increased level of care coordination. *Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Accountable Care Organizations: Testing Their Impact. 2012 Call for Proposals. Value-Based Payment (Pay for performance, P4P) • • • • Align payments with value, not volume Stimulate improvements in the quality of care and, in some cases, reductions in costs. Variety of performance measures Funding: • Hold a portion of current payments for future payment increases • Add new money to existing payments • Share savings from cost reductions. • Increase payment for each service delivered. *Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Accountable Care Organizations: Testing Their Impact. 2012 Call for Proposals. What is happening with Medicaid (NY) NYS Medicaid Roadmap – moving away from FFS toward VBP • Bundling payments for chronic care conditions • Example: Depression is both episodic and continuous • Can the same be done for childhood obesity services? Population Health focus on overall Outcomes and total Costs of Care Sub-population focus on Outcomes and Costs within sub-population/episode of Care Can Brief Motivational Interviewing in Practice Reduce Child Body Mass Index? Results of a 2-year Randomized Controlled Trial Ken Resnicow, PhD, Alison Bocian, MS, Donna Harris, MA, Robert Schwartz, MD, Linda Snetselaar, PhD, RD, Esther Myers, PhD, RD, Jaquelin Gotlieb, MD, Susan Woolford, MD, MPH, Richard Wasserman, MD, MPH Funding provided by a grant from National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL085400), PROS core funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau (R60MC00107) and the American Academy of Pediatrics MI Delivery and Training Group 1 Usual care only Group 2 Group 3 Up to 4 MI sessions Up to 4 MI sessions with pediatricians with pediatricians and up to 6 MI sessions with registered dietitians Group 2 and 3 pediatricians and dietitians attended a 2-day MI training session and received follow up skill assessments by phone with MI experts 70 Year 2 BMI Percentile and Percentile Change N Year 2 BMI Percentile^ (SE) BMI Percentile Difference#^ (SE) Group 1 Usual Care 158 90.31 (0.94) 1.82 (0.98) Group 2 Pediatricians 145 88.1 (0.94) 3.8 (0.96) Group 3 Pediatricians & RDs 154 87.11 (0.92) 4.92 (0.99) Study Group 1,2 Groups with matching superscripts differ p < .05 # Subtracting post-intervention BMI percentile from baseline BMI percentile ^ Adjusted for age, race, sex, baseline BMI, household income, parent BMI, pediatrician age, and practice effects (clustering) 71 MI SESSIONS COMPLETED Number and Percent of MI Contacts Completed Study Group Group 2 Pediatricians (n =145) Group 3 Pediatricians (n =154) Group 3 RDs (n =154) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 2.1% 14 9.7 8 5.% 14 9.7% 106 73.1% NA NA 3 1.9% 18 11.7% 17 11.0% 12 7.8% 104 67.5% NA NA 21 13.6% 24 15.6% 29 18.8% 30 19.5% 22 14.3% 9 5.8% 19 12.3% 72 Treatment Outcomes of Overweight Children and Parents in the Medical Home 73 3yr old WCC w/ pt Not Mykid 74 Pt NW, first seen at 3yrs and noted to be obese PNP informed pt in ‘Red zone’ as unhealthy. Can we discuss? 75 Pt MN 76 Center of Excellence SCREENING FOR OBESITY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: CLINICAL SUMMARY OF USPSTF RECOMMENDATION 2010 Population Children and adolescents 6 to 18 y of age Recommendation Screen children aged 6 y and older for obesity. Offer or refer for Moderate (>25 hrs over 6 months) to High (>75hrs over 12 months) intensive counseling and behavioral interventions. Grade: B Grade B Definition: The USPSTF recommends the service. There is high certainty that the net benefit is moderate or there is moderate certainty that the net benefit is moderate to substantial. Suggestions to practice: Offer/provide this service. For a summary of the evidence systematically reviewed in making these recommendations, the full recommendation statement, and supporting documents please go to www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov. Community Collaboration Model from Autism 79 What we all can do Advocate for payment of tertiary care / referral services for obesity treatment at a children’s hospital / department of pediatrics Advocate for Evidence based guidelines as part of policies for early childcare Think outside the box for new roles in clinic Ask / screen parents Wt for height just of obesity SW or Cert Health Educator to deliver parenting style or behavioral health or Master’s level mental health provider Try to link with commmunity resources like YMCA, but also bring/bridge those resources to other community setting like after school programs Pediatrician’s Positive Influence • Encourage parents, schools, and communities to find rewards other than food. • Help families and schools create “tease-free” environments, especially because weight-related teasing starts in the home and spreads to the community and school, with potentially devastating effects on a child’s self-esteem. • Teach media literacy to decrease the “pester power” of children for high-calorie, low nutrient-dense food choices. • Join a school health advisory board or other community collaborative network to be an agent of change. • Link with academic medical centers to help with program design and evaluation that can measure impact and disseminate evidence-based best practices and policies. 81 82 83 Questions?? @DrSteveCook The Effect of Maternal Obesity on the Offspring. Prevalence of childhood body mass index (BMI)>=95th percentile by maternal pre‐pregnancy BMI and breastfeeding. US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, Child, and Young adult data 2 to 14 years of age (n=2636). Li et al. Obesity Research.2005;13:362–371. 2 Stigma of Child Obesity “The lot of fat children is a sad one. They are bashful and ashamed of their shapeless figures, yet unable to conceal them. Wherever they go they attract attention…..Obesity is a serious handicap in the social life of a child, even more so of a teenager. Obesity does not have the dignity of other diseases…” Bruch H. Pediatric Annals: 1975 Framework for Integrated Clinical and Community Systems of Care 88 Treatment of Obesity in Children and Adolescents Stage Delivery Behaviors Stage 1 – Prevention Plus Office-based support, with scheduled follow-up 5 fruits and vegetables of < About 2 hrs of 30-35% screen time yr oldsactivity > 1 2-18 hr of physical Stage 2 – Structured Weight Management Specially-trained staff in office with support from referrals Reduced-calorie eating plan If 1/3rd come / < 1 hr of screen time follow up= 10% Monitoring Stage 3 – Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Intervention Dedicated weight management program or registered dietician referral; weekly follow-up for 8-12 weeks More frequent contact, more f If 1/3rd continue, 1/3rdstructured monitoring, then ~3% goal-setting Stage 4 – Tertiary Care Pediatric weight management center with multidisciplinary team; clinical or research protocol Medication, meal If 1/3rdsurgery, continue, replacement, ongoing behavior then ~1% change Adapted from Katzmarzyk 2014 Why are we here? 90 Payment Reform Payment reform Bundled payments for acute care episodes (Hip replacement) Value-based payment (Pay for Quality P4Q) Accountable care organizations Patient-centered medical home Medicaid (Medicare) ACO Employer / Commercial Plan Accountable Care Organizations • A coordinated network of providers with shared responsibility for providing high quality and low cost care to their patients.* • Couples risk-based provider payment with health care delivery system reform • Accepts performance risk for quality and cost *Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Accountable Care Organizations: Testing Their Impact. 2012 Call for Proposals. How Obesity might fit • Prevention model with PCP as lead and within the patient centered medical home. • Use ESDPT codes and less severe or less complicated level of obesity • PCP would have to be on board/trained. • Could link to community service or embed therapists into PCP/Medical home • Could be Value‐based payment? How Obesity might fit • Treatment model with referral to specialty ctr • Could link w/ community resource but must be high enough level of intensity/dose with right specialty and approach • Would accommodate more complicated or more severe children/teens with obesity • This might still be FFS but could move to discounted FFS or PMPM? Who are we really treating? Those with Overweight and above?? 25-30% Those with Obesity only?? 12-22% OW or OB and a parent w/ OW or OB? 2/3 of youth w/ OW or OB Or Those with Severe Obesity (>99th percentile or > 120% of Obesity) • 3-4 % of youth in your region. 95