* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download MBSImP ™© Web-Based Interface for Patient Management and
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
MBSImP ™© Web-Based Interface for Patient Management and Reporting User Guide The designation of “Registered MBSImP Clinician” is earned upon successful completion of the Reliability Zone. With this comes immediate access to the MBSImP interface for patient management and report generation. Designed by speech pathologists for speech pathologists, this extension of the MBSImP is meant to be clinically useful and practical. It allows the Registered Clinician to efficiently enter patient medical histories, MBSImP study scores, patient management data, and other related information in a HIPAA compliant manner. Once entered, the clinician can quickly produce clinical documentation of each MBSImP study, track the status of patients over time, evaluate the success of patient management and treatment strategies, and optimize patient care through practices consistent with evidence-based medicine. What may not be apparent, however, is that this extension of the MBSImP is in effect a data registry dedicated to swallowing disorders. Each clinician who enters information will be contributing to a pool of knowledge that is dynamically expanding and has the potential to answer a myriad of questions that will advance the understanding and treatment of swallowing impairment. With this knowledge will hopefully come improvement in the health status and quality of life for many, many people. Patient History Entry The entry fields are for the most part self-explanatory. There are some things that should be pointed out, which is the purpose of this guide. Before entering an MBSImP study, a patient must be added and the medical history entered. At first glance, the number of entry fields that follow can appear daunting, and initially, input may seem less efficient than desired. Once familiar with the system, however, the average time to enter patient history and study/treatment information and produce the documentation is ten minutes, which is significantly less than other means of reporting. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 1 The patient's name will never be entered. Instead, each patient is assigned a random identifier that is a combination of letters and numbers, and it will be up to each clinician to decide the best means of associating the actual identity of a patient with the identifier assigned by the system. Also, only the year of birth is entered into the database. The only exception to this is if the year of birth is 90 years or more from the current year, any attempt to enter the year will cause the system to record instead “ 90 or older.” This was implemented, of course, to assure HIPAA compliance across a large group of users. The entry of dates is done through one method in the patient history screen, and another in the MBSImP study screen. In the patient history screen, the year must be selected first, which then populates the selection fields for the month and day. This allows the system to accept only the year or the month & year, rather than requiring a complete date, which is useful in accommodating a reported history that lacks specificity. For the MBSImP study screen, in which the clinician controls the specificity, a calendar format is used, and only a complete date is accepted. Diseases and conditions are classified according to systems of the body, for example, Circulatory System Disorders, Digestive System Disorders, Nervous System Disorders, Respiratory System Disorders, and so on. Once selected, each disorder must be further PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 2 classified according to Current-Primary Dx, Comorbidities, Morbidities, or Past Medical Hx. (Of Note: the terms “comorbidity” and “morbidity” are variably defined, depending on the source and the intended use. For purposes here, “comorbidity” refers to a condition other than the primary diagnosis that significantly affects the patient's medical status, complicates the care, and existed prior to admission. “Morbidity” represents the same, medically, but only became present during the current hospitalization, developing, perhaps, as a result of surgery, a procedure, or an infection.) In this abbreviated example of the layout of the disorders and category columns, notice that most have an associated ICD-9 diagnosis code, but some do not. Those without are related to either a specific category of Cancer or to Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and when selected trigger secondary screens for the input of more specific information and detail. The categories of cancer are Head and Neck, Thyroid, Esophageal, Lung/Mediastinal, and Brain; the sub-screen for CVA discriminates hemorrhagic from non-hemorrhagic. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 3 The Cancer sub-screen includes the input fields for all of the previously named categories, and is divided into sections that correspond with each. Simply scroll and select the appropriate section. The Cancer can then be further defined according to classification/stage, pathology, and other characteristics. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 4 Details of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy can be entered, as applicable. Similarly, the CVA sub-screen contains categorized input fields to more specifically describe the stroke according to hemisphere, site(s) of lesion, and associated treatment(s), if any. A disorder that has recurrent episodes can be represented by marking the appropriate category, which provides a separate sub-screen for each episode. For example, the specifics of a current diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer can be described separately from an earlier diagnosis by selecting “Head and Neck Cancer” and indicating “Current Primary Dx” as well as “Past Med Hx.” No doubt there are conditions and disorders that have not been included in the diagnoses provided. To accommodate this, at the end of this listed diagnoses, there are five areas to enter and categorize “Other” conditions. These will be monitored and the most frequently cited will be added on a quarterly basis. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 5 After input of this base medical history, sections follow for present and past Surgical History, present and past Medical (non-surgical) Treatments, Medications (prescribed and over-thecounter), Vitamins/Supplements, Alternative Therapies, Allergies, and Social History. (Of Note: any surgery or treatment information that was entered via either the Cancer or CVA sub-screen should NOT be re-entered in a similar area that follows. The information is already captured.) The final step, SAVE the data! MBSImP Study Entry Once saved, the study input screen can be accessed from this medical history screen (at the bottom or the top).” PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 6 or by returning to the home screen, selecting “Patient Data & Reports,” and then the specific patient just created. Again, the MBSImP study entry fields are for the most part self-explanatory. There are just a few things to point out. In pilot testing, several clinicians questioned what was meant by “Time-out Time,” which is near the beginning of the study screen. The Joint Commission mandated that procedures performed by more than one person, invasive or not, should pause just prior to initiating the procedure and ensure that the correct patient is about to undergo the correct procedure and that the correct materials for performing that procedure are ready and available, then record the time.....and this is what is meant by “Time-out Time.” Along the same lines, areas for “Pain Assessment,” “Special Needs,” and “Barriers to Learning” have been included. Once selected, an area for free text input appears, if needed. Very few areas ask for either a “yes” or “no.” The general rule is that selection of a statement is in effect a “yes” and not selecting a statement is a “no” or indicates a non-applicable status. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 7 Often, the ability to enter greater detail is nested within the first statement. For example, when “Tracheostomy Tube Present” is selected, the additional selections populate. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 8 Entry of MBSImP Overall Impression scores for each component is relatively straight forward. The description of each score, however, is not included, only the numeric choice, so always have a copy of the Component-Scores Definitions list, if needed. There are a few things that when selected cue the system to include additional information in the clinical report. Each component has an alternate, non-numeric selection, which for all but one component is “Could not test.” When selected, it signifies that for some reason other than physiologic impairment, a component could not be adequately assessed. Some examples of this might be poor fluoroscopic image capture or the patient who is always moving. It will most likely occur on components 1, 13, 14, and 17, but could potentially affect others. Notice that for component 3, Bolus Preparation, the term is changed from “Could not Test” to “Solid not Given.” This is the only component whose overall impression score depends on one consistency being administered.....the cookie. There are two reasons that the solid would not be given. The first is that physiologic Impairment in other oral domain components was observed during the study when given liquid and semi-solid boluses, and the impression developed that giving a solid would not be successful and could potentially harm the patient. When this is the case, score 3 and “Solid not Given” should be selected. The report will then state that no solid was given, and that the decision to eliminate this bolus is linked to oral impairment. The second is that over the course of the study, the impairment seen in other non-oral domain components indicated that it is in the patient's best interest to avoid giving the solid, but that this decision is not necessarily related to physiologic impairment in the ability to prepare and manipulate a solid bolus. In this situation, only “Solid not Given” should be selected. The report will then explain the absence of a solid bolus and the inability to score the component in a manner consistent with the circumstances. As a reminder, component 13, “Pharyngeal Contraction,” can only be scored in the anteriorposterior (AP) viewing plane. If for some reason this cannot be achieved, then no score is given and “Could not Test” is selected. Component 17, “Esophageal Clearance in the Upright Position” can be scored in the lateral view if the esophagus is adequately visualized, but AP is PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 9 always the preferred plane. If neither position provides adequate imaging, or another nonphysiologic reason exists, no score will be given and “Could not Test” must be selected. Following the section for score entry, the Penetration – Aspiration (PA) scale can be used, if desired. Upon choosing one of the eight descriptions, the consistencies become available for selection, as needed. Typically, for a given consistency, only the descriptor that represents the greatest level of airway invasion and consequent reaction is selected. It is not necessary that each of the eight levels be addressed. It will do no harm to do so, however. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 10 For the report to provide insight into the functional significance of the physiologic impairment, the section following the PA Scale asks for the evaluation of up to five components that significantly affected swallowing ability. Upon selecting a component, the available choices emerge. Select all that apply. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 11 If any physical abnormalities were noted, such as osteophytes on the cervical spine or perhaps suspicious fullness in structures, checking “structural abnormality” will provide a list of things most commonly seen, ending with an field for free text entry of anything not listed. As is customary, each selection reveals a list of additional descriptor statements that can be selected, as needed. Nearing the end of the study input screen, any compensatory strategy that was used during the study can be evaluated for effectiveness and indicate whether or not it will be included in therapy and/or a management plan. This applies to strategies that were first used in the particular study as well as those that have been targeted in therapy and patient care. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 12 Similarly, any exercise that has been used in the preceding therapy period can be evaluated for seeming effectiveness. If therapy is to be initiated or a new exercise is to be introduced, this can be indicated and included in the report, then available for subsequent evaluation in a follow-up study after a period of therapy. Or perhaps The study input screen ends with areas to indicate that education was provided to the patient and/or family/caregivers, to recommend referrals, if needed, to other medical specialties or services, and to indicate if therapy is to be initiated, continued, or discontinued. These are followed by free-text fields to enter an overall assessment, prognosis for improvement, the patient's personal goals, and the clinician's short- and long-term goals for the patients care. Keep in mind, with all free-text fields, the clinical report will reflect the appearance and manner of what is typed into the fields. Save the entered data, return to the home screen, select “Patient Data & Reports,” and then “View Report” for the selected patient. From the PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 13 screen that follows, the patient's studies are listed and can be chosen. Once selected, the report is generated in the browser for viewing, and with the “Print” icon at the top of the report, it can be sent to a printer, virtually printed as a PDF document, or downloaded for editing or archiving, providing the ability to enter a file name and specify the subdirectory into which it will be saved. The format will use the common .doc extension. That's all there is to it! In closing, take some time to become familiar with the data fields and the method(s) of input. Try not to rush through the entry of the first few patients and studies. This initial patience should lead to more rapid acquisition of skill in efficient entry and in turn, a corresponding decrease in the time needed for each study. A fully featured forum system is built into this interface. Please use it for peer support and discussion, and please provide feedback and suggestions via the Forum Administrator. If needed, clinical and technical questions can also be addressed to the Forum Administrator. PtMgmtRepGuide 050911 14