Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TREATY OF VERSAILLES REVIEW HISTORY QUESTION STRUCTURE A) 1 PARAGRAPH B) 2 PARAGRAPHS C) 2 FOR, 2 AGAINST AND YOUR OWN CONCLUSION MOTIVES AND AIMS (PG. 82-83) Wilson: suggested 14 points, League of Nations, less harsh towards Germany to prevent revenge, idealist, stability in the region, selfdetermination (France and the UK did not support as much), US was new to war so more idealistic views Clemenceau: wanted super revenge, cripple Germany, take back Alsace-Lorraine and Rhineland (comprised with plebiscite), realist, little comprise as possible, more threatened with Germany because of geographic Lloyd George: wanted to maintain trade relations with Germany, not punish Germany harshly; but wanted to appease his British public so agreed to go harsher on Germany; protect colonies and seas; Germany should limit naval power and maintain UK naval supremacy, did want Germany to keep colonies, did not want free access to the seas GEORGE’S CHANGING APPROACHES 1918 Britain wanted Germany’s colonies The public felt Germany should pay for the war Britain was more in line with France’s desire for harsh treatment because they faced direct attacks, heavy casualties, economy disrupted and concerned about France’s eastern border 1919 George wanted a more moderate approach Revive trade relations with Germany, so wanted to make sure Germany was still economically strong If deprived of Rhineland, not as wealthy so supported Rhineland to Germany High reparations would weaken Germany’s economy and a weak Germany would be inadequate to stop the spread communism Wanted to prevent Germany from getting revenge TOV MAIN FEATURES (PAGE 86-87) Blame Reparations Arms limited Territorial loss TREATY OF VERSAILLES In 1919, the “big three” met to discuss how Germany should pay for the damage WWI had caused: ¡ Woodrow Wilson (USA): 14-point plan to bring stability in region and creation of League of Nations ¡ Georges Clemenceau (France): Seek revenge and wanted to make sure Germany could never start another war again. Gain back Alsace-Lorraine. ¡ Llyod George (UK): Find a compromise between Wilson and Clemenceau. He agreed with Wilson, but knew the British public agreed with Clemenceau. MAIN TERMS OF TOV Blame: The War Guilt Cause essentially made Germany accept the blame for starting WWI. Reparations: Germany had to pay 6,600 million British pounds for the damage caused by the war. Army limited: Germany had to disarm and was only allowed to have small army and six naval ships. No tanks, no airforce and no submarines were allowed. Rhineland area to be de-militarized. Territorial losses: Germany had to give up some land and its colonies were handed over to France and Britain. WAR GUILT CLAUSE Article 231 Germany and her allies had to accept total responsibility for starting the war. REPARATIONS Germany had to accept liability for reparation, the amount that was agreed in 1921 was set at 6600 million British pounds They would pay this until 1984, if it had not been changed under the Young Plan in 1929 DISARMAMENT • Germany army restricted to 100,000 with no conscription • No military or naval air force was permitted • No tanks, armored vehicles or heavy artillery were permitted • Navy restricted to 6 battleships, 12 destroyers, 6 light cruisers, 12 torpedo boats and NO submarines • Rhineland had to be demilitarized (without troops, armament or fortifications) and Allied army occupation of Rhineland for 15 years TERRITORY • Germany lost all her colonies in Africa and the Far East • Alsace-Lorraine returned to France • Other German regions transferred back to other European countries (Denmark, Belgium, Czechoslovakia) • Saar Basin administered by League of Nations for 15 years when a plebiscite would decided whether it should belong to France, Germany or remain under League control • Treaty of Brest-Litovsk cancelled, with Estonia, Latvia and Lithuanian taken away from Germany and set up as independent states • Union of Germany and Austria to be forbidden OTHER TREATY TERMS Common features • A war guilt clause • Obligation to pay reparations • Reduction in armaments • Acceptance of the League of Nations TREATY OF ST GERMAIN WITH AUSTRIA (1919) • New Republic of Austria had to accept break-up of AustroHungarian empire • Austria had to recognize the independence of Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Poland • Territory from former Empire was given to Czechoslovakia, Poland, Yugoslavia, Italy and Romania • Union between Austria and Germany forbidden • Felt they were being treated unfairly, as now a small country surrounded by hostile countries • The Sudeten Germans were now under Czech rule, felt this violated the principle of self-determination TREATY OF TRIANON WITH HUNGARY (1920) • Hungary had to accept break-up of Austro-Hungarian Empire • Hungary had to recognize the independence of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia • Territory from former Empire was transferred to Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Romania • More than 70% of its territory and 1/3 of its population had been lost • Since the treaty also deprived Hungary of its seaports it was now like Austria, a land-locked country TREATY OF NEUILLY WITH BULGARIA (1919) • Bulgaria had to recognize the independence of Yugoslavia • Bulgaria had lost territory to Greece, Yugoslavia and Romania • Bulgaria treated less harshly than other of its allies • Also paid reparations and limited its armed forces TREATY OF SEVREST WITH TURKEY (1920) • Turkey had to recognize the independence of the Kingdom of Hejaz (later form part of Saudi Arabia) and Armenia • Turkey lost its provinces in the Middle East to Britain and France • Turkey lost territory to Greece and Italy • Dardanelles Strait was to become an international waterway • Mustapha Kemal sparked a nationalist movement against the terms of the treaty, driving the Greeks out of Smyrna creating a renegotiated treaty: Treaty of Lausanne TREATY OF LAUSANNE WITH TURKEY (1923) Mustapha Kemal sparked a nationalist movement against the terms of the treaty, driving the Greeks out of Smyrna creating a renegotiated treaty: Treaty of Lausanne • Turkey confirmed the loss of its provinces in the Middle East • Turkey received back most of its European territory • The Dardanelles Strait was to return back to Turkey • Restrictions on armed forces were removed • Turkey was no longer to pay reparations WHAT VICTORS LIKED AND DIDN’T LIKE France (wanted harsh peace) • TOV gave Clemeanceau some demands like Alsace-Lorraine and transfer of some of Germany’s former colonies (e.g. Syria, Lebanon, Togo, Cameroon) • France to get some reparations • France felt secure with demilitarization of Rhineland and got some revenge as Germany was deprived of economic and military capacities • Clemenceau wanted to be extra secure and proposed an Anglo/American Treaty of Guarantee for France for UK and the USA to assistant France in the event of future German aggression • American Congress refused and went into isolationist policies • UK unwilling to guarantee assistance • Clemenceau was defeated and lost election in 1920 USA (WANTED LENIENT PEACE) • League of Nations a reality • Movement towards disarmament, as defeated nations had to disarm and limit armies • Rhineland still part of Germany reduced harshness of treaty and Germany would still do economic business with America • Germany not burdened with heavy reparations • Pleased at self-determination for Poland, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia • Free navigation of seas abandoned, Wilson didn’t approve of British control of seas • Britain, France and Japan rewarded themselves Germany’s colonies which Wilson disapproved of (they were supposed to be governed by League of Nations under mandates, but in reality Britain, France and Japan exerting their control) • American Congress did not approve League of Nations or treaties • Austria and Sudeten Germans not consulted about their future BRITAIN (MODERATE PEACE) • Most satisfied (moderate peace) because wanted European economy to revive and that is what he achieved • Some features he did not like were placing German-speaking peoples under French or Polish rule • He was able to expand British colonial empire • Persuaded France to adopt a more moderate approach by offering assistance against any future German aggression • Reassured trade with Germany and reviving economy of Germany will prevent spread of communism • House of Commons approved treaty IMPACT ON GERMANY • Too harsh because had to pay heavy reparations and deprived of the very resources (coal, iron ore) that were needed to pay these reparations • Germans had the same harsh treaty towards Russia: the BrestLitovsk in March 1918 • Germany objected that the treaty was “diktat” or a dictated peace • Germany excluded from negotiations and pretty much forced to sign it, otherwise another naval blockade and restart of war • Germans not convinced of “war guilt clause,” as it could be argued that Russian mobilization was the first military action in the immediate lead-up to the war • Rubbing salt into their wounds: if you cause damage, its entirely your fault and you must pay compensation POLITICAL IMPACTS • New German government called Weimar Government • Because they signed the TOV, they were undermined • Munich Putsch on November 1923: tried to overthrow Weimar republic because right-wing activists and politicians felt Germany’s dishonor • Right-wing extremists carried out a number of assassinations of high-ranking government ministers • Left-wing extremists exploited unpopularity of Weimar government by promoting rebellions • Weimar Republic signing of TOV under a major disadvantage from the very beginning of its existence • Freikorps: an unofficial anti-communist vigilante group that was composed of army members….Weimar government tried to disband group, but they staged a coup in Berlin and almost succeeded but a general worker’s strike brought public services to a standstill ECONOMIC IMPACTS • No figure was actually stated in the Treaty until 1921, which was 6.6 billion British pounds • Immediate post-war period was characterized by inflation, rising unemployment and social problems like poverty and homelessness • Germany made its first installment of reparations in 1921, but then claimed unable in 1922 • French felt Germany trying to escape Treaty obligations and France and Belgium occupied the Ruhr, Germany’s most industrial area in 1923 • German government not in position to order armed resistance, so ordered the German Ruhr population to engage in passive resistance or strikes • French responded by expelling 100,000 Germans and killing over 130; German government faced economic problems trying to re-house and feed displaced Ruhr population and income declined due to ending of Ruhr tax receipts • German government began to print money, which stoked up the existing high inflation into hyperinflation and the German mark became worthless • Germans had to barter goods such as eggs, cigarettes and sugar as their form of currency ECONOMIC IMPACTS • Gustav Stresemann became Chancellor in August 1923 and ordered the ending of the passive resistance in the Ruhr • New currency introduced (Rentenmark), which strictly controlled circulation and soon afterward he agreed to resume reparation payments • More flexible reparation plans were put into place (Dawes Plan of 1924 and Young Plan of 1929) • Germans were taking more American loans during the 1920s than it ever paid back the allies • Germany claimed that 100,000 men was insufficient for border defense and that it would be difficult to deal with revolts and uprising The Treaty of Versailles caused both political and economic problems for Germany between 1919 and 1923. The political problems arose from the fact that once the new government of Germany had signed the treaty it became instantly associated with one of the most unpopular and humiliating events in German history. Between 1919 and 1923 there was considerable support for communist and extreme right-wing groups that rejected the treaty. The ability of the Weimar governments to deal with this dissatisfaction was not helped by the clause in the Treaty which limited the German army to 100 000 men. Economic problems resulted from the loss of colonies, the loss of mineral resources in Europe, and the imposition of reparations. The crisis of 1923, that is, military occupation of the Ruhr followed by hyperinflation, was directly linked to reparations since the Ruhr occupation was the French and Belgian response to Germany’s claim that it was unable to pay the 1922 reparations installment. Once the reparations issue was resolved after the 1923 crisis, there was a return to relative economic and political normality.