Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
The reptiles and frogs of Maungatautari By Chris Smuts-Kennedy NZ has permanently lost its largest herbivores, the moa. They were our ‘ecosystem engineers’, largely shaping the botanical landscape into which all other species fitted in their various ways. Their primary ecological role can never be refilled, so our reconstructed faunal communities on the mainland will always be in a very different botanical setting, however ‘natural’ we might like to think they look. This is indeed the age of ‘novel ecosystems’ – even our ‘restored’ ones. But we can only do what we can only do, and Maungatautari can certainly be about as good as any such restoration can get on the NZ mainland. The pre-human fauna of New Zealand is often viewed as being predominated by birds, and there is some truth in that, with birds (and indeed some insects) taking on many ecological roles that in other places are performed by mammals. But there was also a significant NZ ‘herpetofauna’, with probably more than 100 lizard species, half a dozen frog species, and 2 tuatara species. Reptiles performed important ecosystem services including pollination (via nectar feeding) and seed dispersal (some NZ plants have evolved to produce fruits which are detected and consumed mostly by lizards). Tuatara were mid/high-level predators, and research is increasingly discovering the ecological importance of such predation. In some USA ecosystems where species like bears, wolves and cougars have been removed, progressive ecosystem degradation has been observed. And where those top predators have been reintroduced (e.g. wolves in Yellowstone), the ecosystem has returned to a much healthier functional state. Co-evolved native predators are normally good, introduced exotic predators are mostly not good. While many NZ ‘keystone’ bird species are now extinct (the large herbivores i.e. moa, and the large predators Haast’s eagle, Forbes’ harrier, adzebill and laughing owl), the good news is that very few NZ lizards and no tuatara are totally extinct (we’ve probably lost only 2 skink and one gecko species – but we have lost half our frog species). The low reptile extinction rate is somewhat surprising, given that we lost more than 40% of our bird species and 33% of our bat species (one of the 3 species has been lost). A back-of-the-envelope exercise suggests that Maungatautari might once have had a total of about 20 reptile and amphibian species. In terms of total vertebrate species (not including fish) on the mountain, we perhaps had about 50 bird species and 3 bat species – so the herpetofauna was indeed an important component. We currently know of 4 gecko species (including our very unexpected and surprising Duvaucel’s gecko discovery), one skink species, tuatara (reintroduced), and one frog species (our surprising Hochstetter’s frog discovery) existing on the mountain. There is very good reason to believe that more species still remain as-yet undiscovered (herpetofauna tend to be cryptic by nature) – and looking at the back of my envelope, it’s possible that another 3 gecko species and another 4 skink species might yet turn up, and we might yet discover Archey’s frogs on the mountain. We can also reintroduce at least another 3 skink species which are currently mostly restricted to offshore islands, and perhaps another one or 2 frog species. So we can potentially almost completely reconstruct the herpetofaunal community that once occurred on Maungatautari, which is an exciting prospect. Possibly up to 18 species, which will be the greatest assemblage of reptiles and frogs at one site in this country! At best we can restore the avifauna to perhaps 60% of its former diversity (itself a remarkable achievement), but we might be able to restore the herpetofauna to more than 90% of what it once was. To achieve that full potential, it might be necessary to eradicate mice from the whole mountain – but pest management techniques have been improving steadily throughout my working life, and the next step might well be the development of mouse eradication technology for large rugged mainland sites. Some areas might also need to be maintained as open habitat for e.g. takahe, tuatara breeding – and for some lizard species. Other species like red crowned kakariki and snipe might also utilise such habitat, providing multiple benefits from such management. It is quite conceivable that moa once maintained such open areas by browsing pressure and trampling, thereby enabling those other species to flourish in those areas. In the same vein, our planned re-establishment of petrel breeding colonies (2 species) on the mountain might also enhance the habitat for reintroduced reptiles like robust skinks and tuatara, and other species. A friend of mine once attempted to draw a diagram of all the ecological interactions between all the animal species on one small Hauraki Gulf island with a relatively simple ecosystem. The result was unbelievably complicated, even though no doubt incomplete. Maungatautari will be much more complex than that island, and progressively more so as we reintroduce more species. In pest-free environments reptiles can achieve high densities, and a night walk on Maungatautari will then be quite something. NZ reptiles and frogs have many unique ecological, physiological and evolutionary features, which make them of considerable interest world-wide – and an almost-completely restored mainland community on this scale will provide an exceptional visitor experience, as well as unique research opportunities.