Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 63, No. 12, December 2011, pp 3692–3701 DOI 10.1002/art.30599 © 2011, American College of Rheumatology Blood Memory B Cells Are Disturbed and Predict the Response to Rituximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Jérémie Sellam,1 Stéphanie Rouanet,2 Houria Hendel-Chavez,3 Karim Abbed,3 Jean Sibilia,4 Jacques Tebib,5 Xavier Le Loët,6 Bernard Combe,7 Maxime Dougados,8 Xavier Mariette,1 and Yassine Taoufik3 Objective. To examine blood B cell subsets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prior to B cell depletion therapy and to assess their potential as predictors of clinical response to rituximab (RTX). Methods. Blood B cell subsets were assessed by flow cytometry in 208 RA patients included in an RTX retreatment study (assessed prior to RTX treatment) and in 47 age-matched controls. Expression of BAFF receptor (BAFF-R) on B cells and serum B cell biomarkers was also measured. B cell subsets and BAFF-R expression were compared between RA patient and control populations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify baseline factors associated with a European League Against Rheumatism response 24 weeks after 1 cycle of RTX. Results. Mean ⴞ SD counts of both CD27ⴚ naive and CD27ⴙ memory B cells were decreased in RA patients (188.6 ⴞ 121.4/mm3) compared with controls (257.3 ⴞ 154.1/mm3) (P ⴝ 0.001) and were partially restored in patients treated with methotrexate (MTX) plus anti–tumor necrosis factor compared with patients treated with MTX alone. Within the CD27ⴙ memory B cells, the CD27ⴙIgDⴚ switched memory subtype was selectively decreased, irrespective of treatment. The frequency of CD27ⴙ memory B cells correlated inversely with levels of several B cell activation biomarkers in RA. Serum BAFF level and BAFF-R expression was comparable in RA patients and controls. A low baseline CD27ⴙ memory B cell frequency was associated with a greater clinical response to RTX (odds ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.95–0.99], P ⴝ 0.0015). Conclusion. In B cell depletion therapy–naive RA patients, a low frequency of CD27ⴙ memory B cells correlated with levels of serum B cell activation biomarkers and may predict response to RTX. These results suggest that low memory B cell frequency may be indicative of a B cell–driven RA subtype that is more sensitive to B cell depletion therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01126541. Supported by Roche France. 1 Jérémie Sellam, MD, PhD (current address: Hôpital SaintAntoine, AP-HP, and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Paris, France), Xavier Mariette, MD, PhD: Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, INSERM U1012, and Université Paris-Sud 11, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; 2Stéphanie Rouanet, PhD: Roche, Neuilly/Seine, France; 3 Houria Hendel-Chavez, PhD, Karim Abbed, MD, Yassine Taoufik, PhD: Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, and Université Paris-Sud 11, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; 4Jean Sibilia, MD, PhD: EA 3432, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg and Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; 5Jacques Tebib, MD, PhD: Centre Hospitalier LyonSud, Pierre-Bénite, France; 6Xavier Le Loët, MD, PhD: Rouen University Hospital and INSERM U905, Rouen, France; 7Bernard Combe, MD, PhD: Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier I University, and UMR5535, Montpellier, France; 8Maxime Dougados, MD: Université Paris Descartes, UPRES-EA 4058, and Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France. Drs. Mariette and Taoufik contributed equally to this work. Drs. Sellam, Sibilia, and Mariette have received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Roche (less than $10,000 each). Drs. Sibilia, Tebib, Le Loët, Combe, Dougados, and Mariette have received honoraria from Roche for serving on the scientific committee of the SMART study (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Le Loët has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Schering-Plough (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Combe has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Roche, Wyeth-Pfizer, Schering-Plough, and UCB (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Dougados has received research grants and honoraria from Roche to conduct studies and/or to participate at symposia organized by Roche (less than $10,000 each). Address correspondence to Jérémie Sellam, MD, PhD, Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France (e-mail: jeremie. [email protected]); or to Xavier Mariette, MD, PhD, Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France (e-mail: [email protected]). Submitted for publication January 19, 2011; accepted in revised form August 3, 2011. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), B cells can play a number of roles critical for inducing or maintaining autoimmune inflammation (1). Accumulating evidence points to the disruption of B cell–regulated processes in the pathogenesis of RA and other autoimmune disorders, and provides the rationale for B cell depletion 3692 MEMORY B CELLS IN RA AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO RITUXIMAB therapy in RA. Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody effective for reducing the clinical signs and symptoms of RA and inhibiting the progression of joint damage in patients with RA, markedly depletes peripheral and, to a lesser extent, tissue B cells (1,2). As RTX specifically targets B cells, the monitoring of blood B cell subsets before and after B cell depletion therapy may be valuable in the management of RA before and during treatment. Recently, it has been suggested that decreases in preplasma cells and memory B cells might be associated with a better response to RTX and with a late relapse in responders, respectively (3–5). However, in contrast to studies of other systemic autoimmune diseases such as Sjögren’s syndrome or systemic lupus erythematosus (6–9) and despite several studies focusing on the modification of peripheral blood B cell homeostasis induced by RTX (3,4,10,11), few studies have explored disturbances of peripheral B cell subsets in RA patients compared with controls and the potential influence of non–B cell depletion therapies such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers or methotrexate (MTX) in RA patients (12–14). BAFF, a cytokine secreted predominantly by myeloid cells but also by synoviocytes, is involved in B cell activation and survival in general (15–17) and in RA (18,19). BAFF binds to B cells expressing B lymphocyte stimulator receptor 3 (also called BAFF receptor [BAFF-R]) and mediates a survival signal. An increase in serum BAFF, together with a decrease in BAFF-R expression, has already been observed in other autoimmune diseases, leading to the hypothesis that changes in components of the BAFF/BAFF-R system could be implicated in RA and be associated with the clinical outcome after RTX treatment (20–23). Thus, we aimed to investigate 1) the distribution of peripheral blood B cell subsets in RA before B cell depletion therapy and the influence of MTX or an anti-TNF agent on absolute lymphocyte counts and relative frequencies of B cell subsets, and 2) the predictive value of baseline blood B cell subset on the clinical response after 1 course of RTX in patients with refractory RA. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients. A total of 224 patients diagnosed as having RA for at least 6 months and fulfilling the 1987 revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (24) were included in the SMART (eSsai MAbthera sur la dose de ReTraitement) study (NCT01126541). This is a 2-year national, multicenter, randomized, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of 2 doses of RTX for retreatment following 1 initial course of RTX at the licensed dose (1,000 3693 mg on days 1 and 15). The biologic ancillary study presented here includes 208 of the 224 patients and only concerns the first 6 months after this first cycle and thus does not consider the retreatment phase. A list of the SMART investigators is provided in Appendix A. All patients had active disease, as defined by a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (25) using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) of ⬎3.2 and ⱖ6 swelling joints (of 66) and ⱖ6 tender joints (of 68), or a CRP level of ⱖ10 mg/liter, or an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of ⱖ28 mm/hour. Each patient was receiving a stable dose of MTX (ⱖ10 mg/week for at least 4 weeks) and either had experienced an inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNF agents or had had contraindications to anti-TNF therapy. Patients previously receiving etanercept were required to have discontinued therapy for at least 4 weeks; patients previously receiving infliximab or adalimumab were required to have discontinued therapy for at least 8 weeks. Steroids (ⱕ10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were permitted if their doses had remained stable for at least 4 weeks and 2 weeks, respectively, before enrollment. Cross-sectional study comparing RA patients before B cell depletion therapy and age-matched controls. Prior to initiation of B cell depletion therapy, we compared peripheral blood B cell subsets from the 208 RA patients receiving anti-TNF and/or MTX (of the 224 included in the SMART study) with those from 47 age-matched controls who were hospitalized for degenerative rheumatic diseases and had not been diagnosed as having neoplasia, active infections, or inflammatory diseases. In this part of the study, RA patients were stratified according to the length of time since their last dose of anti-TNF. Patients taking MTX who received their last administration of anti-TNF within 6 months of inclusion were included in the anti-TNF plus MTX group. Patients taking MTX who received their last anti-TNF injection more than 6 months prior to study initiation, or who had never received anti-TNF because of a contraindication, were included in the MTX group. Longitudinal SMART study protocol. All RA patients included in the SMART study received 1 course of RTX (a 1,000 mg infusion on days 1 and 15). Intravenous methylprednisolone (100 mg before each infusion) and 1,000 mg of acetaminophen and 100 mg of diphendramine hydrochloride (antihistamine) were also administered prior to each RTX infusion. Treatment efficacy was evaluated 24 weeks after the first RTX infusion according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria (26,27). This initial response was used to classify patients as responders (good or moderate) or nonresponders. Responders were subsequently randomly assigned to receive retreatment with 1 of 2 RTX doses (one or two 1,000 mg infusions), although we do not report the data from this part of the clinical study, which corresponds to the main part of the SMART study (NCT01126541). In this biologic ancillary study, we investigated whether baseline repartition of peripheral blood B cell subpopulations before the first cycle of RTX treatment predicts clinical response to this therapy at 24 weeks. This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière). All patients and controls provided informed consent for the entire trial. Assessment of blood lymphocyte subsets. A peripheral blood sample was obtained from all patients and controls at 3694 SELLAM ET AL Figure 1. Representative flow cytometry studies of B cell subsets according to CD27/IgD classification, plasmablast identification, and expression of BAFF receptor (BAFF-R). A, Frequency of CD19⫹ B cells in the lymphocyte gate. B, Frequency of memory CD27⫹ B cells in the CD19⫹ B cell population. C, Frequency of IgD⫺CD38⫹⫹ plasmablasts in a large lymphocyte gate (upper left in the dot plot). D, Frequency of CD19⫹ B cell subsets according to CD27/IgD classification. E, BAFF-R expression expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in each B cell subset. The numbers in each quadrant of dot plots or on the histograms represent the percentages of each subpopulation (A–D) or the value of BAFF-R MFI (E). enrollment for assessment of lymphocytes and B cell subsets using flow cytometry. For this purpose, 4-color staining was performed, and samples were analyzed using FACSCalibur and FACSCanto II cytometers (Becton Dickinson). Lympho- cyte subsets (CD3⫹ T cells, CD19⫹ B cells, and CD16⫹ and/or CD56⫹ natural killer [NK] cells) were enumerated using the multitest reagent (Becton Dickinson). B cell subsets were analyzed based on the presence of CD19, CD38, CD27, MEMORY B CELLS IN RA AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO RITUXIMAB and IgD (Becton Dickinson). Likewise, we characterized B cell subsets using the following IgD/CD27 classification (28–31): memory CD19⫹CD27⫹ cells split into CD19⫹CD27⫹IgD⫺ switched memory B cells and CD19⫹CD27⫹IgD⫹ nonswitched memory B cells (also called “marginal zone–like” B cells), naive CD27⫺IgD⫹ cells, and the recently characterized CD27⫺IgD⫺ memory B cell subset. CD38 and IgD staining was also used to evaluate CD38⫹⫹IgD⫺ plasmablasts, using a wider gate for CD45⫹ cells exclusively in the RA patient population for the longitudinal study (32,33). The expression of BAFF-R in each CD27/IgD B cell subset was measured as mean fluorescence intensity. A representative example is shown in Figure 1. Serum biomarker assessment. Serum samples obtained before the first RTX infusion were analyzed for several biomarkers of B cell activation to identify potential factors predictive of response to RTX (34). Specifically, we assessed rheumatoid factor (RF) by nephelometry (BN Prospec; DadeBehring) and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (DiaSorin). The cutoff values for positivity were 15 IU/liter for RF and 25 IU/liter for anti-CCP antibodies. BAFF was measured by Quantikine ELISA (R&D Systems). Serum concentrations of IgG, IgA, and IgM (BN Prospec; Dade-Behring) and free light chains (Freelite; The Binding Site) were assessed by nephelometry. We also measured serum BAFF concentrations in samples from the control population to enable comparisons with the samples from RA patients. Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.1. All tests were 2-sided, and the Type I error was set at 0.05. Continuous data are described as the mean ⫾ SD or the median and range. 3695 To compare B cell subsets and BAFF-R expression in samples from RA patients and controls at baseline, we used Student’s t-test or analysis of variance for continuous data and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for qualitative variables. The correlation between B cell subsets and B cell biomarkers or disease activity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. For the longitudinal study investigating baseline factors predictive of response to RTX, the relationship between EULAR response at 24 weeks and explanatory variables was analyzed by logistic regression. The variables were selected by univariate logistic regression within the frequencies of peripheral blood B cell subsets and BAFF-R expression at baseline. Variables significant after univariate regression (P ⱕ 0.15) were then entered into a stepwise multivariate model adjusted for the DAS28-CRP. Results are expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed on the 208 patients who received at least 1 RTX infusion, had an available measure of EULAR response at week 24, and had available results of B cell subset investigations. RESULTS Characteristics of the study population. Baseline characteristics of the 208 RA patients (all patients, anti-TNF plus MTX group, and MTX group) and 47 controls are reported in Table 1. Of the 66 patients in Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the RA patients and healthy controls* Age, mean ⫾ SD years Women, no. (%) Disease duration, mean ⫾ SD years DAS28-CRP, mean ⫾ SD HAQ DI score, mean ⫾ SD Prednisone ⬍10 mg/day, no. (%) MTX, mean ⫾ SD mg/week Monoclonal antibody/etan., no. (%) RF, no. (%), median (range) IU/liter Anti-CCP, no. (%), median (range) IU/liter CRP level, median (range) mg/liter Radiographic erosions, no. (%) ESR, median (range) mm/hour MTX duration, mean ⫾ SD years Time since last anti-TNF, median (range) months Controls (n ⫽ 47) RA patients (n ⫽ 208) Anti-TNF ⫹ MTX group (n ⫽ 142) MTX group (n ⫽ 66) 58 ⫾ 15 29 (62) NA 56 ⫾ 11 176 (85) 13 ⫾ 9 55 ⫾ 12 120 (85) 12 ⫾ 9 58 ⫾ 10 56 (85) 16 ⫾ 9 NA NA NA 5.8 ⫾ 0.9 1.8 ⫾ 0.6 165 (79) 5.8 ⫾ 0.9 1.7 ⫾ 0.6 110 (78) 5.8 ⫾ 0.9 1.9 ⫾ 0.6 55 (83) NA NA 14.1 ⫾ 3.7 NA 14.1 ⫾ 3.6 95 (67)/47 (33) 14.1 ⫾ 4.0 NA NA 136 (65), 98.1 (17.0–2,430.0) 90 (63), 97.2 (17.5–1,460.0) 46 (70), 101.5 (17.0–2,430.0) NA 159 (76), 740.0 (26.0–17,194.0) 103 (73), 695.0 (26.0–17,194.0) 56 (85), 839.0 (41.0–13,447.0) 2.0 (1.0–28.0) 11.0 (0.3–139.0) 13.3 (0.4–139.0) 9.4 (0.3–89.1) NA 12.0 (2.0–82.0) NA 184 (89) 28.0 (2.0–124.0) 5.1 ⫾ 4.7 122 (86) 27.5 (4.0–124.0) 4.8 ⫾ 4.3 62 (94) 28.0 (2.0–102.0) 5.6 ⫾ 5.3 NA 2.7 (0.6–73.6) 2.3 (0.6–5.6) 17.8 (6.2–73.6) * RA ⫽ rheumatoid arthritis; anti-TNF ⫽ anti–tumor necrosis factor; MTX ⫽ methotrexate; NA ⫽ not applicable; DAS28-CRP ⫽ Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein; HAQ DI ⫽ Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index; etan. ⫽ etanercept; RF ⫽ rheumatoid factor; anti-CCP ⫽ anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide; ESR ⫽ erythrocyte sedimentation rate. 3696 SELLAM ET AL Table 2. Lymphocyte subsets in RA patients before rituximab therapy and in controls* Lymphocytes/mm3 B cells/mm3 T cells/mm3 NK cells/mm3 B cells, % CD27⫺ B cells, % CD27⫹ B cells, % CD27⫺IgD⫹ B cells, CD27⫺IgD⫺ B cells, CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells, CD27⫹IgD⫹ B cells, CD38⫹⫹IgD⫺ plasmablasts, % % % % % Controls (n ⫽ 47) RA patients (n ⫽ 208) Anti-TNF ⫹ MTX group (n ⫽ 142) MTX group (n ⫽ 66) P, RA patients vs. controls P, anti-TNF ⫹ MTX group vs. MTX group 1,959.4 ⫾ 601.0 257.3 ⫾ 154.1 1,422.3 ⫾ 499.9 256.7 ⫾ 134.6 12.8 ⫾ 5.2 67.0 ⫾ 17.1 33.0 ⫾ 17.1 57.7 ⫾ 20.1 9.0 ⫾ 7.5 23.1 ⫾ 15.8 9.9 ⫾ 7.7 ND 1,787.8 ⫾ 853.7 188.6 ⫾ 121.4 1,379.1 ⫾ 702.3 196.8 ⫾ 131.1 10.6 ⫾ 5.3 70.7 ⫾ 17.0 29.3 ⫾ 17.0 61.8 ⫾ 19.8 7.5 ⫾ 6.4 17.9 ⫾ 11.8 10.6 ⫾ 9.6 3.3 ⫾ 3.8 1,872.7 ⫾ 880.4 211.3 ⫾ 128.7 1,437.5 ⫾ 717.0 201.7 ⫾ 138.9 11.5 ⫾ 5.3 71.4 ⫾ 15.6 28.6 ⫾ 15.6 63.4 ⫾ 18.4 6.7 ⫾ 4.4 17.7 ⫾ 10.3 10.6 ⫾ 9.4 2.9 ⫾ 2.9 1,602.5 ⫾ 767.8 137.2 ⫾ 83.5 1,251.6 ⫾ 657.5 185.8 ⫾ 112.2 8.6 ⫾ 3.9 69.3 ⫾ 19.9 30.8 ⫾ 19.9 58.2 ⫾ 22.3 7.8 ⫾ 9.1 18.4 ⫾ 14.7 10.5 ⫾ 10.0 4.3 ⫾ 5.2 0.20 0.001 0.69 0.007 0.009 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.16 0.01 0.66 NA 0.04 0.0004 0.09 0.48 0.0006 0.45 0.45 0.11 0.02 0.73 0.97 0.30 * Values are the mean ⫾ SD. NK ⫽ natural killer; ND ⫽ not done (see Table 1 for other definitions). the MTX group (32% of all RA patients), 52 had discontinued anti-TNF therapy more than 6 months before the study and 14 had never received anti-TNF. The 142 patients in the anti-TNF plus MTX group (68% of all RA patients) did not respond to anti-TNF received within the past 6 months in combination with MTX. These 2 groups of RA patients had similar baseline characteristics except for disease duration, which was longer in the MTX group (P ⫽ 0.004). The control group had a lower proportion of women compared with the RA group (P ⬍ 0.001). Subsets of blood lymphocytes in RA patients and controls. Compared with controls, RA patients exhibited global blood lymphopenia selectively involving B cells and NK cells; no decrease in T cell counts was observed (Table 2). Interestingly, mean ⫾ SD B cell and NK cell counts were reduced to a lesser extent in the anti-TNF plus MTX group (211 ⫾ 129/mm3 and 202 ⫾ 139/mm3, respectively) than in the MTX group (137 ⫾ 84/mm3 and 186 ⫾ 112/mm3, respectively), although counts of both cell subsets were reduced in each group compared with controls (B cell count 257 ⫾ 154/mm3 and NK cell count 257 ⫾ 135/mm3 in controls; P ⬍ 0.03 for both versus MTX group and P ⬍ 0.02 for both versus anti-TNF plus MTX group). In the anti-TNF plus MTX group, no difference was observed between the soluble Table 3. Correlation between the frequency of CD27⫹ memory B cells and DAS28-CRP, serum B cell activation biomarkers, and biomarkers of inflammation in RA patients* Figure 2. Frequency of blood B cell subsets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy controls (HC). A, Frequency of CD27⫺ and CD27⫹ B cells. B, Frequency of switched CD27⫹IgD⫺ and nonswitched CD27⫹IgD⫹ memory B cells. NS ⫽ not significant. DAS28-CRP Anti-CCP level Serum IgG level Serum IgA level Serum IgM level Serum FLC level Serum FLC level CRP level ESR Serum BAFF level r P ⫺0.07 ⫺0.17 ⫺0.31 ⫺0.25 0.08 ⫺0.33 ⫺0.21 ⫺0.18 ⫺0.19 ⫺0.23 0.37 0.05 ⬍0.0001 0.0008 0.27 ⬍0.0001 0.006 0.02 0.02 0.002 * FLC ⫽ free light chain (see Table 1 for other definitions). MEMORY B CELLS IN RA AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO RITUXIMAB 3697 Table 4. Leukocytes, lymphocytes, B cell subsets, and BAFF-R expression on B cell subsets according to the EULAR response at week 24 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis* Characteristic Leukocyte count, no. (%)† ⬍10,000/mm3 (referent) ⱖ10,000/mm3 Lymphocyte count, no. (%)‡ ⬍1,500/mm3 (referent) ⱖ1,500/mm3 CD3⫹ T cells, % NK cells, % CD19⫹ B cells, % CD27⫺ naive B cells, % CD27⫹ memory B cells, % CD27⫺IgD⫺ B cells, % CD27⫺IgD⫹ B cells, % CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells, % CD27⫹IgD⫹ B cells, % CD38⫹⫹IgD⫺ plasmablasts, % BAFF-R expression on, MFI CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells CD27⫹IgD⫹ B cells CD27⫺IgD⫹ B cells CD27⫺IgD⫺ B cells EULAR nonresponders (n ⫽ 59) EULAR responders (n ⫽ 149) OR (95% CI) 35 (26) 21 (32) 102 (74) 44 (68) – 0.72 (0.38–1.37) 23 (32) 25 (24) 76.2 ⫾ 8.3 12.8 ⫾ 8.7 9.4 ⫾ 4.4 64.2 ⫾ 19.0 35.9 ⫾ 19.0 6.9 ⫾ 4.4 54.5 ⫾ 23.1 21.4 ⫾ 14.1 13.1 ⫾ 12.1 4.1 ⫾ 4.8 49 (68) 78 (76) 76.2 ⫾ 7.9 11.6 ⫾ 6.3 11.0 ⫾ 5.3 73.2 ⫾ 15.5 26.8 ⫾ 15.5 7.7 ⫾ 7.0 64.5 ⫾ 17.7 16.6 ⫾ 10.5 9.6 ⫾ 8.3 3.0 ⫾ 3.3 – 1.47 (0.75–2.86) 1.00 (0.96–1.04) 0.98 (0.93–1.03) 1.07 (0.99–1.16) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.97 (0.95–0.99) 1.02 (0.97–1.09) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 0.97 (0.940–0.995) 0.97 (0.933–0.997) 0.93 (0.86–1.02) 474.6 ⫾ 210.8 514.4 ⫾ 228.5 658.2 ⫾ 270.3 471.2 ⫾ 224.3 473.0 ⫾ 225.1 548.2 ⫾ 240.7 636.5 ⫾ 296.0 512.5 ⫾ 265.1 1.000 (0.998–1.002) 1.001 (0.999–1.002) 1.000 (0.999–1.001) 1.001 (0.999–1.002) P – 0.32 – 0.26 0.99 0.34 0.07§ 0.002§ 0.002§ 0.43 0.004§ 0.02§ 0.03§ 0.11§ 0.97 0.41 0.67 0.36 * Except where indicated otherwise, values are the mean ⫾ SD. EULAR ⫽ European League Against Rheumatism; OR ⫽ odds ratio; 95% CI ⫽ 95% confidence interval; NK ⫽ natural killer; BAFF-R ⫽ BAFF receptor; MFI ⫽ mean fluorescence intensity. † The denominator is the total number of patients with a count of ⬍10,000/mm3 or ⱖ10,000/mm3. ‡ The denominator is the total number of patients with a count of ⬍1,500/mm3 or ⱖ1,500/mm3. § Significant variables in univariate analysis (P ⱕ 0.15) included in the multivariate analysis. receptor and monoclonal antibody therapies for B cell count (P ⫽ 0.24). In addition, there was no difference in B cell counts according to steroid use (always ⬍10 mg/day) in the anti-TNF plus MTX group (207 ⫾ 132/mm3 with steroids versus 226 ⫾ 120/mm3 without; P ⫽ 0.49) or in the MTX group (134 ⫾ 85/mm3 with steroids versus 157 ⫾ 78/mm3 without; P ⫽ 0.58). In a manner similar to the total B cell count, B cell frequency was also decreased in RA patients, with a smaller decrease noted in the anti-TNF plus MTX group than in the MTX group (Table 2). Cross-sectional study of B cell subsets in RA patients before B cell depletion therapy and in controls. The CD27 marker enabled a simple differentiation between naive and memory B cells (except for the very low fraction of CD27⫺IgD⫺ memory B cells). The decrease in B cell count observed in the RA group involved the CD27 naive and the CD27⫹ memory B cells in equal proportions, leading to a conserved equilibrium between these 2 subpopulations in RA patients (mean ⫾ SD 67 ⫾ 17% and 71 ⫾ 17% of CD27⫺ B cells in controls and RA patients, respectively; P ⫽ 0.19) (Figure 2A). We further investigated the distribution of the CD27⫹ memory B cell subsets into switched CD27⫹IgD⫺ and nonswitched CD27⫹IgD⫹ subsets. The CD27⫹IgD⫹ B cell frequency was comparable in controls and RA patients, and within the RA patient population between the 2 treatment groups. In contrast, the frequency of switched CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells was significantly decreased in RA patients (18 ⫾ 12%) compared with controls (23 ⫾ 16%) (P ⫽ 0.01), although there was no significant difference between the RA treatment groups (P ⫽ 0.73) (Table 2 and Figure 2B). This difference was observed irrespective of whether patients received steroids (19 ⫾ 13% with prednisone versus 14 ⫾ 9% without; P ⫽ 0.54). The frequency of the small fraction of memory CD27⫺IgD⫺ B cells was comparable between RA patients and controls (P ⫽ 0.16). However, the frequency of this subset was lower in the anti-TNF plus MTX group than in the MTX group (P ⫽ 0.02) (Table 2). BAFF and BAFF-R assessment in RA patients and controls. Serum BAFF concentrations were comparable in RA patients (561 ⫾ 313 ng/ml) and controls (mean ⫾ SD 480 ⫾ 118 ng/ml) (P ⫽ 0.21). In addition, no difference in serum BAFF concentration was observed between the MTX group and the anti-TNF plus MTX group. Moreover, the level of expression of BAFF-R on each peripheral blood B cell subset accord- 3698 SELLAM ET AL ing to the CD27/IgD classification was similar in the RA patient and control populations (data not shown). Correlation between decreased frequency of memory B cells, B cell biomarkers, and biomarkers of inflammation. We assessed whether several B cell biomarkers of disease activity and disease activity itself correlated with the relative frequency of B cell subsets. Accordingly, we used the DAS28-CRP in addition to the several measurements undertaken in the SMART study as previously described (34): anti-CCP, serum IgG, IgA, and IgM, serum and free light chains, and serum BAFF levels. Interestingly, we found that the decreased frequency of CD27⫹ memory B cells was correlated with several biomarkers of B cell activation (IgG, IgA, free light chains, free light chains, anti-CCP level, and serum BAFF level) as well as with biologic markers of inflammation (CRP level and ESR) (Table 3). However, no correlation was found between CD27⫹ memory B cells and disease activity. Baseline predictive factors associated with response to RTX at week 24. A total of 149 patients (72%) were classified as EULAR responders to RTX at week 24. These included 44 good responders (21%) and 105 partial responders (50%). For the leukocyte subsets and B cell subsets, we used the relative frequencies of the B cell subsets (%), rather than absolute cell counts, to analyze correlation with EULAR response. Results are presented in Table 4. By univariate analysis, higher frequencies of CD19⫹ B cells, CD27⫺ naive B cells, and CD27⫺IgD⫹ naive B cells and lower frequencies of CD27⫹ memory B cells, switched CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells, nonswitched CD27⫹ IgD⫹ memory B cells, and CD38⫹⫹IgD⫺ plasmablasts were associated with EULAR response and subsequently included in the multivariate analysis. The level of BAFF-R expression was not associated with a particular profile of EULAR response. In the multivariate analysis, a lower frequency of memory CD27⫹ B cells was significantly associated with EULAR response at week 24 (OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.95–0.99], P ⫽ 0.0015). DISCUSSION In this study, we have shown that B cell depletion therapy–naive RA patients exhibit a global B cell lymphopenia attenuated by anti-TNF therapy; this quantitative decrease involves CD27⫺ naive and CD27⫹ memory B cells in equal proportions, leading to a maintenance of the global equilibrium between these 2 subsets. Moreover, in the CD27⫹ memory B cell subset, the decrease was selectively observed in CD27⫹IgD⫺ switched memory B cells, while the nonswitched mem- ory CD27⫹IgD⫹ B cells remained unchanged in RA patients compared with controls. In contrast to other autoimmune diseases, the BAFF/BAFF-R system studied in the blood exhibited no significant abnormalities in RA. The most interesting finding of our study is that the decrease of global memory CD27⫹ B cells is associated with a greater clinical response to RTX. While the variations of B cell subsets after RTX therapy have been extensively studied in RA and other autoimmune diseases (3,4,10,11,35), few data are available concerning B cell homeostasis in RA patients receiving other agents (12–14,22). Recently, de la Torre et al have shown in a study with 11 healthy controls and 15 RA patients that blood B cell subset frequency according to the IgD/CD27 classification was not disturbed, except for a slightly increased proportion of CD27⫺IgD⫺ B cells in RA patients (22). In the present study involving more than 200 RA patients, we could not confirm disturbances of CD27⫺IgD⫺ B cells in RA patients. The first part of our study focused on B cell subpopulations before B cell depletion therapy in RA patients compared with controls, in addition to the influence of anti-TNF and/or MTX therapy. The difference in the proportion of women between the RA patient and control groups is unlikely to affect the interpretation of data, since B cell subset frequency might be affected by age but not by sex (36). Since the range of time before receiving the last infusion or injection of anti-TNF prior to the first infusion of RTX was very broad, we chose to stratify these patients into 2 groups: the anti-TNF plus MTX group, in which patients received their last anti-TNF injection during the previous 6 months; and the MTX group, including anti-TNF– naive patients and patients who received their last anti-TNF more than 6 months before study inclusion. The cutoff of 6 months was determined based on the half-life of each TNF blocker; this ensured that patients in the MTX group had no significant residual amounts of anti-TNF able to modify B cell subsets. Surprisingly, while no abnormalities in T cell counts were observed, absolute counts of peripheral blood B cells were quantitatively lower in RA patients than in controls, and this decrease in B cells involved both naive and memory B cells in the same proportion, thus explaining the conservation of equilibrium between naive and memory B cells in RA. The B cell lymphopenia in RA was more marked in the MTX group, suggesting that anti-TNF therapy may, in part, counteract this decrease. However, we cannot separate the impact of the disease itself and that of the treatment on this B cell lymphopenia, since we could not study untreated RA MEMORY B CELLS IN RA AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO RITUXIMAB patients, who represent the “ideal” population to determine whether B cell disturbances observed here are explained by the disease itself or by anti-TNF and/or MTX therapy. There was no variation of this equilibrium between the treatment groups or according to the type of anti-TNF (monoclonal antibody or etanercept). The B cell lymphopenia was not linked to the use of steroids. The reported B cell lymphopenia was more marked in RA patients who had received MTX than in those who had previously received MTX plus anti-TNF. Studying a small number of patients, Anolik et al have shown that RA patients receiving etanercept exhibited a decrease in the frequency of peripheral blood memory CD27⫹ B cells through the blockade of the germinal center reaction and the follicular dendritic cell network (12). In another study with results similar to those in our study, a decrease in the frequency of nonswitched CD27⫹IgD⫹ memory B cells observed in a small sample of RA patients was partially restored by infliximab; however, no data on the total B cell count were available (14). Despite the conservation of the equilibrium between CD27⫺ and CD27⫹ B cells, the decrease in the frequency of memory CD27⫹ B cells selectively affected switched CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells, suggesting that these cells have migrated to the target tissue of RA, the synovium, or are sequestered at this site. Infiltration of the synovial membrane by these cells has been shown previously (14,37). Another explanation would be a decrease in the generation of this subset induced either by the disease itself or by the previous treatments before B cell depletion therapy. This more profound decrease in memory CD27⫹ B cells may reflect a more active disease state. Thus, despite the lack of correlation between the frequency of memory CD27⫹ B cells and the DAS28 (possibly explained by the fact that all included patients had active disease with a DAS28-CRP of ⬎3.2), a correlation between decreased CD27⫹ B cell frequency and serum biomarkers of B cell activation was observed. The latter correlate with disease activity in both established and early RA (38,39), and two of them (presence of autoantibodies and serum IgG levels above normal) are predictive of a response to RTX (34). Of note, the present study also confirmed a positive correlation between serum free light chain levels and the DAS28 in established RA (data not shown). Thus, we can hypothesize that in active RA, B cell activation is associated with both the production of several B cell biomarkers and the migration or sequestering of the pathogenic memory B cells into the synovium. Indeed, the only serum B cell activation biomarker that did not correlate with the frequency of memory 3699 CD27⫹ B cells was serum IgM level; this was likely to be a reflection of the activation of naive B cells. Since RTX selectively depletes B cells, monitoring this cell subset could be valuable for predicting the response to RTX and any subsequent recurrence of disease. Several studies have shown that the reemergence of memory B cells is associated with early relapse in a small group of RA patients (3–5). The presence of residual blood B cells 15 days after RTX infusion is also associated with a poorer outcome (40). However, these parameters are measured after RTX infusion and do not represent real predictive tools. Only Vital et al have recently shown that a lower absolute count of preplasma cells at baseline was predictive of a better outcome in a univariate analysis (5). Here, we have reported, from a study of a larger population, that a low frequency of global CD27⫹ memory B cells, switched CD27⫹IgD⫺ B cells, nonswitched CD27⫹IgD⫹ B cells, and, to a lesser extent, CD38⫹⫹IgD⫺ plasmablasts was predictive of a greater clinical response to a single course of RTX. According to multivariate analyses, a low frequency of memory CD27⫹ B cells was the best parameter predictive of efficacy of RTX. The OR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.99) does not seem impressive but it is actually highly statistically significant (P ⫽ 0.0015), and it means that for each absolute decrease in memory CD27⫹ B cells of 1%, the likelihood of responding to RTX increases by 3%, which is clinically meaningful. Taking into account the cost and the complexity of the assay, as recently noted in an updated consensus statement on the use of RTX in patients with RA (41), we cannot currently recommend the study of B cell subpopulations in routine daily clinical practice. Moreover, no threshold of baseline CD27⫹ memory B cell frequency could discriminate responders from nonresponders by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (data not shown). As we have previously reported (34), there are other markers, such as autoantibodies or serum IgG level, that are simpler and less expensive to use in clinical practice. The present results suggest some explanations of the mechanism of action of RTX; since the decrease in memory CD27⫹ B cells was associated with surrogate biomarkers of disease activity (B cell biomarkers and biomarkers of inflammation), we suggest that this decreased frequency of switched memory B cells in the blood could be a surrogate marker of activation of these memory B cells in the target tissue of RA, the synovium, and may delineate a B cell–driven subset of RA that is more sensitive to B cell depletion therapy. Increases in serum BAFF and decreases in BAFF-R expression on B cells have been reported in 3700 SELLAM ET AL several autoimmune diseases (20–23). Previously, we showed that serum BAFF levels were not predictive of response to RTX (34). In the present study, we confirmed the findings of some studies showing that BAFF concentration did not differ significantly in RA patients compared with controls (22,42). Moreover, BAFF-R expression on B cell subsets was similar in RA patients and healthy controls, as previously reported (22), and here we have also shown that this expression was not predictive of response to RTX. In conclusion, RA patients not previously treated with B cell depletion therapy exhibit a selective B cell lymphopenia attenuated by anti-TNF treatment and involving CD27⫺ and CD27⫹ B cell subsets in equal proportions. The CD27⫹IgD⫺ switched memory B cell frequency was especially decreased within CD27⫹ memory B cells. The low frequency of CD27⫹ memory B cells may be predictive of response to RTX. These data suggest that in RA, decrease in peripheral memory B cell compartments may be associated with migration and activation of these cells in the synovium. These features may define a specific B cell–driven subtype of RA that is more sensitive to B cell depletion therapy. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Dr. Rosemary Jourdan, Dr. Nadine Mackenzie (Roche France), and Dr. Jamila Filipecki (previously at Roche France). AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published. Drs. Sellam, Mariette, and Taoufik had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study conception and design. Sellam, Hendel-Chavez, Abbed, Sibilia, Tebib, Le Loët, Combe, Dougados, Mariette, Taoufik. Acquisition of data. Sellam, Hendel-Chavez, Abbed, Sibilia, Tebib, Le Loët, Dougados, Mariette, Taoufik. Analysis and interpretation of data. Sellam, Rouanet, Hendel-Chavez, Abbed, Sibilia, Tebib, Le Loët, Combe, Dougados, Mariette, Taoufik. ROLE OF THE STUDY SPONSOR Roche France designed the SMART study but did not participate in the design, data collection, or interpretation of the results of this ancillary study, which was proposed by an independent scientific committee. Roche France supported the measurement of serum biomarkers, the flow cytometry experiments, and the statistical analysis. Roche France was not involved in the writing of the manuscript. Their agreement to submit the manuscript for publication was not required, their approval of the content of the submitted manuscript was not required, and publication of the manuscript was not contingent upon their approval. REFERENCES 1. Sibilia J, Gottenberg JE, Mariette X. Rituximab: a new therapeutic alternative in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2008;75: 526–32. 2. Sanz I, Anolik JH, Looney RJ. B cell depletion therapy in autoimmune diseases. Front Biosci 2007;12:2546–67. 3. Roll P, Dorner T, Tony HP. Anti-CD20 therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: predictors of response and B cell subset regeneration after repeated treatment. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58: 1566–75. 4. Roll P, Palanichamy A, Kneitz C, Dorner T, Tony HP. Regeneration of B cell subsets after transient B cell depletion using anti-CD20 antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2377–86. 5. Vital EM, Dass S, Rawstron AC, Buch MH, Goeb V, Henshaw K, et al. Management of nonresponse to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: predictors and outcome of re-treatment. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:1273–9. 6. Hansen A, Odendahl M, Reiter K, Jacobi AM, Feist E, Scholze J, et al. Diminished peripheral blood memory B cells and accumulation of memory B cells in the salivary glands of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2160–71. 7. Hansen A, Gosemann M, Pruss A, Reiter K, Ruzickova S, Lipsky PE, et al. Abnormalities in peripheral B cell memory of patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: 1897–908. 8. Arce E, Jackson DG, Gill MA, Bennett LB, Banchereau J, Pascual V. Increased frequency of pre-germinal center B cells and plasma cell precursors in the blood of children with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 2001;167:2361–9. 9. Sellam J, Miceli-Richard C, Gottenberg JE, Ittah M, Lavie F, Lacabaratz C, et al. Decreased B cell activating factor receptor expression on peripheral lymphocytes associated with increased disease activity in primary Sjögren’s syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:790–7. 10. Anolik JH, Barnard J, Cappione A, Pugh-Bernard AE, Felgar RE, Looney RJ, et al. Rituximab improves peripheral B cell abnormalities in human systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3580–90. 11. Anolik JH, Looney RJ, Lund FE, Randall TD, Sanz I. Insights into the heterogeneity of human B cells: diverse functions, roles in autoimmunity, and use as therapeutic targets. Immunol Res 2009. E-pub ahead of print. 12. Anolik JH, Ravikumar R, Barnard J, Owen T, Almudevar A, Milner EC, et al. Cutting edge: anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis inhibits memory B lymphocytes via effects on lymphoid germinal centers and follicular dendritic cell networks. J Immunol 2008;180:688–92. 13. Fekete A, Soos L, Szekanecz Z, Szabo Z, Szodoray P, Barath S, et al. Disturbances in B- and T-cell homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis: suggested relationships with antigen-driven immune responses. J Autoimmun 2007;29:154–63. 14. Souto-Carneiro MM, Mahadevan V, Takada K, Fritsch-Stork R, Nanki T, Brown M, et al. Alterations in peripheral blood memory B cells in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis are dependent on the action of tumour necrosis factor. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R84. 15. Mackay F, Figgett WA, Saulep D, Lepage M, Hibbs ML. B-cell stage and context-dependent requirements for survival signals from BAFF and the B-cell receptor. Immunol Rev 2010;237: 205–25. 16. Mackay F, Woodcock SA, Lawton P, Ambrose C, Baetscher M, Schneider P, et al. Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J Exp Med 1999;190:1697–710. 17. Schneider P, MacKay F, Steiner V, Hofmann K, Bodmer JL, Holler N, et al. BAFF, a novel ligand of the tumor necrosis factor family, stimulates B cell growth. J Exp Med 1999;189:1747–56. MEMORY B CELLS IN RA AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO RITUXIMAB 18. Nakajima K, Itoh K, Nagatani K, Okawa-Takatsuji M, Fujii T, Kuroki H, et al. Expression of BAFF and BAFF-R in the synovial tissue of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2007;36:365–72. 19. Ohata J, Zvaifler NJ, Nishio M, Boyle DL, Kalled SL, Carson DA, et al. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes of mesenchymal origin express functional B cell-activating factor of the TNF family in response to proinflammatory cytokines. J Immunol 2005;174:864–70. 20. Mariette X, Roux S, Zhang J, Bengoufa D, Lavie F, Zhou T, et al. The level of BLyS (BAFF) correlates with the titre of autoantibodies in human Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62: 168–71. 21. Pers JO, Daridon C, Devauchelle V, Jousse S, Saraux A, Jamin C, et al. BAFF overexpression is associated with autoantibody production in autoimmune diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1050: 34–9. 22. De la Torre I, Moura RA, Leandro MJ, Edwards J, Cambridge G. B-cell-activating factor receptor expression on naive and memory B cells: relationship with relapse in patients with rheumatoid arthritis following B-cell depletion therapy [published erratum appears in Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1350]. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:2181–8. 23. Landau DA, Rosenzwajg M, Saadoun D, Klatzmann D, Cacoub P. The B lymphocyte stimulator receptor-ligand system in hepatitis C virus-induced B cell clonal disorders. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68: 337–44. 24. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24. 25. Prevoo ML, van ’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight–joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:44–8. 26. Van Gestel AM, Anderson JJ, van Riel PL, Boers M, Haagsma CJ, Rich B, et al, for the American College of Rheumatology and the European League of Associations for Rheumatology. ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. J Rheumatol 1999;26:705–11. 27. Van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van ’t Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:34–40. 28. Klein U, Rajewsky K, Kuppers R. Human immunoglobulin (Ig)M⫹IgD⫹ peripheral blood B cells expressing the CD27 cell surface antigen carry somatically mutated variable region genes: CD27 as a general marker for somatically mutated (memory) B cells. J Exp Med 1998;188:1679–89. 29. Rodriguez-Bayona B, Ramos-Amaya A, Perez-Venegas JJ, Rodriguez C, Brieva JA. Decreased frequency and activated phenotype of blood CD27 IgD IgM B lymphocytes is a permanent abnormality in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R108. 30. Wei C, Anolik J, Cappione A, Zheng B, Pugh-Bernard A, Brooks J, et al. A new population of cells lacking expression of CD27 represents a notable component of the B cell memory compartment in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 2007;178: 6624–33. 31. Jacobi AM, Reiter K, Mackay M, Aranow C, Hiepe F, Radbruch A, et al. Activated memory B cell subsets correlate with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: delineation by expression of CD27, IgD, and CD95. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:1762–73. 32. Bohnhorst JO, Bjorgan MB, Thoen JE, Natvig JB, Thompson KM. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 3701 Bm1-Bm5 classification of peripheral blood B cells reveals circulating germinal center founder cells in healthy individuals and disturbance in the B cell subpopulations in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. J Immunol 2001;167:3610–8. Bohnhorst JO, Thoen JE, Natvig JB, Thompson KM. Significantly depressed percentage of CD27⫹ (memory) B cells among peripheral blood B cells in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Scand J Immunol 2001;54:421–7. Sellam J, Hendel-Chavez H, Rouanet S, Abbed K, Combe B, Le Loet X, et al. B cell activation biomarkers as predictive factors of response to rituximab in refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a six-month, national, multicenter, open-label study. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:933–8. Anolik J, Sanz I, Looney RJ. B cell depletion therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2003;5:350–6. Caraux A, Klein B, Paiva B, Bret C, Schmitz A, Fuhler GM, et al. Circulating human B and plasma cells: age-associated changes in counts and detailed characterization of circulating normal CD138⫺ and CD138⫹ plasma cells. Haematologica 2010;95: 1016–20. Jimenez-Boj E, Redlich K, Turk B, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Wanivenhaus A, Chott A, et al. Interaction between synovial inflammatory tissue and bone marrow in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol 2005;175:2579–88. Gottenberg JE, Aucouturier F, Goetz J, Sordet C, Jahn I, Busson M, et al. Serum immunoglobulin free light chain assessment in rheumatoid arthritis and primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:23–7. Gottenberg JE, Miceli-Richard C, Ducot B, Goupille P, Combe B, Mariette X. Markers of B-lymphocyte activation are elevated in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and correlated with disease activity in the ESPOIR cohort. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11: R114. Dass S, Rawstron AC, Vital EM, Henshaw K, McGonagle D, Emery P. Highly sensitive B cell analysis predicts response to rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58:2993–9. Buch MH, Smolen JS, Betteridge N, Breedveld FC, Burmester G, Dorner T, et al. Updated consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:909–20. Cambridge G, Stohl W, Leandro MJ, Migone TS, Hilbert DM, Edwards JC. Circulating levels of B lymphocyte stimulator in patients with rheumatoid arthritis following rituximab treatment: relationships with B cell depletion, circulating antibodies, and clinical relapse. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:723–32. APPENDIX A: THE SMART INVESTIGATORS In addition to the authors, the SMART investigators (all in France) are as follows: Dr. I. Azais (Poitiers), Dr. J. C. Balblanc (Belfort), Dr. F. Berenbaum (Paris), Dr. P. Bertin (Limoges), Dr. M.-C. Boissier (Bobigny), Dr. P. Bourgeois (Paris), Dr. A. Cantagrel (Toulouse), Dr. P. Carli (Toulon), Dr. P.-Y. Chouc (Marseille), Dr. M. Couret (Valence), Dr. L. Euller-Ziegler (Nice), Dr. P. Fardellone (Amiens), Dr. P. Fauquert (Berck/Mer), Dr. R.-M. Flipo (Lille), Dr. P. Gaudin (Echirolles), Dr. J.-L. Grauer (Aix-en-Provences), Dr. A. Heraud (Libourne), Dr. P. Hilliquin (Corbeil), Dr. S. Hoang (Vannes), Dr. E. Houvenagel (Lomme), Dr. D. Keita (Paris), Dr. K. Lassoued (Cahors), Dr. L. Le Dantec (Lievin), Dr. J.-M. Le Parc (Boulogne), Dr. L. Lequen (Pau), Dr. F. Lioté (Paris), Dr. C. Marcelli (Caen), Dr. O. Meyer (Paris), Dr. J.-L. Pellegrin (Pessac), Dr. A. Perdriger (Rennes), Dr. G. Rajzbaum (Paris), Dr. S. Redeker (Abbeville), Dr. J.-M. Ristori (Clermont-Ferrand), Dr. A. Saraux (Brest), Dr. G. Tanguy (La Roche sur Yon), Dr. T. Thomas (Saint-Priest-en-Jarez), Dr. L. Zabraniecki (Toulouse), and Dr. C. Zarnitski (Montivilliers).