Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Beata Deka-Szymankiewicz Michalina Adamczyk, Andrzej Niedzielski Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland 30.06.2015 Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Planet-metallicity relation: the fact that giant planets hosts (solar-type dwarfs) are more metal-rich than stars without planet companions is well accepted. is the metallicity of host star an important factor connected to the formation of planetary system? is there a planet occurrence - host metallicity relation for giants? Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Mechanisms of planet formation: core accretion (Safronov, 1960; Pollack et al., 1996) formation of planet comes from the collisional accretion of planetesimals (dependence on metallicity) gravitational disk instability (Bodenheimer, 1974; Boss, 1997): formation of planet comes from the collapse of an unstable part of the protoplanetary disk (NO dependence on metallicity) Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Dwarfs Subgiants Giants Planet-metallicity relation (dwarfs): Fischer & Valenti (2005) concluded that there is planet-metallicity relation: occurrence of gas giant planets around FGK-type dwarfs is very sensitive to metallicity of host star. Santos et al. (2001) and Ghezzi et al. (2010) showed that there is planet-metallicity relation which means that gas giant planets host stars (FGK-type dwarfs) tend to be more metal-rich compared to field stars without gas giant planets. Johnson et al. (2010) indicated that there is planet-metallicity relation: positive metallicity-planet occurrence relation for M-dwarf host stars, however it is lower compared to solar-mass stars. Buchhave et al. (2012) concluded that there is planet-metallicity relation and the average metallicity for giant planets host stars (late-type dwarfs) is higher than for smaller planets. Wang et al. (2015) showed that there is planet-metallicity relation for planets of all sizes around metal-rich host stars (4800K < Teff ¬ 6500K, log(g) 4.2) which tend to be more abundant than around metal-poor stars. Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Dwarfs Subgiants Giants Planet-metallicity relation (subgiants): Fischer & Valenti (2005) showed that there is planet-metallicity relation and metallicity distribution of subgiants with planets is compatible with dwarf stars with planets. Ghezzi et al. (2010) and Jofré et al. (2015) indicated that there is planet-metallicity relation which means that subgiants with gas giant planets tend to be more metal-rich than subgiant stars without gas giant planets. Ghezzi et al. (2010) and Jofré et al. (2015) concluded that there is planet-metallicity relation, subgiant host stars show similar planet-metallicity relation compared with main-sequence host stars. Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Dwarfs Subgiants Giants Planet-metallicity relation (giants): Hekker & Meléndez (2007) and Reffert et al. (2015) showed that there is planet-metallicity relation and giant stars with planets have higher metallicity than average metallicity of giants without planet companions. Pasquini et al. (2007) and Takeda et al. (2008) concluded that there is NO planet-metallicity relation: there is a lack of positive metallicity-planet occurrence for planet host giant stars. Mortier et al. (2013) showed that there is NO planet-metallicity relation which means that the mean metallicity of planet host giant stars is lower than dwarfs with planets. Jofré et al. (2015) indicated that there is NO planet-metallicity relation: there are no differences between metallicity of giants with and without planets. Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Pennsylvania-Torun Planet Search PTPS planets 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 3M ¯ 3M ¯ 0.0 [Fe/H] log L/L ¯ Pennsylvania-Torun Planet Search (PTPS) sample: 0.5 1M ¯ 1M ¯ [Fe/H]=0.00 [Fe/H]=-0.30 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 Teff [K] Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search 1.0 1.5 Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Pennsylvania-Torun Planet Search PTPS planets Metallicity of PTPS sample: 1.0 RGC stars (Zielinski et al. (2012)) Subgiants & Giants (Niedzielski et al. - in prep.) Dwarfs (Deka-Szymankiewicz et al. - in prep.) 0.5 [Fe/H] 0.0 −0.5 −1.0 −1.5 1 2 3 log g 4 Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search 5 Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Pennsylvania-Torun Planet Search PTPS planets Metallicity for evolved stars from several projects: 350 300 250 PTPS Wang et al. 2011 Takeda et al. 2008 Liu et al. 2010 Reffert et al. 2015 Alves et al. 2015 Jones et al. 2011 N 200 150 100 50 0 −2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 [Fe/H] 0.0 Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search 0.5 1.0 Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Pennsylvania-Torun Planet Search PTPS planets PTPS planets and metallicity: 175 RGC stars (Zielinski et al. (2012)) PTPS planet host stars 6.75% Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results: D = 0.34 p-value = 0.03 150 125 N 100 K-S test shows that the metallicity distribution of giants with planets is consistent with that without planets. 6.94% 75 1.82% 50 25 20% −1.00 −0.75 −0.50 −0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 [Fe/H] Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search Metallicity-planet occurrence PTPS Pennsylvania-Torun Planet Search PTPS planets Conclusions: PTPS sample (RGC) shows no evidence of planet occurrence stellar metallicity relation only uniform samples suitable for such studies. Metallicity distribution for planet-hosting stars from Penn State - Torun Planet Search