* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Competitive advantage
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Anthropic principle wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Dark energy wikipedia , lookup
Outer space wikipedia , lookup
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Hubble Deep Field wikipedia , lookup
Lambda-CDM model wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Cosmic microwave background wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard cosmology wikipedia , lookup
Expansion of the universe wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Ultimate fate of the universe wikipedia , lookup
Shape of the universe wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Competitive advantage Highly Successful Existing Centre 2014 Mid-term review: ü “excellent scientific achievements” ü “exceptional level of collaboration” ü “outstanding and supportive environment for students and postdoctoral researchers” ü “outstanding gender equity program” ü “highly effective and efficient Centre administration ü “highly successful and innovative outreach program” “The Centre management, including the Board, is encouraged to strategically focus on a vision for the future beyond 2017” CAASTRO Opportunities 2017-2024: A New Era of Australian Facilities SKA Pathfinder Murchison Widefield Array AAT HERMES AAT SAMI / Hector Giant Magellan Telescope Square Kilometre Array Intrinsically 3-D Facilities Science Themes The Ionized Universe: Epoch of Reionization The Massive Universe: Growth of mass and angular momentum The Chemical Universe: How the building blocks of life evolved Themes chosen where Australia will lead internationally in 2017-2024. Requires combination of Optical, Radio and Theory The Ionized Universe What are the sources of reioniza0on? How were the sources distributed? How did the ionizing sources evolve across space and cosmic 0me? MWA The Ionized Universe What are the sources of reioniza0on? When did reioniza0on begin and end? How did the ionizing sources evolve across space and cosmic 0me? First Stars Skymapper Discovering the Oldest stars First Galaxies James Webb Space Telescope Galaxy Evolution Keck, AAT Redshift space covered 6 The Massive Universe How did mass and angular momentum build across the universe? Early Universe: Gravitational Lensing Cluster magnifies galaxy light 10-30x Keck The Massive Universe How did mass and angular momentum build across the universe? Nearby Universe: ASKAP + SAMI & Hector Image Slice at a given wavelength 3-D picture of a galaxy and its motion Spectrum at a given pixel The Massive Universe 9 The Chemical Universe How did the building blocks of life proliferate across the universe? Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen Efficiency: Same Observations First Galaxies Give chemical data James Webb First Stars Space Telescope Skymapper Keck Oldest star discovered: 13.6 Gyr Galaxy Evolution Keck, AAT The Chemical Universe How did the building blocks of life proliferate across the universe? Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen GAIA Galactic Archeology Chemical elements reveal the history of our Milky Way AAT HERMES Redshift range covered 12 National Benefit Building the research capacity and technical exper0se to fully exploit Australia’s $480M investment in future Astronomy Infrastructure. CAASTRO-3D 2017 2018 2019 Giant Magellan Telescope 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Square Kilometre Array CAASTRO-3D and HECTOR › HECTOR will address all three science themes for the local universe: 1. Ionization mapping 2. Chemical abundance mapping 3. Mass and angular momentum build-up How do these quantities change as a function of environment and mass? 14 HECTOR specs To measure metallicities and ionization parameters we must: 1. Separate star formation from AGN per spaxel 2. Separate star formation from shocks per spaxel For accurate angular momentum estimates, we need: 1. Reliable stellar velocity maps 2. HI maps 15 Star formation vs AGN Composite spaxels form a clean ring of mixed Starburst-AGN activity Davies, Rich, Kewley & Dopita (2014, MNRAS, 439, 3835) Starburst vs AGN fraction Davies, Kewley & Dopita (2014), MNRAS,444, 3961 Starburst vs AGN Fits from data cube of ESO 137−G34 25 Rblue = 3000 Rblue = 2000 Median H −[O III] flux deviation (%) 20 15 10 H [O III] 5 0 7000 6000 5000 4000 Rred 3000 5000 18 Star formation vs AGN Fits from data cube of ESO 137−G34 0.08 Rblue = 3000 Rblue = 2000 Median line ratio deviation (dex) 0.06 [O III]/H 0.04 0.02 [S II]/H [N II]/H 0.00 7000 6000 5000 4000 Rred 3000 5000 19 Star formation vs Shocks Narrow Component IC 1623 flux Broad component 20 Isolating Shocks: Velocity Dispersion R=7000 Rich et al. 2011 (ApJ, 734, 87) IC 1623 NGC 3256 log([NII]/Hα) log([SII]/Hα) log([OI]/Hα) Isolating Shocks Rich et al. 2011 (ApJ, 734, 87) SAMI Shocks HII Three velocity dispersion peaks ?? Shocks Ho et al. 2015, MNRAS, 3894, 910 Star formation vs shocks SAMI R1750 in blue SAMI R4500 in red WiFeS R7000 WiFeS R7000 Star formation vs shocks Ho et al. 2015, MNRAS, 3894, 910 SAMI R4500 WiFeS R7000 SAMI vs WiFeS Ho et al. 2015, MNRAS, 3894, 910 Electron density & shocks Ho et al. 2015, MNRAS, 3894, 910 HECTOR: Bottom Line › Spectral resolution is extremely important for this science. › Ideal: R=7000 both red (i.e. @ 6500A) and blue (i.e. @ 4500A) › Minimal: R=5000 in Red and R=3000 in blue: Red line in Robert’s 4x 2kx 2k resolution vs λ plot would work, among others. › Wavelength coverage: › Require [OII] 3727 to [OIII] 5007 in blue › Require [NII] 6548 to [SII] 6731 in red › i.e. for λ<7500, require z<0.1 for a HECTOR survey › Gaps between red and blue are OK › Spatial coverage: › > 2 Re ideal – we do need larger bundles than SAMI › Resolution of individual SF regions ideal 10-100 pc HECTOR on an 8-10m? Nodes and CIs Prof. Lisa Kewley (CAASTRO-‐3D Director) Prof. Ma>hew Colless (RSAA Director) Prof. Mar@n Asplund (Laureate Fellow) AAO CSIRO Prof. Joss Bland-‐Hawthorn (Laureate Fellow) Prof. Elaine Sadler (current CAASTRO director) Prof. Sco> Croom (Future Fellow) Prof. Stuart Wyithe (Laureate Fellow) Prof. Rachel Webster Prof. Michele Tren@ Prof. Karl Glazebrook (Director) Prof. Darren Croton (QEII Fellow) Dr Emma Ryan-‐Weber Prof. Steven Tingay (Director) Dr. Cath Tro> Prof. Lister Staveley-‐Smith (Director) Prof. Simon Driver Prof. Chris Power (Future Fellow) Governance Advisory Board Director Executive Science Management Committee