Download NoN-sustaiNed, symptomatic VeNtricular tachycar

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Tzu Ming Ou et al.
Non-sustained, Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia: A case report and literatures review
Tzu Ming Ou1, Shih Chung Huang2, Jeng Chuan Shiang1, Yi Chen Wang2
Abstract
Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is commonly seen but poorly
understood. Patients with NSVT might be asymptomatic or encountered sudden cardiac
death. The prognosis depends on what the concomitant heart disease is. Poor prognosis
were found in patient with NSVT during or post exercise; acute myocardial infarction
more than 24 hours; chronic ischemic heart disease with left ventricular ejection
fraction (LVEF) below 40% with/without inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia in
electrophysiology testing; and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in the young.
Medical therapy including beta-blockers and class III antiarrhythmic agents, while
implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) and radiofrequency ablation are indicated
in certain patients. Here, we report a case that had near syncope and palpitation with
NSVT on 24-hours electrocardiography, finally received ablation and antiarrhythmic
therapy. No more arrhythmia was found during out patient department follow up.
Key Words: Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), Left ventricular ejection
fraction (LVEF), Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), Implantable
cardioveter defibrillator (ICD)
Introduction
2-weeks history of epigastric pain, chest tightness,
shortness of breath, near syncope, and palpitation.
The electrocardiography (Fig. 1) revealed sinus
tachycardia and complete right bundle branch
block. Initial vital signs showed that the blood
pressure was 202/73 mmHg, the pulse rate was
105 beats per minute, the respiratory rate was
18 breaths per minute and the body temperature
was 37.2°C. Physical examination revealed mild
pale conjunctivae, no jugular vein engorgement,
rapidly regular heart beat, no heart murmur, clear
breath sound, no legs edema. Laboratory data
showed that microcytic anemia, normal cardiac
NSVT is usually a benign cause, but it may
provoke malignant arrhythmia and then induce
sudden cardiac death. The symptoms of NSVT
vary from asymptomatic to heart failure. This report describes a 71-year-old woman with NSVT.
The symptoms were stabilized after antiarrhythmic agents and electrophysiology study plus ablation.
Case Report
A 71-year-old woman presented with a
Correspondence: Dr. Yi Chen Wang
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital; No. 2, Zhongzheng 1st
Road, Lingya District, Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan2
Phone: +886-7-749-4941; E-mail: [email protected]
Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital1
182
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Non-sustained, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia
enzymes (Hgb: 10.4 gm/dl, Hct.: 30.5%, MCV:
78.2 fl, CK: 35 U/L, CK-MB: 13.4 U/L). Traced
her past history, she has had hypertension with
medical control (unknown drugs) for 4 years. She
also received internal fixation for left femoral
fracture 2 years ago. Under the tentative diagnosis
of hypertensive emergency, conduction disorder,
anemia, peptic ulcer, she was admitted for further
management. The upper gastrointestinal panen-
doscopy revealed gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcers,
and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The 24-hours
electrocardiography showed 39 episodes of frequent NSVT (the longest duration was 4 seconds),
occasional premature ventricular contractions, and
no ischemic change (Fig. 2). The echocardiogram
disclosed no hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy and normal left ventricular systolic function.
There is no prominent hemodynamic compromise
Fig. 1. Electrocardiography revealed sinus tachycardia and complete right bundle branch block.
Fig. 2. One episode of NSVT during 24-hours electrocardiography.
183
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Tzu Ming Ou et al.
and syncope, so the patient was monitored at intensive care unit without anti-arrhythmic medication initially. The magnetic resonance imaging of
chest (Fig. 5) disclosed no evidence of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD). The
coronary angiography disclosed insignificant coronary artery disease (Fig. 3) and the electrophysiology study disclosed right ventricular outflow tract
ventricular tachycardia. Radiofrequency catheter
ablation with anatomically guided linear ablation
of the anterior septum and posterior septum little
moving to free wall was performed with a 4-mmtip ablation catheter (Safire, St. Jude Medical,
Minnetonka, MN, USA) with the temperature
preset at 60°C and radiofrequency pulse duration of 120 seconds (Fig. 4). After discharged, the
oral medications included amiodarone 200mg po
daily after intravenous loading dose, plus atenolol
25mg po daily and adalat OROS 30mg po daily.
Another 24-hour electrocardiographic recording
that revealed no more ventricular tachycardia at
outpatient department two months later.
tive premature ventricular contractions, which
may be monomorphic or polymorphic, occurred
with rate above 120 beats per minute, lasting less
than 30 seconds.
Etiology of NSVT
The mechanisms of NSVT included: (1) increased automaticity, (2) reentry, and (3) triggered
automaticity. Increased automaticity (such as right
ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia)
is often associated with autonomic tone, ischemia,
reperfusion, acidosis, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, or cardiotoxic factors.1 It may not have
sudden onset or termination. Reentry is usually
scar related. NSVT occur after acute myocardial
infarction is believed to result from the formation
of scar tissue. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia typically occurs due to reentry or triggered
automaticity, while polymorphic ventricular tachycardia is caused by increased automaticity.2 The
most common form of right ventricular outflow
tract (RVOT) ventricular tachycardia is related to
triggered automaticity arising from delayed afterdepolarizations. It is thought to be dependent on
intracellular calcium overload and cyclic adenosine monophosphate.3-5 Other causes of triggered
automaticity are described in Table 1.
Discussion
Definition of NSVT
NSVT is defined as three or more consecu-
(A)
(B)
Fig. 3. Coronary angiography disclosed insignificant coronary artery disease: (A) Right coronary artery (B)
Left anterior descending artery & left circumflex artery.
184
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Non-sustained, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia
Fig. 4. Right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia was terminated during radiofrequency
catheter ablation.
Prevalence of NSVT
Using 24 to 48 hours electrocardiographic
recording, the prevalence in people without symptoms or history of cardiac disease ranged from 0 to
3%,7-11 approximately 20% of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,12,13 40 to 50% in patients
with dilated cardiomyopathy.14-17 The prevalence
of NSVT in patients with coronary artery disease
depend on the stage of disease. Within the first 24
hours of acute MI, the prevalence ranged from 45
to 75%18-20 and declined as time went on after the
event. The SPRINT study showed the incidence
of NSVT 48 hours post MI was 3%.21 In the 24-48
hours post infarction, the NSVT is usually due to
automaticity or triggered activity; however NSVT
is often due to reentry while more than 48 hours
post infarction.20,21 The symptoms of NSVT include palpitation, chest distress, pre-syncope, syncope, and heart failure. It is usually asymptomatic
but a risk factor for sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and sudden cardiac
death, especially in patients with high frequency
or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. NSVT also
may lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy,
Fig. 5. Magnetic resonance imaging of chest
disclosed no sufficient evidence of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
(ARVD).
185
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Tzu Ming Ou et al.
Table 1. The etiologies of NSVT
Triggered automaticity6
Early afterdepolarization
1.Drugs (sotalol, N-acetylprocainamide,
terfenadine, erythromycin), cesium,
barium, low potassium
2.Acquired long-QT syndrome and
associated ventricular arrhythmia
Increased automaticity
Autonomic tone
Ischemia
Reperfusion
Acidosis
Hypokalemia
Hypomagnesemia
Cardiotoxic factors
Delay afterdepolarization
1. Gain-of- function mutation in the gene
encoding RyR2
2. Catecholaminergic polymorphic
ventricular tachycardia
Reentry
Abnormalities of myocardium or Purkinje
fibers (Same as increased automaticity or scar
formation post-myocardial infarction)
which is reversible. Ventricular tachycardia is the
most common manifestation of arrhythmogenic
right ventricular dysplasia that is a familial disease causing sudden cardiac death. Idiopathic
right ventricular tachycardia commonly presents
as non-sustained or repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Ventricular tachycardia arising from the RVOT in the absence of structural
heart disease is common, accounting up to 10%
of all ventricular tachycardias.22 The symptoms of
idiopathic RVOT ventricular tachycardia occurred
typically between the age of 20 and 40 years,
more commonly in women.23 Idiopathic right ventricular tachycardia that is most often arising from
the septal region of the right ventricular outflow
tract is a benign course.
physiology study in risk stratification for arrhythmic death is influenced by the LVEF. Patients with
LVEF between 30 % and 40% were suggested for
electrophysiology study. In ischemic heart disease
with LVEF >40%, the role of electrophysiology
study is not yet established. 25 In patients with
coronary artery disease, the two and five years
rate of sudden death were 18 and 32 percent if not
treated in NSVT and induced sustained monomorphic VT.24 Without induced sustained monomorphic VT, the two & five years rate of sudden death
were 12 and 24 percent in patients with coronary
artery disease and NSVT.26 The ACC/AHA/ESC
guidelines suggested electrophysiology testing is
reasonable for risk stratification in patients with
remote myocardial infarction, NSVT, and LVEF
equal to or less than 40% ( Class IIa; Level of Evidence: B).27
Diagnosis of NSVT
Diagnosis of NSVT is typically based on the
finding of ambulatory 24-hour Holter electrocardiography. It can establish the frequency, duration,
and morphology of the NSVT. Echocardiography
can provide the left ventricular function and identify other underlying cardiomyopathy. Patients
with suspected coronary heart disease may require
coronary angiography. Besides, the MUSTT study
suggested inducibility of tachyarrhythmia-identified patients whose death was significantly more
likely to be arrhythmic.24 The utility of electro-
Treatment of NSVT
The goals of treatment are prevention of
malignant arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death and
elimination of symptoms. Treatments included antiarrhythmic medications, implantable cardioveter
defibrillator (ICD) and catheter ablation.
1. Anti-arrhythmic medications
According to the CAST trial,28 class I antiarrhythmic drugs are not advised due to associated
186
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Non-sustained, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia
with increased mortality in patients with history of
myocardial infarction. The safe & effective antiarrhythmic medications are commonly beta-blocker
and amiodarone. Beta-blocker can reduce the
mortality of patients with ischemic heart disease
who both have LVEF below 40% and NSVT. 29
Amiodarone is effective in suppressing ventricular
arrhythmias and has a trend toward reduces mortality among those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, but it cannot reduce the incidence of sudden death or prolong survival among patients with
heart failure.30 Another study showed amiodarone
is associated with a reduction in the incidence of
sudden death in adult HCM patients (including
young adults) with NSVT.31 The Canadian Myocardial Infarction Amiodarone Trial (CAMIAT)
disclosed that amiodarone reduces the incidence of
ventricular fibrillation or arrhythmic death among
survivors of acute myocardial infarction with frequent VPCs or NSVT, but no significant reduction
in overall mortality was found.32 Amiodarone in
combination with beta blockers significantly reduced both arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic cardiac
death.32
received ICD implantation. In patients without diminished ejection fraction, further studies will be
needed to determine whether those patients would
benefit from ICD therapy. The ACC/AHA/HRS
2008 guidelines suggested ICD therapy is indicated in patients with NSVT due to prior myocardial
infarction, LVEF less than or equal to 40%, and
inducible ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia at electrophysiological study
(Class I; Level of Evidence: B).36
3. Catheter ablation
ICD can terminate ventricular tachycardia
episodes but does not prevent them. Catheter ablation offers a cure for ventricular tachycardia,
which is resistant to antiarrhythmic medications.
It can also reduce ICD shock and reversing tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. 37 Ablation was
recommended in the ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines
as useful therapy in patients who are otherwise
at low risk for sudden cardiac death and have
symptomatic nonsustained monomorphic VT
that is drug resistant, who are drug intolerant or
who do not wish long-term anti-arrhythmic drugs
therapy(Class IIa; Level of Evidence: C).27 The
success rate of catheter ablation for ventricular
tachycardia ranges from 83%-100%, while recurrence rates from 0%-31% on a variable follow-up
period.38-41 Ablation for RVOT ectopy was more
likely to fail as opposed to RVOT ventricular
tachycardia (sustained or non-sustained).42 The
predictors of failed ablation included presence of
QRS morphologic variation, wider mean QRS,
and taller R wave amplitude in lead II.42 Ablation
of ventricular tachycardia is often challenging and
lower success rates than ablation of supraventricular tachycardias. The reasons included: (1) large
infarct region. (2) Hemodynamically unstable and
poorly tolerated. (3) Epicardial or intramural in
location. (4) Several reentrant circuits.33 It is controversial that anti-arrhythmic medications needed
after successful catheter ablation. Overall, catheter
ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of
structural heart disease can only be considered an
adjunctive therapy, which in general, will require
ICD therapy.33
2. Implantable cardioveter defibrillator (ICD)
ICD is first-line therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia who also have structural heart
disease with impaired LVEF. It is also superior to
medical therapy in primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. In the patients who
received ICD implantation as primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, 20% of them would
experience at least one ventricular tachycardia
episode within 3-5 years after ICD implantation.33
The MUSTT trial disclosed ICD reduced arrhythmic death in patients with asymptomatic NSVT,
LVEF≤ 40%, and induced sustained ventricular
tachycardia, comparing with no therapy or antiarrhythmic drugs.24,34 The MADIT I study proved
the benefit of ICD for improved survival in patient
with asymptomatic NSVT and symptomatic ischemic heart disease with LVEF<35%.35 According
to the MUSTT and MADIT I results, patients with
LVEF below 40%, NSVT, and inducible ventricular tachycardia in electrophysiology study should
187
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Tzu Ming Ou et al.
sudden death43 (see Table 2). In post-myocardial
infarction patients with LVEF less than 40%, the
risk of sudden death is increased more than fivefold.48, 49 The MUSTT study also disclosed patients with coronary artery disease, left ventricular
dysfunction and asymptomatic NSVT in whom
sustained ventricular tachycardia can be induced
in electrophysiology testing have a higher risk of
sudden death or cardiac arrest and higher overall
mortality than similar patients without inducible
sustained ventricular tachycardia.26
Prognosis of NSVT
Spontaneous NSVT in apparently healthy
individuals does not imply an adverse prognosis,
but long-term follow up is advisable. NSVT in
the presence of structural heart disease carries a
more serious prognosis than NSVT in the absence
of structural heart disease. It is adverse prognostic significance for NSVT attacks during or post
exercise, in patient with acute myocardial infarction more than 24 hours, chronic ischemic heart
disease with LVEF below 40%, and hypertrophic
obstructive cardiomyopathy in the young.43,44 In
patients with congestive heart failure, NSVT is an
independent marker for increased overall mortality rate and sudden death.45 In adult patients with
hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, NSVT
is a sensitive marker for increased risk of sudden
death.46 NSVT is an insensitive and nonspecific
predictor of sudden death in idiopathic dilated
cardiomyopathy patients. 47 However, NSVT in
patients with primary ventricular fibrillation, congenital long-QT, Brugada syndrome, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, repaired congenital abnormalities, valvular heart disease, hypertension were unknown prognostic significance for
Conclusion
NSVT is frequently encountered in clinical
practice. It may increase the risk for malignant arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. The prognosis
depends on the etiologies. Clinical approach to the
patient with NSVT should always be considered
what the coexisted heart disease is. In the absence
of heart disease, spontaneous NSVT does not
carry any adverse prognostic significance. NSVT
with adverse prognostic significance were found
in patients with some conditions. Treatment to
the NSVT included antiarrhythmic medications,
Table 2.Prognostic significance of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia with
different underlying heart condition.43-49
Adverse prognostic significance
1.NSVT during or post exercise
2.Acute myocardial infarction more than 24 hours
3.Chronic ischemic heart disease with LVEF below 40%
with/without inducible sustained ventricular
tachycardia in electrophysiology testing
4.Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in the young
No Adverse prognostic significance
Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Unknown prognostic significance
1.Primary ventricular fibrillation
2.Congenital long-QT
3.Brugada syndrome
4.Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
5.Repaired congenital abnormalities
6.Valvular heart disease
7.Hypertension
188
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Non-sustained, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia
ICD implantation and catheter ablation. Betablocker and amiodarone are safe and effective
anti-arrhythmic medications. ICD implantation is
convinced as first line therapy to terminate ventricular tachycardia episode. In patients who have
structural heart disease, catheter ablation is recommended as adjunctive therapy if frequent episodes
of VT and ICD shocks. Anti-arrhythmic medications therapy after successful catheter ablation is
controversial.
11.Takada H, Mikawa T, Murayama M, et al. Range of
ventricular ectopic complexes in healthy subjects
studied with repeated ambulatory electrocardiographic
recording. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:184-186.
12.McKenna WJ, Chetty S, Oakley CM, et al. Arrhythmia
in hypertrophic cardiomypathy: Exercise and 48-hour
ambulatory electrocardiographic assessment with and
without beta adrenergic blocking therapy. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:1-5.
13.Savage DD, Seides SF, Maron BJ, et al. Prevalance of
arrhythmias during 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring and exercise testing in patients with obstructive and nonobstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation
1979;59:866-875.
14.Huang SK, Messer JV, Denes P. Significance of
ventricular tachycardia in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: Observation in 35 patients. Am J Cardiol
1983;51:507-512.
15.Meinertz T, Hofmann T, Kasper W, et al. Significance
of ventricular arrhythmias in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:902-907.
16.Neri R, Mestroni L, Salvi A, et al. Arrhythmias in dilated cardiomyopathy. Postgrad Med J 1986;62:593-597.
17.Suyama A, Anan T, Araki H, et al. Prevalance of ventricular tachycardia in patients with different underlying heart disease: A study by Holter ECG monitoring.
Am Heart J 1986;112:44-51.
18.Campbell R, Murray A, Julian DG. Ventricular
arrthythmias in the first 12 hours of acute myocardial
infarction. Br Heart J 1981;46:351-357.
19.de Soyza N, Bennett FA, Murphy ML, et al. The relationship of paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia complicating the acute phase and ventricular arrhythmia
during the last hospital phase of myocardial infarction
to long-term survival. Am J Med 1978;64:377-381.
20.Heidbüchel H, Tack J, Vanneste L, et al. Significance
of arrhythmias during the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase and effect of
early administration of a beta-blocker or a bradycardiac agent on their incidence. Circulation 1994;89:
1051-1059.
21.Eldar M, Sievner Z, Goldbourt U, et al. Primary ventricular tachycardia in acute myocardial infarction:
clinical characteristics and mortality. The SPRINT
Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:31-36.
22.Joshi S, Wilber DJ. Ablation of idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: current perspectives.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16 Suppl 1:S52-S58.
23.Nakagawa M, Takahashi N, Nobe S, et al. Gender
differences in various types of idiopathic ventricular
tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:
633-638.
24.Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al. A randomized
References
1.Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology, transient risk, and intervention assessment. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1187-1197.
2.Sheldon SH, Gard JJ, Asirvatham SJ. Premature
Ventricular Contractions and Non-sustained Ventricular Tachycardia: Association with Sudden Cardiac
Death, Risk Stratification, and Management Strategies. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
2010;10(8):357-371.
3.Lerman BB, Stein K, Engelstein ED, et al. Mechanism
of repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.
Circulation 1995;92:421-429.
4.Lerman BB, Belardinelli L, West GA, et al. Adenosinesensitive ventricular tachycardia: evidence suggesting
cyclic AMP-mediated triggered activity. Circulation
1986;74:270-280.
5.Lerman BB. Response of nonreentrant catecholaminemediated ventricular tachycardia to endogenous adenosine and acetylcholine. Evidence for myocardial receptor-mediated effects. Circulation 1993;87:382-390.
6.Michael R, Douglas PZ. Braunwald’s heart disease: a
textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia. Saunders-Elsevier Inc. 2011:672.
7.Califf RM, Mckinnis RA, Burks J, et al. Prognostic
implications of ventricular arrhythmias during 24-hour
ambulatory monitoring in patients undergoing cardiac
catheterization for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:23-31.
8.Hinkle LE, Carver ST, Stevens M. The frequency of
asymptomatic disturbances of cardiac rhythm and conduction in middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol 1969;24:
629-650.
9.Kantelip JP, Sage E, Duchene-Marullaz P. Findings on
ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in subjects
older than 80 years. Am J Cardiol 1986;57;398-401.
10.Kostis JB, McCrone K, Moreyra AE, et al. Premature
ventricular complexes in the absence of identifiable
heart disease. Circulation 1981;63:1351-1356.
189
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Tzu Ming Ou et al.
study of the prevention of sudden death in patients
with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med
1999;341:1882-1890.
25.Buxton AE, Lee KL, Hafley GE, et al. Relation of
ejection fraction and inducible ventricular tachycardia
to mode of death in patients with coronary artery disease: an analysis of patients enrolled in the multicenter
unsustained tachycardia trial. Circulation 2002;106:
2466–2472.
26.Buxton AE, Lee KL, DiCarlo L, et al. Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery
disease who are at risk for sudden death. Multicenter
Unsustained tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J
Med 2000;342:1937-1945.
27.Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, et al. ACC/AHA/
ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients
With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of
Sudden Cardiac Death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to
develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With
Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death): developed in collaboration with
the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart
Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006;114:e385-e484.
28.William JR, Andrew EE, Joaquin GA, et al. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression
after myocardial infarction. The Cardiac Arrhythmia
Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators. N Engl J Med
1989;321:406-412.
29.De Ponti R, Ho SY. Mapping of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia/ectopies: activation mapping
versus pace mapping. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:345-347.
30.Singh SN, Fletcher RD, Fisher SG, et al. Amiodarone
in patients with congestive heart failure and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure. N
Engl J Med 1995;333:77-82.
31.McKenna WJ, Oakley CM, Krikler DM, et al. Improved survival with amiodarone in patients with
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia. Br Heart J 1985;53:412-416.
32.Cairns JA, Connolly SJ, Roberts R, et al. Randomised
trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients
with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Investigators. Lancet
1997;349:675-682.
33.Eckardt L, Breithardt G. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. From indication to three-dimensional
mapping technology. Herz 2009;34:187-196.
34.Buxton AE, Fisher JD, Josephson ME, et al. Prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery
disease: the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial
(MUSTT). Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1993;36:215-216.
35.Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with
coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation
Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1933-1940.
36.Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based
Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of
the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002
Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic
Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation
2008;117;e350-e408.
37.Bogun F, Crawford T, Reich S, et al. Radiofrequency
ablation of frequent, idiopathic premature ventricular
complexes: comparison with a control group without
intervention. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:863-867.
38.Klein LS, Shih HT, Hackett FK, et al. Radiofrequency
catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients
without structural heart disease. Circulation 1992;85:
1666-1674.
39.Coggins DL, Lee RJ, Sweeney J, et al. Radiofrequency
catheter ablation as a cure for idiopathic tachycardia of
both left and right ventricular origin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1333-1341.
40.O’Connor BK, Case CL, Sokoloski MC, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow
tachycardia in children and adolescents. J Am Coll
Cardiol 1996;27:869-874.
41.Rodriguez LM, Smeets JL, Timmermans C, et al.
Predictors for successful ablation of right and leftsided idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol
1997;79:309-314.
42.Vestal M, Wen MS, Yeh SJ, et al. Electrocardiographic
predictors of failure and recurrence in patients with idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia and
ectopy who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Electrocardiol 2003;36:327-332.
43.Katritsis DG, Camm AJ. Nonsustained ventricular
tachycardia: where do we stand? Eur Heart J 2004;
25:1093-1099.
44.Monserrat L, Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, et al. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an independent marker of sudden death
risk in young patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:
190
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Non-sustained, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia
873-879.
45.Doval HC, Nul DR, Grancelli HO, et al. Nonsustained
ventricular tachycardia in severe heart failure. Independent marker of increased mortality due to sudden
death. Circulation 1996;94:3198-3203.
46.Maron BJ, Savage DD, Wolfson JK, et al. Prognostic
significance of 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a prospective study. Am J Cardiol 1981;
48:252-257.
47.Larsen L, Markham J, Haffajee CI. Sudden death in
idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: role of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993;16:
1051-1059.
48.Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM. Prevalence,
characteristics and significance of ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recordings in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:1151-1160.
49.Mukharji J, Rude RE, Poole WK, et al. Risk factors for
sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: twoyear follow-up. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:31-36.
191
Taiwan Crit. Care Med.2011;12:182-192
Tzu Ming Ou et al.
非持續性具症狀之心室心搏過速:病例報告及文
獻回顧
1
2
1
2
歐子銘 , 黃世鐘 , 項正川 , 王怡誠
摘要
非持續性心室心搏過速臨床上很常見,但了解的人卻不多。具有非持續
性心室心搏過速的病人輕微者可以無症狀,嚴重者卻有猝死的可能。預後跟
合併的心臟疾病有關。不良的預後常見於運動誘發之非持續性心室心搏過速、
急性心肌梗塞 24 小時過後、慢性缺血性心臟病及左心室射出分率小於 40%
合併有或無於心臟電生理檢查誘發出非持續性心室心搏過速、年輕人之肥厚
性阻塞性心肌病變。藥物治療包含乙型交感神經阻斷劑及 amiodarone,而植
入式心臟整流去顫器及射頻燒灼術適用於某些病人。我們報告一個 71 歲女性
合併有暈厥及心悸的症狀,24 小時心電圖診斷非持續性心室心搏過速。經射
頻燒灼術及藥物治療後病情獲得穩定控制。希望藉由這個病例讓大家更加認
識這個疾病。
關鍵詞:非持續性心室心搏過速,左心室射出分率
聯絡人:王怡誠醫師
802 高雄市苓雅區中正一路 2 號;國軍高雄總醫院心臟內科 2
電話:07-749-4941;E-mail:[email protected]
1
國軍高雄總醫院內科部
192
Related documents