Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Insolvencies in Europe 2011/12 A survey by the Creditreform Economic Research Unit CONTENTS PAGE 1 Introduction 1 2 Insolvencies in Western Europe in 2011 2 2.1 Corporate insolvencies 2 2.2 Private insolvencies 8 2.3 Business sector structure of insolvency 3 4 11 Financial and economic environment 16 3.1 Earnings situation 17 3.2 Equity capital situation 18 3.3 Payment conduct 20 3.4 Financing conditions 23 National reports Europe 24 4.1 Germany 24 4.2 United Kingdom 25 4.3 France 26 4.4 Italy 26 4.5 Spain 27 4.6 Benelux countries 28 5 Central and Eastern Europe 29 6 USA 35 7 Summary 37 List of sources 41 g 1 Introduction The pace of economic growth slowed in 2011, resulting in a year overshadowed by the European debt crisis. In Greece, in particular, the crisis assumed such serious proportions that there was a risk of it spreading to other – basically solvent – national economies. As a result of sustained tension in the financial markets, both financing conditions and business and consumer confidence in Europe deteriorated. Coupled with massive austerity programs, these developments curbed the dynamism of economic activity across Europe. Within Europe, however, growth varied considerably. Some national economies such as Germany, Netherlands and Denmark produced growth rates that were almost as high as before the financial crisis. On the other hand, countries such as Greece, Ireland and Portugal registered dramatic falls. In some cases, worse outcomes were averted only by financial support from the euro bail-out fund. Even though the German economy was not immune to these events, it managed to cut loose and become a kind of economic dynamo for the eurozone. In the first half of the year, the main driving force for the German economy came from sharply rising exports. And although the economy appreciably lost momentum in the second half of the year, it proved extremely robust on the whole. Regarding insolvency figures across Europe, 2011 presents a mixed picture: while the incidence of insolvency decreased in a large number of core countries such as Germany and Denmark, the crisis left its mark on the corporate failure figures of the periphery. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Europa overshadowned by sovereign debt crisis EU core and peripheral countries drift apart 1 g EU core countries keep insolvency total in check Peripheral countries most strongly affected 2 2 2.1 Insolvencies in Western Europe in 2011 Corporate insolvencies The European sovereign debt crisis, which had begun in 2010, continued to cast an ominous shadow last year, evolving into a full-scale crisis of confidence. It took firm hold of the European economy in 2011, and shaped – even if only indirectly – the insolvency scene in the Western European countries (EU-15 plus Switzerland and Norway). Accordingly, the European insolvency situation in the second year after the financial crisis was tense. The number of corporate collapses rose year-on-year by a margin of 0.3 percent – from 174,463 in 2010 to 174,917 in 2011 (see Tab. 1). This represents an extremely moderate increase and so it is actually more appropriate to talk of stagnation on the insolvency front. All the same, in any historical comparison, the number of insolvencies is still at a worrying high level. It is only thanks to the comparatively positive development in the core European countries that the insolvency situation has not taken on any more dramatic form. The sovereign debt crisis had the peripheral states of the eurozone firmly in its grip. Greece had already had to secure massive financial support from the EU in 2010, and in 2011, it was followed by Ireland und Portugal. The precarious situation of these economies was reflected by the way insolvency totals developed: Greece, Portugal and Ireland are among the countries with significant increases in corporate insolvency figures. There were growing fears that other highly indebted countries such as Spain and Italy would also be unable to meet their obligations and so they too were affected. And they were also among the states whose business communities last year had to face relatively serious difficulties. Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 Tab. 1: Corporate insolvencies in Western Europe g 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Change 2010/11 in percent Austria 6,194 6,657 7,076 6,500 6,362 - 7.0 Belgium 10,182 9,570 9,382 8,476 7,678 + 6.4 Denmark 5,447 6,461 5,710 3,709 2,401 - 15.7 Finland 3,005 2,864 3,275 2,612 2,254 + 4.9 France 49,506 51,060 53,547 49,723 42,532 - 3.0 Germany 30,200 32,060 32,930 29,580 29,150 - 5.8 Greece 452 355 355 359 524 + 27.3 Ireland 1,631 1,525 1.406 773 363 + 7.0 Italy *) 11,792 10,089 8,354 6,498 5,518 + 16.9 Luxembourg 961 918 698 590 680 + 4.7 Netherlands 7,000 7,211 8,040 4,635 4,602 - 2.9 Norway 4,361 4,435 5,013 3,637 2,845 - 1.7 Portugal 6,025 5,144 4,450 3,267 2,123 + 17.1 Spain 5,752 4,845 4,984 2,528 880 + 18.7 Sweden 7,177 7,546 7,892 6,298 5,791 - 4.9 Switzerland **) 6,661 6,255 5,215 4,222 4,314 + 6.5 United Kingdom 18,571 17,468 19,908 16,268 12,893 + 6.3 174,917 174,463 178,235 149,675 130,910 + 0.3 Total *) Since 2006, the insolvency statistics compiled by the register of companies in Italy include only company headquarters and no longer the individual branches of a company. **) Since 1.1.2008, companies can be officially closed down and deleted from the register by means of bankruptcy proceedings: Section 731b OR. Admittedly, some national economies, such as those of Germany and Austria, were able to escape the downward tendencies and generate strong growth. All the same, the negative repercussions of the loss of confidence and the massive austerity programmes made themselves felt in all the countries in the EU. Even in those countries with balanced budgets, the national financial institutions had large holdings of endangered sovereign bonds which created an enormous risk for the stability of the banking sector. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 3 Accordingly, European business companies were last year confronted with perceptibly higher refinancing costs and found it increasingly difficult to obtain third-party capital. In the end, the European economy was unable to liberate itself from the negative influence of the debt crisis. The level of corporate insolvencies remains high by long-term standards and the outlook for the coming year is clouded by considerable uncertainty. Stability of corporate sector under negative influence Fig. 1: Development of corporate insolvencies in Western Europe 2011 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Greece Spain Portugal Italy Ireland Switzerland Belgium Finland Luxembourg Total Norway Netherlands United Kingdom -15% France Sweden Germany -10% Austria -5% Denmark 0% -20% Corporate sector presents mixed picture 4 A glance at Fig. 1 shows how the differences in the health of the West European national economies in 2011 were reflected by the differing rates of change in corporate insolvency totals. Compared with the figures for 2010, Greece (plus 27.3 percent), Spain (plus 18.7 percent), Portugal (plus 17.1 percent) and Italy (plus 16.9 percent) posted considerable increases. On the other hand, the number of business failures declined in Denmark (minus 15.7 percent), Austria (minus 7.0 percent) Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 and Germany (minus 5.8 percent). This is particularly notable in a period when the debt crisis sometimes threatened to get out of control and refinancing terms for business firms had deteriorated massively. Overall, across Europe, the increases and falls in insolvency totals more or less offset one another, ultimately producing stagnation in aggregate insolvencies in 2011. Fig. 2: Distribution of corporate insolvencies in Western Europe dIn 2011, just as in 2010, French companies accounted for almost three corporate failures in every ten in Western Europe (28.3 percent). In second place, as before, came Germany, with 17.3 percent. The third-highest proportion was posted by Scandinavia, with 11.4 percent. The Benelux states (10.4 percent) and the United Kingdom (10.6 percent) were each responsible for around one tenth of the total (see Fig. 2). Compared with the total number of business firms, the insolvency ratio in 2011 was highest in Luxembourg, with 316 cases for every 10,000 companies. Then, a long way behind, came Denmark, with 182 collapses (see Fig. 2). Germany, with 84 insolvencies for every 10,000 registered firms, once again finished in the middle range, but higher than the European average of 68 cases of insolvency. It is notable that in respect of the insolvency ratio, the peripheral eurozone states tend to perform well. Core countries like Germany, France (94) and the Netherlands (81), on the other hand, Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 France again registers highest number of insolvencies Insolvency ratios low in the peripheral states 5 post below-average figures or even end up towards the bottom of the table, like Belgium and Austria, with 132 and 152 cases respectively. Tab. 2: Insolvency ratios in the individual Western European countries in 2011 g Greece Insolvencies per 10,000 companies 5 Spain 18 Italy 26 Portugal 57 Sweden 68 United Kingdom 81 Netherlands 81 Ireland 82 Germany 84 Norway 90 Finland 94 France 94 Switzerland 118 Belgium 132 Austria 152 Denmark 182 Luxembourg 316 Average 68 Source: National statistics offices However, these figures need to be treated with caution, since the depiction is distorted by the fact that only to a limited extent are the insolvency statistics in the individual European countries comparable with one another. So one reason for the gradient between the peripheral and the core countries is that official statistics on the overall number of business firms in Southern Europe include a large number of small traders and freelance professionals. But these groups only rarely opt for orderly insolvency proceedings; instead, they simply give up their business activities (voluntarily). Moreover, there are national specifics to be taken into consideration which might conceal the liquidity situation and solvency problems in the 6 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 corporate sector. Finally, it seems justifiable to speculate whether the lower insolvency ratio is connected to a more open-handed lending policy in these countries. Tab. 3: Insolvency-related job losses in Europe *) g Job losses (in millions) 2001 1.4 2002 1.6 2003 1.7 2004 1.6 2005 1.5 2006 1.4 2007 1.2 2008 1.2 2009 2.0 2010 1.4 2011 1.5 *) Creditreform estimate Although it is just modest, the renewed rise in the aggregate volume of insolvencies in Europe also impacted on the labour market (see Tab. 3). The still high number of business failures together with the increasing incidence of major company collapses with thousands of people being sacked led to a rise in the number of insolvency-related job losses. The figure climbed from 1.4 million in 2010 to around 1.5 million last year, corresponding to a year-on-year increase of 7.1 percent. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Slight rise in insolvencyrelated job losses 7 Dark cloud on the horizon Even though the level of insolvency-linked job losses may have been only moderate, it is important to look especially at the worsening prospects in the labour markets of such countries as Greece, Spain and Portugal, where many employees face an uncertain future. After all, there is usually a time-lag between any crisis and its impact on employment figures. SMEs in particular generally react to financial market turmoil only late when it comes to shedding personnel. So it seems likely that the situation in European labour markets could well deteriorate. 2.2 Fewer private insolvencies during the crisis European labour markets under pressure 8 Private insolvencies Whereas 2010 had brought a sharp increase in the number of private bankruptcies, in 2011 – i.e. at a time when the debt crisis threatened to get out of control – the number declined. In those countries which register the relevant data, there were altogether 1.5 percent fewer private insolvencies than the year before. The total number was 373,284. In absolute terms, that means that around 5,800 fewer individuals had to file for bankruptcy (see Tab. 4). Overall, the situation in European labour markets deteriorated in the second half of 2011. The economic slowdown in several upward-striving countries and the structural adjustments necessitated by the sovereign debt crisis led to a marked growth in unemployment in a good many parts of Europe. But alongside irresponsible conduct on the part of consumers, joblessness is a key factor boosting over-indebtedness and consequent insolvency. And so, despite the overall picture, the number of private bankruptcies rose in a good many European states last year. Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 Tab. 4: Private insolvencies in Europe g 2011 2010 2009 Austria 10,861 10,296 10,245 9,561 8,616 + 5.5 Finland *) 3,531 2,951 2,854 2,851 3,038 + 19.7 France *) 56,079 44,360 41,045 33,378 27,959 + 26.4 Germany 129,800 137,780 129,940 126,330 135,600 - 5.8 14,344 11,381 8,966 9,206 14,947 + 26.0 999 905 995 404 114 + 10.4 Sweden *) 8,051 7,987 6,589 6,528 6,831 + 0.8 Switzerland 5,748 5,719 5,691 6,007 6,140 + 0.5 United Kingdom 143,871 157,712 159,641 127,241 120,775 - 8.8 Total 373,284 379,091 365,966 321,506 324,020 - 1.5 Netherlands *) Spain 2008 2007 Change 2010/11 in percent *) Debt relief plan/ rescheduling process The most marked year-on-year increase in the numbers of insolvent consumers was registered in France (plus 26.4 percent), followed by the Netherlands (plus 26.0 percent) and Finland (plus 19.7 percent). Expressed in absolute terms, the number of private insolvencies in these three countries together increased by around 15,300. As well as economic factors, something else that probably also played a role is that consumers sometimes move to a neighbouring country before filing for bankruptcy. The chief reason for this kind of "insolvency tourism" is the ongoing lack of any harmonization of insolvency law within the EU. This creates considerable differences between countries where the course of the bankruptcy proceedings is concerned, especially in respect of the length of the required period of good conduct until an individual is freed of his or her residual debts. The overall decline in the total number of private insolvencies was fuelled chiefly by the developments in Germany and the United Kingdom: in these two countries alone, the absolute total of such cases fell by about 21,820 compared with 2010. The year-on-year decline in Germany was 5.8 percent, with a 2011 total of 129,800 (2010: 137,780). As the 2011 Creditreform Debtor Atlas shows, the scale of private over-indebtedness in Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 "Insolvency tourism" Germany and United Kingdom with marked declines starken Rückgängen 9 Good conduct period in Germany shortened Private indebtedness endemic in the UK 10 Germany has decreased in line with the improvement in the labour market and the economy as a whole. One negative aspect remains: the general level of consumer bankruptcies remains high. And it does not seem likely that Germany will be able to lower this level in the medium term. In fact, the shortening of the good conduct period from six years to three may well lead to a marked increase in the number of private bankruptcies. In fact, the prospect of a shorter good conduct period might even be the reason for the reticence shown last year regarding the opening of court proceedings. In the United Kingdom, the number of private insolvencies fell by 13,840. That corresponds to a decline of 8.8 percent – the most marked drop in any of the European countries. Nevertheless, the United Kingdom still registered by far the largest number of private insolvencies in Europe for the third year in succession, with a total of 143,871 cases (2010: 157,712). The reason for this extremely high level: in the United Kingdom, the idea of "living on tick" is taken for granted. Hardly any other industrial country exhibits such a high scale of indebtedness among private households (source: OECD). From the historical angle, too, the British figures are worrying: since 2003 (38,930 cases), the number of private bankruptcies has more than tripled. This rise is due mainly to a restructuring of insolvency legislation, with the introduction of new procedures which make it easier for private individuals to file for bankruptcy and which also considerably speed up the process through to discharge of residual debt. Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 2.3 Business sector structure of insolvency In the period under review, the relative contribution to the European insolvency volume made by commerce (wholesale/retail including catering/hotels) increased somewhat (see Tab. 5). Just like the year before, almost one insolvency in every three involved a firm from this branch of the economy, giving it a share of 31.2 percent, after 30.5 percent in 2010. The construction sector was also responsible for a bigger proportion of the total number of corporate insolvencies in Europe: two out of every ten insolvent firms came from this sector (2011: 21.4 percent; 2010: 21.0 percent). The absolute numbers in 2011 were 54,574 business failures in commerce and catering (2010: 53,211) and 37,432 bankrupt building firms (2010: 36,637). Construction and commerce with higher shares of total Tab. 5: Contribution of the key economic sectors to overall insolvency in Western Europe in 2011 g Contribution to insolvency volume Insolvencies per 10,000 companies Manufacturing 10.5 (10.9) 61 ( 63) Construction 21.4 (21.0) 107 (100) Commerce *) 31.2 (30.5) 89 ( 85) Services 36.9 (37.6) 49 ( 52) 100.0 (100.0) 68 ( 68) Total *) including hotels and catering; figures in percent, ( ) = 2010 Last year saw European industry continue its recovery. The contribution to the overall insolvency volume in Western Europe made by manufacturing was 10.5 percent, after 10.9 percent in 2010 and 11.4 percent in 2009. This fall in the relative incidence of corporate collapses was presumably due to the expanding level of industrial activity and to the situation on the foreign trade front, enabling manufacturing to show itself in a relatively good light. In 2011, only 18,366 industrial firms had to file for bankruptcy, as against 19,016 in 2010. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Lower figures in manufacturing 11 Fig. 3: Contribution of the key economic sectors to overall insolvency in Western Europe in 2011 *) including hotels and catering; Source: Creditreform, NACE Rev. 2, own calculations Service firms account for more than one in three insolvencies Industry with fall in relative incidence of insolvency Compared with the previous year, the contribution made to the Western European insolvency total by the service sector fell in 2011, and the absolute number of insolvencies in this sector also declined, from 65,598 to 64,544. Nevertheless, it still accounted for the biggest share, over one third, of aggregate insolvency, with 36.9 percent. Where the structural distribution of the relative incidence of insolvency is concerned – i.e. the number of cases of insolvency for every 10,000 firm in the sector – nothing changed much last year (see Tab. 5). The construction sector is still the hardest hit, with 107 building firms in every 10,000 going broke. That is actually worse than the year before, when the figure was 100. The manufacturing sector posted a slight fall in the incidence of insolvency: from 63 cases for every 10,000 firms in 2010 to just 61 last year. That result is in line with the reduction of the absolute number of corporate collapses in industry. The incidence of insolvency in commerce/catering was again relatively high last year, with an insolvency ratio of 89 cases for every 10,000 firms. The 2010 figure was 85. Just as in the previous two years, the ratio was lowest in the service sector, where just 49 firms in every 10,000 had to file 12 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 for bankruptcy. That was actually slightly fewer than the year before (2010: 52). Regarding the time-line development of the sectoral shares of total insolvency in Western Europe, it is apparent that there have been changes in the relationship of the different branches of the economy to one another (see Fig. 4). In 2011, the contribution made by commerce rose to 31.2 percent after having stagnated the year before. In the construction sector, too, 2010 had been a year exhibiting little change. Between 2008 and 2010, this sector's share was between 20.9 and 21.1 percent; then in 2011 it climbed again to reach a peak of 21.4 percent. Post-2010 development somehwat more dynamic Fig. 4: Year-on-year changes in contribution to insolvency in Western Europe by the key economic sectors *) including hotels, catering; Source: Creditreform, NACE Rev. 2, own calculations The relative development of the manufacturing sector since 2007 shows that – despite all the prophecies of doom – this sector has in fact been recovering: last year's share, of 10.5 percent, was drawing closer to its 2007 level (9.5 percent). Since 2007, the contribution made by the service sector had grown continuously, but last year it fell Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Manufacturing sector close to 2007 level 13 again for the first time (2011: 36.9 percent; 2010: 37.6 percent). Service sector hardest hit in most countries In most Western European countries, it is the service sector which accounts for the largest proportion of corporate insolvencies (see Tab. 6). Exceptions in this respect are Belgium and France, where commerce/catering makes the biggest contribution, with shares of 45.8 and 35.3 percent respectively. The recovery in manufacturing referred to above and shown in Fig. 4 is a phenomenon that is evident in the insolvency totals of most of the important European industrial countries. In Germany, for instance, the contribution made by manufacturing fell from 9.4 to 8.9 percent, in Italy from 24.1 to 22.8 percent, in France from 7.7 to 7.5 percent, and in the United Kingdom from 12.5 to 10.7. Tab. 6: Insolvencies in the key economic sectors in 2011 Manufacturing g Construction Commerce *) Services Austria 7.3 ( 7.9) 15.9 (15.4) 35.9 (36.5) 41.0 (40.2) Belgium 6.4 ( 6.9) 16.7 (16.0) 45.8 (46.7) 31.1 (30.4) Denmark 8.4 ( 7.8) 14.2 (15.6) 24.7 (22.5) 52.7 (54.1) Finland 11.9 (12.7) 26.6 (25.8) 26.0 (25.3) 35.5 (36.3) France 7.5 ( 7.7) 27.0 (28.0) 35.3 (34.2) 30.2 (30.0) Germany 8.9 ( 9.4) 16.1 (15.9) 30.2 (30.6) 44.9 (44.1) Ireland 11.5 (10.3) 29.1 (31.0) 35.2 (26.8) 24.2 (32.0) Italy 22.8 (24.1) 20,6 (18,5) 28.0 (26.2) 28.6 (31.3) Luxembourg Netherlands 1.1 ( 1.9) 8.7 (10.0) 26.0 (31.3) 64.1 (56.9) 12.8 (14.0) 15.3 (16.1) 28.9 (27.3) 42.9 (42.6) Norway 7.6 ( 7.9) 22.9 (24.1) 31.7 (30.5) 37.8 (37.5) Portugal 23.5 (28.7) 18.7 (19.1) 38.4 (35.3) 19.4 (16.9) Spain 21.7 (21.4) 34.7 (32.5) 18.7 (19.3) 25.0 (26.8) Sweden 8.2 ( 8.9) 15.0 (14.3) 29.4 (28.0) 47.4 (48.8) Switzerland 9.2 ( 9.4) 24.8 (23.3) 19.7 (22.4) 46.3 (44.9) United King- 10.7 (12.5) 21.6 (18.5) 23.8 (21.8) 43.9 (47.1) dom *) including hotels, catering, figures in percent, ( ) = 2010 14 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 Although several of the fundamental structures are apparent across a large number of Western European states, the insolvency scene nevertheless varies between individual countries, in some cases quite considerably. The share of the national insolvency total generated by production/processing in Southern Europe, for instance, is particularly high, something due, among other things to the exposed situation of agriculture and the small trades. In Portugal, this sector contributes all of 23.5 percent to the aggregate number of the cases of insolvency in the country – in other words, almost one insolvency in every four in Portugal concerns a firm involved in production. The relevant figures for Spain (21.7 percent) and Italy (22.8 percent) are also well above the Western European average in this branch of the economy (10.5 percent). In most countries in Western Europe, the insolvency situation in the construction sector has intensified. In the "Big 5", with the exception of France, the construction sector contributed a larger number of corporate failures than the year before, with a comparatively big increase in the United Kingdom (2011: 21.6 percent; 2010: 18.5 percent). This sector made a particularly high contribution to overall insolvency in Spain (34.7 percent) and in Ireland (29.1 percent) – but the property business is evidently also shrinking its way back to health in Finland (26.6 percent) and France (27.0 percent). Iberian peninsula with big problems in the production trades European property business shrinking In many countries, a particularly large number of bankrupt firms are to be found in the sector commerce/catering. In Portugal (38.4 percent) and Austria (35.9 percent) but also in France (35.3 percent) and Ireland (35.2 percent), more than one business collapse in every three involves a firm in wholesale/retail or catering. In Belgium, the proportion rises to almost half (45.8 percent). Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 15 Fig. 5: Changes in insolvency in the key economic sectors *) including hotels, catering, figures in percent In respect of the rates of change in the incidence of insolvency in the individual branches of the economy, the picture is mixed (see Fig. 5). Whereas the year before, there were declines across the board, in 2011 only manufacturing/production (minus 3.2 percent) and the service sector (minus 1.7 percent) registered a negative change. In contrast, the difficult business situation in construction and in commerce made itself apparent with increases of 2.2 percent and 2.4 percent respectively, meaning that in these sectors, the average incidence of insolvency was higher in 2011 than in 2010. Further declines in manufacturing and services g 3 Financial and economic environment The economic development and the financial environment were the main reasons for the upward trend in insolvency in wide areas of Europe in 2011. The position of the European business community was adversely affected by an indifferent earnings situation, bad debts, more restrictive financing conditions and structural deficiencies (e.g. shortage of equity capital). 16 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 3.1 Earning situation An evaluation of the 2010 annual financial statements of about 2.8 million (Western) European companies reveals that the earnings situation of European businesses remains under strain (see Tab. 7). Almost one third of the companies surveyed (29.9 percent) had a negative EBIT margin, and were thus posting a loss. EBIT – earnings before interest and taxes – is a turnover-related indicator of a company's operative profitability. So almost one in three companies in Europe was definitely in a bad way. The year before, the proportion of companies with a negative earnings margin had been just 27.8 percent. In addition, the proportion of European firms with an EBIT margin of between six and 25 percent fell from 30.2 to 28.2 percent. All the same, there was a glimmer of light on the horizon: in 2010, a larger number of companies achieved an EBIT margin of over 25 percent. The figure in 2009 had been only 13.9 percent, whereas in 2010 16.1 percent of European firms demonstrated that they are extremely profitable. Almost one third of firms with negative earnings margin Tab. 7: EBIT margin (in %) of Western European companies in 2010 *) g negative 29.9 (27.8) up to 5 % 25.7 (28.1) up to 10 % 12.5 (14.7) up to 25 % 15.7 (15.5) more than 25 % 16.1 (13.9) *) Figures in percent; ( ) = 2009; Source: Creditreform database, own calculations Where 2011 is concerned, the earnings situation of firms in Europe looked set to improve somewhat. Although it will not be possible to evaluate the EBIT data until the financial statements for 2011 have been published, analysis by the European Central Bank indicates that the earnings position should have brightened slightly (ECB Monthly Reports). In particular the earnings situation of Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Slight rebound in the course of 2011 17 non-financial companies developed comparatively positively in the course of the year. 3.2 Basel III makes equity ratio even more important Equity capital situation A company's equity ratio provides information on the extent to which its assets are backed by its own funds. It is measured as a ratio between liable capital and the balance sheet total and forms a decisive indicator for appraising a firm's solvency and ability to bear risk. Seen from the angle of a bank, a company's equity capital represents security against credit default. Since it can be assumed that the amended equity capital regulations laid down in Basel III will have a profound impact on the equity situation and the business activities of banks, companies are well advised to attach even greater importance to having a solid financial structure in order to be ready for the new requirements. Fig. 6: Proportion of firms with equity ratio < 10% *) Figures for 2010 in percent; Source: Creditreform database, own calculations 18 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 An analysis of the financial statements from 2010 shows that in particular firms in the peripheral countries of Europe have a relatively low capacity for bearing risks (see Fig. 6). In this evaluation of the equity ratios of 5.8 million companies, ten percent was taken as the threshold indicator for highlighting financing problems in an economy: such problems are especially apparent in countries where a large proportion of companies have equity ratios of less than ten percent in relation to the balance-sheet total, in other words where the national corporate sector is poorly capitalised. This proportion is particularly high in such peripheral European countries as Italy (35.4 percent), Ireland (30.4 percent), Spain (27.6 percent) and Portugal (26.5 percent). By the same yardstick, the solvency of firms in Scandinavia is relatively good. The proportion of firms there with an equity ratio of less than ten percent is only around one in five, for instance in Denmark (18.8 percent), Finland (20.3 percent) or Sweden (21.1 percent). Companies in the core EU countries like Germany (22.2 percent) and France (20.4 percent) are also relatively well capitalised. On average in Western Europe, 25.9 percent of all business companies have an equity ratio of less than ten percent, meaning that one quarter of all business enterprises are under-capitalised and thus have only a relatively low credit-standing. These firms tend to have a greater number of creditors and are likely to have occasional problems concerning refinancing. So in the era of Basel III, a considerable proportion of European business firms will have to strengthen their equity basis to avoid endangering their chance of obtaining follow-up financing, which would put their stability at risk. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Poor equity ratio in the peripheral countries Core countries and Scandinavia stable Probably one firm in every four faced with refinancing problems 19 3.3 Payment conduct A basic distinction between peripheral states on the one hand and core and Scandinavian countries on the other also needs to be made in respect of the time taken to settle invoices. The analysis here is based on the average days sales outstanding (DSO), which shows how quickly bills are paid after goods have been exported to particular countries. Core and Scandinavian countries pay invoices fastest Eastern European countries with average payment conduct A glance at Fig. 7 shows just how much the payment conduct of companies varies between the different European countries. Almost threequarters of German firms (72.3 percent) exporting goods to Austria or Switzerland, for instance, receive payment within a month. Invoices issued to customers in other European core nations are also paid relatively quickly. Firms in Benelux countries, for example, settle bills sent to them by German exporters within 30 days in 57.9 percent of all cases. At the other end of the scale are peripheral states like Spain and Portugal. Only in two cases out of every ten (20.0 percent) does a German company exporting goods to these countries receive payment within one month. The situation regarding Italian customers is similar (20.1 percent). Where payment conduct is concerned, the Eastern European countries tend to occupy a midfield position. For instance, 42.4 percent of German firms exporting goods to Poland report receipt of payment within 30 days. German companies which export goods to Italy have to wait an extremely long time before they are paid. Almost half of all firms (46.3 percent) report waiting periods of over two months. A similar waiting period is experienced by 29.3 percent of German exporters shipping goods to Spain and Portugal. More than one in four German firms (27.1 percent) has to wait over 60 days for payment if it sends merchandise to Romania, Bulgaria or Croatia. 20 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 Fig. 7: Collection periods in Europe (data in percent) Source: Creditreform The situation regarding payment delays in Europe is similar to the picture outlined above of payment conduct in the context of actual payment terms (see Fig. 8). Export-oriented German companies have extremely bad payment experiences in relation to the Mediterranean countries. Over one quarter of all firms (25.2 percent) report that in the case of goods sent to Italy, they are still waiting for their money a month after the payment deadline has passed. Things are not much better where Spain or Portugal is concerned: customers there are also tardy payers. 23.4 percent of all firms with business relations in these two countries complain of agreed deadlines being exceeded by 30 days. Similar problems arise in trade with Eastern Europe. Only one exporter in every ten has no complaints to make about payment arrears after sending goods to countries like Romania and Croatia (10.6 percent), the Czech Republic or Hungary (10.7 percent). French customers also tend to wait a considerable time after the payment deadline has expired before settling their invoices. 15.1 Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Italians over-run the longest 21 percent of German firms with dealings in France report payment delays of more than 30 days. Excellent payment conduct in Switzerland The heart of Western Europe presents a totally different picture, with Austria and Switzerland in particular standing out positively from the rest of the field. German exporters with business relations in these countries are spared payment delays entirely in more than three out of every ten cases (35.3 percent). Customers in the Benelux countries are also relatively good debtors. Almost a quarter of German firms (23.3 percent) exporting goods to these countries do not experience any payment delays. Fig. 8: Payment delays in Europe (in percent) Source: Creditreform 22 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 3.4 Financing conditions Financing terms in Europe deteriorated considerably in the course of 2011. Whereas in the first half of the year, lending conditions for business enterprises were tightened only slightly, from the third quarter onwards there were growing concerns regarding the debt situation in the eurozone grew and this was accompanied by a weakening of the European banking sector. In particular, banks holding large quantities of the sovereign bonds of the highly indebted European countries found themselves confronted by growing refinancing costs and liquidity problems. Accordingly, bank in the eurozone tightened their credit terms for business companies and increased their interest rates (European Central Bank, Euro Area Bank Lending Surveys). In the wake of the euro crisis, the signs point towards an upcoming credit squeeze in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, whose economies are anyway developing far worse than expected. The generally weakened European banking sector and the correspondingly more difficult refinancing environment could aggravate a possible downturn in Central and Eastern Europe, since approx. 80 percent of the foreign liabilities there relate to eurozone banks. In several countries, such as Romania, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Croatia, Western European banks are so strongly committed that they are of systemic significance for the relevant national financial systems (Bank for International Settlements, quarterly reports). The financing environment in Germany, on the other hand, can be seen as relatively relaxed. German banks are admittedly more reticent than before about lending money but there is no danger of a credit crunch. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Tight credit terms in Europe Credit squeeze imminent in Eastern Europe Financing environment in Germany relatively good 23 g Third-lowest insolvency total since 2001 4 4.1 National reports Europe Germany In 2011, the German economy once again developed vigorously. With growth of around three percent, Germany functioned once more as the economic dynamo of Europe. This growth was fuelled above all by private consumer expenditure and a robust scale of investment. Unemployment, at less than seven percent, was relatively low by previous standards. This good economic situation impacted positively on the insolvency scene (see Tab. 8). The number of corporate insolvencies in 2011 totalled 30,200. That is the third-lowest level since 2001 and corresponds to a year-on-year fall of 5.8 percent (2010: 32,060). Tab. 8: Insolvencies in Germany g Total Companies Private individuals Manufacturing and construction benefit strongly from upswing up- Negative outlook in the field of private bankruptcies 24 2011 2010 Change in % 160,000 169,840 - 5.8 30,200 32,060 - 5.8 129,800 137,780 - 5.8 The most marked decline in insolvency figures was registered by the manufacturing sector, with a clear-cut reduction of 14.1 percent. Another beneficiary of the upswing was construction, where the number of insolvencies dropped by an exceptionally high 13.3 percent. At the same time, the extent of major insolvencies was limited. By far the biggest was the collapse of printing press manufacturer manroland AG, with 6,500 people on its payroll. Other prominent corporate bankruptcies were Sellner GmbH, with around 1,600 employees, and the Schlott Group, with a workforce of around 1,480. Less pleasing was the situation in the field of private insolvencies. Even though here, too, the total fell – by 5.8 percent to 129,800 (2010: 137,780) –, it still reached its third-highest level since 1999. Another factor here is that many private individuals probably delayed filing for bankruptcy in anticiInsolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 pation of the shortening of the period of good conduct expected in 2012. This is likely to produce a grave increase in private insolvencies in this present year once the procedure for residual debt relief is speeded up. 4.2 United Kingdom The economic recovery in the United Kingdom in the past twelve months has been somewhat meagre, with growth of just 0.6 percent. The outlook, with an IMF forecast of 0.9 percent, is not much brighter, either. Domestic consumption is held back by restrictive lending policies, "financial restructuring" in private households and the country's tighter financial policies. Nor is any real improvement in the labour market in sight – the unemployment rate is around the 8 percent mark. The number of corporate insolvencies rose according, by 6.3 percent (see Tab. 9) from 17,468 in 2010 to 18,571. The biggest proportion of aggregate insolvencies was registered by the service sector, with an exceptional 43.9. Real estate and property were particularly hard hit. Difficult economic situation boosts corporate insolvency numbers erneh- Tab. 9: Insolvencies in the United Kingdom g Total Companies Private individuals 2011 2010 Change in % 162,442 175,180 - 7.3 18,571 17,468 + 6.3 143,871 157,712 - 8.8 Despite the still high jobless total and the high level of over-extended households, the number of private insolvencies fell by 8.8 percent last year to 143,871 (2010: 157,712). Any rejoicing is likely to be short-lived, though, because the scale of private indebtedness in the United Kingdom remains extremely high, and the situation is actually likely to be aggravated by such adverse factors as the sluggish economy and the ongoing decline in property prices. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Brief respite in field of private insolvencies 25 4.3 Boom for debt clearance procedure France In view of the fact that 2012 is set to be a year of stagnation for France (IMF forecast), the 1.6 percent economic growth achieved in 2011 looked like relatively good news. The French government faces the difficult job of finding the right balance between stricter budgetary consolidation and the need to promote growth. Unemployment has reached a worrying level, with a rate of over nine percent. Together with the increasing trend for consumers from neighbouring countries to opt for insolvency proceedings in France, this has led to a substantial leap in the number of private individuals taking advantage of the French debt clearance procedure (Procédure de Rétablissement Personnel) (see Tab. 10). The number of people filing for private bankruptcy in 2011 rose by a remarkable 26.4 percent, from 44,360 to 56,079. Tab. 10: Insolvencies in France g 2011 2010 Change in % 105,585 95,420 + 10.7 Companies 49,506 51,060 - 3.0 Private individuals 56,079 44,360 + 26.4 Total Decline in French corporate insolvency figures The development of corporate insolvencies, on the other hand, was far more positive. In absolute terms, the number fell from 51,060 cases in 2010 to 49,506 in 2011. That corresponds to a decline of 3.0 percent. The share generated by the construction sector was above-average (27.0 percent), while the largest number of business failures was registered in the field of commerce and catering, with 35.3 percent of the total. 4.4 Structural bottlenecks in Italy 26 Italy In 2011, the economy in Italy suffered from the repercussions of the European debt crisis, especially the increase in refinancing costs. Even though the economy in Italy is not in such poor condition as that in Greece or Portugal, the finan- Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 cial markets fear that Italy will not be in a position to completely repay its substantial debts. Economic growth last year was just 0.4 percent and in view of structural bottlenecks it is likely to remain low for some time to come. The labour markets remain weak and sovereign debt rose in 2011 to around 120 percent of GDP. The International Monetary Fund forecast for Italy in 2012 is of negative growth of 2.2 percent. Tab. 11: Corporate insolvencies in Italy g 2011 2010 Change in % 11,792 10,089 + 16.9 Against this background, there was a renewed year-on-year increase of 16.9 percent in the total number of corporate insolvencies (see Tab. 11). The figure rose from 10,089 to 11,792. The biggest contribution to the total was made by the service sector, with a share of 28.6 percent, closely followed by commerce/catering, with 28.0 percent. 4.5 Spain Spain was among the European countries worst hit by the 2007-09 financial crisis. In addition, the country's economy is now suffering enormously from the impact of the European sovereign debt crisis. Together with the high budgetary deficit and the growing costs of debt refinancing, Spain's biggest problem is the high level of joblessness. In the course of last year, the unemployment rate touched almost 23 percent at times and the figure at the end of the year was over 20 percent. The sovereign debt crisis is continuing to exert massive pressure on the Spanish government and the country's economy. The wide-ranging package of economic policy measures initiated by the government will probably not be able to prevent the country's GDP – which grew by 0.7 percent in 2011 – from shrinking in 2012 (IMF forecast). Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Spain especially hard hit by financial and debt crisis 27 Tab. 12: Corporate insolvencies in Spain g Bloated construction sector boosts number of insolvencies Insolvencies in Luxembourg at record level 28 2010 Change in % 5,752 4,845 + 18.7 In an effort to regain the confidence of the financial markets, Spain is demonstrating fiscal moderation. Between 2009 and 2010, it already reduced its deficit from 11.1 to 9.2 percent, and the reduction is likely to have continued last year. But the austerity measures and the tense economic situation in Europe is imposing a strain on Spanish business. In particular the construction and property sector is still bloated, highly indebted and heavily dependent on third-party capital. Accordingly, the number of corporate insolvencies in Spain rose by 18.7 percent compared with 2010 (see Tab. 12). The total increased from 4,845 cases in 2010 to 5,752 in 2011. The construction sector's share of this total was disproportionately high. Whereas in Europe as a whole, this sector accounted for an average of 21.4 percent of aggregate insolvencies, in Spain the figure was 34.7 percent. 4.6 Netherlands with fewer business failures 2011 Benelux countries The insolvency situation in the Benelux countries exhibited differing trends (see Tab. 13). The Netherlands excelled, with a decline of 2.9 percent in the number of corporate insolvencies. This fell from 7,211 to 7,000. Neighbouring Belgium performed far worse; there, the number of firms having to make their way to the bankruptcy courts rose from 9,570 to 10,182. That is equivalent to an increase of 6.4 percent. Luxembourg, where the insolvency total had already climbed by a remarkable 31.5 percent between 2009 and 2010, set a new negative record in 2011. Year-on-year, aggregate business collapses increased by a further 4.7 percent to 961 cases (2010: 918). In Luxembourg and the Netherlands, it was the service sector which was hardest hit, with shares of 64.1 and 42.9 percent respectively. In Belgium, this Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 sector accounted for only 31.1 percent of the total, and the insolvency scene there was dominated by commerce and catering, with 45.8 percent of all corporate insolvencies. Tab. 13: Corporate insolvencies in the Benelux countries g 2011 2010 Change in % 10,182 9,570 + 6.4 Netherlands 7,000 7,211 - 2.9 Luxembourg 961 918 + 4.7 Belgium In the Netherlands, statistics also cover private bankruptcies. These rose sharply, by 26.0 percent, from 11,381 cases to 14,344. Just like France, the Netherlands has a procedure which enables private individuals to free themselves from their debts after just a relatively short good conduct period. Alongside economic factors, something which could have played a role in the rise in the insolvency total is the fact that consumers from neighbouring countries move to the Netherlands to take advantage of this procedure. g 5 Central and Eastern Europe Overall, the economic development in Central and Eastern Europe was very modest. The economic environment in the individual countries was influenced substantially by the debt crisis and its repercussions in the nations of Western Europe. In view of the imminent credit squeeze (see also Section 3.4), the situation is generally speaking extremely tense and in connection with a net capital outflow could lead in the course of 2012 to a serious slump in growth or even a recession (EBRD). Economic situation in Central and Eastern Europe tense The third quarter of 2011 brought an outflow of capital from the CEE region for the first time since 2009: banks in Western Europe – faced by growing refinancing problems – set out to reduce their debts in order to strengthen their equity ratios. Since a large proportion of the financial assets in Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 29 the Eastern European banking sector is foreignowned and the CEE banks are dominated by Western European financial institutes, this had earnest consequences for the Eastern European financial system. Banking system integration causes big problems for CEE countries Another sizeable rise in corporate insolvencies Although the strong presence of foreign financial institutes is generally seen as having a positive influence, the difficult situation confronting Western European parent banks impaired their ability to support subsidiaries in restructuring their balance sheets. This led to stricter lending standards and fewer loans, which ultimately had the effect of slowing down economic growth in the CEE region. Naturally enough, the extremely difficult financing environment inflicted wounds on the business community and was ultimately also reflected in last year's corporate insolvency figures (see Tab. 14). Following the massive rise of 14.1 percent between 2009 and 2010, 2011 brought another marked increase, of 6.1 percent altogether. In absolute terms, the number of CEE firms having to file for bankruptcy climbed from 37,139 in 2010 to 39,423 last year. But there were also declines. The biggest were those registered by the Baltic states of Estonia (minus 49.2 percent) and Latvia (minus 66.8 percent) and by Romania (minus 16.4 percent). At this point, mention must be made of the exemplary performance of Latvia, which in the past few years has provided a convincing demonstration of the art of debt reduction. The excellent management of the country's finances has now led to fewer cuts in state demand – with highly positive effects for local businesses. Despite all the euphoria regarding such marked falls in insolvency totals, it should not be forgotten that the relevant legislation varies considerably between the different countries of Central and Eastern Europe. So comparing the insolvency figures of one country with those of another is anything but easy; caution is required in interpreting the sets of figures. 30 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 In Hungary, the insolvency situation is worrying, with growth of 16.2 percent in the total number of corporate failures. Although it must be borne in mind that in Hungary the insolvency statistics include company liquidations as well as the registered bankruptcies of going concerns, the increase in the number of corporate insolvencies from 17,487 to 20,322 is alarming. One reason for the grave condition of the Hungarian business sector is the instable exchange rate of the forint. While business firms invoice their domestic customers in forints, they generally have to pay their bills in foreign currency. Another factor is that the debts of both companies and private individuals are often in a foreign currency – for some years, the prime interest rate in Hungary was higher than that in neighbouring countries, which made foreign-currency loans comparatively attractive, but then in the wake of the economic crisis, the value of the forint fell considerably, thus increasing interest costs quite substantially. Hard times in Hungary Tab. 14: Corporate insolvencies in Central and Eastern Europe g 2011 2010 Bulgaria 1,500 700 + 114.3 Croatia 1,450 1,501 - 3.4 Czech Republic 6,753 5,559 + 21.5 256 504 - 49.2 20,322 17,487 + 16.2 800 2,407 - 66.8 1,512 1,496 + 1.1 705 665 + 6.0 Romania 4,580 5,480 - 16.4 Slovakia 870 830 + 4.8 Slovenia 675 510 + 32.4 39,423 37,139 + 6.1 Estonia Hungary *) Latvia Lithuania Poland Total Change 2010/11 in % *) Bankruptcies and other liquidations There have been marked rises in corporate insolvency totals especially in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Even though many firms in the Czech Republic had a growing order intake and the eco- Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Czech Republic and Slovenia also face serious problems 31 nomic situation in the business sector had largely stabilised after the financial crisis, the number of company collapses there rose to 6,753 in 2011, after 5,559 the year before. That represents an increase of 21.5 percent. Higher totals were also registered in Slovenia (plus 32.4 percent) and Poland (plus 6.0 percent). In Slovenia, it was above all the timber industry which came in for a terrible battering in 2011, with a series of large firms in this sector going bankrupt. Russia registers decline The growth of insolvencies in Poland, on the other hand, was only moderate in 2011. Economically, Poland is one of the best-positioned of the CEE countries. In Russia – whose insolvency figures have been included in this survey only since last year – the situation improved considerably in 2011 (see Tab. 15). The number of corporate failures fell by 20.1 percent to 12,794 (2010: 16,009). Tab. 15: Corporate insolvencies in Russia g Where they are possible, private bankruptcies rise drastically Third of all insolvencies involve firms in commerce 32 2011 2010 Change in % 12,794 16,009 - 20.1 In most Eastern European countries, there are still no possibilities for private individuals to obtain debt relief via orderly bankruptcy proceedings. Insolvency legislation in Croatia, Lithuania or Romania, for instance, contains no stipulations allowing over-indebted consumers to file for bankruptcy. But in those countries where a judicial option of this kind does exist, it was used extensively. In the Czech Republic, the number of private insolvencies rose dramatically – from around 10,600 in 2010 to 17,600 in 2011, an increase of 66.7 percent. Similar increases in cases of private bankruptcy were registered in Latvia (from 246 to 810) and Slovenia (from 80 to 13). Unlike in Western Europe, the biggest proportion of corporate insolvencies in Central and Eastern Europe were not in the service sector but in commerce and catering (see Fig. 9), which Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 accounted for more than one business failure in every three (37.0 percent). The share generated by services, on the other hand, was 28.2 percent. The contribution made by manufacturing companies was relatively high, with one in every five insolvent enterprises (19.2 percent). 15.6 percent of all corporate failures were in the construction sector. Fig. 9: Contributions to insolvency in Central and Eastern Europe in 2011 by the key economic sectors *) incl. hotels, catering; Source: Creditreform The development since 2009 shows that the incidence of insolvency is still highest in the field of commerce/catering and has not changed much in that period – just from 37.4 to 37.0 percent in 2011 (see Fig. 10). The way in which the contribution of the manufacturing sector has developed provides a clear indication of the scars inflicted by the slow-down in economic growth. Last year, this sector's share rose to 19.2 percent, up from 15.1 percent in 2009 and 15.2 percent in 2010. The share of total insolvency generated by the service sector is gradually declining; it 2011 it was just 28.2 percent (2010: 31.1 percent, 2009: 33.6 percent). The situation regarding construction is that after increasing from 14.5 to 16.3 percent between 2009 and 2010, it last year fell again somewhat, to 15.6 percent. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 Downward trend in service sector 33 Fig. 10: Changes in shares of total insolvency generated by the key economic sectors in Eastern Europe (in %) *) incl. hotels, catering; Source: Creditreform, NACE Rev. 2, own calculations Not all CEE countries publish statistics on the number of insolvency-related job losses. In the case of some countries there, though, it was possible to obtain the relevant figures. These were the Czech Republic (52,000), Hungary (50,000), Poland (43,500), Bulgaria (15,000), Latvia (8,000), Slovenia (2,500) and Estonia (1,500). Using these figures as a yardstick for the CEE region as a whole, it can be estimated that the number of people made jobless when their employers went broke totalled around 230,000 in 2011. That is an increase on the year before (2010: 200,000), when, however, Bulgaria was not included in the calculation. Poor prospects for Eastern Europe 34 The forecasts for 2012 are not bright. A further deterioration of the situation in the euro area coupled with intensified debt reduction on the part of Western European banks could confront Central and Eastern Europe with systemic financial problems – with dire consequences for growth in the region and for the insolvency scene. Any recesInsolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 sion in the eurozone would probably result in far weaker development of the Eastern European export markets and impact heavily on overall economic growth there. Erik Berglöf, chief economist of the EBRD, is currently forecasting CEE growth of 3.1 percent. The prospects are particularly dismal for countries like Slovenia and Hungary, which will probably slip into recession. In contrast, economies which are less tightly tied to Western Europe could develop relatively positively. g 6 USA In 2011, the US economy tried to find a firmer foothold but had to cope with mainly modest growth and a fragile labour market. One worrying feature of the year was the inability to reach political agreement on reducing American sovereign debt. The meagre budgetary prospects resulted in a downgrading of the USA's credit-standing. US bonds now no longer have the top possible rating but are classed as AA+. Since there is a considerable degree of uncertainty regarding any future consolidation of the US budget, rating agencies view the outlook as negative. US credit-standing downgraded In the first half of last year, the recovery of the American economy continued – but then received a hard blow as a result of the disastrous natural catastrophe in Japan which impacted severely on the US automotive industry in particular. After registering growth of 0.4 and 1.3 percent in the first and second quarters, the economy picked somewhat during the second half of the year. Higher consumer expenditure and increased investment produced Q3 growth of 1.8 percent, followed in Q4 by a sharper rise to 2.8 percent. Although towards the end of the year there were signs of a moderate improvement in the labour market situation, the unemployment rate looks set to remains relatively high in 2012, with around 8.2 to 8.5 percent. Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 US labour market still under strain 35 Tab. 16: Insolvencies in the USA g Total Companies Private individuals Fall in private bankruptcies... ...with a further decline forecast Only 48,500 companies insolvent in 2011 36 2011 2010 Change in % 1,459,500 1,593,081 - 8.4 48,500 56,282 - 13.8 1,411,000 1,536,799 - 8.2 Against the backdrop of an unemployment rate which is high by US standards, American citizens seem to have realized that they cannot maintain their substantial level of indebtedness for ever. Accordingly, 2011 was distinguished primarily by a reduction in the debts of private consumers. Whereas the number of private insolvencies had risen continuously from 2006 onwards, this development now appears to be slowing down (see Tab. 16). In fact in 2011, 8.2 percent fewer private bankruptcy proceeding were opened, with around 1.41 million US citizens declaring themselves bankrupt after about 1.54 million the year before. Although both the labour market and the property market – where the financial crisis of 2007-09 originated – remain under pressure, a further improvement in the field of private insolvencies is anticipated. For instance, Samuel Gerdano, Executive Director of the American Bankruptcy Institute, expects to see US consumers continue to reduce their debts, with the result that in 2012 the number of private bankruptcies will go on falling. The insolvency situation in the business sector developed in equally positive fashion last year. Business recovery continued, something reflected for example in the rise in corporate investment in the second half of 2011. Correspondingly, the number of corporate insolvencies dropped. Just 48,500 firms had to make their way to the insolvency courts in 2011, as against 56,282 the year before. That is equivalent to a reduction of 13.8 percent. It is gratifying to note that this positive development is continuing and even apparently picking up speed – the prior-year total already represented a decline of around six percent in corporate collapses. Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 Despite the upward tendencies depicted here, the outlook for 2012 is subdued. Speaking at the beginning of this year, US Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner confirmed that it would take the country a lengthy period of time to fix the damage caused by the latest financial crisis. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Bank recently announced that it will probably leave the prime interest rate at its present exceptionally low level until 2014. The Fed funds rate currently lies between 0.0 and 0.25 percent. g 7 Subdued outlook – prime rate to maintain record low until 2014 Summary Economic activity in Europe was dominated in 2011 by the European debt crisis. In the EU-15 plus Norway and Switzerland, the impacts of the crisis were clearly apparent. The number of corporate insolvencies rose to 174,917 in 2011. This reflected a marginal increase of 0.3 percent against the prior year, when 174,463 businesses were hit by insolvency. In historical terms, the insolvency total is still at a worryingly high level. The fact that the insolvency situation did not assume more dramatic proportions last year was due only to the comparatively positive developments in the core European countries. In Western Europe, a clear trend is emerging in the pattern of insolvency. Indeed, it is almost possible to say that Western Europe is divided into two parts. While developments in the business sectors and the corresponding insolvency figures in core countries such as Germany (30,200 cases; minus 5.8 percent), France (49,506 cases; minus 3.0 percent), Denmark (5,447 cases; minus 15.7 percent) and the Netherlands (7,000 cases; minus 2.9 percent) were relatively positive, the situation on the periphery, in Greece (452 cases; plus 27.3 percent), Spain (5,752 cases; plus 18.7 percent), Italy (11,792 cases; plus 16.9 percent) and Portugal (6,025 cases; plus 17.1 percent) was poor. The problems and impact vectors are certainly a great deal more complex and convoluted. Never- Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 37 theless, the present economic situation in the shadow of the debt crisis seems almost to mirror the present insolvency situation across Europe. It is particularly noticeable that the economies worst affected – Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Ireland – are the ones that fare worst in the corporate insolvency statistics for Western Europe. The branch of the economy accounting for the largest share of insolvency was the service sector. Service providers made up 36.9 percent of all registered insolvencies, retaining their top-of-thetable position with approximately 65,598 reported corporate failures. In second place came commerce and catering with around 54,574 insolvent businesses, which was 31.2 percent of the total. In the construction sector, more than one in five enterprises (21.4 percent) filed for bankruptcy – a total of 37,432 building firms. One in ten insolvencies (10.5 percent) involved a manufacturing enterprise – 18,366 businesses in absolute terms. Downturns in insolvency figures were noted in manufacturing (minus 3.2 percent) and services (minus 1.7 percent) while upturns due to the difficult economic climate were seen in the construction sector (plus 2.2 percent) and commerce (plus 2.4 percent). The worsening of the insolvency situation in Europe impacted on insolvency-related unemployment. The number of jobs threatened by insolvency in 2011 increased by 7.1 percent to 1.5 million (2010: 1.4 million). The sustained high level of insolvency overall and the growing number of major corporate failures involving thousands of dismissals led to an increase in insolvency-related job losses. The private insolvency situation eased moderately. While 2010 saw a marked rise in the number of insolvency cases involving private individuals, the figure in 2011 was recessive. In the countries that collect private insolvency data, a total of 373,284 private insolvency proceedings were recorded – 38 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 1.5 percent fewer than the year before. In absolute terms, this means around 5,800 fewer persons were registered as insolvent. Sharp rises in private insolvency were noted in France (56,079 cases; plus 26.4 percent), the Netherlands (14,344 cases; plus 26.0 percent) and Finland (3,531 cases; plus 19.7 percent). Although the biggest contributors to private insolvency were Germany and the UK, the figures in both these countries were lower than in 2010. While the number of private insolvencies in Germany fell by 5.8 percent (129,800 cases), the UK registered 13,841 fewer cases (143,871 cases; minus 8.8 percent). An appreciable rise (plus 6.1 percent) was seen in the number of corporate insolvencies in Central and Eastern Europe. After 37,139 corporate failures in 2010, last year produced a total of 39,423 cases. The sharpest increases were noted in Bulgaria (1,500 cases; plus 114.3 percent), Hungary (20,322 cases; plus 16.2 percent), Czech Republic (6,753 cases; plus 21.5 percent) and Slovenia (675 cases; plus 32.4 percent). Notable downturns in corporate failure were registered in Romania (4,580 cases; minus 16.4 percent), Lithuania (800 cases; minus 66.8 percent) and Estonia (256 cases; minus 49.2 percent). The largest sectoral contributors to insolvency figures were commerce and catering (37.0 percent) and services (28.2 percent). Manufacturing and construction accounted for smaller shares of 19.2 and 15.6 percent respectively. The prospects for 2012 are clouded. Major Western European economies – including Spain and Italy – are expected to slip into recession. Even in Germany, the economic recovery will peter out (0.7 percent; Federal Economics Ministry), a further fall prevented only by robust domestic demand. And while the credit squeeze now seems to have reached Central and Eastern Europe, fears of a credit crunch are widespread in Western Europe. In some national economies, lending ap- Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 39 pears to be severely disrupted at present. Under these auspices, corporate insolvency is expected to rise again this year – at a significantly sharper rate than in 2011. How steeply the number of corporate insolvencies increases depends largely on how swiftly policy makers get to grips with the sovereign debt crisis. If the crisis is not under control by the summer, serious consequences are anticipated for corporate borrowing, economic performance and insolvency. Responsible for the content: Creditreform Economic Research Unit Head: Michael Bretz, tel.: (02131) 109-171 Editor: Dr. Benjamin Mohr, tel.: (02131) 109-172 Hellersbergstr. 12, D - 41460 Neuss All rights reserved 2012, Verband der Vereine Creditreform e.V., Hellersbergstr. 12, 41460 Neuss With the exception of fair use for journalistic or scientific purposes, no part of this survey may be reprinted or reproduced in any form without the express permission of the publishers. Licensing by arrangement with the publishers. Neuss, 07 February 2012 40 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12 List of sources Austria: Creditreform Austria, Vienna Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt Belgium: StatBel Institut National des Statistique, Brussels Graydon Belgium NV SPF Economie, P.M.E. Denmark: Danmarks Statistik, Copenhagen Finland: Statistikcentralen Finland, Helsinki France: INSEE, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques Banque de France Germany: Verband der Vereine Creditreform e.V. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden Greece ICAP Group S.A., Athen Bank of Greece National Statistical Service of Greece Deutsch-Griechische Industrie- und Handelskammer, Athen Ireland: Central Statistical Office Insolvency Journal Italy: Creditreform Italia Modena ISTAT, Istituto Nazionale di Statistiva, Roma Luxembourg: Creditreform Luxembourg SA STATEC, Service Central de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands Norway: Statistics Norway Portugal: Instituto Nacional de Estatistica Deutsch-Portugiesische Industrie- und Handelskammer, Lisbon Coface Portugal Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Insolvencies in Europe, 2011/12 41 Sweden: Statistics Sweden Kronofogden, Amt für Beitreibung und Vollstreckung Switzerland: Schweiz. Verband Creditreform, St. Gallen Statistik Schweiz UK: Office for National Statistics, London The Insolvency Service USA: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Adminstration, Washington D.C. American Bankruptcy Institute Further sources: Bank for International Settlements, quarterly reports Bureau van Dijk European Central Bank (ECB), monthly reports European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Regional Economic Prospects Federal Ministry of Economics, annual report International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook Creditreform business offices in Eastern Europe Creditreform Eesti OÜ, Estonia Creditreform Latvija SIA, Latvia Creditreform Lietuva UAB, Lithuania Creditreform Polska Sp. z o.o., Poland Creditreform k.s., Slovakia Creditreform d.o.o., Slovenia Creditreform s.r.o., Czech Republic Creditreform-Interinfo Kft., Hungary Creditreform d.o.o. Croatia Creditreform Romania Creditreform Bulgaria EOOD Creditreform RUS 42 Insolvencies in Europe, Jahr 2011/12