Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Current Biology, Vol. 14, R287–R289, April 6, 2004, ©2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.027 Plant Cytoskeleton: Reinforcing Lines of Division in Plant Cells Jaideep Mathur Cytokinesis in plants has unique features concerned with defining and maintaining the line of cell division. Recent studies have identified key cytoskeletal components and events that help to ensure the fidelity of cytokinesis in higher plants. The ability to divide is a fundamental property of living cells. In plants, the presence of a cell wall and absence of cell migration makes the establishment of the line of division between daughter cells a critical step, important for both organ morphogenesis and the overall architecture of the plant body. Somatic cell cytokinesis in higher plants thus presents certain unique features [1]. Following a stage known as karyokinesis, in which the cell undergoes nuclear division, a distinct cytoplasmic domain — the phragmoplast — is defined between the reforming nuclei. The ring-like phragmoplast effectively demarcates the ‘division plane’ as it mediates organelle and vesicular traffic to orchestrate the assembly of a growing cell-plate that fragments the cell into two. Intriguingly, in most dividing plant cells the site of phragmoplast formation, and thereby the future division plane, is predicted accurately, well in advance of other cell-division events, by a transiently occurring ‘pre-prophase band’ [1,2]. The pre-prophase band disappears completely by pro-metaphase, and is thus temporally well separated from the phragmoplast assembly that typically occurs during late anaphase. However, the coincident localization of the preprophase band and the phragmoplast suggest that the former leaves some sort of imprint in the parent cell’s memory. The search for this imprint led to the identification of another intracellular zone defined between the stages of pre-prophase band and phragmoplast formation. This ‘actin-depleted zone’ apparently provides a spatial reference site for the phragmoplast and may constitute the ‘memory’ left behind by the pre-prophase band [3]. The pre-prophase band, actin-depletion zone and the phragmoplast (Figure 1) thus constitute major arrays that define the division line, and their creation and maintenance obviously plays an important role in cytokinesis. But despite excellent descriptions emphasizing their spatio-temporal relationship and interdependence, not much is known about the molecular factors involved in their creation and maintenance. Recent studies [4–11] have identified many of the molecular components that play pivotal roles in generating and/or reinforcing these cytoplasmic landmarks, and provided fresh insights into the novel cytokinesis process in plants. Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B2, Canada. Dispatch A number of cytokinesis-defective mutants have been described in plants ([1,7] and references therein). The presence of incomplete cell walls in enlarged, usually multinucleate cells is taken as a characteristic cytokinesis-linked phenotype (Figure 2). Defects may result from an inability to form cohesive pre-prophase bands [8] or to co-align developing phragmoplasts to the pre-prophase band-designated site [6], or as a result of aberrant cell-plate assembly [9–13]. These events may involve molecules as diverse as dynamins [12], kinesin-like proteins [10], syntaxins [9], Sec1-like proteins [11] and cell-wall/plate components [7,13]. A study published recently in Current Biology [4] has added the protein PLEIADE to the list of molecular players that assemble at the line of division. Mutant pleiade plants display all the defects typically associated with a cytokinesis defect [8], and enlarged pleiade cells contain phragmoplasts that are significantly broader compared to wild-type. PLEIADE localizes initially to the pre-prophase band and then, after chromosome separation, specifically to the cytokinetic phragmoplast [4]. The cytokinesis defect in pleiade mutants is attributed to an inability to concentrate the components required for assembling a cell-plate at the correct location. PLEIADE is a microtubule-associated protein, hence its alternative name AtMAP65-3. Although Müller et al. [4] conclude that PLEIADE has a specific role in phragmoplast formation, its localization to the pre-prophase band suggests it also has an earlier role. This conjecture finds support in a recent study [14] that dissected microtubule behavior during pre-prophase band formation in exquisite detail. Dhonushke and Gadella [14] used the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fused to the cytoplasmic linker protein CLIP170 to highlight the growing plus ends of microtubules. By resolving pre-prophase band formation into distinct stages — initiation, narrowing, maturation and breakdown — and following microtubule plus-end dynamics, these authors were able to show that the parameters governing microtubule dynamic instability change significantly during preprophase band formation. Dhonukshe and Gadella [14] found that microtubules in a maturing pre-prophase band are shorter and more dynamic than usual. The formation of filamentous cross-bridges between anti-parallel, inter-digitated microtubules is likely to be a critical factor in narrowing down the pre-prophase band with its complement of very dynamic microtubules. An inability to form such cross-bridges might result in a loose, unfocused preprophase band. Other plant members of the MAP65 family to which PLEIADE belongs have been implicated in forming precisely such cross-bridges between microtubules [15], and the pleiade mutant phenotype [4,8] emphasizes the necessity of maintaining a tight line of division. That PLEIADE is not the only MAP required during cytokinesis is suggested by a similar localization pattern for MOR1/GEM1, another member Dispatch R288 Prophase A Cytokinesis B Pre-prophase band C Actin-depleted zone Interdigitated microtubules Actin microfilaments ADZ Figure 1. Three spatially linked arrays that form sequentially to define the line of site of cytokinesis in a dividing plant cell. The pre-prophase band (A) and phragmoplast (C) are made up of inter-digitating microtubules with co-aligned actin microfilaments, whereas the intervening stage (B) is defined by an equatorial actindepleted zone. In most vacuolated cells the cell plate may develop in a polarized manner [20], connecting to one edge of the cell first before extending to the other side. Phragmoplast and cell plate Nuclear material Developing cell plate Current Biology of the MAP215 family of proteins [5]. The gem1 mutation affects cytokinesis and cell division pattern at pollen mitosis. Abnormally oriented cell plates and aberrant cytokinesis are also seen in tan1 mutant maize. TAN1 is a highly basic microtubule-binding protein that displays domain similarity to the vertebrate APC protein [6]. APC is known to interact with the microtubule plus endbinding EB1 proteins [16], and three EB1 homologs have been recently identified in Arabidopsis [17,18]. From the localization of one of these EB1-like proteins, my colleagues and I [17] suggested that microtubule plus-ends may interact with endo-membranes and help in their rapid rearrangement. It would likely be informative to observe the activity of EB1-like proteins during pre-prophase band and phragmoplast assembly in pleiade, gem1 and tan1 mutant backgrounds. An additional feature of the EB1-like proteins is a calponin homology (CH) domain near the amino terminus [17]. This CH domain appears somewhat different from those of known actin-interacting proteins, but it remains possible that the plant proteins also interact with actin. Indeed certain features of plant cytokinesis make the identification of a possible actininteracting domain in a protein that localizes to the tip of a microtubule very interesting. It is known that the pre-prophase band and phragmoplast are both made up of co-aligned actin microfilaments and microtubules [2,3]. Actin microfilaments are believed to play a role in narrowing the pre-prophase band, while the actin-depletion zone that appears after the breakdown of the pre-prophase band apparently provides spatial cues to the later developing phragmoplast [3]. The link between the pre-prophase band, actindepletion zone and phragmoplast has been reaffirmed by Hoshino et al. [19], who tested the effects of disrupting actin microfilaments at different stages in a synchronized tobacco BY2-cell population. When the actin inhibitor was added before formation of the actindepletion zone, the division plane was significantly altered. Maintenance of the actin-depletion zone is obviously vital for defining the precise positioning of the phragmoplast. Defects in the tan1 mutant have been attributed to an inability of developing phragmoplasts to be guided to the former pre-prophase band site. Moreover, TAN1 localizes to both the pre-prophase band and the phragmoplast [6], and has a region that can potentially interact with CH-domain-carrying proteins such as EB1. Though pure conjecture at this point, the chances that actin-microtubule interactions during cytokinesis occur via this set of proteins is an intriguing possibility. The line of division in plants is already beginning to look crowded as new molecules are identified. Considering that variations on the cytokinesis theme, such as asymmetric and polarized cytokinesis, are common [20], and that many cytokinesis-defective mutants do not exhibit global phenotypes, dissecting the hierarchical relationships between these players is the obvious challenge for a better understanding of cytokinesis in higher plants. References 1. Smith, L.J. (2001). Plant cell division: building walls in the right places. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 33-39. 2. Gunning, B.E.S., and Wick, S.M. (1985). Preprophase bands, phragmoplasts, and spatial control of cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 2, S157S179. 3. Cleary,A.L., Gunning, B.E.S., Wasteneys, G.O., and Hepler, P.K. (1992). Microtubule and actin dynamics at the division site in living Tradescantia stamen hair cells. J. Cell Sci. 103, 977-988. 4. Müller, S., Smertenko, A., Wagner, V., Heinrich, M., Hussey, P.J., and Hauser, M-T. (2004). The plant microtubule associated protein, AtMAP65-3/PLE, is essential for cytokinetic phragmoplast function. Curr. Biol. March 9 issue. 5. Twell,D., Park, S.K., Hawkins, T.J., Schubert, D., Schmidt, R., Smertenko, A., and Hussey, P.J. (2002). MOR1/GEM1 has an essential role in the plant-specific cytokinetic phragmoplast. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 711- 714. 6. Smith, L.G., Gerttula, S.M., Han, S., and Levy, J. (2001). TANGLED1: A microtubule binding protein required for the spatial control of cytokinesis in maize. J. Cell Biol. 152, 231-236. 7. Sollner, R., Glasser, G., Wanner, G., Somerville, C.R., Jurgens, G., and Assaad, F. (2002). Cytokinesis defective mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 129, 678-690. Current Biology R289 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Figure 2. Cytokinesis defective mutants. Cytokinesis defects are typically identified by incomplete cell walls (A, arrowheads) and enlarged, usually multinucleate cells (B, asterisks). 8. Müller, S., Fuchs, E., Ovecka, M., Wysocka-Diller, J., Benfey, P.N., and Hauser, M-T. (2002). Two new loci, PLEIADE and HYADE, implicate organ-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. 130, 312-324. 9. Lauber, M.H., Waizenegger, I, Steinmann, T., Schwarz, H., Mayer, U., Hwang, I, Lukowitz, W., and Jurgens, G. (1997). The Arabidopsis KNOLLE protein is a cytokinesis-specific syntaxin. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1485-1493. 10. Strompen, G., El Kasmi, F., Richter, S., Lukowitz, W., Assaad, F. F., Juergens, G. and Mayer, U. (2002) The Arabidopsis HINKEL gene encodes a kinesin-related protein involved in cytokinesis and is expressed in a cell-cycle dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 12, 153158. 11. Assaad, F.F., Huet, Y., Mayer, U., and Jurgens, G. (2001). The cytokinesis gene KEULE encodes a Sec1 protein that binds the syntaxin KNOLLE. J. Cell Biol. 152, 531-543. 12. Verma, D.P.S. (2001). Cytokinesis and building of the cell plate in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 52, 751-784. 13. Zuo, J., Niu, Q.W,, Nishizawa, N., Wu, Y., Kost, B., Chua, N.-H. (2000). KORRIGAN, an Arabidopsis endo-1,4-beta-glucanase, localizes to the cell plate by polarized targeting and is essential for cytokinesis. Plant Cell. 12, 1137-1152. 14. Dhonukshe, P., and Gadella Jr. T.W.J. (2003). Alteration of microtubule dynamic instability during pre-prophase band formation revealed by Yellow Fluorescent Protein-CLIP170 microtubule plusend labeling. Plant Cell 15, 597-611. Hussey, P.J., Hawkins, T.J., Igarashi, H., Kaloriti, D., and Smertenko, A. (2002). The plant cytoskeleton: recent advances in the study of the plant microtubule-associated proteins MAP-65, MAP-190 and the Xenopus MAP215-like protein, MOR1. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 915924. Bienz M. (2002). The subcellular destinations of APC proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 328-338. Mathur, J., Mathur, N., Kernebeck, B., Srinivas, B.P., and Hülskamp, M. (2003). A novel localization pattern for an EB1-like protein links microtubule dynamics to endomembrane organization. Curr. Biol. 13, 1991-1997. Chan, J., Calder, G.M., Doonan, J.H., and Lloyd, C.W. (2003). EB1 reveals mobile microtubule nucleation sites in Arabidopsis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 967-971. Hoshino, H., Yoneda, A., Kumagai, F., and Hasejawa, S. (2003). Roles of actin-depleted zone and pre-prophase band in determining the division site of higher-plant cells, a tobacco BY2 cell line expressing GFP-tubulin. Protoplasma 222, 157-165. Cutler, S.R., and Ehrhardt, D.W. (2002). Polarized cytokinesis in vacuolate cells of Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 28122817.