Download Mitigating Electrostatic Effects on Measurement Accuracy

Mitigating Electrostatic Effects on
Measurement Accuracy
Author: Greg Gumkowski
NRD LLC
2937 Alt Boulevard
Grand Island, NY 14072-0310 USA
Phone: (716)773-7635, FAX: (716)773-7744, Email: [email protected]
Author: Arnold Steinman, M.S.E.E.
Electronics Workshop
1321 Walnut Street, Berkeley CA 94709 USA
Phone: (510)205-9003, FAX: (510)549-3775, Email: [email protected]
July 2014
ABSTRACT
Electrostatic charge can have unwanted effects on the accuracy of instruments making precision
weighing measurements. This paper will discuss electrostatic phenomena and their interaction
with weighing operations. Charge is generated primarily by the contact and separation of
dissimilar materials. If one of the materials is a conductor, charge can be quickly removed or
even prevented by connecting the material to ground. In most cases, however, at least one of the
materials will be an insulator or an isolated conductor. As contact and separation occurs
throughout the weighing process, the materials involved are almost certain to be charged. A
charged insulator is also capable of inducing charge on nearby isolated conductors. Examples of
materials that may be charged include samples, transport media, and parts of weighing
equipment or their enclosures.
Once generated, the static charge affects both the instruments and the materials being weighed.
Electrostatic forces interact directly with the mechanisms of weighing machines, making precise
measurements in the microgram range all but impossible. Electrostatic forces of attraction and
repulsion affect light weight sample materials, causing unwanted movement and losses during
transfers, as well as the movement and clinging of unwanted particles to measurement
surfaces. Measurement problems caused by static charge are not limited to weighing
applications. Whenever small physical quantities or objects need to be measured, electrostatic
forces can cause errors or unwanted movement of the object being measured. This is true for
atomic force microscopes, force and mass measurements, and electrochemical measurements.
Mitigation methods for static charge are well known in the electronics industry, as it is
imperative to protect sensitive integrated circuits from the effects of static charge, both during
manufacture and use. Grounding of conductive materials, replacing insulators with dissipative
materials, and air ionization are the primary static control methods. Air ionization is of particular
importance in weighing operations as equipment parts, samples or transport media are often
insulators or isolated conductors. This paper discusses how static control may be applied in
precision weighing operations, both in the equipment and in sample transport, to remove static
charge and improve the accuracy and repeatability of measurements.
1. INTRODUCTION
Work place activities typically involve the contact and separation of materials. Whether it is the
transfer of materials from one place to another, walking across the floor, or movement of the
parts of equipment, contact and separation of materials is constantly occurring. This is the
primary cause of triboelectric charge generation. When dissimilar materials are in contact and
then separated, a charge exchange occurs between the two materials, leaving one of them
positively charged and the other material negatively charged. [1] The presence of charge on
materials gives rise to electric fields on the materials. These electric fields can interact with other
objects in the environment, primarily by exerting forces on them. The forces of attraction or
repulsion often result in uncontrolled movement of these objects, which can be problematic.
Unwanted sticking of materials to surfaces, or unexpected movement or deflection of lightweight
materials are the most obvious results.
When these electrostatic driven phenomena occur in precision weighing or other instrument
applications, the obvious result is measurement inaccuracies. Electrostatic forces can interact
1|Page
with the lightweight mechanisms of scales designed to make measurements in micrograms and
cause errors. Lightweight substances being weighed may be moved by attraction or repulsion
forces, causing them to adhere in places where the result is both measurement errors and loss of
the material being weighed. Particularly in pharmaceutical applications, this can be a serious
problem due the possibility of mis-dosing.
Electrostatic problems are well known in many industries, and techniques have been developed
to mitigate these problems. This paper will attempt to describe electrostatic phenomena and the
problems they cause in weighing operations, as well as some of the methods being used to
eliminate these problems.
2. TRIBOELECTRIC CHARGING
Triboelectric charging occurs whenever two materials with different affinities for electrons are in
contact and then separated. At transfer of charge (i.e., electrons) occurs between the two
materials, leaving one positively charged (loses electrons) and one negatively charge (gains
electrons), although there has been no change in the net charge of the two materials. Any
material, solid, liquid, or gas may become charged. Whether it remains charged depends
primarily on whether it is a conductor or an insulator. If a conductor is isolated from ground, it
will remain charged. However, by definition charge flows easily within a conductor, and will be
removed if the conductor is connected to ground.
This leaves us with the other type of material, the insulator. Charge generated triboelectrically on
an insulator resides on its surface. Charge cannot flow easily through an insulator, so the charge
stays on the surface where it is generated and connecting the insulator to ground has no affect on
the surface charge.
There are a number of factors that affect the nature of triboelectric charging. The most important
is the nature of the two materials. Experimenters have arranged materials in what is called the
triboelectric series to describe whether a material will charge positively or negatively when it
contacts another material. Any subset of the triboelectric series is shown in Figure 1. Note that a
given material may charge either positively or negatively depending on what other material it
contacts. For example, silicon coming into contact with water or nylon will charge negatively,
while silicon coming into contact with Teflon will charge positively.
Other factors affect the magnitude of the charge being generated. These include:
 Intimacy of contact – smooth surfaces produce higher charge
 Contact pressure – higher pressure produces higher charge
 Motion – rubbing or friction produces higher charge. Rapid separation of materials
produces higher charge
 Humidity – lower humidity produces higher charge
Looking at the above issues we can see some mechanical means to reduce the levels of static
charge generation. Rough surfaces, low contact pressure, and less rubbing or other friction will
reduce charging. Controlling the humidity in work areas can also reduce the level of static
charging. However, the nature of the work process, and the variability of humidity conditions
2|Page
often makes these mechanical means difficult to apply. We will be discussing more efficient
means of controlling static charge below. It should also be noted that many weighing operations
take place in cleanrooms where the humidity has been reduced to very low levels to protect
product quality. The result is extremely high levels of static charge generation in and around the
weighing operation.
Figure 1 – Triboelectric charging
One more method of creating electrostatic charge needs to be mentioned as well. When an object
becomes triboelectrically charged, it is capable of creating charge on nearby conductive objects.
This is known as induction charging. In summary then, we have two means of creating
electrostatic charge. One results from the contact and separation of dissimilar maters, and the
other results from bringing an isolated conductive object near another object that has already
been charged. We will see examples of the problems caused by these two methods of charge
generation below. [2]
3. ELECTROSTATIC PROBLEMS IN PRECISION WEIGHING
Static electricity exerts mechanical forces on objects that can be easily detected by precision
weighing equipment. This static electricity may be present on the object being weighed, the
person using the balance, on parts of the weighing chamber, or on the sample carriers. The
source of the charge may also be any other insulating materials in the measurement area
including table tops and personnel clothing. Charge generation is greater in low humidity areas,
such as most cleanrooms.
A typical example of this problem occurs when charged objects are placed in the weighing
chamber or near the weighing sensor result in a change in zero levels and otherwise affect
accuracy. Electrostatic forces act on lightweight measurement components causing errors as high
as 3%. Charges on multiple objects may either attract or repel, also affecting measurement
accuracy. A sample or its carrier may be charged to one polarity, while the components of the
weighing chamber, draft shield, or enclosure may be charged to the same or opposite polarity.
The resulting electrostatic forces can alter the measurement in unknown ways. Figure 2 shows
an example of the effect on the zero setting when a charged object is introduced into the
weighing chamber.
3|Page
Figure 2. Charged Object in the weighing chamber.
Powders and other lightweight materials, such as filter media, adhere to weighing station
components and sample carriers making them both hard to handle and causing weighing errors.
Small quantities of the samples may be lost from the transfer of these lightweight materials to
charged objects in the weighing area. Charged vials or other transport containers attract
lightweight materials, removing them from the measurement process. Conversely, the charged
vials and containers may attract contaminating particles from the environment, both degrading
the sample material and altering its measurement.
4. STATIC MITIGATION METHODS
Control of static charge has been actively pursued in the electronics industry since the late
1970’s. As electronic devices have increased in complexity, they have become steadily more
sensitive to the effects of static charge, primarily to electrostatic discharge (ESD). In addition, as
the sizes of the features of the integrated circuits have shrunk into the nanometer range, the
electrostatic attraction (ESA) of small particles during manufacturing has become a more
important problem to solve. A number of methods are used, both in the design and the
manufacturing and handling of integrated circuits, to eliminate the electrostatic hazards. [3]
The first method always employed is grounding. Anything that is conductive, including the
personnel, is provided with a connection to ground. This assures that any charge generated, by
triboelectric or induction charging, is rapidly removed. In the context of the weighing operations,
the following issues need to be addressed:
 An electrostatic ground point needs to be established in the weighing area. This is usually
a connection to the AC power ground. All grounding of static control materials should be
done to this “common point ground”.
 Personnel performing weighing operations need to be connected to the ground point
using a wrist strap while performing sample transfer and weighing operations. This
prevents charge on the person’s body from interacting with the measurement equipment
or causing unwanted transfers of the sample materials. An example of a wrist strap is
shown in Figure 3.
4|Page

Personnel should wear clothing made of natural fibers which tend to absorb moisture and
conduct static electricity to ground. Alternatively, personnel can wear static dissipative
smocks during weighing operations. Note that static dissipative cleanroom garments are
available, but not always used.
Figure 3. Examples of wrist strap and grounding connection point


Equipment parts in weighing instruments should be conductive if possible and have a
connection to the equipment AC ground. Portable instruments should have a way to
connect their ground system to the common point ground. This eliminates induction
charging of the weighing instrument parts and reduces the possibility of static-related
measurement errors.
If possible, weighing operations should be performed on a conductive work area (e.g., a
stainless steel table) that is grounded. In some instances this may be impractical due to
electrical safety issues that must be considered. An alternative is discussed below.
A second method of static control is to eliminate all unnecessary insulators from the weighing
operation. This requires a review of every aspect of the weighing process to determine which
insulators are essential and which are non-essential. Essential insulators may include the samples
themselves, parts of the measuring equipment, work surfaces, sample trays, transfer carriers, and
handling tools. Non-essential insulators include drinking cups, plastic envelopes for paperwork,
employee clothing (sweaters, synthetics), and personal cooling fans.
Whenever possible, essential insulators should be replaced with a static dissipative equivalent.
This is a material that retains the desirable insulator properties (e.g., mechanical, thermal or
chemical) while still having a lower resistance than an insulator. This is achieved by adding
carbon, metals, or other additives to an insulating material. The result is a material that may be
connected to ground to prevent charge generation. Sample trays and carriers and weighing
instrument enclosures are examples of insulating materials for which there may be a static
dissipative alternative. Non-essential insulators should be removed and prohibited from the
weighing area. Personnel can wear cotton or specially designed static-dissipative garments to
prevent charge on their clothing from interacting with the weighing process.
Finally, static mitigation techniques exist for insulators that are essential and cannot be removed
from the weighing process. The most important example of this is usually the material that is to
be weighed. More often than not, it will be insulative and easily charged during its handling.
5|Page
This means that unwanted movement of the materials will occur, sticking to some surfaces and
transferring to others. The primary method used to eliminate charge on insulators is air
ionization. For surfaces that do not come into contact with the material or the weighing process,
there are also “antistatic” chemicals that may be applied and renewed periodically. These
typically work by depositing a conductive chemical on the surface, or by increasing the attraction
of moisture from the air to the insulative surfaces.
Humidity is often used in an attempt to control static charging. If relative humidity can be
maintained above 60%, there will be a significant reduction in charge generation. But
maintaining humidity at this level usually involves a significant expense. Uncontrolled humidity
can easily range over a 10-80% range, with serious static problems occurring in the winter
months when heating drives the moisture out of the interior air. In cleanrooms, where many
precision weighing operations occur, process requirements often dictate humidity levels of 40%
RH or less. At these levels humidity is an unreliable and ineffective static control method.
5. MITIGATION WITH IONIZERS
Using only the air surrounding weighing process, often of cleanroom quality, ionizers are the
most effective method to dissipate static charge on both insulators and isolated conductors. Air
ions are molecules of the gases in air (nitrogen, oxygen, water vapor, and carbon dioxide) that
have lost (positive ion) or gained (negative ion) an electron. Ions are present in normal outside
air but are removed when air is subjected to filtration and air conditioning. Ionization systems
work by flooding the atmosphere with positive and negative ions. When ionized air comes in
contact with a charged surface, the charged surface attracts ions of the opposite polarity. As a
result, the static electricity that has built up on products, equipment and surfaces is neutralized.
This is shown in Figure 4. The most common methods of producing air ions artificially are alpha
ionization and high voltage corona discharge. [4]
Bipolar ionization (both positive and negative ions) has become the accepted standard for
controlling static charge in all industries. There is, however, no single "best" method of creating
bipolar ionization for all situations. Deciding which method is best for an application depends on
the environment, the problem to be solved, and the nature of the work performed in the area. Ions
are moved by electrostatic fields and by airflow, and the effectiveness of a system depends on
various outside conditions. A number of alpha and corona ionization methods have been
developed to generate ions. The following is a short description of the differences between these
ionization technologies and a few examples of where each technology has been applied.
6|Page
+
Charged Air Molecules
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+++++++
+++++++++
-----------
Insulator
Figure 4. Neutralizing Surface Charges with Bipolar Air Ionization




Alpha Ionization - Utilizes alpha emission from a Polonium-210 source without the need
for an electrical power connection. Alpha particles cannot penetrate into live human
tissue or through a thin sheet of paper, but efficiently ionize the air. Alpha ionizers are
ideal for in-tool applications because they do not produce electric fields that might
interact with instrument components. Without electrical power, they are useful in
applications where flammable chemicals are present. Alpha technology is available in
spot sources, bars and blowers.
AC (Alternating Current) - High voltage is applied to a number of closely spaced
emitter points, which cycle alternately, negative and positive, at the power line frequency.
A high electric field is produced at the points, and produces ions of the corresponding
polarity. AC technology is used in ionizing bars and blowers, and blowoff guns.
Steady-state DC - High voltage is continually applied to pairs of positive and negative
emitter points which create electric fields to generate ions continuously. Steady-state DC
is more efficient than AC and can be used in both high and low airflow conditions. Like
AC technology Steady State DC ionizers are found in bars, blowers and blowoff guns.
Pulsed DC - High voltage at positive and negative emitter points is alternately turned on
and off, creating clouds of positive and negative ions. Pulsed DC ion emitters can be used
to neutralize static charge in whole rooms, even with low airflow, and is the most
common type of ionizer in cleanrooms and laminar flow hoods.
6. IONIZER APPLICATIONS IN PRECISION WEIGHING
A common ionizer used in precision weighing applications, is actually an ionizer designed to
keep dust from collecting on LP records. Known as the ZeroStat it uses two piezoelectric crystals
to produce positive and negative ions. Although simple to operate (squeeze and release the “gun
trigger) the performance leaves something to be desired. Typically, squeezing the trigger creates
one polarity of ion (e.g., positive) and releasing the trigger creates the opposite polarity (e.g.,
negative).
The standard industry test using a Charged Plate Monitor was done to determine the effect of the
ZeroStat gun. [5] Figure 6 shows the ZeroStat gun test setup and the test results. With the gun 6
7|Page
inches from the isolated conductive plate of the instrument, note that it first charges to about
+1200 volts and discharges to approximately +1000 volts until the trigger is released. Then it
charges to about -1200 volts, decreasing towards -1000 volts over time. Each pull and release of
the trigger produces the same result. Very little decrease in voltage occurs when the trigger is at
rest in either position. In practice, for a positively charged object, pulling the trigger increases
the charge on the object, while releasing the trigger recharges it negatively. For a negatively
charged object, pulling the trigger decreases the charge on the object, while releasing the trigger
recharges it negatively.
The effect of ZeroStat gun on conductors, such as conductive parts of measuring equipment and
conductive samples and sample containers is illustrated accurately by the results. The effect of
the ZeroStat on insulators might not be as extreme, but it is expected to be similar. Conversely,
an alpha ionizer or a small ionizing blower would reduce either polarity of charge on conductors
or insulators to almost zero in less than 2 seconds under similar conditions.
Figure 6. ZeroStat test setup and results.
Alpha ionizers, working without additional airflow or electrical power are a convenient method
for ionizing the interior of weighing instruments. Easily mounted in the weighing chamber, they
assure that static charge on any object in the weighing chamber is quickly neutralized.
Containing only a small amount of Polonium 210, they have only minimal regulations and
maintenance consists only of replacing them periodically when the source operating level is no
longer adequate. An example of an application of an alpha ionizer is shown in Figure 7. Note
that this is the same situation as shown in Figure 2, except that an ionizer has been installed in
the interior of the weighing chamber, and now there is no drift in the zero reading.
Both alpha and corona ionization technology is used for small ionizing bars or blowers located in
the measurement area. These are used to assure that the components of the weighing equipment,
the sample materials, and transport containers have their static charge reduced to low levels. The
corona ionizers require periodic cleaning to maintain their performance. Since they utilize high
voltage to produce ions, they have to be designed in a way that prevents contact with the ionizer
emitter points. Coupling the ion source with a blower increase the area of coverage, but might
impart unwanted motion to extremely light materials. Its primary use would be to neutralize
8|Page
static charge on all critical surfaces before the actual sample is introduced. Examples of other
types of ionizers are shown in Figure 8.
Figure 7. Alpha ionizer in a weighing instrument.
Figure 8. Other types of ionizers used to neutralize materials in weighing applications.
7. CONCLUSION
The presence of static charge is inevitable in most workplaces due to the unavoidable contact and
separation of materials. But static charge can be controlled by providing adequate grounding,
control of insulating materials, and the application of air ionization to neutralize static charge on
process essential insulators. In precision weighing applications it is essential to remove static
charge to prevent measurement inaccuracies, loss of critical materials, and unwanted adhesion of
materials in the weighing chamber. Static charge control methods from other industries, properly
applied in precision weighing applications, can eliminate the problems caused by static charge.
9|Page
8.
REFERENCES
[1] ESD ADV11.2-1995 Triboelectric Charge Accumulation Testing, ESD
Association, www.esda.org
[2] “Static Charge: A Life Sciences Problem?”, GIT Verlag Laboratory Journal
(Germany), September 1999, www.gitverlag.com
[3] ESD TR 20.20-2008 - ESD Handbook, ESD Association
[4] “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Air Ionization”, Threshold
Magazine, volume 18 number 2, March/April 2002, ESD Association
[5] ANSI/ESD STM 3.1 - Ionization, ESD Association
10 | P a g e