Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Geriatric Otolaryngology August 2007 1 Presbycusis I. II. III. IV. V. Definition: Older hearing (Greek presby – old man; ackousis – hearing) a. Refers to all the conditions that lead to hearing loss with age i. Aging ii. Genetic susceptibility iii. Noise exposure iv. Otological disorders (e.g., Meniere’s disease, otosclerosis) v. Ototoxic agents 1. Estimated as an important contributor in up to 30% of elderly patients presenting with hearing impairment a. Aminoglycosides, quinine, β-blockers, loop diuretics, NSAIDs, salicylates, tricyclic antidepressants Characteristics a. Reduced hearing sensitivity b. Reduced speech understanding, particularly in noisy environments c. Reduced dynamic range d. Slowed central processing of auditory information e. Impaired sound localization of sound sources f. Progressive Disability a. Hearing impairment i. Conversations, telephone use, music appreciation, etc. ii. Social isolation 1. Depression 2. Loss of self-esteem iii. Difficulty orienting to alarms iv. Difficulty integrating with other sensory modalities v. Particularly limiting in the face of co-morbidities such as cognitive dysfunction (e.g., dementia) Incidence a. >65 years of age i. 40% have hearing loss great enough to impair communication b. Varies according to societal factors i. For example, hearing levels are poorer in industrial vs. isolated, agrarian societies Progression a. Begins with loss of sensitivity in high frequencies i. Adverse effect on understanding speech in noisy or reverberant environments ii. High-frequency alarms not heard VI. VII. Geriatric Otolaryngology August 2007 2 b. Progresses toward low frequencies i. Once it reaches range of 2-4 kHz, speech understanding in any situation is affected (difficulty hearing voiceless consonants t, p, k, f, s, and ch) ii. With further progression speech detection is affected Pathophysiology a. Outer and middle ears i. Flaccidity of cartilaginous external auditory canal ii. Stiffening of the tympanic membrane iii. Difficulty clearing cerumen iv. Cerumen impaction aside, relatively small impact on function b. Inner ear i. Degeneration of stria vascularis and loss of Na+-K+ ATPase 1. Microvasculature diminished 2. Starts in base and apex and extends to mid-cochlear regions with age 3. Inability to maintain direct current endolymphatic resting potential (80-90 mV) – impairs cochlear amplifier ii. Hair cells 1. Human temporal bone pathology suggest primarily outer hair-cell loss, followed by inner hair-cell loss 2. Starts in the base and progresses to the apex 3. Some argue that hair-cell losses are a manifestation of noise exposure, rather than aging per se iii. Ganglion cells/auditory nerve 1. Thought to be secondary to loss of sensory cells 2. Asynchronous activity in auditory nerve a. Impacts temporal resolution of conveyed signal c. Central nervous system i. Decrease in number and size of neurons in the central nuclei, as well as changes in neurochemical makeup of cells with age ii. Diminished function of neurons projecting to the cochlea iii. Known as neural or central presbycusis, age-related auditory processing disorder iv. Secondary degeneration of central pathways after loss of peripheral input v. Can limit rehabilitation 1. Affects speed of speech processing and result in poorer speech understanding in noise or with rapid or degraded speech Schuknecht’s classification of presbycusis a. Sensory (outer hair-cell loss) – The most common i. Associated with high- to low-frequency progressive threshold elevation ii. Audiogram: abruptly sloping high-frequency loss above speechfrequency range VIII. IX. X. Geriatric Otolaryngology August 2007 3 b. Neural (ganglion-cell loss) i. Progressive loss of speech discrimination, relatively stable audiogram c. Metabolic (strial atrophy) i. Associated with gradual elevation of thresholds across frequencies ii. Audiogram – flattened, relatively good speech discrimination d. Cochlear conductive i. Theoretical – Stiffness of basilar membrane, changes in resonance of the cochlear duct ii. Audiogram – Linear descending pattern e. Intermediate i. No pathological correlate ii. Audiogram – Flat and/or abrupt high-tone hearing loss f. Mixed i. Audiogram – Mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss Hereditability a. High index i. Particularly for strial and sensory types of presbycusis ii. May involve mitochondrial DNA Molecular mechanisms a. Mitochondrial clock theory ( = membrane hypothesis) – aging renders mitochondria bioenergetically inefficient i. Hypoperfusion of cochlear tissue with aging 1. Production of ischemia and reactive oxygen species ii. ROS damage mitochondrial DNA 1. mtDNA deletions 2. Reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential Diagnosis a. History i. Global question: “Do you have a hearing problem now?” 1. More effective than the 10-item Hearing Handicap Inventor for Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) questionnaire ii. Not all patients with hearing loss present with a complaint 1. Often presbycusis is identified when patient presents with another ENT complaint 2. Tinnitus is an important attribute to be kept in mind iii. Risk factors 1. Noise exposure a. Occupational b. Recreational 2. Smoking 3. Medication 4. Family history Geriatric Otolaryngology August 2007 4 XI. iv. Co-morbidities 1. Hypertension 2. Stroke 3. Diabetes 4. Atherosclerosis 5. Myocardial infarction 6. Hyperlipidemia 7. Kidney disease 8. Alzheimer’s disease 9. Metabolic bone disease 10. Plasma hyperviscosity 11. Hypothyroidism 12. Immune dysfunction/Autoimmune phenomena b. Physical examination i. Aside from cerumen, normal c. Screening i. Do you have a hearing problem now? ii. Audiogram Coming next: Rehabilitation a. Barriers to rehabilitation i. Only 20% of patient who might benefit from amplification actually purchase hearing aids ii. 25%-40% of those who purchase hearing aids underuse or abandon them Key references: Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet. 2005, 366:1111-1120. Howarth A, Shone GR. Ageing and the auditory system. Postgrad Med J. 2006;86:166-171. Jennings CR, Jones NS. Presbyacusis. J Laryngol Otol. 2001,115:171-178. Ohlemiller KK. Age-related hearing loss: the status of Schuknecht’s typology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004,14:439-443. Seidman MD, Ahmad N, Joshi D, Seidman J, Thawani S, Quirk WS. Age-related hearing loss and its association with reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial DNA damage. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004 (552):16-24.