Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Arterial Stiffness in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases Mary J. Roman,, Richard B. Devereux, Joseph E. Schwartz, Michael D. Lockshin, Stephen A. Paget, Adrienne Davis, Mary K. Crow, Lisa Sammaritano, Daniel M. Levine, Beth-Ann Shankar, Elfi Moeller, Jane E. Salmon Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 Abstract—Chronic inflammatory diseases are associated with premature atherosclerosis; however, it is unknown whether arterial stiffness is increased in this setting, possibly as a manifestation of vascular disease preceding and/or independent of atherosclerosis. Carotid ultrasonography and radial applanation tonometry were performed in 101 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 80 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and 105 healthy control subjects. The 3 groups were comparable in age, gender, and carotid artery absolute and relative wall thickness. Atherosclerotic plaque was more common in lupus (46%) and rheumatoid arthritis (38%) patients than in controls (23%) (P⬍0.003). Although control subjects had higher central and peripheral blood pressures, arterial stiffness was increased in patient groups compared with controls (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, controls, respectively: : 3.36 versus 3.22 versus 2.60, P⬍0.001; Young’s modulus: 441 versus 452 versus 366 mm Hg/cm, P⫽0.004; Peterson’s elastic modulus: 278 versus 273 versus 216 mm Hg, P⬍0.001) after adjustment for differences in mean brachial pressure. In multivariate analysis involving the entire population, arterial stiffness was independently related to age, serum glucose, and the presence of chronic inflammatory disease. In multivariate analysis restricted to the patients, arterial stiffness was independently related to age at diagnosis, disease duration, serum cholesterol, and C-reactive protein (and IL-6, when substituted for C-reactive protein). When analyses were repeated in the 186 study subjects without carotid plaque, arterial stiffness remained significantly elevated in patient groups after adjustment for differences in age and mean brachial pressure. In conclusion, arterial stiffness is increased in chronic inflammatory disorders independent of the presence of atherosclerosis and is related to disease duration, cholesterol, and the inflammatory mediator C-reactive protein and the cytokine that stimulates its production, IL-6. (Hypertension. 2005;46:194-199.) Key Words: arterial pressure 䡲 arteriosclerosis 䡲 carotid arteries 䡲 elasticity 䡲 vascular disease A sclerosis, was not related to C-reactive protein or other circulating mediators of inflammation independent of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Framingham Offspring Study.12 Chronic inflammatory diseases might be associated with arterial stiffness, possibly as a manifestation of premature atherosclerosis.13 In 2 recent studies in small numbers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and control subjects, arterial stiffness was marginally increased in patients after adjustment for traditional risk factors in one study,14 and significantly increased in another study involving 14 young patients with no cardiovascular disease risk factors.15 Thus the present study was designed to determine whether arterial stiffness is increased in a large sample of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases in comparison to healthy control subjects and to determine whether arterial stiffness associated with inflammation is independent of both traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors and of the presence of atherosclerosis. rterial stiffening is caused by structural changes within the walls of the major conduit arteries resulting in an increase in pulse wave velocity. Systolic and pulse pressures are increased because of an alteration in the timing of reflected waves. Arterial stiffening occurs as a consequence of aging1 and is increased in the setting of risk factors for atherosclerosis such as hypertension,2 diabetes,3 hypercholesterolemia,4,5 and smoking.6 Furthermore, arterial stiffening predicts cardiovascular events independent of traditional risk factor.7,8 Given the relation of inflammation to atherosclerosis, elevated levels of inflammatory mediators might be associated with arterial stiffening. C-reactive protein was recently reported to be independently related to higher pulse wave velocity9 and pulse pressure,10 a surrogate for arterial stiffening, in 2 healthy British and US populations, respectively, but not to pulse wave velocity in healthy Japanese men after traditional risk factors were taken into account.11 Flowmediated dilation of the brachial artery, a measure of endothelial function that may be altered in the setting of athero- Received February 9, 2005; first decision March 1, 2005; revision accepted April 13, 2005. From the Divisions of Cardiology (M.J.R., R.B.D.) and Rheumatology (M.D.L., S.A.P., A.D., M.K.C., L.S., B.A.S., E.M., J.E.S.) and The Rogosin Institute (D.M.L.), Weill Medical College of Cornell University, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY; and the Department of Psychiatry (J.E.S.), SUNY-Stony Brook, NY. Correspondence to Mary J. Roman, MD, Division of Cardiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th St, New York, NY 10021. E-mail [email protected] © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. Hypertension is available at http://www.hypertensionaha.org DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000168055.89955.db 194 Roman et al Methods Study Population Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 The patient population consisted of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) participating in a study to determine the prevalence and correlates of premature atherosclerosis in these conditions.13 Patients were sequentially recruited for the study at the time of regularly scheduled outpatient visits with their rheumatologist at the Hospital for Special Surgery. Patients fulfilled strict diagnostic criteria for the presence of SLE16 or RA.17 Control subjects of a comparable age and gender who had undergone a similar protocol to assess arterial structure and function were drawn from a longitudinal study of employed individuals.18,19 Patients were excluded based on use of antihypertensive medications at the time of study; none had renal failure. Hypertensive control subjects were studied after withdrawal of antihypertensive medications for at least 3 weeks, and, in many instances, several months. A total of 105 control subjects, 101 patients with SLE, and 80 patients with RA were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Study protocols were approved by our institutions’ institutional review boards; all subjects gave signed informed consent to study participation. All patients were interviewed and examined with the use of standardized data collection instruments. Disease activity and disease-related damage in SLE patients was assessed with use of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index20 and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index,21 respectively, whereas disease-related damage among RA patients was assessed by an index of irreversible joint damage.22 Laboratory evaluation of patients included erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum complement (C3 and C4), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Serum IL-6 was measured with the use of a kit (Biosource International). Carotid Ultrasonography All study participants underwent carotid ultrasonography; all studies were performed by an experienced research sonographer using an identical protocol and interpreted by a single cardiologist. In brief, as previously described,18 both extracranial carotid arterial systems were extensively scanned in multiple planes to optimize identification of atherosclerosis defined as discrete plaque protruding into the lumen ⱖ50% beyond the thickness of the adjacent wall. Intimalmedial thickness (IMT) and lumen diameter were measured from end-diastolic (minimum dimension) M-mode images of the far wall of the distal common carotid artery. IMT was never measured in a location containing plaque (uncommon in the common carotid artery, which is characterized by laminar flow). Minimum and maximum arterial diameters were obtained by continuous tracing of the intima–lumen interfaces of the near and far walls. Arterial cross-sectional area was calculated as a more comprehensive estimate of vascular volume or mass.18 Relative wall thickness of the artery was calculated as (2 ⫻ IMT)/end-diastolic diameter. Vascular strain was calculated as ([maximum diameter ⫺ minimum diameter]/ minimum diameter) ⫻ 100. Brachial blood pressures were obtained in triplicate and averaged at the end of the ultrasound studies, ie, after 45 to 60 minutes in the supine position in a quiet, darkened room. Assessment of Arterial Stiffness Arterial stiffness was estimated from pressure– diameter relations of the common carotid artery and pressure waveforms obtained by applanation tonometry of the radial artery with a high-fidelity transducer; central arterial waveforms and pressures were calculated by the use of the SphygmoCor device using a generalized transfer function (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) and calibration using the brachial mean and diastolic pressures. Orientation and pressure applied to the transducer were adjusted to achieve optimal applanation of the artery between the transducer and the underlying tissue. Applanation tonometry has been validated to yield accurate estimates of intra-arterial pulse pressure by comparison with simultaneous invasive pressure recordings.23–25 Minimum (end-diastolic) and maximum (peak systolic) diameters were obtained from carotid Chronic Inflammation and Arterial Stiffness 195 TABLE 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patient and Control Groups Variable No. Age, y Gender, % female BSA, m2 Hypertension, % Control SLE RA ANOVA or 2 105 101 80 47⫾8 45⫾13 45⫾12 95 95 99 0.36 1.75⫾0.17 1.74⫾0.20 1.69⫾0.14 0.047 5 10 3 0.091 0.50 Brachial BP, mm Hg Systolic 110⫾16 105⫾14* 106⫾15 0.026 Diastolic 74⫾9 65⫾9‡ 68⫾8‡ ⬍0.001 Mean 88⫾10 78⫾10‡ 81⫾10† ⬍0.001 Pulse 37⫾11 39⫾10 38⫾11 0.27 Systolic 100⫾15 93⫾12† 97⫾16 0.003 Diastolic 75⫾9 67⫾9‡ 69⫾8‡ ⬍0.001 Mean 86⫾11 78⫾10† 81⫾10† ⬍0.001 Pulse 25⫾10 27⫾8 29⫾13 66⫾11 74⫾12‡ 71⫾10† Aortic BP, mm Hg Heart rate, bpm Current smoking, % 17 12 Cholesterol, mg/dL 202⫾40 189⫾40 5 201⫾43 0.086 ⬍0.001 0.054 0.043 BP indicates blood pressure; BSA, body surface area; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. *P⬍0.05 vs control; †P⬍0.01 vs control; ‡P⬍0.001 vs control in post hoc testing for multiple comparisons. ultrasonography performed immediately before applanation tonometry with the position of the subject and ambient environment unchanged. Three measures of arterial stiffness were evaluated: (1) arterial stiffness index ():26,27 ln(Ps/Pd)/([Ds⫺Dd]/Dd), where Ps and Pd are aortic systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively, and Ds and Dd are carotid systolic and diastolic diameters, respectively; (2) Young’s modulus:28 ([Ps⫺Pd]/[Ds⫺Dd])⫻(Dd /IMTd), where IMTd is common carotid artery far wall thickness at end diastole; and (3) Peterson’s elastic modulus:29 Ep⫽([Ps⫺Pd]/[Ds⫺Dd])⫻Dd. These measures provide indices of regional arterial stiffness under the vessel’s usual loading conditions (Peterson’s elastic modulus) or adjusted for the effects of arterial wall thickening (Young’s modulus) and distending pressure (stiffness index). The arterial stiffness index is considerably less pressure-dependent than is Peterson’s elastic modulus.30 Statistical Analyses Comparisons were made between the three groups using 2 statistic for categorical variables and 1-way analysis of variance for continuous variables with post hoc testing for multiple comparisons (Scheffé). Continuous variables are expressed with the standard deviation as the index of dispersion and the standard error for adjusted means. Independence of association with arterial stiffness was performed by stepwise linear regression analysis using those variables found to have a bivariate relation (P⬍0.1) to arterial stiffness as potential predictors. Results Comparison of Demographics Characteristics and Arterial Structure By design, patients and control subjects were comparable in age and gender (Table 1). Weight and height were similar in the 3 groups. Although the rates of diagnosed hypertension did not differ among the 3 groups, both brachial and central 196 Hypertension July 2005 TABLE 2. Common Carotid Artery Structure in Patient and Control Groups Variable No. Diastolic diameter, mm Control SLE RA ANOVA or 2 105 101 80 5.24⫾0.5 5.45⫾0.47* 5.28⫾0.47 0.01 Systolic diameter, mm 5.85⫾0.60 6.06⫾0.56* 5.89⫾0.52 0.014 IMT, mm 0.63⫾0.13 0.63⫾0.16 0.61⫾0.16 0.67 Relative wall thickness 0.24⫾0.05 0.23⫾0.06 0.23⫾0.06 0.67 CSA, mm/m2 6.76⫾1.92 7.02⫾2.24 6.78⫾2.07 0.62 Plaque, % 23 Strain, % 11⫾3 46 11⫾4 38 0.003 11⫾3 0.90 CSA indicates cross-sectional area; IMT, intimal-medial thickness. *P⬍0.05 vs control. Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 diastolic and mean pressures were higher in the control subjects, whereas pulse pressures were similar. Heart rate was higher in patients than in control subjects. Current smoking tended to be more prevalent among the control subjects. Diabetes was present in 3 patients and in no control subjects. Although carotid artery lumen diameters were slightly larger in the patients with systemic lupus erythematosus than in control subjects, there were no differences between the 3 groups in absolute and relative wall thickness or in overall arterial cross-sectional area (Table 2). Atherosclerotic plaque was found more commonly in the patients. Comparison of Arterial Stiffness In view of differences in blood pressures between patients and control subjects, and to avoid autocorrelation, estimates of arterial stiffness were adjusted for differences in mean brachial blood pressure. All 3 estimates of arterial stiffness were significantly greater in the 2 patient populations than in the control group (Figure, Table 3). Heart rate did not relate to the 3 estimates of arterial stiffness; therefore, further adjustment for heart rate did not alter the findings. Because atherosclerosis promotes arterial stiffening, analyses were repeated in the control subjects and SLE and RA patients without atherosclerotic plaque. Control subjects were older (46⫾9 years) than the SLE and RA patients (39⫾9 and 40⫾11, respectively; P⬍0.001), with higher mean brachial blood pressures (85⫾10 versus 78⫾11 and 78⫾7 mm Hg, respectively; P⬍0.001). After adjustment for differences in age and mean brachial blood pressure, all 3 measures of arterial stiffness remained elevated in patients without plaque compared with control subjects without plaque (Table 3). Further adjustment of the arterial stiffness index and Peterson’s elastic modulus for carotid wall thickness or crosssectional area had no effect on results. Determinants of Arterial Stiffness Independent correlates of the arterial stiffness index () in the entire population were age, fasting glucose level, and the presence of either systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis (Table 4). When analyses were restricted to the patients, age at diagnosis, duration of disease, level of C-reactive protein, and fasting, serum cholesterol entered the model (Table 5). In models predicting either Peterson’s elastic modulus or Young’s modulus, mean arterial pressure also entered the equation, supporting the lesser pressure dependence of the arterial stiffness index relative to the other estimates of arterial stiffness; the association between inflammatory disease and increased arterial stiffness was significant in all analyses. Substitution of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C3 or C4 for C-reactive protein weakened the model. In contrast, IL-6, which stimulates the production of acute phase reactants including C-reactive protein, entered the model when substituted for C-reactive protein. Among patients with SLE, arterial stiffness was not related to either disease activity or disease-related damage, as assessed by the SLE Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index, respectively. Among patients with RA, arterial stiffness was not related to irreversible joint damage. Discussion Arterial stiffness index (mean⫾95% confidence interval) in control subjects and in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The present study is the first to demonstrate that arterial stiffness is increased in the chronic inflammatory diseases SLE and RA relative to a control population independent of traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis. Furthermore, arterial stiffening is not attributable to the premature atherosclerosis detected in these diseases. Rather, the similarity in vascular structure in the 3 groups and the confirmation of findings when distending pressure is taken into account by use of the arterial stiffness index suggest an alteration in underlying physical properties of the vessel wall and/or vascular tone in the setting of chronic inflammation even in the absence of atherosclerosis. The independent association of fasting glucose with arterial stiffness noted in the present study is in keeping with earlier observations in diabetic patients3 and in the general population,31 possibly as a consequence of accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts.32 The associations of disease duration and level of C-reactive protein with arterial stiffening in patients with SLE and RA suggest that the cumulative burden of inflam- Roman et al TABLE 3. Chronic Inflammation and Arterial Stiffness 197 Estimates of Arterial Stiffness in Patient and Control Groups Entire Population Variable Control SLE RA 105 101 80 Stiffness index () 2.60⫾0.13 3.36⫾0.13 3.22⫾0.14 Young’s modulus, mm Hg/cm 365⫾19 441⫾19 452⫾21 0.004 Elastic modulus, mm Hg 216⫾11 278⫾11 273⫾12 ⬍0.001 No. ANCOVA* ⬍0.001 Control Subjects and Patients Free of Atherosclerotic Plaque Variable Control No. SLE RA ANCOVA† 81 55 50 Stiffness index () 2.39⫾0.11 3.08⫾0.13 2.99⫾0.14 Young’s modulus, mm Hg/cm 347⫾20 430⫾24 442⫾24 0.006 Elastic modulus, mm Hg 196⫾9 252⫾11 248⫾11 ⬍0.001 ⬍0.001 Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 *Adjusted for differences in mean brachial artery pressure; data are presented as adjusted means⫾SE. †Adjusted for differences in age and mean brachial artery pressure; data are presented as adjusted means⫾SE. mation is of primary importance in this abnormality. The independent relation of cholesterol to arterial stiffness in our patients with chronic inflammatory diseases is of interest given the recent observation that low-grade systemic inflammation may be a primary mediator of increased arterial stiffness in individuals with hypercholesterolemia.5 To date, few studies have evaluated arterial function in chronic inflammatory diseases. Carotid femoral pulse wave velocity was determined in 220 women with SLE participating in the Pittsburgh SLE Registry and was significantly related to mean arterial pressure, age, impaired fasting glucose, low white blood cell count, and serum creatinine in postmenopausal women, and to carotid atherosclerosis, C3 level, and lack of use of hydroxychloroquine in premenopausal women.33 The study lacked a control population to determine whether arterial stiffness was actually increased in women with SLE. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, a measure of endothelial function, was reduced in 62 patients with SLE in comparison to 38 control subjects in a recent study from the United Kingdom and was not related to specific disease attributes, although C-reactive protein was not evaluated.34 In contrast, a small study of 25 patients with RA and 25 control subjects did not detect differences between the 2 groups in flow-mediated dilatation,35 whereas arterial TABLE 4. Multivariate Correlates of Arterial Stiffness () in the Entire Population Variable Age (per 10 y)  P R2 Change 0.485 ⬍0.001 0.256 compliance was reduced in a subset of patients, although results were not adjusted for higher blood pressure in the patients. In a small study of another chronic inflammatory disease, systemic vasculitis, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index, an indirect measure of arterial stiffness, were increased in comparison to a control population, but only among those patients with active disease.36 Again, the relation of these findings to premature atherosclerosis was not investigated. Although premature atherosclerosis might be expected to promote arterial stiffening in chronic inflammatory diseases, our study indicates that factors other than arterial wall thickness, as a possible measure of early or diffuse atherosclerosis, or discrete atherosclerotic plaque detectable by noninvasive ultrasonography, are responsible and are consistent with the hypothesis that C-reactive protein or IL-6, the cytokine that stimulates its synthesis, has a direct role. C-reactive protein is deposited in the arterial intima in early atherosclerotic lesions,37 induces an inflammatory and atherogenic phenotype in endothelial cells,38,39 interferes with endothelial progenitor cell survival and function,40 and stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation.41 The lack of differences in intimal-medial thickness TABLE 5. Multivariate Correlates of Arterial Stiffness () in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Rheumatoid Arthritis  P Age at diagnosis (per 10 y) 0.453 ⬍0.001 0.185 0.205 0.004 0.041 Variable R2 Change Glucose, mg/dL 0.247 ⬍0.001 0.088 Duration of disease (per y) Disease status* 0.145 0.006 0.018 C-reactive protein* 0.176 0.032 0.011 Serum cholesterol, mg/dL 0.152 0.030 0.022 *Disease status: 0 indicates control subject; 1, presence of systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis. Model: R⫽0.602; R 2 ⫽ 0.363. Not in model: mean arterial pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking status, intimal-medial thickness, and plaque Model: R⫽0.527; R 2 ⫽ 0.278. Not in model: mean arterial pressure, serum glucose, smoking status, intimal-medial thickness, and plaque. *IL-6 entered the model when substituted for C-reactive protein. 198 Hypertension July 2005 between our patient and control groups does not preclude the occurrence of microscopic structural changes within the extracellular matrix of the vessel walls, which might alter endothelial cell function and physical properties of the vessel wall. Furthermore, current ultrasound techniques do not allow separate measurement of intimal and medial layers, which may be differentially affected by inflammation. Independent of the cause of alterations in arterial function in chronic inflammatory disease, 2 recent studies showed an improvement in endothelial function associated with infliximab therapy42 and a reduction in the augmentation index associated with atorvastatin therapy43 in small numbers of RA patients. Perspectives Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 Our study documents substantial increases in arterial stiffness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis independent of the presence of atherosclerotic plaque and traditional risk factors. The association of arterial stiffening with disease duration and circulating levels of C-reactive protein and IL-6 implicates chronic inflammation as important mediators of this process. The cross-sectional nature of our study limits our ability to determine whether arterial stiffening precedes the development of atherosclerosis. However, the independent prognostic usefulness of arterial stiffness documented in other populations6,7,44 suggests that noninvasive measurement of arterial stiffness might be used as a biomarker for increased vascular risk in chronic inflammatory diseases and as a target of treatment efficacy. Acknowledgments Supported by National Institutes of Health grant AR 45591. References 1. Avolio AP, Chen S, Wang R, Zhang C, Li M, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983;68:50 –58. 2. Ting CT, Brin KP, Lin SJ, Wang SP, Chang MS, Chiang BN, Yin FCP. Arterial hemodynamics in human hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1986;78: 1462–1471. 3. Schram MT, Henry RMA, van Dijk RAJM, Kostense PJ, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Bouter LM, Westerhof N, Stehouwer CDA. Increased central artery stiffness in impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes: The Hoorn Study. Hypertension. 2004;43:176 –181. 4. Wilkinson IB, Prasad K, Hall IR, Thomas A, MacCallum H, Webb DJ, Frenneaux MP. Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39: 1005–1011. 5. Pirro M, Schillaci G, Savarese G, Gemelli F, Vaudo G, Siepi D, Bagaglia F, Mannarino E. Low-grade systemic inflammation impairs arterial stiffness in newly-diagnosed hypercholesterolaemia. Eur J Clin Invest. 2004;34:335–341. 6. Liang Y-L, Shiel LM, Teede H, Kotsopoulos D, McNeil J, Cameron J, McGrath BP. Effects of blood pressure, smoking, and their interaction on carotid artery structure and function. Hypertension. 2001;37:6 –11. 7. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001;37:1236 –1241. 8. Boutuyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, Gautier I, Benetos A, Lacolley P, Laurent S. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension. 2002;39:10 –15. 9. Yasmin, McEniery CM, Wallace S, Mackenzie IS, Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB. C-reactive protein is associated with arterial stiffness in apparently healthy individuals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24: 969 –974. 10. Abramson JL, Weintraub WS, Vaccarino V. Association between pulse pressure and C-reactive protein among apparently healthy U.S. adults. Hypertension. 2002;39:197–202. 11. Tomiyama H, Arai T, Koji Y, Yambe M, Hirayama Y, Yamamoto Y, Yamashina A. The relationship between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein an pulse wave velocity in healthy Japanese men. Atherosclerosis. 2004;174:373–377. 12. Vita JA, Keaney JFJr, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Massaro JM, Lipinska I, Lehman BT, Fan S, Osypiuk E, Wilson PWF, Vasan RS, Mitchell GF, Benjamin EJ. Brachial artery vasodilator function and systemic inflammation in the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 2004;110: 3604 –3609. 13. Roman MJ, Shanker B-A, Davis A, Lockshin MD, Sammaritano L, Simantov R, Crow MK, Schwartz JE, Paget SA, Devereux RB, Salmon JE. Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2399 –2406. 14. Wong M, Toh L, Wilson A, Rowley K, Karschimkus C, Prior D, Romas E, Clemens L, Dragicevic G, Harianto H, Wicks I, McColl G, Best J, Jenkins A. Reduced arterial elasticity in rheumatoid arthritis and the relation to vascular disease risk factors and inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:81– 89. 15. Klocke R, Cockcroft JR, Taylor GJ, Hall IR, Blake DR. Arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, as determined by pulse wave analysis, in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:414 – 418. 16. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982; 25:1271–1277. 17. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McSHane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS. The Am Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315–324. 18. Roman MJ, Pickering TG, Pini R, Schwartz JE, Devereux RB. Prevalence and determinants of cardiac and vascular hypertrophy in hypertension. Hypertension. 1995;26:369 –373. 19. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG. A longitudinal study of job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: results from a three-year follow-up. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:697–706. 20. Petri M, Buyon J, Skovron ML, Kim M for the SELENA Study Group (M Belmont, B Hahn, K Kahmian, R Lahita, M Lockshin, J Merrill, L Sammaritano). Reliability of Selena Sledai and Flare as clinical trial outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(suppl):S218. 21. Gladman D, Ginzler E, Goldsmith C, Fortin P, Liang M, Urowitz M, Bacon P, Bombardieri S Hanly J, Hay E, IsenbergD, Jones J, Kalunian K, Maddison P, Nived O, Petri M, Richter M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Snaith M, Sturfelt G, Symmons D, Zoma A. The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic/Am College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:363–369. 22. Orces CH, del Rincón I, Abel MP, Escalante A. The number of deformed joints as a surrogate measure of damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47:67–72. 23. Kelly R, Hayward C, Ganis J, Daley J, Avolio A, O’Rourke M. Noninvasive registration of the arterial pressure waveform using high-fidelity applanation tonometry. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:142–149. 24. Chen C-H, Ting CT, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass DA, Pak P, Wang SP, Chang MS, Yin FCP. Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. Hypertension. 1996;27:168 –175. 25. O’Rourke MF, Nichols WW, Safar ME. Pulse waveform analysis and arterial stiffness: realism can replace evangelism and scepticism. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1633–1634. 26. Hayashi K, Handa H, Nagasawa S, Okumura A, Moritaki K. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J Biomechanics. 1980;13:175–184. 27. Hirai T, Sasayma S, Kawasaki T, Yagi S. Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1989;80:78 – 86. 28. O’Rourke M. Arterial stiffness, systolic blood pressure, and logical treatment of arterial hypertension. Hypertension. 1990;15:339 –347. 29. Peterson LN, Jensen RE, Parnell R. Mechanical properties of arteries in vivo. Circ Res. 1968;8:78 – 86. 30. Roman MJ, Ganau A, Saba PS, Pini R, Pickering TG, Devereux RB. The impact of arterial stiffening on left ventricular structure. Hypertension. 2000;36:489 – 494. Roman et al Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 31. Salomaa V, Riley W, Kark JD, Nardo C, Folsom AR. Non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus and fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with arterial stiffness indexes: The ARIC Study. Circulation. 1995;91:1432–1443. 32. Kass DA, Shapiro EP, Kawaguchi M, Capriotti AR, Scuteri A, deGroof RC, Lakatta EG. Improved arterial compliance by a novel advanced glycation end-product crosslink breaker. Circulation. 2001;104: 1464 –1470. 33. Selzer F, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Fitzgerald S, Tracy R, Kuller L, Manzi S. Vascular stiffness in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Hypertension. 2001;37:1075–1082. 34. El-Magadmi M, Bodill H, Ahmad Y, Durrington PN, Mackness M, Walker M, Bernstein RM, Bruce IN. Systemic lupus erythematosus: an independent risk factor for endothelial dysfunction in women. Circulation. 2004;110:399 – 404. 35. van Doornum S, McColl G, Jenkins A, Green DJ, Wicks IP. Screening for atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison of two in vivo tests of vascular function. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:72– 80. 36. Booth AD, Wallace S, McEniery CM, Yasmin, Brown J, Jayne DRW, Wilkinson IB. Inflammation and arterial stiffness in systemic vasculitis: a model of vascular inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:581–588. 37. Torzewski M, Rist C, Mortensen RF, Zwaka TP, Bienek M, Waltenberger J, Koenig W, Schmitz G, Hombach V, Torzewski J. C-reactive protein in the arterial intima. Role of C-reactive protein receptor-dependent monocyte recruitment in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2094 –2099. Chronic Inflammation and Arterial Stiffness 199 38. Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ETH. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000;102: 2165–2168. 39. Szmitko PE, Wang C-H, Weisel RD, de Almeida JR, Anderson TJ, Verma S. New markers of inflammation and endothelial cell activation. Part 1. Circulation. 2003;108:1917–1923. 40. Verma S, Kuliszewski MA, Li S-H, Szmitko PE, Zucco L, Wang C-H, Badiwala MV, Mickle DAG, Weisel RD, Fedak PWM, Stewart DJ, Kutryk MJB. C-reactive protein attenuates endothelial progenitor cell survival, differentiation, and function. Further evidence of a mechanistic link between C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2004;109:2058 –2067. 41. Wang CH, Li SH, Weisel RD, Fedak PWM, Dumont AS, Szmitko P, Li R-K, Mickle DAG, Verma S. C-reactive protein upregulates angiotensin type 1 receptors in vascular smooth muscle. Circulation. 2003;107: 1783–1790. 42. Hürlimann D, Forster A, Noll G, Enseleit F, Chenevard R, Distler O, Béchir M, Spieker LE, Neidhart M, Michel BA, Gay RE, Lüscher TF, Gay S, Ruschitzka F. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-␣ treatment improves endothelial function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation. 2002;106:2184 –2187. 43. van Doornum S, McColl G, Wicks IP. Atorvastatin reduces arterial stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63: 1571–1575. 44. Blacher J, Guérin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 1999;99:2434 –2439. Arterial Stiffness in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases Mary J. Roman, Richard B. Devereux, Joseph E. Schwartz, Michael D. Lockshin, Stephen A. Paget, Adrienne Davis, Mary K. Crow, Lisa Sammaritano, Daniel M. Levine, Beth-Ann Shankar, Elfi Moeller and Jane E. Salmon Downloaded from http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 17, 2017 Hypertension. 2005;46:194-199; originally published online May 23, 2005; doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000168055.89955.db Hypertension is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0194-911X. Online ISSN: 1524-4563 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://hyper.ahajournals.org/content/46/1/194 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Hypertension can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Hypertension is online at: http://hyper.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/