* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download society journal - Auckland Astronomical Society
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Star of Bethlehem wikipedia , lookup
Corona Australis wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Cassiopeia (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Archaeoastronomy wikipedia , lookup
Hubble Deep Field wikipedia , lookup
Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
H II region wikipedia , lookup
Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup
Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Constellation wikipedia , lookup
International Year of Astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Future of an expanding universe wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical naming conventions wikipedia , lookup
Astronomy in the medieval Islamic world wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Chinese astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Hebrew astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek astronomy wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Astrophotography wikipedia , lookup
DECEMBER 2014 SOCIETY JOURNAL December Monthly Meeting Monday 8 December at 8.00pm The 2014 Debate: Should Pluto be a Planet? Host: Oana Jones The Monthly Meeting normally features a talk by a guest speaker, but Decembers meeting will host the AAS Great 2014 Debate: The 2014 Debate: Should Pluto be a Planet? In 2006 the International Astronomical Union (IAU) stripped Pluto of its planet-hood, demoting it to dwarf planet status. Ever since, the Pluto is a Planet argument has seen ranging debate on both sides of the fence. Should it be reinstated to its former glory? What about the other Dwarf Planets in our Solar System? Harry Williams Trophy Astrophotography Awards 2014 Results and Judges comments A few comments on the overall judging: The quality of images entered into this years competition was of a high standard making it challenging to judge. In the Artistic/Misc and Newcomers categories, I was mainly looking for well composed natural looking images that stood out from the rest and unique in their own way, as well as being technically sound. There were a few cases where I came across an image that I was considering as a highly commended image due to good composition, but were down scored due to the image either not being sharp or over/poorly processed. In the Solar System and Deep Space categories, it was mostly composition and technical/processing quality of the image that I took into account. Artistic / Miscellaneous Winner and Overall Harry Williams Trophy Winner Wanaka Tree Mikey Mackinven A beautifully composed image of the MIlky Way above Wanaka. The flow tree line and Milky Way arch flows in harmony ending with the silhouette and reflection of the famous Wanaka Tree. A well planned and executed shot, with perhaps a little discomfort having to wade out in the freezing cold waters of Lake Wanaka to get the shot. Technically very difficult to pull off as this is a 36 image pano stitched together. There is no stretching or disproportions in the image, and the overall image is natural looking and perfectly balanced between the light pollution of Wanaka and the night sky. Highly Commended Lizards Eye Rob Dickinson A 360 degree panorama of the night sky presented in a creative way. As the name suggests, the image resembles that of a lizards eye, with the Milky Way stretching right across the top of the dome of the night sky. Other features of this image include the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, air glow and gravity waves in the left of frame. Technically a difficult image to get right with the stitching of many images that make up the complete sky dome. Highly Commended Falling To Earth Andrew Caldwell There were lots of images which featured the Milky Way in this competition, but this one was a little different. It was a well planned and executed shot taken during the blue hour just after sunset. It’s a lovely well balanced and natural looking image, which features the ISS seemingly falling to earth with it’s trajectory along the Milky Way. The soft light and dreamy water in the foreground sits nicely in this well composed shot. 2 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 Solar System Winner Moon And Saturn - Paul Stewart An impressive image of the occultation of Saturn and by the Moon. Technically sound and great detail in the image with good colour balance. The composition of diagonally splitting the frame in half with the dark sky against the Moon and Saturn works really well. Highly Commended Plato And Alpine Valley James Tse A great image of the 95 kilometer wide crater Plato and surrounding sunlit peaks of the lunar alps, with the Alpine Valley cutting through them towards the bottom right of frame. The detail in this image is stunning and sharp with no real visible noise. Technically this image was very well executed. Deep Sky Winner Antennae Extreme Deep Field Rolf Wahl Olsen A spectacular image of a pair of colliding galaxies known as The Antennae, that is approimately 45 million light years away from Earth. Technically this image is amazing 75 hours of data to produce this image over 38 nights, and the detail in the image is something you’d almost expect from the Space Hubble Telescope. A worthy winner of the Deep Sky category. Highly Commended Tarantula Paul Stewart A lovely image of the Tarantula Nebula which is 160,000 light years from Earth. The image data is well processed and sharp. and also has great color balance which helps to exhibit the star clusters, glowing gas, and thick dark dust within the region. Highly Commended M83 Southern Pinwheel Galaxy Raymond Collecutt A stunning image of the Pinwheel Galaxy which is located 21 million light years away from earth. This image was superior in it’s processing with really nice sharp detail in the image itself. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 3 Newcomers Contest Winner Te Arai Tim Dobson An amazing, well composed image with the Milky Way sitting perfectly parallel just above the horizon. The lighter tone of the wind blown sand leads you into the picture, and the car parked on the beach silhouetted by the waves and ocean really gives this photo a sense of scale. Nice natural looking processing and colours really gels this image together. Highly Commended Kaikoura Magic David Hardy When people think of astrophotography, they usually think of impressive photos of the Milky Way or Deep Space. This image captures neither of those, but what it does capture is the true sense of a New Zealand starry sky as seen from many of the towns throughout the country. It’s a beautifully composed and natural looking image overlooking the South Island coastal village of Kaikoura. It was shot early morning during astronomical twilight before sunrise, and the snow covered mountains and low cloud compliments the starry sky above. Highly Commended On My Way Terry Urban Great composition in this image with the Milky Way sitting horizontally across the night sky in contrast with the strikingly vertical aspect of the cross. To me this image is symbolic of life and death stars have a life cycle, just like life on earth. The image is well balanced, processed and technically sound, and the nearby lights reflecting off the front face of the cross helps to bring out detail that would normally be lost during a night time exposure like this. All entries and winners may be viewed in video via the Auckland Astronomical Society website at http:// www.astronomy.org.nz Beaumont Prize 2014 Results and Judges Comments by J.C.B. White Acknowledgements The Editorial Team Without the continuing efforts of the Journal’s editorial team: Clive Bolt, Shaun Fletcher and Milina Ristic, there would be no Beaumont prize, and their selection of articles from members and from other media helps to keep members informed of new and interesting developments across many aspects of modern astronomy. Gavin Logan Gavin presents the monthly film nights, which always draw an appreciative audience, and writes short summaries of them to inform those who didn’t attend about the treat they missed; he also contributes brief reports on many of the dark sky and other Society events. Alan Gilmore For a long time now, Alan has prepared monthly sky charts and commentaries on interesting objects for amateur viewers; they are always helpful for those who want suggestions of what to look for. He is about to retire from his position at Mt John Observatory, and his considerable contribution to amateur astronomy needs to be recognized and acknowledged 4 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 Summaries of articles considered for the Beaumont Prize The Beaumont Prize requires authors to show a high standard of writing, and the call for entries states that articles about observing, personal experiences and the use and maintenance of equipment meet the judging criteria perfectly. The articles considered this year were all of a high standard, and covered a wide range of topics. Dec 2013 - Keith Smith “Processing FITS images” A concise step-by-step guide to what processing is needed in order to get the best final images from a raw data set. Jun 2014 - Keith Smith “Basics of photography” An easily-understood summary of the various camera settings which have to be set correctly to obtain a satisfactory exposure. Dec 2013 - Stan Walker “Colour photometry of variable stars” A careful explanation of the terms used in analyzing colour photometric data, and some illustrative examples of data sequences and what physical characteristics of the stars can be deduced from them. Jun 2014 - Stan Walker “Pulsating stars Follows on with descriptions of the physical processes which can be deduced from observations of stars in which the variation in brightness is due to pulsations, and some examples of several types of these. Jun 2014 - Nalayini Brito “Matariki” Takes a well-known star cluster, the Pleiades, and outlines the variety of star types which can be seen in it, and describes the stellar life cycle which this variety illustrates. Oct 2014 - Nalayini Brito “Imaging the lunar eclipse” Brief article with a number of illustrations, and suggestions for how to obtain images of the lunar eclipse of 8 Oct 2014. Oct 2014 - Elena Bloksberg “Dark Matter” Critically examines the data used to deduce the amount of dark matter in an example galaxy UGC711, and poses the question, “are we really detecting dark matter, or are our measurements (optical and radio astronomy) actually about different physical quantities. Assessments The assessments accord with the criteria for awards: a good standard of writing and some preference for articles on observing and practical amateur astronomy. First Prize Stan Walker:“Colour photometry of variable stars” Clear expositions of both the observation and the interpretation of astronomical measurements which an increasing number of our members are now equipped to participate in making. Second Prize Nalayini Brito: “Matariki” A scholarly summary of the different aspects of the life cycles of stars as illustrated in the diversity of objects to be seen in the Pleiades cluster. Special mention Elena Bloksberg: “Dark Matter” Every scientific theory must be under constant and critical appraisal and re-appraisal. This article is a brave, preliminary approach to such a re-appraisal of the theory of dark matter. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 5 Calendar and Events FEBRUARY PROGRAMME DECEMBER PROGRAMME Mon 1 7:00pm Young Astronomers with Margaret Arthur Mon 2 8:00pm Intro to Astronomy with Bernie Brenner Mon 1 7:00pm Astrophotography Group Fri 6 8:00pm Practical Astronomy with Bill Thomas 7:00 pm 8:00pm Young Astronomers with Margaret Arthur Mon 09 8:00pm Monthly meeting Subject TBA Mon 16 7:00pm Astrophotography Group 8:00pm Practical Astronomy with Bill Thomas 8:00pm Film Night February Mon 8 8:00pm Monthly Meeting Dec - The 2014 Debate: Should Pluto be a Planet? Mon 15 8:00pm Intro to Astronomy with Bernie Brenner Mon 22 8:00pm Film Night December - How to Explore the Universe Mon 23 TBA JANUARY 2015 Film Night DECEMBER Monday 22nd December at 8:00pm With Gavin Logan Young astronomers TImes and format How to Explore the Universe With Margaret Arthur A film from the Sci Fi Science series that looks at how future space travel might work and whether it could be possible to travel faster than the speed of light. This is a very futuristic view of space travel taking concepts from science fiction and looking at whether they could ever become reality. Young Astronomers is the session for our younger members, aged 6yrs upwards. Monthly Meeting December Monday 08 December, 2014 at 8:00pm The 2014 Debate: Should Pluto be a Planet? In 2006 the International Astronomical Union (IAU) stripped Pluto of its planet-hood, demoting it to dwarf planet status. Ever since, the Pluto is a Planet argument has seen ranging debate on both sides of the fence. Should it be reinstated to its former glory? What about the other Dwarf Planets in our Solar System? The debate will be held on Monday 08 Dec, 2014 at 20:00Hrs, and the winning team will be decided by audience vote, so come along to what will be a fantastic evenings entertainment. To register as a debater or for more info, email Oana on events@ astronomy.org.nz or call her on 0212 362 962. Astrophotography Group DecEMBER Monday 1st December at 7:00pm Keith Smith The Astrophotography Group discusses the practical aspects of astrophotography. This month the 2015 Harry Williams Astrophotography Competition winner Mike Mackinven is the guest speaker 6 As usual, club meetings and events are suspended during the month of january. society journal, DECEMBER 2014 At 7pm Margaret Arthur leads an interactive session covering various current topics with plenty of question and answers. At 8pm David Wardle will work with the older members of the group who are working on a range of research projects. Members are welcome come to either or both session Welcome new members Patrick Gailer (ordinary) Alastair Emerson (ordinary) Tamar Wolf (ordinary) November Society Meeting - Monuments Tied to the Sky: The Controversial Heritage of Ancient Astronomy by AAS Speaker/Host: Prof. Clive Ruggles Professor Ruggles presented a packed audience of society members with a fascinating, informative and sometimes amusing look into the world of Archeoastronomy and his work with the IAU and UNESCO. A video of this lecture is available on request from the Society library. Society Council and Officers Society Contacts PresidentBill Thomas 09 478 4874 Vice-President Grant Christie 021 024 04992 Treasurer &Andrew Buckingham 09 473 5877 Membership Secretary Gavin Logan 022 691 2055 Curator of Graham Beazley 09 537 1313 Instruments Librarian Jerina Grewar 09 444-5086 Telescope Hire Steve Hennerley 027 245 644 Journal EditorsClive Bolt 09 534 2946 Shaun Fletcher 09 480 5648 Milina Ristić 029 912 4748 CouncilBernie Brenner 09 534 4103 Jonathan Green09 415-7284 David Britten 09 846 3657 Special EventsOana Jones 021 236 2962 Auckland Astronomical Society Inc, PO Box 24187, Royal Oak, Auckland 1345, New Zealand Email [email protected] Journal [email protected] Website www.astronomy.org.nz Facebookfacebook.com/AuckAstroSoc Twitter @AuckAstroSoc Membership enquiries: contact Andrew Buckingham at [email protected] or by phone on 09 473 5877 or 027 246 2446 Training Sessions We will be conducting telescope training sessions at 7pm on the 1st and 3rd Mondays before the ‘Intro to Astronomy’ and ‘Practical Astronomy’ sessions. This will enable members to: • Learn to use the Society rental equipment. Note there are a number of new items being added to the rental range. • Bring along your own telescope for lesson on how to best use it. • Learn to use the large EWB Telescope at Stardome. For more information, please contact Andrew Buckingham or Steve Hennerley. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 7 Film Night November - Comet Catcher - The Rosetta Landing. By Gavin Logan A very well attended November film night featured a double feature on the Rosetta Mission to orbit the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and then land a probe (Philae) on it. The first film covered the development of the project, difficulties with the mission and discoveries made by the spacecraft so far. Initial difficulties with the project and delays mean a change of target. This meant putting the probe into hibernation for several years and then bring all the equipment back to life. Gravity of just 1000 of Earths required making a lander that could be anchored on to the surface of the comet. The second film, which was a sky at night special showed the landing and the two day of information collecting until Philae’s batteries went flat. The comets surface was harder than expected and the anchoring equipment did not work as planned and the lander bounced off the comet twice before settling on the surface in a position with little sunlight. One bounce was estimated to be more than a kilometre. In spite of these problems the lander was able to conduct virtually all of the planned tasks and returned information that will take scientist year to analysis. The films showed some amazing photos of the comets A close up of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko’s surface. surface. Rosetta will orbit the comet as it goes close to the sun and keep sending back valuable data. Next month’s film night will be on Monday 22th December at 8pm at Stardome. It features A film from the Sci Fi Science series that looks at how future space travel might work and whether it could be possible to travel faster than the speed of light. This is a very futuristic view of space travel taking concepts from science fiction and looking at whether they could ever become reality.. A large attendance at November’s Film Night for the Rosetta double feature 8 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 10th December - Special Lecture at University of Auckland Public Lecture: The Dark Side of Astronomy 10 December 2014 6pm Venue: Fisher and Paykel Appliances Auditorium, Owen G Glenn Building University of Auckland Cost: Free. All welcome Come and hear Nobel Prize winner Professor Brian Schmidt tell the story of the discovery of dark energy and cosmologist Associate Professor Tamara Davis explain its implications for fundamental physics. You’ll hear them chat about event horizons, wonder about the future of the universe, banter about the energy of the vacuum, and question the fundamental nature of reality. Please register at http://www.eventbrite.co.nz/e/the-dark-side-of-astronomy-tickets-14402110099 Society Telescopes for Hire The Society has a wide range of telescopes for hire to members. If you are looking to purchase or upgrade a telescope and are not sure what to buy, this is a very good way to evaluate some of the available equipment. See also the advertisement on the back page. The Society does, of course, have more telescopes and other equipment, and you will start to see this equipment being made available to members as rental gear; including some equipment more suited for experienced members as well as beginners. Three items that are now newly available for rental include: • Celestron C5 5” SCT on iOptron Minitower Computerised GoTo mount • Celestron Nexstar5 5” SCT on a computerised GoTo Alt/Az mount with tripod • Meade 90mm Achromatic Refractor on a manual Equatorial Mount. If you have a project idea where this telescope or other Society equipment may help, particularly if you are happy to write a short article for the journal, please see Steve or Graham. The Society is also keen to hear what members would like to have available for rental (the availability of the C5 scopes is in response to a member request for a more portable rental option). Any submissions and ideas, or any questions or queries regarding rental equipment should go to Rental Coordinator, Steve Hennerley at [email protected] or on 027 245 6441 For advice on telescope maintenance, repairs or any other questions about Astronomical Society instruments, Curator of Instruments, Graham Beazley can be contacted on 09 5371313/021 537610 www.astroNoMy.org.nz 9 Processing FITS with MaxIm DL by Keith Smith M axIm DL is a program that is, not only used for processing images, but can be also used to control the entire observatory and telescope, able to do tasks such as dome rotation, focusing, and tracking. It is a rather expensive package but it is possible to get the subset for image processing. Still a bit expensive compared to other alternatives – some of which are free – but once mastered, it is very powerful. Experts that combine MaxIM with Photoshop can produce some really stunning images. I’m still trying to get the hang of what all the various functions and filters do, but I’m getting reasonable results – still working on impressive though. Here’s a brief resume of what I’ve figured out so far. If readers have any useful hints and tips they can add, please send them to me, via the Society, and I’ll combine them into a future column. All the FITS I work with have already been calibrated. This means darks, flats, and biases have already been applied so, what is left should be noise free and ready for stacking. Upon starting MaxIM, the main window appears as well as several other smaller ones. The only one that you really need is the Screen Stretch window which tells you the distribution of pixels between black and white. If it’s not there, you can get it by selecting View->Screen Stretch from the top menu or pressing CTRL/H (holding down the Ctrl key and pressing H). Select Process>Stack or click on the ‘+’ button. This brings up the stacking window with the tabs: Select/Quality/Align/Color/ Combine. Clicking on the Select tab allows you to select the FITS you want for the object, usually a combination of light frames taken through the clear/red/green/ blue filters, if you’re going for true colour images. There’s usually no need to change the default settings for anything, unless you know what they do, so I skip past Quality and Align (which defaults to Auto – Star Matching), and click on Color (sorry – USA spelling) to enter the parameters for the filters. Different filters have different 10 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 weightings and I presume they are provided by the manufacturer but it is here where you enter those numbers down the top left to bottom right of the 3x3 colour matrix. I presume the other cells are for special effects. Again, leave the luminance weight at 100%. The theory is, that most of the data is in the luminance, which is usually shot in high resolution and the colour frames just carry the colour data and are shot in a lower resolution. This is usually known as ‘binning’ and a 1x1 bin uses all the pixels in a CCD to produce the image whereas a 2x2 bin, combines 4 pixels on the CCD to produce one on the image and a 3x3 bin combines 9 CCD pixels to produce 1 image pixel. Once those are entered, click on the Combine tab. Select your combination method then don’t forget to click on ‘Go’ – otherwise nothing happens. The input FITS will then be combined and produces one or more output FITS, usually a combined LRGB image or an L image and an RGB image. Now you’ve got those, the next thing to do is to tease the data out. It’s all in there but it’s all squashed into a thin area between black and white. You can use careful applications of ‘Curves’ to stretch it out, followed by adjustments of the black and white points under ‘Levels’, but to save time, you can use ‘Digital Development Processing’ (DDP) to get it out. This is under Filter>Digital Development. You can then use iterations of curves, followed by more black/white point adjustments to tweak the data. I’ve been trolling the ‘net looking for helpful hints and tips on DDP and Deconvolution (a system for sharpening and cleaning up images. There are several settings that can be tweaked and it is recommended that the user experiment to see what works best. This is what I found. Upon opening DDP, you will see it’s dialog box. Set the filter type to None, then click on Auto under background to see what number comes up. Some people recommend reducing that number by 200 as DDP can be a bit aggressive at times. To do this, click on Mouse then click on Auto again to turn it off, and reduce the number by 200 (minimum zero). Leave the mid-level setting at Auto then click OK. Next thing to do is to run a Deconvolution, under Filter>Deconvolve. Deconvolution does sharpening as well as trying to make stars smaller by reducing the PSF (Point Spread Function). The first tab is Noise Model and, under that, click Auto Extract to get the background noise value. If you know the Gain of your CCD camera then enter that under e-/ADU, otherwise go with the default. Just make sure that the Poisson Distribution click box is ticked. Under the PSF model tab, select ‘Gaussian’, click on ‘Select from Image’ then click on the centre of a star that is round and hasn’t been clipped to get it’s maximum value. It should be less than 65000. If it’s higher, find another star. The PSU value returned may be too high so it is recommended that it be halved then the process ran. If you’re not sure about the results, undo the deconvolution, adjust the PSU upwards a bit and do it again. Under the Deconvolve tab, select Lucy-Richardson and ten iterations to start. Again, you can undo, change the number of iterations and redo. Don’t forget to check your levels between each step to ensure your black and white points are at each end of the histogram otherwise you may be either clipping data or including stuff you don’t want. You can also adjust the gamma (grey point) as well to get a more pleasing image. Other things you can do are: Colour>White Balance: - if you know that star should be white and it’s not, click on it. Colour>Adjust Saturation: to make colours bolder. Filter>Flatten Background: click on four or more background points to smooth out the background Once you are satisfied, then save it as a 16bit TIFF for further processing in GIMP or Photoshop. Well, that’s all I’ve learnt about MaxIm so far. Once I collect more tips to share, there may be a sequel article. Sunspots in November 2014 Images By Danut Ionescu The Sun Auckland 2014-11-23 at 13:15 NZ Time: Sunspots 2216 and 2217 Lunt100mm Solar telescope Ha with B1200 blocking filter on Zeiss and camera Flea2 all property of Stardome Observatory-Auckland, New Zealand. Processed with AS2, Fitswork4 and Photoshop. Sunspot 2209 and around-Detail with 2x Barlow (1’25 from Meade). Auckland 2014-11-23 at 14:36 NZ Time Lunt100mm Solar telescope Ha with B1200 blocking filter on Zeiss and camera Flea2 all property of Stardome Observatory-Auckland, New Zealand. Processed with AS2, Fitswork4 and Photoshop. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 11 Astronomers solve puzzle about bizarre object at center of our galaxy: Enormous black hole drove two binary stars to merge from University of California - Los Angeles Telescopes from Hawaii’s W.M. Keck Observatory use a powerful technology called adaptive optics, which enabled UCLA astronomers to discover that G2 is a pair of binary stars that merged together, cloaked in gas and dust. Credit: Ethan Tweedie The mystery about a thin, bizarre object in the center of the Milky Way that some astronomers believe to be a hydrogen gas cloud headed toward our galaxy’s enormous black hole has been solved by astronomers. F or years, astronomers have been puzzled by a bizarre object in the center of the Milky Way that was believed to be a hydrogen gas cloud headed toward our galaxy’s enormous black hole. 12 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 Having studied it during its closest approach to the black hole this summer, UCLA astronomers believe that they have solved the riddle of the object widely known as G2. torn apart by the black hole, and that the resulting celestial fireworks would have dramatically changed the state of the black hole. A team led by Andrea Ghez, professor of physics and astronomy in the UCLA College, determined that G2 is most likely a pair of binary stars that had been orbiting the black hole in tandem and merged together into an extremely large star, cloaked in gas and dust -- its movements choreographed by the black hole’s powerful gravitational field. The research is published today in the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters. “G2 survived and continued happily on its orbit; a simple gas cloud would not have done that,” said Ghez, who holds the Lauren B. Leichtman and Arthur E. Levine Chair in Astrophysics. “G2 was basically unaffected by the black hole. There were no fireworks.” Astronomers had figured that if G2 had been a hydrogen cloud, it could have been Black holes, which form out of the collapse of matter, have such high density that nothing can escape their gravitational pull -- not even light. They cannot be seen directly, but their influence on nearby stars is visible and provides a signature, said Ghez, a 2008 MacArthur Fellow. Ghez, who studies thousands of stars in the neighborhood of the supermassive black hole, said G2 appears to be just one of an emerging class of stars near the black hole that are created because the black hole’s powerful gravity drives binary stars to merge into one. She also noted that, in our galaxy, massive stars primarily come in pairs. She says the star suffered an abrasion to its outer layer but otherwise will be fine. Ghez and her colleagues -- who include lead author Gunther Witzel, a UCLA postdoctoral scholar, and Mark Morris and Eric Becklin, both UCLA professors of physics and astronomy -- conducted the research at Hawaii’s W.M. Keck Observatory, which houses the world’s two largest optical and infrared telescopes. When two stars near the black hole merge into one, the star expands for more than 1 million years before it settles back down, said Ghez, who directs the UCLA Galactic Center Group. “This may be happening more than we thought. The stars at the center of the galaxy are massive and mostly binaries. It’s possible that many of the stars we’ve been watching and not understanding may be the end product of mergers that are calm now.” Ghez and her colleagues also determined that G2 appears to be in that inflated stage now. The body has fascinated many astronomers in recent years, particularly during the year leading up to its approach to the black hole. “It was one of the most watched events in astronomy in my career,” Ghez said. Ghez said G2 now is undergoing what she calls a “spaghetti-fication” -- a common phenomenon near black holes in which large objects become elongated. At the same time, the gas at G2’s surface is being heated by stars around it, creating an enormous cloud of gas and dust that has shrouded most of the massive star. Witzel said the researchers wouldn’t have been able to arrive at their conclusions without the Keck’s advanced technology. “It is a result that in its precision was possible only with these incredible tools, the Keck Observatory’s 10-meter telescopes,” Witzel said. The telescopes use adaptive optics, a powerful technology pioneered in part by Ghez that corrects the distorting effects of the Earth’s atmosphere in real time to more clearly reveal the space around the supermassive black hole. The technique has helped Ghez and her colleagues elucidate many previously unexplained facets of the environments surrounding supermassive black holes. “We are seeing phenomena about black holes that you can’t watch anywhere else in the universe,” Ghez added. “We are starting to understand the physics of black holes in a way that has never been possible before.”. The Protoplanetary Disk of HL Tauri from ALMA Image Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), NSF Explanation: Why does this giant disk have gaps? The exciting and probable answer is: planets. A mystery is how planets massive enough to create these gaps formed so quickly, since the HL Tauri star system is only about one million years old. The picture on which the gaps were discovered was taken with the new Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) of telescopes in Chile. ALMA imaged the protoplanetary disk, which spans about 1,500 light-minutes across, in unprecedented detail, resolving features as small as 40 light minutes. The low energy light used by ALMA was also able to peer through an intervening haze of gas and dust. The HL Tauri system lies about 450 light years from Earth. Studying HL Tauri will likely give insight into how our own Solar System formed and evolved. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 13 The Evening Sky in December 2014 By Alan Gilmore, University of Canterbury‘s Mt John Observatory, www.canterbury.ac.nz 14 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 T he twilight sky is briefly lit by Venus the brilliant ‘evening star’. It sets in the southwest about an hour after the Sun. It is catching up on Earth from the far side of the Sun. In the first half of 2015 it will swing outward from the Sun and set progressively later. Though bright, Venus is a small featureless disk in a telescope. It is 250 million km away mid month. In late December the planet Mercury appears as a star below and left of Venus. As Mercury swings out from the far side of the Sun faster than Venus it will appear move close to the brighter planet. Low in the western sky, above and right of Venus is Mars. It looks like a medium-bright orange star and sets around 11 p.m. NZDT. The brightest true stars are in the east and south. Sirius, the brightest of all the stars, is due east at dusk, often twinkling like a diamond. Left of it is the bright constellation of Orion. The line of three stars makes Orion’s belt in the classical constellation. To southern hemisphere skywatchers they make the bottom of ‘The Pot’. The faint line of stars above and right of the three is the Pot’s handle. At its centre is the Orion Nebula, a glowing gas cloud nicely seen in binoculars. Rigel, directly above the line of three stars, is a hot blue-giant star. Orange Betelgeuse, below the line of three, is a cooler red-giant star. Left of Orion is a triangular group making the upside down face of Taurus the bull. Or- ange Aldebaran is the brightest star in the V shape. Aldebaran is Arabic for ‘the eye of the bull’. Still further left is the Pleiades /Matariki/Seven Sisters/Subaru cluster, impressive in binoculars. It is 440 light years* away. Canopus, the second brightest star, is high in the southeast. Low in the south are the Pointers, Beta and Alpha Centauri, and Crux the Southern Cross. In some Maori star lore the bright southern Milky Way makes the canoe of Maui with Crux being the canoe’s anchor hanging off the side. In this picture the Scorpion’s tail can be the canoe’s prow and the Clouds of Magellan are the sails. The Milky Way is wrapped around the horizon. The broadest part is in Sagittarius low in the west at dusk. It narrows toward Crux in the south and becomes faint in the east below Orion. The Milky Way is our edgewise view of the galaxy, the pancake of billions of stars of which the Sun is just one. The thick hub of the galaxy, 30 000 light years away, is in Sagittarius now low in the west. The nearby outer edge is the faint part of the Milky Way below Orion. A scan along the Milky Way with binoculars will show many clusters of stars and a few glowing gas clouds. The Clouds of Magellan, LMC and SMC, high in the southern sky, are two small galaxies about 160 000 and 200 000 light years away, respectively. They are easily seen by eye on a dark moonless night. The larger cloud is about 1/20th the mass of the Milky Way galaxy, the smaller cloud 1/30th. Very low in the north is the Andromeda Galaxy seen in binoculars in a dark sky as a spindle of light. It is a bit bigger than our Milky Way galaxy and nearly three million light years away. Jupiter rises in the northeast around 1:30 a.m. at the beginning of the month, the brightest ‘star’ in the morning sky. By New Year it is up at 11:30. It shines with a steady golden light, obeying the rough rule that stars twinkle and planets don’t. It is 710 million km away mid month. A small telescope shows the planet’s disk with Jupiter’s four big moons like stars lined up on each side. They change sides from night to night as they orbit Jupiter. The Geminid meteor shower peaks on the morning of the 15th. The meteors appear to come from the constellation of Gemini, low in the northeast at midnight, moving to the north by dawn. The meteors are clumps of dust from a comet. Friction with the air heats them up and makes the air around them glow. Saturn rises about 4:30 a.m., mid month, a little south of due east. It is the brightest ‘star’ in that part of the sky. Saturn is 1620 million km away and worth a look in any telescope. To its right is the orange star Antares, the heart of the Scorpion. The crescent Moon will be left of Saturn on the morning of the 20th. Diary of events in December by RASNZ Date (NZDT) Diary of Solar System Events in DECEMBER 2014 for New Zealand December 1 Uranus 1.1 degrees south of the Moon Occn December 4 Mercury 3.9 degrees north of Antares December 6 Aldebaran 1.4 degrees south of the Moon Moon full December 20 Venus 3.2 degrees south of Pluto December 21 Moon southern most declination (-18.7 degrees) Solstice December 22 Moon northern most declination (18.7 degrees) Moon new Uranus stationary Pluto 2.8 degrees south of the Moon December 24 Moon at perigee December 8 Mercury superior conjunction December 25 December 9 Jupiter stationary Mars 5.6 degrees south of the Moon Mercury 4.3 degrees south of Pluto December 12 Jupiter 4.9 degrees north of the Moon Regulus 4.2 degrees north of the Moon Moon at apogee December 26 Neptune 4.0 degrees south of the Moon December 28 Moon first quarter December 29 Uranus 0.9 degrees south of the Moon Occn December 7 December 14 Moon last quarter December 17 Spica 2.7 degrees south of the Moon December 19 Saturn 1.5 degrees south of the Moon www.astroNoMy.org.nz 15 BINARY STARS WITH ECLIPSES by Stan Walker Introduction: There are many thousands of known eclipsing binary stars with periods ranging from a few tens of minutes to several, even many, years. Probably 50% or more of stars are members of binary or multiple systems. The widely separated ones lead their own lives with little interaction between them but if they’re close to each other then the evolution of these objects becomes complex and fascinating. Eclipses can only take place if we’re close to the plane of revolution of a binary system. But even some of the non-eclipsing objects have interesting histories. Many popular books quote Sirius as a good example of an A0 star - but spectral analysis of its envelope reveals that when Sirius B became a white dwarf star the envelope of Sirius A became heavily polluted by the ejection of highly evolved material, rich in heavy elements. Sirius A may also have become slightly more massive but by how much? This event must have been fascinating at the time but what did it look like? We’ll never know. Some Massive Binary Systems: For these we turn to one of the richest star forming regions of our galaxy - the eta Carina nebula and the surrounding associations. Eta itself is part of a binary system with a companion in an elongated orbit so that every 5.52 years there is a perihelion passage with as yet not understood spectral and other changes. In this same region is QZ Carinae, the variability of which was discovered and measured using UBV photometry at the Auckland Observatory. This system comprises two pairs of massive stars, one showing eclipses every 5.99857 days and a non-eclipsing pair with a period measured spectroscopically of ~20.74 days, the total mass being about 95 solar masses. Even at about 7000 light years and heavily obsured by interstellar gas and dust, at V = 6.2 it’s almost naked eye. Then in the north there is epsilon Aurigae with eclipses every 27.1 years. These last many months. The nature of the components of this system is still not clearly understood. Some like a model with two high mass stars, others suggest highly evolved low mass objects. Probably the eccentricity of the system supports the former - young massive objects - idea better. In the south we have BL Teklescopii with a period of 778 days or so. Algol Eclipsing Binaries - EA: To avoid too much confusion different types of eclipsing bodies are grouped within a class designation. The simplest light curves are of the Algol (beta Persei) type where the components are not strongly distorted by tidal effects. Such a system is shown in Figure 1 - the colours are arbitrary to provide good contrast. There’s also a little artistic licence - strictly speaking the red star is completely behind the yellow star at point 4, which should be a mirror image of position 2. Let’s analyse what we’re seeing. The orbit of the smaller, cooler star is shown with four different points marked. At points 1 and 3 the two stars are both visible and the system is at its brightest. At point 2 the cool red star passes in front of the hotter yellow object so the brightness of the system drops considerably. At point 4 the red star passes behind the hotter star and another, less pronounced drop in brightness takes place. These are primary and secondary eclipses respectively. Figure 1: This is a fairly stylised light curve with a few inconsistencies. Unless the orbit is eccentric the red star is not visible at point 4 being totally eclipsed (the light curve is flat bottomed there) and the duration of the eclipses should be identical. To see it like shown we would have to be looking directly along the long axis of the ellipse but even then the durations of totality would differ. Still, Wikipedia provides a helpful illustration. Eclipses come in two types: a sharp minimum with no flat bottom is a partial eclipse with the smaller star not being completely in front or behind the larger one, and total eclipses when the smaller star is completely over or behind the larger star show a flat curve at minimum. There is other information in Figure 1. Using the type of radial velocity curves shown in Figure 2 the actual dimensions of the stars can be determined. That of the larger star is not certain unless it’s a central transit but application of the L = R2 * T4 relationship will provide 16 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 a useful indicator. Figure 2: Assuming a circular orbit the amplitude of each star in the radial velocity curve can be determined. Thus the duration of the ingress or egress multiplied by the combined velocities will provide a measure of the smaller star’s diameter. The duration of ingress/egress plus the duration of totality , the total multiplied by the sum of the two orbital speeds provides a minimum diameter for the larger star. Other things come into the picture: the system is usually a little brighter each side of the secondary eclipse due to a reflection effect - the hot star heats the inner face of the cool star -and gravitational effects dim the outer faces of both stars. There are always some tidal effects which cause the latter. But, in general, most of the situation in non-interacting stars follows the above rules. Close Binary and Interacting Binary Stars: In these stars it’s often difficult to see the points when ingress begins and ends. These objects are tidally distorted or, in the case of the very short period objects, may share a common envelope. The uneclipsed light curve is strongly convex. Periods range from about 3 hours to hundreds of days as we see with W Crucis in Figure 3. Figure 3: W Crucis was another star observed from Auckland at the request of Ed Budding. Even with an orbital period of 198 days it still shows very strong tidal effects so that it’s difficult to see from the light curves when one star begins to obscure the other. These two stars are very massive and rather egg-shaped (distorted ellipsoids) and the eclipses are close to or actually total. The mean colours are about B-V = 1.2 and U-B = 0.6 which suggests the system is interacting, with much gas around. The spike in the U-B curve near primary minimum reinforces that idea. These measures were made about 30 years ago - it’s time for another look, perhaps. Variable Stars South has a strong eclipsing binary section and is interested in the shorter period W Ursae Majoris stars of this group. Their periods are from about two hours to a day. Observers are looking at several aspects - checking catalogue periods to study possible changes, or finding periods if none are available - and using analysis software to endeavour to model their observations. Contact the website at www.variablestarssouth.org and look under projects or research. Figure 4 on the next page shows aspects of one of these stars - YY Gruis. Observations by Tom Richards, Director of Variable Stars South. The upper part of the graph shows colours, V-I at the top, B-V below. Both show substantial colour or temperature variations. The lower part shows the light variations through three filters, I at the top, then V and at the bottom, B. As we would expect from the colour variations, the B curve has the largest amplitude. The curves are not symmetric - the egress from the secondary or shallower minimum is rather distorted. What this means might perhaps be discloed in the later analysis once a little more data has been collected. The short period is a great advantage - we’re seeing two nights’ data with three eclipses plus one which was interrupted by cloud. Other Close Binaries - Cataclysmic Variables: Without moving into the pulsar area the shortest period interacting stars include the various types of cataclysmic variables, CVs. But that is a very complex field so more about those stars another time. They include Dwarf Novae, Classical Novae, Recurrent Novae, Polars and Intermediate Polars. One of the more interesting of these objects is V803 Centauri, a pair of helium white dwarf stars with an orbital period of ~26 minutes, dwarf nova outbursts every 23 hours and an extreme mass ratio of 50:1. The system would fit comfortably inside the diameter of our Moon’s orbit. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 17 Figure 4: Colour curves in the top section, actual light curves through each filter in the lower. The blank area between is, of course, the daylight hours. This suggests that with a colleague in South America or South Africa a continuous curve could have been obtained. Unusual Binary Stars: Many sytems have one star which itself is an intrinsic variable, usually pulsating. The eclipsing binary star group of VSS has found a numbe of objects which appear to contain a delta Scuti variable star - a main sequence Cepheid type pulsator. Others contain a semi-regular or Mira star, although in the latter case this will dominate the system. Presence of a much hotter companion buried in Mira’s stellar wind is detected spectroscopically and SY Fornacis is another such object. QZ Carinae - a Real Challenge: When we began looking at this star in 1970 to prove its variability we were frustrated by the almost 6 day period. All the measures fell into 6 closely matched bins. We were fortunate that two of these included both the primary and secondary minima. From these and later spectrographic measures Leung and his colleagues, along with others, managed to determine the four main components of the system. They also drew up the mean light curve of Figure 5. Figure 5:The solid line joining the points represents the fit to the original 58 measures in Auckland. The open blue squares are all the Auckland measures without correction for the light time effects, the pale green points are the same measures with light time corrections. Only the earliest of the uncorrected points fit the curve well. 18 society journal, DECEMBER 2014 The first question is why are the eclipses, which appear total, so shallow at about 0.22 and 0.20 magnitudes? This suggests another source of light which the radial velocity measures identified as the primary pair with an eccentric orbit of ~20.74 days. Why are the observations so noisy when fitted to the mean curve. It’s speculated that there are light variations from the elliptical orbit of the tidally distorted primary pair superimposed on the measures. There is a campaign this summer to endeavour to resolve this possibility. This may be the reason why, of the few eclipses observed by other groups, some are flat bottomed, others are not. But there may well be other effects like some mass flow causing brightness variations. The Hubble Space Telescope was used to try to detect the star pairs individually but it appears that the timing was poor - the star pairs were in line as viewed from our solar system. Fitting of each year’s measures to a mean light curve suggest a system orbital period of 3050 years and light time effects of up to +/- 7.2 hours. And to add to the difficulties the eclipses move eastward at 30 or so degrees each year so a full light curve requires observations widely spaced in longitude - or, failing this, 12 patient years of measures.. A more detailed account of this fascinating star can be found on the Variable Stars South website. But the eclipsing binary field is fascinating and acessible to anyone with a DSLR or CCD camera. For further background look under QZ Carinae on the Variable Stats South Website. And let’s conclude with a piece of astronomy for entertainment. One of the most spectacular stars in the sky, when seen through the Edith Winstone Blackwell telescope with its four secondary supports, is Sirius - a real Xmas card star, and brilliant! We used to look for Sirius B when it was near elongation in the orbit by using an occulting bar in the eyepiece - in this case a narrow cardboard strip across the centre of the eyepice to block out Sirius A. A very successful technique but I have no idea of the separation of the pair at present. 2015 NZ Astronomical Yearbook The 2015 Yearbook is now available. This is a must-have astronomy almanac for what’s happening in the New Zealand skies for 2015!. The 2015 edition features topical articles iincluding - The Rosetta Mission - Neteroites of New Zealand - The Goldern Anniversary at Mt John Observatory - Outdoor and Street Lighting - New Horizons mission to Pluto - Hubble Space Telescope - the first 25 years - The Hunt for Another Earth Also features - Monthly sky guides and star charts - Moon and Sun information for each day - Meteor Showers for 2015 - Latest discoveries and technological advancements - Information for beginners as well as veterans - Contact information for NZ Astronomical Societies Published by Stardome Observatory, the book is fully of spectacular images from New Zealand astrophotographers Members can purchase the yearbook at the special member’s price of $14.00 (+ $2.50 postage). To order contact Andrew Buckingham by email at [email protected] or phone 09 473 5877. It will also be available at any AAS meeting. www.astroNoMy.org.nz 19 SOCIETY MEMBERS ONLY SPECIAL! CHRISTMAS DOB SALE 153mm (6”) - $449 200mm (8”) - $584 254mm (10”) - $809 303mm (12”) - $1124 All everyone really wants for Christmas is to find a brand new Astronz Dobsonian Telescope under the tree - and if you take advantage of our fantastic Christmas special, you could find it’s a lot cheaper than you thought Until Christmas, all members can get a full 10% discount off the Astronz price of a new 153mm (6”), 200mm (8”) or 254mm (10”) easy to use Dobsonian-mount telescope. 10% OFF 200mm, 254mm or 303mm • • • • • • 200mm (8”) f/6 or 254mm (10”) f/5 or 303mm (12”) f/5 Newtonain Optical Tube Assembly 9mm Plossl 1.25” Eyepiece 30mm Superview 2” Eyepiece 2” 10:1 Crayford Focuser with 1.25” adapter Dobsonian base (assembly required) 8x50 Finder Scope 153mm • • • • • • 153mm (6”) f/8 Newtonain Optical Tube Assembly 9mm Plossl 1.25” Eyepiece 25mm Plossl 1.25” Eyepiece 1.25” Crayford Focuser Dobsonian base (assembly required) 6x30 Finder Scope As an extra special Christmas gift, expand the range of magnifications from our dobs with a 15mm SuperView 1.25” Eyepiece for only $45 (normal price $55) Newtonian/Dobsonian Telescopes High Grade Ritchey-Chretien Telescopes Eyepieces, Diagonals, Barlows, Filters Computerised GOTO Mounts www.astronomy.co.nz email: [email protected] ph: 09 473 5877