Download Document

Permutation Entropy
File
Worksheet
PE_modmPE_ meanSD
meanSD
PE_statistics
PE_statistics
modmPE_statistics
PE_n_tau_slide_electrode.tiff
modmPE_n_tau_slide_electrode.tiff
Information
Mean and standard deviations of
results for both permutation entropy
and modified permutation entropy for
all n_tau_slide input combinations
detailed at the top of each table. Each
table also contains either student’s t
test (p) or Kruskal Wallis (KW)
significances
All normality, homoscedasity (Barteltt
test except L=Levene), statistical
significance (Student’s t test except
KW=Kruskal Wallis)
(green=significant, bold=significance
with Holm-Bonferroni correction of
16 and bold border with Bonferroni
correction of 16), receiver operating
characteristic and leave-one-out
analysis results for permutation
entropy by electrode and n_tau_slide
input combinations.
All normality, homoscedasity (Barteltt
test except L=Levene), statistical
significance (Student’s t test except
KW=Kruskal Wallis)
(green=significant, bold=significance
with Holm-Bonferroni correction of
16 and bold border with Bonferroni
correction of 16), receiver operating
characteristic and leave-one-out
analysis results for modified
permutation entropy by electrode and
n_tau_slide input combinations.
Receiver operating characteristic
result graphs with permutation
entropy for the n_tau_slide and
electrode combination
Receiver operating characteristic
result graphs with modified
permutation entropy for the
n_tau_slide and electrode combination
Lempel Ziv Complexity with band pass pre-filtering
File
Worksheet
Information
GJ_LZC_mean meanSD
Mean and standard deviations of
SD
results for Lempel-Ziv complexity for
each band pass filter, detailed at the
GJ_LZC_ANOV
A
Student’s t
GJ_LZC_ROC_L ROC_LOO
OO
GJ_LZC_electrode_bandpass.tiff
Coherence
File
Coherence
Worksheet
Results
Student’s t test
multcompare
top of each table by f=initial frequency
and w=filter width frequency. Each
table also contains student’s t test (p)
significances. Statistically significant
electrodes are indicated with an *
Significances from Student’s t test for
each electrode given f=initial
frequency and w=filter width
frequency. Coloured from blue (least
significant) to red (most significant),
significant results are edged in a red
border, bold and italic results are
most significant
Receiver operating characteristic and
leave-one-out analysis results for all
significant w=filter width frequency,
f=initial frequency, and electrode
combinations. Combinations
significant with both Bonferroni and
Holm-Bonferroni corrections for 16
electrodes are noted with ⌘ in the
electrode column, only HolmBonferroni with *. Optimal results are
indicated with *
Receiver operating characteristic
result graphs with Lempel-Ziv
complexity applied to the signal
filtered between the frequencies of
the band pass for a particular
electrode
Information
Coherence results for each of the 22
subjects split into control and
Alzheimer’s subjects, mean and
standard deviations, for all electrode
pairs for five traditional frequency
bands
Results of Student’s t test on
Coherence results for all electrode
pairs for five traditional frequency
bands. Red backgrounds indicate
statistical significance with red
underline indicating high but not
significant significances
Results of multcompare on coherence
results for all electrode pairs, with the
Results-Infotrans
Student’s t testInfotrans
Multcompare-Infotrans
Results-Regions
Student’s t test-Regions
Multcompare-Regions
lower, mean and upper bound of the
significance comparison graph and
the significance of the comparison (p)
for each pair of electrode pairs for five
traditional frequency bands. Red
backgrounds indicate statistical
significance in p
Results for each of the 22 subjects
split into control and Alzheimer’s
subjects, mean and standard
deviations, for selected electrode
pairs for coherence results for five
traditional frequency bands
Results of Student’s t test for selected
electrode pairs for coherence results
for five traditional frequency bands.
Red backgrounds indicate statistical
significance with red underline
indicating high but not significant
signficances
Results of multcompare for selected
electrode pairs, with the lower, mean
and upper bound of the significance
comparison graph and the
significance of the comparison (p) for
each pair of electrode pairs for
coherence results for five traditional
frequency bands. Red backgrounds
indicate statistical significance in p
Results for each of the 22 subjects
split into control and Alzheimer’s
subjects, mean and standard
deviations, for coherence results for
all region pairs for five traditional
frequency bands
Results of Student’s t test for all
region pairs for coherence results for
five traditional frequency bands. Red
backgrounds indicate statistical
significance with red underline
indicating high but not significant
significances
Results of multcompare for coherence
results for all region pairs, with the
lower, mean and upper bound of the
significance comparison graph and
the significance of the comparison (p)
for each pair of electrode pairs for five
traditional frequency bands. Red
backgrounds indicate statistical
significance in p
dLZC03
File
dLZC03
Worksheet
Results and student’s t
test
Information
Mean and standard deviation results
of the four distance based Lempel-Ziv
methods for all electrode pairs. Also
Student’s t test results for each
electrode pair for all four methods
multcompare
Results of multcompare for all
electrode pairs, with the lower, mean
and upper bound of the significance
comparison graph and the
significance of the comparison (p) for
each pair of electrode pairs for all four
distance based Lempel-Ziv complexity
methods
Results-Infotrans
Mean and standard deviation results
of the four distance based Lempel-Ziv
methods for selected electrode pairs
Multcompare-Infotrans Results of multcompare for selected
electrode pairs, with the lower, mean
and upper bound of the significance
comparison graph and the
significance of the comparison (p) for
each pair of electrode pairs for all four
distance based Lempel-Ziv complexity
methods
Results-Regions
Mean and standard deviation results
of the four distance based Lempel-Ziv
methods for all region pairs
Multcompare-Regions
Results of multcompare for all region
pairs, with the lower, mean and upper
bound of the significance comparison
graph and the significance of the
comparison (p) for each pair of
electrode pairs for all four distance
based Lempel-Ziv complexity
methods
dLZC03_norm methodnormnormalisati Results for each of the 22 subjects
onmethod_results
split into control and Alzheimer’s
subjects, mean and standard
deviations, for all electrode pairs for
each method and normalization
method tested for distance based
Lempel-Ziv complexity
Student’s t test
Results of Student’s t test for all
multcompare
Volume conduction testing
File
Worksheet
CSD_Coherence Results
Student’s t test
multcompare
CSD_dLZC03
Results
electrode pairs for all method and
normalization methods applied for
distance based Lempel-Ziv
complexity. Green backgrounds
indicate statistical significance
Results of multcompare for all
electrode pairs, with the lower, mean
and upper bound of the significance
comparison graph and the
significance of the comparison (p) for
each pair of electrode pairs for all
method and normalization methods
applied for distance based Lempel-Ziv
complexity
Information
Results for each of the 22 subjects
split into control and Alzheimer’s
subjects, mean and standard
deviations, for all electrode pairs for
five traditional frequency bands for
Coherence on volume conduction
mitigated electroencephalogram data
Results of Student’s t test for
Coherence on volume conduction
mitigated electroencephalogram data
for all electrode pairs for five
traditional frequency bands. Red
backgrounds indicate statistical
significance with red underline
indicating high but not significant
significances
Results of multcompare for
Coherence on volume conduction
mitigated electroencephalogram data
for all electrode pairs for five
traditional frequency bands, with the
lower, mean and upper bound of the
significance comparison graph and
the significance of the comparison
(p) for each pair of electrode pairs
for five traditional frequency bands
Results for each of the 22 subjects
split into control and Alzheimer’s
subjects, mean and standard
deviations, for all electrode pairs for
all four successful distance based
Student’s t test
multcompare
Lempel-Ziv complexities on volume
conduction mitigated
electroencephalogram data
Results of Student’s t test for all four
successful distance based Lempel-Ziv
complexities on volume conduction
mitigated electroencephalogram data
for all electrode pairs for five
traditional frequency bands. Red
backgrounds indicate statistical
significance with red underline
indicating high but not significant
significances
Results of multcompare for all four
successful distance based Lempel-Ziv
complexities on volume conduction
mitigated electroencephalogram data
for all electrode pairs for five
traditional frequency bands, with the
lower, mean and upper bound of the
significance comparison graph and
the significance of the comparison
(p) for each pair of electrode pairs
for five traditional frequency bands
Volume conduction mitigated, band pass pre-filtered, distance based Lempel-Ziv
complexity
File
Worksheet
Information
CSD_GJ_dLZC0 D_1_results
Mean and standard deviations of
3_meanSD
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d1
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all electrode pairs
D_2_results
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d2
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all electrode pairs
D_3_results
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d3
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
D_4alt_results
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Lilliefors
Lilliefors (240)
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Bartlett
Sheet1
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_ANOVA2
ANOVA2
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Multicompar
e
Multcompare_p
CSD_GJ_dLZC03_method_ANOVA
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_InfoTrans_m
eanSD
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D1_Inf
oTrans
all electrode pairs
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d4alt
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all electrode pairs
Out of 240 electrode pairs (120 pairs
both forward and reverse), the
number of failed Lilliefors tests for
each w=filter width frequency and
f=initial frequency for each of the
four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity measures
Out of 120 electrode pairs, the
number of failed Bartlett tests for
each w=filter width frequency and
f=initial frequency for each of the
four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity measures
For each w=filter width frequency
and f=initial frequency, for each of
the four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity measures,
the significance values from
bivariate ANOVA for the electrode
pairs, the group pathologies and the
interaction between them for all
electrode pairs
Significances for multcompare with
w=filter width frequency down and
f=initial frequency across for all four
distance based bivariate Lempel-Ziv
complexity methods for all electrode
pairs
Significances for Student’s t test with
w=filter width frequency down and
f=initial frequency across for each of
the methods of distance based
bivariate Lempel-Ziv complexity for
all electrode pairs
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d1
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
selected electrode pairs
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D2_Inf
oTrans
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D3_Inf
oTrans
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D4alt_I
nfoTrans
CSD_GJ_dLZC0 Sheet1
3_InfoTrans_Lil
liefors
CSD_GJ_dLZC0 Sheet1
3_InfoTrans_Ba
rtlett
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_InfoTrans_A
NOVA2
D1
D2
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d2
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
selected electrode pairs
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d3
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
selected electrode pairs
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d4alt
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
selected electrode pairs
Out of 38 electrode pairs, the
number of failed Lilliefors tests for
each w=filter width frequency and
f=initial frequency for each of the
four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity measures
Out of 38 electrode pairs, the
number of failed Bartlett tests for
each w=filter width frequency and
f=initial frequency for each of the
four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity measures
For each w=filter width frequency
and f=initial frequency, the
significance values from bivariate
ANOVA for the electrode pairs, the
group pathologies and the
interaction between them for
method d1 of distance based
bivariate Lempel-Ziv complexity for
selected electrode pairs
For each w=filter width frequency
and f=initial frequency, the
significance values from bivariate
ANOVA for the electrode pairs, the
group pathologies and the
interaction between them for
method d2 of distance based
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_InfoTrans_M
ulticompare
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_InfoTrans_A
NOVA
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Regions_mea
nSD
bivariate Lempel-Ziv complexity for
selected electrode pairs
D3
For each w=filter width frequency
and f=initial frequency, the
significance values from bivariate
ANOVA for the electrode pairs, the
group pathologies and the
interaction between them for
method d3 of distance based
bivariate Lempel-Ziv complexity for
selected electrode pairs
D4alt
For each w=filter width frequency
and f=initial frequency, the
significance values from bivariate
ANOVA for the electrode pairs, the
group pathologies and the
interaction between them for
method d4alt of distance based
bivariate Lempel-Ziv complexity for
selected electrode pairs
Sheet1
Significances for multcompare with
w=filter width frequency down and
f=initial frequency across for all four
distance based bivariate Lempel-Ziv
complexity methods, detailed at the
top of each table for selected
electrode pairs
Sheet1
Significances for Student’s t test with
w=filter width frequency down and
f=initial frequency across for each of
the four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity methods for
selected electrode pairs
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D1_regi Mean and standard deviations of
on
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d1
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all region pairs
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D2_regi Mean and standard deviations of
on
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d2
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all region pairs
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D3_regi Mean and standard deviations of
on
results for distance based bivariate
GJ_CSD_dLZC03_D4alt_r
egion
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Regions_Lilli
efors
Sheet1
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Regions_Bart
lett
Sheet1
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Regions_AN
OVA2
Sheet1
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Regions_Mul
ticompare
Sheet1
CSD_GJ_dLZC0
3_Regions_AN
OVA
Sheet1
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d3
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all region pairs
Mean and standard deviations of
results for distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity method d4alt
for each band pass filter, detailed at
by f=initial frequency across and
w=filter width frequency down for
all region pairs
Out of 10 region pairs, the number of
failed Lilliefors tests for each
w=filter width frequency and
f=initial frequency for each of the
four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity measures
Bartlett results for distance based
bivariate Lempel-Ziv complexity
method d1 for each band pass filter,
detailed at by f=initial frequency
across and w=filter width frequency
down for all region pairs
For each w=filter width frequency
and f=initial frequency, the
significance values from bivariate
ANOVA for the region pairs, the
group pathologies and the
interaction between them for all four
methods, detailed above each table,
of distance based bivariate LempelZiv complexity for all region pairs
Significances for multcompare with
w=filter width frequency down and
f=initial frequency across for all four
distance based bivariate Lempel-Ziv
complexity methods, detailed at the
top of each table, for all region pairs
Significances for Student’s t test with
w=filter width frequency down and
f=initial frequency across for each of
the four distance based bivariate
Lempel-Ziv complexity methods for
all region pairs