Download Temple Organisat - Max Planck Institut für ethnologische Forschung

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Dhyāna in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Buddhist influences on print technology wikipedia , lookup

Yiqiejing yinyi (Xuanying) wikipedia , lookup

Skandha wikipedia , lookup

Enlightenment in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Buddhist philosophy wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Geyi wikipedia , lookup

Pre-sectarian Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Early Buddhist schools wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism in Japan wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism and violence wikipedia , lookup

History of Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism and psychology wikipedia , lookup

Buddhist art wikipedia , lookup

Korean Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Theravada wikipedia , lookup

Dalit Buddhist movement wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Bhikkhuni wikipedia , lookup

Catuṣkoṭi wikipedia , lookup

Women in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

History of Buddhism in India wikipedia , lookup

Silk Road transmission of Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Greco-Buddhism wikipedia , lookup

Buddhist ethics wikipedia , lookup

Seongcheol wikipedia , lookup

Persecution of Buddhists wikipedia , lookup

Decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism and Western philosophy wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism in Vietnam wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism and sexual orientation wikipedia , lookup

Buddhism in Thailand wikipedia , lookup

Triratna Buddhist Community wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Max-Planck-Institut für ethnologische Forschung
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology
CALL FOR PAPERS
Workshop
Sangha Economies:
Temple Organisation and Exchanges in Contemporary Buddhism
21 – 22 September 2017
Organisers: Saskia Abrahms-Kavunenko, Christoph Brumann, Beata Świtek
(Research Group “Buddhist Temple Economies in Urban Asia”)
Venue:
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle/Saale, Germany
No other “world religion” has given monasticism such a central role as Buddhism in which the
sangha – the community of monks and, where recognised, nuns – is one of the "three jewels"
(together with the Buddha and his teachings). While the first monks where itinerant mendicants,
their successors settled down, eventually establishing prosperous and often very long-lived
institutions. When these house hundreds or even thousands of monks or nuns, it is only natural
that economic and management concerns arise. But these are no less pressing when, as in Japan,
most temples are sustained by just a single priest and his family.
Questions pertaining to the economic organisation of Buddhist monasteries and temples have
been neglected for a long time, reflecting the otherworldly orientation of Buddhist doctrine that
sees the attachment to worldly riches as a hindrance for salvation and enlightenment. In recent
years, however, there is a perceptible turn towards “managing monks” (Jonathan Silk), with
several historical studies showing how economic pursuits were part and parcel of Buddhist
monasticism from early on. Contemporary Buddhism is increasingly being scrutinised for its
economic entanglements, both in theological attempts to construct a Buddhist economic ethics
and in empirical investigations.
In this international workshop, we wish to focus on the sangha, its institutions, and its
interactions with the laity. We apply an empirical perspective: doctrinal reasoning is important in
real-life situations but does not suffice to explain the actual flow of goods and services within,
towards, and away from Buddhist temples. We seek rich ethnographic studies of such flows, how
they are socially and politically embedded, and how clergy and laity justify and evaluate them.
We are particularly interested in economic transactions that involve monks, priests and nuns
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, December 2016
within the classic Buddhist traditions of Theravada and Mahayana (Buddhist lay movements and
lay practices that bypass the clergy are outside our focus).
Crucial aspects include the conceptualisation of exchanges with the sangha. Can there be such
a thing as a “free” and pure-hearted gift, devoid of the self-interest that, in orthodox
formulations, would subvert the intended merit-making of the layperson? Payments for ritual
services can be interpreted as donations but also as fees and reimbursements, with symbolic
distinction being symbolically marked. How do gifts to the sangha affect the status and
credibility of giver and recipient, and what happens when family and kin ties influence the flow
of resources?
Equally important is the economics of the institutions that build on such clergy-laity
exchanges. Can one speak of a unified temple economy at all when sub-units such as colleges,
households within temple precincts, and/or individual monks and nuns transact autonomously on
the basis of separate property and funds? What is considered acceptable in terms of commercial
activities, investments, and paid visits? State law and institutions, expectations of charity and
social welfare contributions, and the nature of the setting (with cities having more volatile social
relations) also have an influence. Finally, we are interested in the self-reflection of Buddhist
practitioners and believers, particularly when socialist ideologies or Buddhist modernism have
branded traditional modes of temple support as questionable or even parasitic. Is there a
discourse of crisis or is regeneration also a possibility?
We expect participants to pre-circulate their papers and, after the workshop, to revise them for
an edited volume or special journal issue by 15 January 2018.
Abstracts of proposals (500 words maximum) should reach all three convenors by 1 March
2017 ([email protected], [email protected], [email protected]). Please send inquiries
to all of us. The Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology will cover travel and
accommodation costs for accepted speakers.
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, December 2016