Download please do not remove this page

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup

Triode wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Thank you for downloading this docum
ment from the RMIT Research
R
R
Repository
7KH50
0,75HVHDUFFK5HSRVLWR
RU\LVDQRSH
GDWDEDVHVK
KRZFDVLQJWWKHUHVHDUF
FK
HQDFFHVVG
RXWSXWVVRI50,78QLYHUVLW\UHV
VHDUFKHUV 50,75
HSRVLWRU\KWWSUHVHDUFKEDQNUPLWHGXDX
5HVHDUFK5H
Citatio
on:
Ye, S, Pan, W, Ding, S, Mo, J, Brandt, M and Mackie, A 2012, 'Electrical discharge
characteristics of polycrystalline diamonds ', Advanced Materials Research, vol. 426, pp.
44-47.
See this record in
i the RMIIT Researcch Repository at:
http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:18003
Version
n: Accepted Manuscript
Copyright Statem
ment: © 2012 Trans Tech Publications
Link to
o Published
d Version:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.426.44
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE
Electrical Discharge Characteristics of Polycrystalline Diamonds
Shulin Ye1, Wencheng Pan2, Songlin Ding2, John Mo2, Milan Brandt2, Andrew Mackie2
2
1
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Foshan University, China
School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Australia
Abstract
This paper introduces the electrical discharging characteristics of PCD based on experimental
studies. The relationship between gap voltage, peak current and electrical resistance of
various PCD materials is presented. The influence of peak current on the discharge
waveforms is analyzed. The conclusion provides important information for the development
of new generators specifically designed for the machining of PCD tools.
Key Words: Electrical Discharge Machining, EDM, Polycrystalline Diamond, PCD
1 Introduction
Since PCD was developed over 40 years ago the manufacturing processes of PCD discs has
not progressed very much. PCD discs are produced by sintering together graded and selected
diamond particles with binding materials at temperatures of up to 2,000 oC and pressures of 5
– 7 GPa [1]. The grain size of diamond particles is in the range of 1 – 50 µm. The thickness of
the PCD layer is in the range of 0.3 – 1 mm. The PCD is supported on a substrate of
cemented carbide of 0.3-5 mm in thickness. The binding material is usually cobalt, which is
electrically conductive making the PCD also electrically conductive. The bulk electrical
resistivity is not constant; it varies with the percentage of binder and the grain size of
diamond particles. Since diamond is the hardest material in the world, to make PCD tools
though traditional grinding and shaping processes is extremely difficult.
Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a non-contact machining method for the
manufacturing of geometrically complex components and the shaping of hard-to-machine
materials. It turns electrical power into thermal energy through a series of discrete electrical
discharges occurring between an electrode and the workpiece. The thermal energy generates a
channel of plasma between the two poles at temperature of up to 20,000 oC [2]. The high
temparature melts and evaporates the material from the surface of the workpiece. A material
removal rate (MRR) of 2 – 400 mm3/min can be achieved depending on applications [3,4].
Since PCD is electrically conductive, it is possible to grind PCD tools using EDM
technology.
As PCD is a relatively low bulk conductivity material, the discharging characteristics of PCD
are different from conventional materials such as carbide and High Speed Steel (HSS) [5].
Theoretically high voltage, smaller current and high frequency (short On-Time) should be
applied to achieve better surface quality. In practice the values of these parameters should be
determined based the discharging characteristics of the PCD workpiece. This is particularly
important in the tool manufacturing industry. Unfortunately little research has been done in
this field and no detailed information is available in the public domain.
1
2 Experimental setup and procedure
The experiment was carried out on a new EDG machine equipped with a rotating grinding
wheel. The electrode was a copper bar (3 mm in diameter) installed in the axial direction of
the grinding wheel. The test sample was brazed on the end face of a Tungsten carbide holder,
which was clamped by the headstock spindle of the machine. The linear gap distance is
adjustable in Z direction through the servo system. The EDM power supply is able to
generate short pulses with a minimum On-Time of 1 µs. The output voltage is in the range of
90 – 260V. The current is in the range of 1 – 20A.
Two types of PCD samples made by Element Six for metal cutting (CTM302 and CMX850)
were tested. To analyze the relationship between gap voltage, gap distance, current, resistance
and the physical characteristics of PCD materials such as grain size and binding materials, a
total of nine groups of experiments were conducted by applying parameters shown in Table 1.
Both normal and abnormal sparks have been recorded. In order to compare the discharging
characteristic of PCD with that in ordinary EDM processes, experiments on Tungsten carbide
samples were carried out before tests on PCD samples.
Table 1 Experimental parameters
Materials
Tungsten carbide
CMX850
CTM302
Experimental parameters
Test Number
Open voltage (V)
Peak current (A)
120
1
B0001
120
1
A0013
160
1
A0001
160
5
A0003
160
10
A0004
120
1
A0019
160
1
A0027
160
5
A0028
160
10
A0029
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Difference in waveforms caused by variation of materials
Discharging waveforms of carbide, CMX850 and CTM302 under the same machining
condition are shown in Fig. 3, 4 and 5. It can be seen from the figures that the discharging
waveforms of PCD are similar to that of Tungsten carbide. At the point of ionization, the
sparking gap voltage is reduced to the machining voltage. The flow of amperes was
instantaneous with the ionization point and it continued for the complete On-time. The gap
voltage is Ue and peak current is ip.
In an EDM process the maintaining voltage is equal to the sum of the voltage in the
discharging channel (Ug) and the voltage on the workpiece (Ur) caused by the resistance of
the material. Value of Ug is dependent on the workpiece material, property of dielectric and
the value of gap distance. Ur is the ratio of workpiece resistance and discharging current.
Ue can be expressed as follows:
2
Ue=Ug + ip×Rc
(1)
Where Rc is the value of workpiece resistance. Because the resistance of Tungsten carbide is
very small, Ur can be neglected. Therefore, in the machining of Tungsten carbide, Ue is equal
to Ug.
Fig. 3
B0001 discharging waveform
Fig. 4
A0013 discharging waveform
Fig. 5
A0019 discharging waveform
3
3.2 The influence of discharging current
Experiments with different electric current were conducted to analyze the influence of
resistance of PCD workpiece. The average voltage in the first 30 or 35 µs from ionization is
taken as maintaining voltage. Table 2 shows the maintaining voltage and the corresponding
current.
Substitute the data into Equation 1, Ug and Rc of CMX850 and CMX302 can be found.
Therefore, the maintaining voltage of CMX850 (Ue1) and CTM302 (Ue2) can be described
as follows:
Ue1=24.9+0.31×ip
(2)
Ue2=39.5+0.59×ip
(3)
Based on above calculation, the resistance of CTM302 (0.59Ω) is found to be bigger than the
resistance of CMX850 which is 0.31Ω. This is because the thickness of CTM302 (0.7mm) is
bigger than CMX850 (0.5mm) although the resistivity of CMX850 is smaller than CTM302.
Table 2 Values of maintaining voltage and discharging current
Sample 1
Sample 2
Discharging current(A)
1.82
5.428
13.36
maintaining voltage(V)
25.5
26.74
29.07
Discharging current(A)
1.635
4.797
11.75
maintaining voltage(V)
40.48
44.02
46.4
Fig. 6 Discharging waveform of zero gap distance
3.3 The impact of gap distance
Short-circuit is an abnormal working condition in EDM machining when the gap distance is
reduced to zero. In the experiment with PCD samples, a controversial phenomenon which is
totally different from Tungsten carbide was found: when the electrode contacted the surface
of PCD workpiece (gap distance became zero), a normal discharging waveform rather than
the waveform of short circuit was captured (Fig. 6). The experiments were repeated for five
times to eliminate the possibility of measuring errors or mis-operations. The non short-circuit
sparking appeared 3 times in the 5 experiments. It can be concluded that this was not a
random phenomenon. On the contrary, it was the unique electrical discharging characteristic
of PCD.
4
The low conductivity of PCD relies on the conductive network formed by the conductive
binding metals and non conductive diamond particles. When the electrode contacted the PCD
workpiece in the experiment, it was very possible that it touched only the diamond particles
protruded from the binder. This protrusion prevented the contact of electrode with the
conductive binder. Thus, it prevented the short circuit. When the high voltage was applied
between the electrode and the workpiece, the normal sparking was observed between the
electrode and the binder. By chance, what contacted the electrode may also be the binder
which protruded from the PCD sample. In this case, short-circuit were observed as expected.
4 Conclusions
This paper introduces the electrical discharging characteristics of PCD. The relationship
between gap voltage, peak current and electric resistance of various PCD materials is
presented. The following results are found:
1. Discharging waveform in machining PCD is similar to that of machining ordinary
materials such as Tungsten carbide.
2. The maintaining voltage in machining PCD is higher than that of conventional EDM
machining of ordinary materials. The difference in the maintain voltage is significant
with the variation of PCD materials.
3. Short-circuit arcing may not exist in the machining of PCD materials. However, it is
difficult to predict if the non short-circuit will occur when the electrode contacts the
workpiece surface.
These conclusions are very important for the design of EDG machines specifically for the
machining of PCD tools. The method for detecting short-circuit during the machining
become invalid, new approaches are required using the discharging characteristics of PCD.
References
1 Shane A. Catledge, Yogesh K. Vohra, Ram Ladi, Ghanshyam Rai, “Micro-Raman stress
investigations and X-ray diffraction analysis of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tools”,
Diamond and Related Materials, 1996 Vol. 5, p. 1159-1165.
2 K.H.Ho and S.T. Newman “ State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM)”,
International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2003, Vol. 23, p.1287-1300
3 N.M. Abas, D.G. Solomon, M.F.Bahari “ A review on current research tgrends in electrical
discharge machining (EDM)”, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,
2007, Vol. 47, p.1214-1228
4 M.P. Jahan, Y.S. Wong, M. Rahman, “ A study on the fine-finish die-sinking micro-EDM
of tungsten carbide using different electrode materials”, Journal of materials processing
technology, 2009, Vol. 209 , p.3956–3967.
5 D.T. Pham, S.S. Dimov, S. Bigot, A. Ivanov, K. Popov, “Micro-EDM—recent
developments and research issues”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 149 (2004)
50–57.
5