Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Screening of Champions Predictive TumorGraft Platform Guides the Clinical Development of the Selective Dual BRAF-EGFR Inhibitor CEP-32496 Bruce Ruggeri2, Elizabeth Bruckheimer1, Brandy Wilkinson1, Bruce Dorsey2, Steve Trusko2, Jay Friedman1 Champions Oncology, Inc.1, Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Oncology Discovery Research, Discovery& Product Development, Global R&D) 2 A) Abstract B) C) Mutations in the BRAF gene have been identified in approximately 7% of cancers, including 60-70% of melanomas and 4–16% colorectal cancers. CEP-32496 (Teva Pharmaceuticals) is an orally active dual inhibitor of wild type and V600E-mutant BRAF kinase and EGFR, as well as other oncogenic protein kinases, including BCR/ABL and RET. Champions Oncology has developed a predictive platform that utilizes the implantation of patient derived xenografts (PDX) in immune-deficient mice that preserves the biological properties of the original human tumor and provides an accelerated and focused translational path into clinical trials. A screening study using a panel of Champions TumorGraft® models of human colorectal cancer and melanoma possessing either the BRAF mutant or BRAF wild type genotype was conducted to compare the therapeutic activity of CEP-32496 versus a clinically approved BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, as well as two standard of care agents (irinotecan or temozolomide). This screening study demonstrated an overall comparable or superior response (p<0.05) of CEP-32496 compared to vemurafenib in 13 out of 15 tumorgraft models of melanoma. Notably, CEP-32496 displayed robust therapeutic activity (p<0.05) over vemurafenib in 7 tumorgraft models of BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. Given these initial results in colorectal cancer, we further explored the antitumor activity of CEP-32496 and several standard of care agents for colorectal cancer (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and cetuximab) given as monotherapy or in combination in two tumorgraft models of BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. In both colorectal tumorgraft models, the combinations of sub-optimal oral doses of CEP-32496 and optimal doses of each standard of care agent achieved significantly improved anti-tumor activity (p<0.05) relative to standard of care agents and in many cases vehicle-treated animals. The combination treatment regimens were generally well tolerated exhibiting no body weight loss or mortality. Based on this dataset, CEP-32496 is currently in clinical trials in cancer patients. D) E) Methods In Vivo Studies Female immunocompromised nu/nu (Harlan) mice between 4-6 weeks of age were implanted unilaterally on the right flank with 5x5 mm tumor fragments. When tumors reached approximately 150-250 mm3, animals were matched by tumor volume into treatment and control groups, and dosing initiated. Animal care and efficacy studies were performed under Champions Oncology’s approved Animal Care and Use protocol (CHA-003-2013). Treatment groups were given one of the following regimens for the screening study involving Champions TumorGrafts® models of melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC): CEP32496 (Teva Pharmaceuticals; 35 mg/kg, p.o., bid), vemurafenib (Teva Pharmaceuticals; 35 mg/kg, p.o., bid), irinotecan (Teva Pharmaceuticals; 100 mg/kg, i.v., q7dx3), or temozolomide (Merck; 100 mg/kg, p.o., qdx5). TumorGraft models of colorectal cancer and melanoma were administered irinotecan and temozolomide, respectively. Combination studies involving Champions TumorGraft® models of colorectal cancer, CTG-0064 and CTG-0360, were given one of following as a single agent or in combination: CEP-32496 (Teva Pharmaceuticals; 17.5 or 35 mg/kg, p.o., bid), irinotecan (Selleckchem; 100 mg/kg, i.v., q7dx3), oxaliplatin (LC labs; 6 mg/kg, i.v., q4dx3), 5-FU (Sigma; 15 mg/kg, i.v., qdx5), and cetuximab (Selleckchem; 10 mg/kg, i.p., 2qwx4). Tumor dimensions were measured twice weekly by digital caliper and tumor volume was calculated using the formula: TV= width2 x length x 0.52. Treatment response at study completion for the screening study was calculated as T/C (%) = (Tf-Ti/Cf-Ci) x100. Data Analysis Statistical differences in tumor volume were determined using a two-tailed One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing treated groups with control and appropriate comparisons amongst treated groups. Figure 4A-E: Effect of CEP-32496, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and cetuximab as single agents or in combination on tumor growth in a Champions TumorGraftTM model of BRaf mutated colorectal cancer (CTG-0064). Figure 1: Bar graph demonstrating varying treatment responses in a panel of Champions’ TumorGraftTM models of melanoma and colorectal cancer that were administered CEP-32496 (35 mg/kg, p.o., bid), vemurafenib (35 mg/kg, p.o., bid), or relevant standard of care agent (irinotecan [100 mg/kg, i.p., q7dx3]; temozolomide [100 mg/kg, p.o., qdx5]). Results Model Name Tumor Type Mutational Status (B-raf) Age Gender Ethnicity CTG-0064 Colorectal G469E 47 M Caucasian CTG-0074 Colorectal V600E 70 M Unknown CTG-0678 Colorectal D594G 64 M Caucasian CTG-0000 Colorectal V600E Unknown Unknown Unknown CTG-0068 Colorectal WT 55 M Caucasian CTG-0089 Colorectal WT 63 M Asian CTG-0360 Colorectal V600E 78 F Caucasian CTG-0883 Melanoma V600E 66 M Caucasian CTG-0882 Melanoma V600R 64 F Caucasian CTG-0884 Melanoma V600R 75 F Caucasian CTG-0202 Melanoma V600E 40 M Unknown CTG-0203 Melanoma WT 56 M Unknown CTG-0204 Melanoma WT 76 M Caucasian CTG-0435 Melanoma CTG-0500 • Conclusions Superior anti-tumor efficacy of CEP-32496 versus vemurafenib against 15 of 24 primary melanoma and CRC tumorgrafts, comparable efficacy in 7 of 24 tumorgraft models, and inferior activity in 2/24 melanoma models. • CEP-32496 demonstrates significant in vivo anti-tumor efficacy against tumorgrafts harboring a variety of BRaf activating mutations, not simply V600E/K. • Clear superiority of CEP-32496 demonstrated in 7/7 Braf mutated colon carcinoma tumorgrafts relative to both vemurafenib and dabrafenib. • Combinations of sub-optimal oral doses of CEP-32496 and optimal doses of each standard of care agent for colorectal cancer achieved significantly improved anti-tumor activity (p<0.05) relative to standard of care agents and were well tolerated. • PDX models are valuable tools for drug development and biomarker discovery, and provided an accelerated and focused path for CEP-32496 into clinical trials in BRaf mutated colorectal cancer. Future directions • Characterize the molecular effects of CEP-32496 on various signaling pathways known to play a role in resistance in BRaf mutated melanoma and CRC and ascertain potential combination strategies that could be used in the clinic. References 1Garralda, 2Hidalgo, E. et al. Integrated next-generation sequencing and avatar mouse models for personalized cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 1;20(9):2476-84. M. et al. A Pilot Clinical Study of Treatment Guided by Personalized Tumorgrafts in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Aug;10(8):1311-6. V600M 53 M Caucasian Melanoma V600E 39 M Caucasian CTG-0210 Melanoma V600E 63 Male Unknown CTG-0205 Melanoma V600E, K601E 46 Male Hispanic 6Friedman, CTG-0206 Melanoma Female Caucasian 7Prahallad, V600E 40 V600E 98 CTG-0207 Melanoma 3Rubio 4Rowbottom MW. et al. Identification of 1-(3-(6,7-Dimethoxyquinazolin-4yloxy)phenyl)-3-(5-(1,1,1-trifluoro-2-methylpropan-2-yl)isoxazol-3-yl) urea Hydrochloride (CEP-32496), a highly potent and orally efficacious inhibitor of BRAFV600E. J Med Chem. 2012 Feb 9;55(3):1082-105. 5James, J. et al. CEP-32496: a novel orally active BRAFV600E inhibitor with selective cellular and in vivo antitumor activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Apr;11(4):930-41. J. et al. Anti-tumor Activity of CEP-32496, a Novel Orally activeBRAFV600E inhibitor, in a Panel of Champions TumorGraft™ Models of Melanoma and Colorectal Cancer with B-Raf V600E Mutations. Proceedings of American Association for Cancer Research, Chicago, IL, March 31- April 4, 2012, Abstract #3755. 8Sun, Female Viqueira, B. et al. An In Vivo Platform for Translational Drug Development in Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 1;12(15):4652-61. Caucasian A. et al. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF (V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature. 2012 Jan 26;483(7387):100-3. C. et al. Reversible and adaptive resistance to BRAF (V600E) inhibition in melanoma. Nature. 2014 Apr 3;508(7494):118-22. 9Girotti, MR. et al. Déjà vu: EGF receptors drive resistance to BRAF inhibitors Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2013 May;3(5):487-90. 10Corcoran, CTG-0208 Melanoma V600E 65 Male Caucasian CTG-0209 Melanoma L584F 79 Female Unknown CTG-0608 Melanoma V600K Unknown Table 1: Characteristics of Champions TumorGraft models of Colorectal Cancer and Melanoma. Unknown Unknown Figure 2: Bar graph demonstrating varying treatment responses in a panel of Champions’ TumorGraftTM models of melanoma that were administered CEP-32496 (35 mg/kg, p.o., bid) or vemurafenib (35 mg/kg, p.o., bid). Models were segregated based upon mutational status of BRAF (mutant versus wild type). R. et al. EGFR-Mediated Reactivation of MAPK Signaling Contributes to Insensitivity of BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancers to RAF Inhibition with Vemurafenib. Cancer Discov. 2012 Mar;2(3):227-35. MAPK 11Cheng, H. et al. Identification and Optimization of New Dual Inhibitors of B-Raf and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinases for Overcoming Resistance against Vemurafenib. J Med Chem. 2014 Mar 27;57(6):2692-703. 12Davies, H. et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417(6892):949-54. 13Tie, J. et al. Optimizing targeted therapeutic development: analysis of a colorectal cancer patient population with the BRAFV600E mutation. Int J Cancer. 2011 May 1;128(9):2075-84. 14Roth, AD. et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40093, and SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):466-74. 15Cantwell-Dorris, ER. et al. BRAFV600E: implications of carcinogensis and molecular therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Mar;10(3):385-94. 16ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01877811. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01877811?term=cep-32496&rank=1. Sponsored by: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.