Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Bacterial cell structure wikipedia , lookup
Microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Bioremediation of radioactive waste wikipedia , lookup
Phospholipid-derived fatty acids wikipedia , lookup
Bacterial morphological plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Marine microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Triclocarban wikipedia , lookup
Disinfectant wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Emerging Frontiers in Geomicrobiology Alexis Templeton1 and Karim Benzerara2 1811-5209/15/0011-0423$2.50 T DOI: 10.2113/gselements.11.6.423 also use specific microsensors (e.g. O2, sulfide, and pH) or fluorescent probes to map chemical gradients at the microscale. Substantial advances in subcellular imaging t e c h n i q u e s — h i g h - r e s o l ut i o n scanning, tunneling and transmission electron and X-ray microscopies—allow GMG researchers to probe cellular microenvironments, image the spatial relationships between organisms, and analyze their localized chemical or electrical activity or signaKEYWORDS : biomineralization; mineral exploration; biogeobatteries; electrontures. Future studies that make transfer, fossilization use of correlative microscopies will result in more effective coupling INTRODUCTION between chemical and taxonomic imaging to visualize The field of geomicrobiology and microbial geochemistry the expression of genes, observe electron transfer, and see (GMG) has made several orders of magnitude leaps over any changes in the material properties around cells. Such the past two decades—in terms of the number of research advances will surely produce new paradigms regarding scientists who self-identify with the field, to the number microbe–mineral interactions and biosignature formation of systems and specific processes under investigation, to in natural environments. the scales over which geomicrobiological processes can be detected and connected. It is now becoming tractable to GMG approaches will profoundly influence such fields as materials science, applied geochemistry, human health, and use GMG approaches to ask questions such as: “How does paleontology. Detailed mechanistic models of microbe– the activity of a single cell influence the microbial commumetal and microbe–mineral interactions are, and will be, nity and the wider geochemical and geophysical properties crucial for not only understanding the function of modern of their local environments?”, “What are the length- and timescales across which the biological and geochemical marine and terrestrial ecosystems but also for deciphering the deep-time record of major environmental transitions, processes are interconnected?”, and, “To what degree do the mechanisms of environmental geomicrobiological or for seeking direct evidence of early life and metabolisms. Furthermore, microbial metal cycling, electron transfer, processes provide insight into complex microbial function and biomineralization processes have now been recognized in engineered or human systems?” in amazingly diverse biomes, including such environments GMG researchers have developed new capabilities to probe as the human body. This article will review and discuss the microenvironment that surrounds living cells. Some of some of the many frontiers that GMG approaches are the most sensitive measures of the environment surrounding directly influencing. microorganisms can now be obtained through multiple techniques. For example, fluorescent in situ hybridization MICROBIAL BIOMINERALIZATION secondary ion mass spectrometry (FISH-SIMS) simultane- AND MATERIALS SYNTHESIS ously provides isotopic probes of biogeochemical activity and single-cell phylogenetic identification. Voltammetry Over the last 15 years, material scientists have designed enables one to measure the in situ transformation of many new routes for synthesizing diverse nanomaterials using redox active species at the microscale; similarly, one can microorganisms or some type of microbe-inspired strategy. This is based on the capability of some microorganisms to form, by a process called biomineralization, mineral particles with unique properties that cannot be otherwise 1 Department of Geological Sciences produced under abiotic conditions (FIG. 1). Mineral partiUniversity of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309-0399 USA cles with a variety of shapes, sizes, and chemical composiE-mail: [email protected] tions can be synthesized intracellularly or extracellularly 2 Institut de Minéralogie, de Physique des Matériaux, by microorganisms. This gives rise to materials with an et de Cosmochimie (IMPMC) associated variety of chemical, electrical, magnetic, and/or Sorbonne Universités – UPMC, UMR CNRS 7590 photoconductive properties. A broad diversity of microorE-mail: [email protected] ganisms—including bacteria, fungi, and viruses—produce Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, IRD UMR 206 nanoparticles of Au, Ag, Pt, Pd, Te, or Se, as well as diverse he interdisciplinary field of geomicrobiology and microbial geochemistry (GMG) has provided surprising insights into microbial function and preservation in diverse environments. The emerging frontiers in GMG are driven by recent discoveries in material sciences, economic geology, human health, and paleontology. The length-scales and mechanisms by which organisms can transfer electrons are being redefined, which have implications ranging from the formation of ore deposits to microbial function in the human body. Pathways of biomineralization are a critical control for many fossilization processes. Microbiologically produced materials also exhibit great potential for technological and medical applications. 4 Place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France E LEMENTS , V OL . 11, PP. 423–429 423 D ECEMBER 2015 1 µm of interest. Thus, several different scientific communities have a common goal of better understanding all the genetic steps involved in the formation of intracellular magnetite. Three types of bacterially formed mineral phases. (LEFT) Amorphous CaCO3 particles formed within the cyanobacterial cells. (M IDDLE) Photoactive arsenic sulfide nanotubes formed outside the cell walls of a Shewanella sp. IMAGE CREDIT : H. G. H UR . (R IGHT) Monodomain magnetite crystals formed within the cells of Magnetobacterium bavaricum. IMAGE CREDIT: A. ISAMBERT, E. L ARQUET, AND N. M ENGUY. FIGURE 1 sulfide or oxide nanoparticles, such as CdS, ZnS, AsS, FeS2, Fe3O4, Co3O4, or UO2 (Narayanan and Sakthivel 2010). Microbial controls on nanoparticle formation can involve a variety of molecular processes that include redox catalysis, confi nement in microcompartments, or nucleation on organic polymers with a specific architecture. Such microbiological materials can be used for a wide range of applications in optoelectronics, electronics, and sensor technologies, as well as medical science. Most microorganisms that are used for materials synthesis applications have been cultivated from natural environments where biomineralization is ubiquitous. For example, Southam and Beveridge (1996) studied the formation of octahedral gold nanoparticles by Bacillus subtilis. In order to make the synthesis of microbiomaterials and their properties more efficient, GMG approaches are required to provide material scientists with a detailed understanding of the molecular processes that control biomineralization. Understanding molecular processes is also a crucial objective for geomicrobiologists in order to track and quantify the impact of biomineralization in modern environments, as well as to reconstruct the geological history of such processes through phylogenetic analyses. An emblematic example of the connections between GMG and material sciences is provided by magnetotactic bacteria, which have been extensively studied by geomicrobiologists. These bacteria, found in a variety of aquatic environments, are able to align themselves along Earth’s magnetic field lines (Lefevre and Bazylinski 2013). Their compass consists of intracellular magnetic nanocrystals of magnetite (Fe3O4) or greigite (Fe3S 4), which have narrow and controlled size ranges (35–120 nm) and shapes. These intracellular nanocrystals are crystallographically aligned and form chains within the cells along specific proteins. Isambert et al. (2007) proposed that microbially formed magnetites contain durable features indicative of their biotic origin and can, therefore, be tracked as traces of life in ancient and/or extraterrestrial rocks. For material scientists, there is great interest in how magnetotactic bacteria control the distribution, shape, and size of nanoparticles in order to optimize magnetic properties. These bacteria may provide an inspiration for how to synthesize magnetic nanoparticles with highly regulated shapes (Prozorov et al. 2013). Several applications for these types of magnetic nanoparticles have been proposed: the development of new, high density, magnetic storage devices; the medical use of these nanoparticles as delivery vectors or as seeds for inducing hyperthermia in cancer treatment; or to magnetically label, immobilize, and/or separate molecules E LEMENTS The immobilization of arsenic by microbially formed minerals provides another ongoing connection between geomicrobiology and material sciences. For a long time, the formation of orpiment (As2S3) was considered to be a phase that only formed abiotically under hydrothermal conditions. The discovery that the bacteria Desulfotomaculum auripigmentum was able to form this phase (Newman et al. 1997) illustrated that microorganisms could catalyze the formation of orpiment at lower temperatures and thereby provide a biogeochemical sink for As(III). From a materials science perspective, Lee et al. (2007) studied the bacterial formation of certain chalcogenides and found that another species, Shewanella sp., can form extracellular orpiment (As2S3) and realgar (AsS) nanotubes with diameters from 20 to 100 nm and lengths up to 30 μm. Interestingly, chalcogenide nanotubes behave as metals and semiconductors in terms of their electrical properties and are photoconductive. This means that they have the potential to be used in the fabrication of next-generation nanoscale optoelectronic materials. MICROBES IN MINERAL EXPLORATION Microbe-driven metal cycling has been a pervasive theme throughout the growth of the field of geomicrobiology. The majority of studies have focused either on precipitation and immobilization of toxic metals or on mineral redox transformations that release metals into the environment. However, there also exists significant interest in prospecting for biologically formed economic mineral deposits and in understanding how microbes have influenced the surface processes that control the accumulation and localized precipitation of metals within and surrounding ore bodies. Thus, geomicrobiology is increasingly being integrated into economic geology and resource extraction. Frank Reith (University of Adelaide, Australia) coined the term “exploration geomicrobiology” to refer to the role played by microbial organisms in cycling rare and precious metals, particular microbially driven precipitation of metals at economically viable concentrations. Microbially mediated mineral dissolution, mineral precipitation, and the concentration of trace elements are core concepts for predicting the biogeochemical behavior and localization of Au, Pt, rare earth elements (REEs), and energy-critical metals. For example, REEs are essential for the production of photovoltaics, batteries, high-strength permanent magnets, catalysts, and lighting; yet, economically viable deposits are scarce. In the past decade, there have been major advances in understanding the mobility of REEs in surface environments through complexation with inorganic ligands such as carbonate and phosphate, as well as by complexation with organic ligands and siderophores (Tang and Johannesson 2003). For example, after REEs have been solubilized and mobilized from minerals, 424 D ECEMBER 2015 subsequent REE complexation with bacterial surfaces can lead to secondary enrichment of REEs by immobilization as phosphate minerals formed by biomineralization (Bau et al. 2013). It is critical to defi ne the mechanisms by which microbes produce the metal enrichments that give rise to economic mineral deposits. In laboratory studies, elemental platinum nanoparticles can be generated by the microbial reduction of soluble PtCl40 complexes to produce Pt(II) nanoparticle chains that are stabilized in an organic matrix; these chains then undergo recrystallization and further reduction to Pt(0) (Lengke et al. 2006). Do such processes occur in natural systems? Likely yes! A surprising recent geomicrobiological discovery is the direct involvement of bacteria—which form biofi lms on secondary gold grains found in many surface environments—in the formation of the gold grains themselves. Specifically, Reith et al. (2009) demonstrated that organisms common in metalrich environments, such as Cupriavidus metallidurans, can mediate Au biomineralization by reducing soluble, toxic Au(III) complexes and forming elemental gold as a fi nal product (FIG. 2). Moreover, in demonstrating that gold is commonly precipitated biologically, Reith et al. (2009) also showed that Au(III)-complexes can exert strong controls on the regulation and expression of a microbe’s genes. This in turn has spurred significant interest in the molecular mechanisms involved in metal resistance and Au cycling. From a resource extraction perspective, there are now great opportunities to develop “omics” approaches to probe the genes and metabolites specifically utilized by microorganisms to precipitate precious metals, and to then optimize their function. A large conceptual shift in GMG regarding extracellular electron transport was initiated by Gorby et al. (2006) who revealed direct electrical connections between single microbial cells and other organisms, as well as between cells and solid, electroactive mineral surfaces (such as Fe(III)-oxides). El-Naggar et al. (2010) used nanofabricated electrodes and probe atomic force microscopy to quantify electron-transport rates along nanowires and confi rmed that the conductivity of these biomaterials was dependent upon outer-membrane cytochromes (MtrC and OmcA). These authors also showed that the electron-transfer rates through nanowires exceeded specific cellular respiration rates; thus, such nanowires can be effectively used for microbial metabolism. So, does the microbial coupling of distant half-reactions occur in natural environments and give rise to electric fields that can be detected? The field studies and conceptual models developed by Revil et al. (2010) were groundbreaking: they established that spatially separated redox reactions could be directly coupled by conductive biological materials interconnected with semiconductor minerals and that this phenomena is particularly strong in contaminated aquifers. Recent work by Risgaard-Petersen et al. (2012) and Pfeffer et al. (2012) revealed that sulfide in marine sediments could be microbially oxidized when pulses of oxygen are introduced centimeters above. One novel pathway for the long-distance electron transport involves the activity of “cable-bacteria,” which are fi lamentous deltaproteobacteria (e.g. Desulfobulbacea) that can form centimeter-scale conductors. When electron transfer between spatially separated anodes and cathodes occurs through electrical conductors, steep gradients in pH, as well as sulfate, calcium and iron, are the result. This drives ion migration across suboxic zones and induces changes in mineral solubility (Risgaard-Petersen et al. 2012). If such “cables” are disrupted or cut, they lose their property to transmit electrical currents (Pfeffer et al. 2012) (FIG. 3). False-colored gold that is inferred to have formed by microbial reduction and precipitation of Au(III)complexes from solution. IMAGE CREDIT: FRANK R EITH, (CSIRO) FIGURE 2 “BIOGEOBATTERIES” AND LONG-DISTANCE ELECTRON TRANSPORT In the past decade, a massive expansion in the known pathways for microbial extracellular electron transport has revealed how biogeochemical processes can be directly coupled across the entire scale of the system studied. While the spatial domain for electron transfer was once defined only at the nanometer scale, today one can directly observe centimeter-scale long-distance electron transfer. This means that redox gradients and “biogeobatteries” may develop over scales of meters … possibly even kilometers! The core concept of “biogeobatteries” is that anodic reactions are spatially separated from cathodic reactions. An example would be the oxidation of sulfide (or organic E LEMENTS matter or oils) in sediments and shallow aquifers being linked to the consumption of oxidants, such as oxygen or nitrate, that are distant from the sulfide. For this to be possible, electron transfer and ion exchange must occur over long length scales to balance the coupled reactions. Several mechanisms for such extracellular electron transfer have been identified, some of which require microbially generated electroactive materials (“electron shuttles”) or extracellular conductive proteinaceous appendages (pili, membrane components, or “nanowires”). Large, multimeter-scale biogeobattery systems may commonly exist where biomaterials and conductive minerals are coupled together to enable long-distance electron transfer (Revil et al. 2010). Extracellular electron-transport processes also have technological applications—such as biological remediation, the design of microbial fuel cells, and sensor development— and implications for microbial community function across redox gradients. There are also intensive efforts being made to test when and where biogeobatteries are established in natural systems. The self-potential anomalies detected by Revil et al. (2010) were shown to be >100mV. Being able to use geophysical methods to detect gradients in chemical potential is a major technological advance for detecting subsurface biogeochemical activity. Similarly, there is intensive investigation into the microbially produced materials that can serve as electrical conductors, into the conditions that give rise to their expression, and into the rates of electron transfer that can be sustained. 425 D ECEMBER 2015 A HIGHLIGHT BOX: LONG-DISTANCE E-TRANSFER “Bacterial Nanowire” Extracellular appendages that are 10s of nm wide and at least 100× longer; electrically conductive across their width and length. “Electron Shuttle” Compounds that can be reduced and re-oxidized, and thereby transfer electrons between bacteria and extracellular oxidants or reductants, including solid minerals. Note: “phenazines” discussed in the text can be an electron shuttle; other common examples include humic substances. “Cable Bacteria” Filamentous bacteria shown to be physically and electrically connected over mm and cm length scales; the first known example is the sulfide-oxidizer Desulfobulbacea. “Biogeobattery” A system where oxidizing and reducing zones are connected through conductive minerals and/or organisms and their appendages or extracellular shuttles. B It is exciting to consider the environments that might harbor biogeobatteries or the microbial communities that are electrically connected for both energ y conservation and signaling. The recently discovered “cable-bacteria” are unlikely to be the only organisms that are capable of self-organizing in order to mediate long-distance electron transfer in a continuous fashion. It is possible that such long-distance electron transport pathways might be important for inducing subsurface, or hardrock, biogeochemical activity by providing a pathway for electron flow from reduced minerals (anodes) to groundwaters that experience pulses of oxidants (cathodes). Establishing ionic and electrical gradients could directly drive bedrock weathering via the localized production of protons, steep pH gradients, and incipient hydration, alteration, and oxidation. To better identify the extent of extracellular electron-transfer processes in natural systems, we will need to cultivate microbes that use minerals and electrodes as electron donors and acceptors. In turn, there are great opportunities to discover previously unknown microorganisms and reveal their mechanisms for element cycling. Are there any reasons not to expect such cell-to-cell and cellto-mineral electron transfer interactions in other biomes, including the human body? In many ways, the recent observations of intercellular electron transport should also become integrated into comprehensive models of biofilm formation and function. Long-distance electron transfer can be mediated by several different microbial pathways: bacterial nanowires, electron shuttles, cable bacteria, and biogeobatteries. ILLUSTRATIONS REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION (COPYRIGHT © THOM G RAVES) FROM EL-NAGGAR AND FINKEL (2013), "L IVE WIRES." THE SCIENTIST. HTTP ://WWW. THE -SCIENTIST.COM /?ARTICLES .VIEW /ARTICLE N O /35299/TITLE /L IVE -WIRES / (A) FIGURE 3 E LEMENTS Chains of bacteria encapsulated in “cables” oxidize hydrogen sulfide in buried marine sediments and transmit the electrons to oxygen dissolved in the upper sediments and porewaters. (B) Individual bacteria can also transfer electrons to mineral surfaces through chains of cytochromes embedded into conductive extracellular materials, or through diffusible extracellular electron carriers. 426 D ECEMBER 2015 GMG APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BODY The human body is a microbial biome ripe for investigation by GMG approaches. Microorganisms inhabit the surface of the human body and also intensively colonize numerous environments within the human body, such as the mouth, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract. Each of these microenvironments is difficult to characterize but each has unique local chemical conditions (e.g. pH, pO2, metabolites, redox homeostasis) that shape microbial community composition, function, metabolic status, and cell-to-cell interactions. These complexities suggest that GMG investigations will become increasingly integrated into the health sciences as efforts grow to understand the microbial role in normal human physiology, to determine why systems go awry due to changes in microbiota, and to understand how microbiological activity can change the materials in our body. Although this is a vast topic, two examples provide great illustrations of the interconnections between GMG and the health sciences. First, scientists need a better understanding of calcium phosphate formation. Geomicrobiologists propose that bacteria are responsible for the accumulation of large phosphorus deposits (phosphorites) in geological systems (e.g. Cosmidis et al. 2013). These sedimentary deposits were formed at specific geological periods and represent a major sink in the global geochemical cycle of phosphorus. Similarly, medical scientists have studied the mechanisms of calcium phosphate formation by bacteria (McLean et al. 1989). Some calculi, such as some kidney or prostate stones or dental calculus, are indeed of microbial origin (Omelon et al. 2013). Infectious kidney stones, which are composed of Ca-oxalates and Ca-phosphates, have been shown to be associated with bacterial species such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, or Proteus mirabilis. Ureolysis, which can induce pH increases, is a metabolism that triggers Ca-phosphate precipitation in kidneys; additional processes in the kidney, such as phosphatase activity or proteins-involved in mineral nucleation, may also be important in precipitating Ca phosphate. Interestingly, the same questions arise for the formation of phosphorites: are there some microbial species that preferentially induce calcium phosphate formation? Are there specific metabolic pathways and proteins with particular nucleating properties that are involved? A second topic where GMG and the health sciences overlap is the critical role that Fe plays in sustaining growth and microbial function in numerous environmental systems, as well as in the human body. A focal area is the lung environment of chronic cystic fibrosis patients, where opportunistic pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, establish biofi lms that are renowned for being highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. Several studies from the health sciences and GMG field have collectively found that Fe-cycling pathways may be critical for P. aeruginosa to function across diverse physiological and intrabody environmental states, such as low-oxygen and low-iron availability (e.g. Cornelis and Dingemans 2013). In particular, mechanistic studies, which focused on microbial utilization and cycling of Fe from numerous pools in the body (such as transferrin, heme, and ferritin) revealed two overarching pathways of Fe acquisition. First, siderophoremediated complexation of Fe(III). Second, “secondary metabolite” interactions with Fe, where molecules that function as electron shuttles, such as phenazines, can reduce Fe(III)-bearing cellular components to bioavailable Fe2+ (aq) (Cornelis and Dingemans 2013). E LEMENTS To better understand the roles of iron-cycling in the human body, and because Fe availability is critical for P. aeruginosa biofi lm formation, numerous studies have explored the interaction of high-affi nity Fe ligands, such as the siderophores, with transferrin and heme (e.g. Banin et al. 2006). Recently, Dehner et al. (2013) also demonstrated that P. aeruginosa can induce the dissolution of ferrihydrite contained within ferritin, which allows this microbe to acquire intracellular Fe through the activity of pyoverdin and proteases. Separately, several recent works have also shown how Fe can be acquired through siderophoreindependent pathways via the activity of microbially produced reductants. For example, the phenazines that regulate redox homeostasis can permit electron shuttling and reduce the Fe(III) that is contained in proteins to Fe2+, which is critical for maintaining Fe bioavailability (Wang et al. 2011). The growing body of literature on Fe-cycling in the lung environment underscores how it will become critical to disrupt biofi lms by targeting the availability of intracellular and extracellular Fe3+ and Fe2+ during chronic infection (Cornelis and Dingemans 2013). In turn, the insights gleaned from such medical microbiology studies will continue to shape our emerging views of how redox-active small molecules may function in environmental biofilms in terms of signaling agents, as well as how electron-shuttles affect cellular redox homeostasis or Fe(III)-speciation. MICROBIAL PRESERVATION AND PALEOGEOBIOLOGY With the realization that the rock record contains evidence of microbial fossils from at least 3.5 Ga, the geobiology community has made tremendous strides in understanding early Earth history. In contrast to macroorganisms from the Phanerozoic Era, fossil microorganisms leave different types of physical and chemical signatures. These include characteristic sedimentary rocks (e.g. stromatolites), micrometer-sized chemical (e.g. isotopic) signatures in minerals, minerals with specific shapes or sizes or pseudomorphs, and fossil remnants of the microbial cells themselves. Remarkably, it has been shown that very fi ne biological details can be fossilized, even down to the subcellular level (e.g. Li et al. 2013). For geobiologists, the challenge consists in sampling rocks from diverse ages and geological settings, obtaining the least altered samples, and only then using analytical tools that will provide data from the hand-scale down to the nanometer-scale. However, the connection between geomicrobiology and paleontology goes beyond this search for fossil microbes in the geological record. While there is a dramatic bias towards the preservation of biomineralized tissue, soft tissues, such as feathers, muscles, eyes or gills, can be exquisitely preserved as well. This occurs in so-called Konservatt-Lagerstätten, which are sedimentary deposits containing exceptionally preserved fossils, including the soft parts. Among the most emblematic Lagerstätten is the Cambrian Burgess Shale of Yoho National Park, British Columbia (Canada). These shales document the early diversification of animals (the so-called “Cambrian explosion”). Another classic Lagerstätten is the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen limestone of Germany, where preservation of feathers helped to identify the fi rst discovered specimen of Archaeopteryx. It was microbes that facilitated the preservation of the feathers in the fi rst place. Microbial fossils are often associated with fossils of macroorganisms and, therefore, the microbiota often interpreted as facilitators of fossilization. This may come as something of a surprise because one typically thinks of 427 D ECEMBER 2015 microorganisms as destroyers of potential fossils because of their tendencies to remineralize “dead meat.” Observations from these settings have spawned an ongoing debate about how microorganisms may facilitate fossilization of macroorganisms and have inspired experimental studies into the fossilization process (Iniesto et al. 2013). First, microorganisms can colonize a dead body, feed on its tissues so that the microbial cells eventually form a 3-D biofi lm, and pseudomorph the original structures of the macroorganism. Alternatively, the formation of a microbial biofilm at the surface of a dead macroorganism may also protect its tissues from decay by blocking any downward diffusion of oxidants. Finally, microorganisms can favor biomineralization, inducing the formation of a mineral layer enclosing and protecting tissues from further degradation (FIG. 4). Overall, a fossilizing animal can be seen as an interesting geomicrobiological system (FIG. 4). The ultimate objective of GMG researchers is to describe the biogeochemical processes that are occurring in such a system and why these processes can result in partial or total loss of the original organic matter that comprise the tissues of the animal. Depending on the existing metabolic capabilities in the microbial ecosystems, some molecules may or may not be degraded. The microbial community that colonizes a dead body is usually very diverse, phylogenetically and metabolically. Some microorganisms may favor degradation of the biological structures, i.e. act as destroyers. Others may preserve the structures and induce mineral precipitation. But changes in environmental conditions and interspecies interactions also impact on degradation and preservation (Raff et al. 2014). There is, thus, a critical need to integrate biogeochemical complexity at the micrometer-scale, to understand microbial ecological interactions, and to fi nd out how these systems are forced by external environmental changes. All this offers a tremendous and exciting challenge for geomicrobiologists. A remarkably wide diversity of mineral phases—apatite, clay minerals, calcite, and silica—are associated with exceptionally preserved fossils, as are anoxic conditions. Yet, microbially catalyzed decay can also happen under anoxic conditions, given that oxidants other than O2 may be present (Gaines et al. 2012). Oxygen fugacity was not the major parameter controlling fossil preservation. Instead, pH buffering of the environment may play an even more important role. If a local environment does not exchange much chemically (i.e. it becomes a closed system) then pH variations and/or accumulation of elements may favor mineral precipitation and, hence, the preservation of biological structures (Briggs 2003). A B D F H I C E G Fossilization of macroorganisms by microbial mats. Exceptionally preserved Early Cretaceous fossils from Las Hoyas (near Cuenca, Spain) can be compared with laboratory fossilization experiments (Iniesto et al. 2013). (A) Section of a fish (Paracheirodon innesi) colonized by a microbial mat after 8 months in the laboratory, representing entombment. (B) Magnetic resonance image illustrating a slowdown in the decay of the fish’s internal organs, including eye, muscles, and intestinal tract. (C) Photograph showing a perfectly articulated fossil fish from Las Hoyas; the fossilized equivalent of 4B. (D) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image showing the surface of a fl y (Musca domestica) as moulded by a microbial mat after 5.5 years in the laboratory. (E) Photograph showing a fossil insect from Las Hoyas with imprints FIGURE 4 E LEMENTS J of the wings; the fossil equivalent of 4D. (F) SEM image showing the pseudomorphism (replacement) of the eye of a fish by microbial cells after 2 years of colonization in the laboratory. (G) Photograph of a fish from Las Hoyas with an eye purportedly replaced by fossil microbial cells; the fossil equivalent of 4F. (H) and (I) SEM image and associated elemental map showing the bioprecipitation of a Si-rich phase at the surface of a fish fossilized in the laboratory. (J) Photograph of a fossil fish (Pelecanimimus) from Las Hoyas. The fish throat (indicated by arrow) has been preserved due to the lithification of a microbial mat; the fossil equivalent of 4H. Scale bars are 0.5 cm for A, B, C, E, G and J; 100 μm for H and I; 10 μm for D and F. A LL IMAGES BY M IGUEL INIESTO (U NIVERSITY OF MADRID). 428 D ECEMBER 2015 CONCLUDING REMARKS The emerging conceptual frameworks that have derived from GMG research on microbial diversity, activity, and function, have revealed new interconnections between microorganisms, Earth materials, and environmental microenvironments. Microbial controls on the pervasive fluxes of electrons and ions between biochemical systems, minerals, and (bio)materials are emerging as focal areas within geomicrobiology. New insights into large-scale pathways of electron transfer and biomineralization are leading to new models for how biogeochemical cycles function and can be interlinked. We anticipate that GMG approaches will become increasingly used in resource exploration and materials synthesis. Similarly, the convergence between the processes observed in environmental systems and the human microbiome are rapidly altering our understanding of how complex living systems function. Lastly, REFERENCES Banin E, Vasil ML, Greenberg EP (2006) Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofi lm formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 11076-11081 Bau M, Tepe N, Mohwinkel D (2013) Siderophore-promoted transfer of rare earth elements and iron from volcanic ash into glacial meltwater, river and ocean water. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 364: 30-36 Briggs DEG (2003) The role of decay and mineralization in the preservation of soft-bodied fossils. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 31: 275-301 Cornelis P, Dingemans J (2013) Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 3: doi: 10.3389/ fcimb.2013.00075. eCollection 2013 Cosmidis J, Benzerara K, Menguy N, Arning E (2013) Microscopy evidence of bacterial microfossils in phosphorite crusts of the Peruvian shelf: implications for phosphogenesis mechanisms. Chemical Geology 359: 10-22 Dehner C and 6 coathors (2013) Ferritin and ferrihydrite nanoparticles as iron sources for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry 18: 371-381 El-Naggar MY, Finkel SE (2013). Live Wires. The Scientist: http://www. the-scientist.com/?articles.view/ articleNo/35299/title/Live-Wires/ El-Naggar MY and 8 coauthors (2010) Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 18127-18131 Gaines RR and 7 coauthors (2012) Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 5180-5184 Gorby YA and 23 coauthors (2006) Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 11358-11363 E LEMENTS innovative studies continue to be required from the GMG community to address how the geological record of life on Earth (and possibly other planets) has been preserved and can be interpreted. Therefore, we eagerly anticipate a sustained growth in the impact of GMG research. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Greg Druschel and Trish Dove for their editorial contributions. We also gratefully acknowledge support from the MATISSE Cluster of Excellence (ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02); the NASA Astrobiology Institute Cooperative Agreement NNA15BB02A (Templeton); and the ERC, under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (#307110 - ERC CALCYAN, Benzerara). Heslop D and 5 coauthors (2013) Quantifying magnetite magnetofossil contributions to sedimentary magnetizations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 382: 58-65 Iniesto M, Lopez-Archilla AI, FregenalMartínez M, Buscalioni AD, Guerrero MC (2013). Involvement of microbial mats in delayed decay: an experimental essay on fish preservation. Palaios 28: 56-66 Isambert A, Menguy N, Larquet E, Guyot F, Valet J-P (2007) Transmission electron microscopy study of magnetites in a freshwater population of magnetotactic bacteria. American Mineralogist 92: 621-630 Lee J-H and 9 coauthors(2007) Biogenic formation of photoactive arsenic-sulfide nanotubes by Shewanella sp. strain HN-41. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 20410-20415 Lefèvre CT, Bazylinski DA (2013) Ecology, diversity, and evolution of magnetotactic bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 77: 497-526 Lengke MF, Fleet ME, Southam G (2006) Synthesis of platinum nanoparticles by reaction of fi lamentous cyanobacteria with platinum(IV)-chloride complex. Langmuir 22: 7318-7323 Li J, Benzerara K, Bernard S, Beyssac O (2013) The link between biomineralization and fossilization of bacteria: Insights from field and experimental studies. Chemical Geology 359: 49-69 McLean RJ, Nickel JC, Beveridge TJ, Costerton JW (1989) Observations of the ultrastructure of infected kidney-stones. Journal of Medical Microbiology 29: 1-7 Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N (2010) Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles by microbe. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 156: 1-13 Newman DK and 6 coathors (1997) Dissimilatory arsenate and sulfate reduction in Desulfotomaculum auripigmentum sp. nov. Archives of Microbiology 168: 380-388 Pfeffer C and 13 coauthors (2012) Filamentous bacteria transport electrons over centimetre distances. Nature 491: 218-221 Prozorov T, Bazylinski DA, Mallapragada SK, Prozorov R (2013) Novel magnetic nanomaterials inspired by magnetotactic bacteria: topical review. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 74: 133-172 Southam G, Beveridge TJ (1996) The occurrence of sulfur and phosphorus within bacterially derived crystalline and pseudocrystalline octahedral gold formed in vitro. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60: 4369-4376 Raff RA and 7 coauthors (2014) Microbial ecology and biofi lms in the taphonomy of soft tissues. Palaios 29: 560-569 Reith F and 16 coauthors (2009) Mechanisms of gold biomineralization in the bacterium Cupriavidus metallidurans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 17757-17762 Revil A, Mendonça CA, Atekwana EA, Kulessa B, Hubbard SS, Bohlen KJ (2010) Understanding biogeobatteries: where geophysics meets microbiology. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences 115: doi: 10.1029/2009JG001065 Risgaard-Petersen N, Revil A, Meister P, Nielsen LP (2012) Sulfur, iron-, and calcium cycling associated with natural electric currents running through marine sediment. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 92: 1-13 Tang J, Johannesson KH (2003) Speciation of rare earth elements in natural terrestrial waters: assessing the role of dissolved organic matter from the modeling approach. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67: 2321-2339 Wang Y, Wilks JC, Danhorn T, Ramos I, Croal L, Newman DK (2011) Phenazine1-carboxylic acid promotes bacterial biofi lm development via ferrous iron acquisition. Journal of Bacteriology 193: 3606-3617 Omelon S, Ariganello M, Bonucci E, Grynpas M, Nanci A (2013) A review of phosphate mineral nucleation in biology and geobiology. Calcified Tissue International 93: 382-396 429 D ECEMBER 2015