Download Searching for the Most Distant Black Holes in the Early

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Galaxy Zoo wikipedia , lookup

Gamma-ray burst wikipedia , lookup

Kerr metric wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

High-velocity cloud wikipedia , lookup

Messier 87 wikipedia , lookup

Astrophysical X-ray source wikipedia , lookup

Star formation wikipedia , lookup

Black hole wikipedia , lookup

Hubble Deep Field wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Black body wikipedia , lookup

Hawking radiation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Searching for the Most Distant
Black Holes in the Early Universe
Anton Koekemoer
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
June 6, 2006
1
A Bit of History...
1687: Isaac Newton
– what goes up, comes down...
– an object moving away from the earth
faster than ~25,000 mph can escape
1783: John Michell
– considered speed of light (186,000 miles/second)
– asked how massive an object can be until light can’t
escape - first description of black hole
1796: Pierre-Simon Laplace
– independently predicted the properties
and possible existence of such objects
2
How are Black Holes made?
• Normal stars:
– the sun has 332,000 times more mass than earth
– what prevents it from collapsing?
• nuclear fusion reactions at its core: 15 million deg K
• heat generates pressure to balance gravitational collapse
• When nuclear fuel runs out, a star collapses
(and explodes), leaving a remnant that is either:
– white dwarf
– neutron star
– black hole
3
• White Dwarf: up to 1.44 Msun
– “electron degenerate” matter
– 1 teaspoon would weigh ~ 5 tons!
– all the mass of the sun, about the size
of earth...
• Neutron Star: 1.44 to 2-3 Msun
– “neutron degenerate” matter
– 1 teaspoon would weigh ~100 million tons!
– the mass of the sun, about the size of a city...
4
• Black Hole: above ~2-3 Msun
– neutrons can no longer be kept apart
– current physics predicts gravitational collapse to
point-like “singularity”
– collapse might instead be to some new form of
condensed matter (eg degenerate quarks) - but still
inside event horizon, thus effectively a black hole
5
• What might a black hole look like?...
not quite!
• Black holes can be
messy - may often
have disks of gas and
dust around them
Einstein: Gravity can
bend light rays...
(light has mass... E=mc2)
6
So, how do we find Black Holes?...
• Black hole candidates in our own Milky Way
galaxy:
–
–
–
–
Cygnus X-1
Circinus X-1
SS433
...
• each one is a likely product of a supernova
• display signatures too unusual for white
dwarfs or neutron stars
7
• Compact objects (black holes, neutron stars)
are often surrounded by “accretion disks”
–
–
–
–
Gas spirals in toward the black hole
heats up as it gets close
emits energetic UV light and X-rays
material can be
ejected in “jets”
Cygnus XR-1 jet
8
• Why might these objects be black holes?
– Spectroscopy show that the main star revolves
around their companion every few days, thus
companion has mass up to 10 Msun
– However, it’s invisible! - can’t be normal star
– Too massive for neutron star
– X-ray and UV properties can show relativistic
signatures
9
• SS433:
– twin “jets”
– rotate with fast
precession speed
– likely too powerful
to be neutron star
10
• Cygnus X-1
– timing measurements
of UV emission from
hot gas around it
– gas is rotating, but
with shorter rotation
period each time
– eventually, emission
fades as gas spirals in
• is only consistent
with a black hole
11
• The Black Hole at the Center of our Milky
Way Galaxy
12
• What is the Central Object in our Milky Way
Galaxy?
– Very massive: almost 4 million Msun
– Compact: diameter ~14 million miles
• Smaller than the orbit of Mercury!
– Strong radio and X-ray emission
– No optical emission:
Radio image
• can’t be a conventional object
(massive star cluster, etc)
• Black hole is the best
candidate that explains the
available data
Chandra X-ray image
13
• MCG-6-30-15: A Galaxy with a candidate
active central black hole
Optical image
Infra-red image
X-ray spectrum
14
Observed spectrum of
MCG-6-30-15
A single emission line (at
6.7 keV) is “Doppler
shifted” to lower energy
with velocities up to
60% the speed of light!
15
• Radio Jets!: The “Radio Galaxy” Centaurus A
– distance: ~ 10 million light years
16
• Radio Jets!: The “Radio Galaxy” Centaurus A
– distance: ~ 10 million light years
17
• Radio Jets!: The “Radio Galaxy” Centaurus A
– distance: ~ 10 million light years
18
• Radio Jets!: The “Radio Galaxy” Centaurus A
– distance: ~ 10 million light years
19
• M87, another radio galaxy with jets
20
• M87, another radio galaxy with jets
21
22
• Other active “radio galaxies”: more distant,
more powerful:
3C433
Fornax A
3C66B
23
• Images in radio emission (100,000s light years)
3C353
Cygnus A
3C31
3C288
24
• A zoo of different types of active galaxies:
–
–
–
–
–
Seyferts Type 1, 2
quasars
blazars
BL Lacs
Radio galaxies; Fanaroff-Riley Type I, II
• Basic ingredients:
–
–
–
–
–
black hole
accretion disk
diffuse gas clouds
thick torus
jets (optional extra)
25
• Measuring Black Hole masses
– Study stars, gas around black holes in galaxy cores
– Use basic “Doppler shift” technique:
• emission towards us is blue-shifted
• emission away from us is red-shifted
– Compare difference, measure size, get the mass!
– eg black hole
in M84
26
Black Hole and Galaxy Masses - A connection!
27
• What determines the BH/bulge mass relation?
– do black holes “grow” along with galaxies, eg
when galaxies merge?
– or do black holes form as-is, early in the universe,
and then fix the properties of galaxies that form
around them?
• These are two very different scenarios gradual growth with cosmic time vs static
early-on determination
• Both probably apply to some extent; therefore,
aim to determine the dominant mechanism
28
• Black Holes can Grow when Galaxies Merge...
29
• Massive black holes appear to exist at the
highest observed distances (earliest epochs):
– more than a dozen at redshift > 6; age of the
universe was less than 1 billion years
– these black holes may be up to 1 billion Msun
How do they grow so fast in the early universe?
30
• Track black hole growth with cosmic time
• Luminosity functions:
Number of objects
– simply count active galaxies of different luminosities
Luminosity
31
• Track the change in luminosity function at
higher redshift (earlier cosmic times):
– low-luminosity objects more numerous later
– high-luminosity objects more numerous earlier
-3
-3
Lx = 42.0
Lx = 43.0
-5
Lx = 44.0
d(phi)/d(logL) (Mpc-3)
Number of objects
-5
-7
-9
z = 0.015 - 0.2
-11
z = 0.2 - 0.4
Lx = 45.0
-7
Lx = 46.0
Lx = 47.0
-9
Lx = 48.0
- 11
z = 0.4 - 0.8
-13
- 13
z = 0.8 - 1.6
z = 1.6 - 3.2
z = 3.2 - 4.8
-15
41.5
- 15
0.1
42.5
43.5
44.5
45.5
Log Lx (e rg/s)
Luminosity
46.5
47.5
0.6
2.4
redshift
Higher redshift
(earlier cosmic times)
32
• So, low-luminosity black hole nuclei reach
their peak at recent cosmic times
• We also know that the rate of star formation in
galaxies reaches a peak at late cosmic times
• One mechanism that can explain both:
– minor mergers (large galaxy swallowing small
galaxy, or passing interactions)
• Small amounts of gas trigger star formation,
and yield low luminosity black hole nuclei
33
• What about high-luminosity black holes?
– reach their peak at much earlier cosmic times
– suggests the fuelling mechanism may be different
• One possible mechanism:
– major mergers (two large galaxies colliding)
– large amounts of gas fuel high luminosity black
hole nuclei
• How to answer this?
– up till now, only had ~10 black holes at high
redshifts (z ~ 6, or cosmic age < 1 billion yrs)
– need to find a lot more black holes at these early
epochs, to enable statistical tests
34
• How to find distant black holes...
– they are very rare, so we need a large area
– they are very faint, so we need to go deep...
– they emit across the spectrum, so need X-ray,
optical, infrared, radio, ...
• do everything! deep, wide, multiband surveys
35
36
• Hubble / ACS for ~1 million seconds exposure
• deepest exposures ever taken (~30th magnitude)
• Very small area (~3 arcminutes on a side):
– 1/10 diameter of full moon
37
38
• Two matching fields, north and south
• 30 times more area than UDF
• Each field is 10x16 arcminutes:
– 30 times more area than UDF
– about half the size of the full moon
• Deepest ever X-ray and infrared exposures
39
• X-ray view of the two GOODS fields:
– each is about half the size of the full moon
– 1 million and 2 million seconds with Chandra
South
North
40
• Largest ever survey obtained with Hubble
– 600 orbits (1.5 million seconds)
– 2 square degrees
– 10 times the area of the full moon
41
• Largest ever survey obtained with Hubble
– 600 orbits (1.5 million seconds)
– 2 square degrees
– 10 times the area of the full moon
42
• Predicted properties of distant black holes?
– should be strong X-ray sources (from hot gas)
– should be strong infrared sources (from hot dust)
– should have very faint (or none) optical emission
43
44
45
• These black hole nuclei appear to be at very
large distances, and they are 1000x fainter
than the bright quasars found previously
• Compare their numbers to those found at
lower redshifts (later cosmic times):
46
• Results:
– find that the faint, low-luminosity black hole
nuclei are indeed much rarer at these epochs
– confirms the prediction that black holes in the
early universe grow mostly by major mergers
between galaxies
– suggests that the relationship between black holes
and galaxy bulge mass is also driven by mergers
• Remaining question: What happens earlier???
• Next steps:
– probe to redshifts > 6 (epochs < 1 billion years)
– probe to fainter limits (lower-luminosity objects)
47
• The Future...
Wide-Field Camera 3
– scheduled for Servicing Mission 4
(late 2007 / early 2008)
James Webb Space Telescope
– currently being built
– scheduled for launch in 2013
48