* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download slides
Linear algebra wikipedia , lookup
Polynomial ring wikipedia , lookup
Homomorphism wikipedia , lookup
Complexification (Lie group) wikipedia , lookup
History of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Homological algebra wikipedia , lookup
Clifford algebra wikipedia , lookup
Boolean algebras canonically defined wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Formal concept analysis wikipedia , lookup
Finite Models and Practical Decision Procedures in Propositional Substructural Logics I Peter Jipsen Chapman University, Orange, California CUSO Winter School, 28 Jan 2013, Les Diablerets 1. Groups G = (G , ·, − , 1) is a group if (xy )z = x (yz ) 1 x −1 x =1 and Prove that xx −1 1x =1 =x and x 1 Show that the identities for all x , y , z =x hold (xy )z = x (yz ), do not suce to dene groups ∈G x −1 x =1 and x 1 =x 2. Monoids M = (M , ·, 1) is a monoid if (xy )z = x (yz ) x1 =x and 1x =x for all x , y , z A monoid is commutative if xy = yx ∈M holds Find a smallest noncommutative monoid 3. Join-semilattices and partial orders A = (A, ∨) is a (join-)semilattice if (x ∨ y ) ∨ z = x ∨ (y ∨ z ) x ∨y =y ∨x Dene x ≤y Prove that x ≤ x and i x ∨x =x for all x , y , z ∈A ∨y =y is a partial order, i.e., x ≤ y & y ≤ x =⇒ x =y A partial order is linear if x and ≤y x or y ≤ x, ≤ y & y ≤ z =⇒ ≤x for all x , y . Find the smallest nonlinear join-semilattice. x ≤z 4. Quasi-identities for semilattices? Suppose A = (A, ∨, ≤) satises x ≤z x ≤ y =⇒ x ≤y ∨z x ≤ z =⇒ x ≤y ∨z and y ≤ z =⇒ Does it follow that x ∨y ≤z and (A, ∨) ≤ is a poset is a semilattice? 5. Lattices A = (A, ∧, ∨) is a lattice if (x ∧ y ) ∧ z = x ∧ (y ∧ z ), x ∧ y = y ∧ x, (x ∧ y ) ∨ x = x , (x ∨ y ) ∨ z = x ∨ (y ∨ z ), x ∨ y = y ∨ x, (x ∨ y ) ∧ x = x These are called the associative, commutative and absorbtive laws for meet and join respectively. Prove that x Show that x ∧x =x holds in every lattice ∧ (y ∨ z ) = ( x ∧ y ) ∨ (x ∧ z ) fails in some lattice. 6. Distributivity Prove the following are equivalent: (i) x ∧ (y ∨ z ) = (x ∧ y ) ∨ (x ∧ z ) (ii) x ∨ (y ∧ z ) = (x ∨ y ) ∧ (x ∨ z ) (iii) x ∧y =x ∧z and x ∨ y = x ∨ z =⇒ y =z (iv) x ∧y ≤x ∧z and x ∨ y ≤ x ∨ z =⇒ y ≤z (i) and (ii) are called the distributive identities 7. Residuated Lattices A = (A, ∧, ∨, ·, 1, \, /) is a residuated lattice if (A, ∧, ∨) (A, ·, 1) is a lattice is a monoid and the residuation property xy for all x , y , z ≤z i y ≤ x \z i x ≤ z /y ∈A Order of operations: stronger than ∧, ∨ Prove that 1 · ≤ x \x stronger than x (x \y ) \, / ≤y and they bind x ≤ y \yx holds Prove that xy \z x (y = y \(x \z ) ∨ z ) = xy ∨ xz (x ∨ y )z = xz ∨ yz (x ∨ y )\z = x \(y ∧ z) = (x \y )/z = x \(y /z ) 8. RL is an equational class Prove that the residuation property can be expressed by 4 identities hence the class RL of residuated lattices is an equational class so it is closed under homomorphic images, subalgebras and direct products 9. Integrality A residuated lattice is integral if 1 is the top element, i.e., x ≤1 holds Prove that xy ≤x ∧y residuated lattice and x \x =1 hold in every integral 10. Bounded Residuated Lattices A = (A, ∧, ∨, ·, 1, 0, \, /) is a bounded residuated lattice if (A, ∧, ∨, ·, 1, \, /) is a residuated lattice and 0 is the bottom element i.e. 0 ≤x Prove that 0x holds for all x = 0 = x0 ∈A and x ≤ 0\0 hence 0\0 is the top element, also denoted by > 11. Divisibility A residuated lattice x A is divisible if ≤ y =⇒ ∃u , v (x = uy and x = yv ) for all x , y ∈A A divisible residuated lattice is called a generalized Basic Logic algebra (or GBL-algebra) Prove that divisibility is equivalent to x ≤ y =⇒ x = (x /y )y = y (y \x ) Prove this is equivalent to two equations 12. Meet is denable in IGBL-algebras A be an integral residuated lattice Prove that A is a GBL-algebra i x ∧ y = (x /y )y = y (y \x ) Let 13. Bounded implies integral Prove that every bounded GBL-algebra is integral 14. GBL-algebras are distributive *Prove that every GBL-algebra satises the distributive identities 15. Prelinearity A residuated lattice is prelinear if it satises the identities x \y ∨ y \x ≥ 1 and x /y ∨ y /x ≥ 1 Prove that they are not equivalent 16. Commutative Residuated Lattices A residuated lattice is commutative if it satises the identity xy = yx Prove that this is equivalent to x \y In this case we dene x = y /x → y = x \y *Prove that subdirectly irreducible commutative residuated lattices are linearly ordered i they satisfy the identity 1 = ((x → y ) ∧ 1) ∨ ((y → x ) ∧ 1) 17. Denition of BL-algebra A Basic Logic algebra (or BL-algebra) is a bounded (hence integral) commutative prelinear GBL-algebra Dene a negation by Prove that ¬x = x → 0 ¬1 = 0, ¬0 = 1 and x ≤ ¬¬x 18. The standard product algebra ⊆ R be the = max(x , y ) Let [0, 1] x ∨y xy = unit interval, x ∧ y = min(x , y ), multiplication of x , y Find a denition for x →y such that P = ([0, 1], ∧, ∨, ·, 1, 0, →) is a bounded residuated lattice, called the standard product algebra. Prove that P is a BL-algebra This is an algebraic model of a fuzzy logic 19. MV-algebras A multi-valued algebra (or MV-algebra) is a BL-algebra that satises ¬¬x = x Find the smallest BL-algebra that is not an MV-algebra Prove that MV-algebras are self-dual, i.e., they satisfy DeMorgan's identity (or equivalently if x ¬(x ∧ y ) = ¬x ∨ ¬y ¬(x ∨ y ) = ¬x ∧ ¬y ) and A is an MV-algebra and one denes x ⊕ y = ¬(¬x · ¬y ) and y = ¬x · y (A, ∨, ∧, ⊕, 0, 1, ) map x 7→ ¬x then the is an MV-algebra isomorphic to A via 20. Boolean algebras A = (A, ∧, ∨, ¬, 0, 1) is a Boolean algebra if (A, ∧, ∨) is a bounded distributive lattice and x ∧ ¬x = 0 Dene x and x ∨ ¬x = 1 → y = ¬x ∨ y an MV-algebra for all x and prove that ∈A (A, ∧, ∨, ∧, 1, 0, →) is 21. The standard MV-algebra ([0, 1], ∧, ∨) be = max(x + y − 1, 0) Again let xy Find a denition for x the unit interval lattice and dene →y such that L = ([0, 1], ∧, ∨, ·, 1, 0, →) is a bounded residuated lattice Prove that L is an MV-algebra This algebra is named after ukasiewicz and is an algebraic model of a fuzzy logic 22. Heyting algebras A Heyting algebra is a bounded residuated lattice that satises xy =x ∧y Prove that Heyting algebras are commutative integral GBL-algebras Prove that xy =x ∧y residuated lattices is equivalent to xx =x ≤1 for 23. Gödel algebras A Gödel algebra is a prelinear Heyting algebra Find the smallest Heyting algebra that is not prelinear 24. Triangular norms Show that I = ([0, 1], ∧, ∨, ∧, 1, 0, →) is a Gödel algebra for a suitably dened operation → A t-norm is a commutative monoid ([0, 1], ·, 1) such that · is order-preserving, i.e., x ≤ y =⇒ xz ≤ yz A t-norm is continuous if lim xb x →a Note that the algebras = ab for all a, b ∈ [0, 1] P, L and I have continuous t-norms as fusion operation Prove that a t-norm satises i · has a residual → Prove it is continuous i · lim xb x →a− = ab for all a, b has a residual and satises divisibility Hence ([0, 1], ∧, ∨, ·, 1, 0, →) continuous t-norm is a BL-algebra i · is a ∈ [0, 1] 25. Lattice-ordered Groups G = (G , ∧, ∨, ·, − , 1) is a lattice-ordered group (or `-group) if 1 (G , ∨) is a join-semilattice, identities x (y Prove that as well as (G , ·, − , 1) ∨ z ) = xy ∨ xz (G , ∧) 1 and x is a group and the ∧ y = (x − ∨ y − )− 1 1 1 hold is a semilattice, both absorption laws hold (x ∨ y )z = xz ∨ yz , (x ∧ y )z = xz ∧ yz , x x (y ∧ z ) = xy ∧ xz , ∧ (y ∨ z ) = ( x ∧ y ) ∨ (x ∧ z ) hold Prove that every bounded (hence every nite) lattice-ordered group has only one element Give an example of a commutative lattice-ordered group 26. `-groups are GBL-algebras Let G be an `-group and dene x \y = x − y and x /y = xy − Prove that 1 (G , ∧, ∨, ·, 1, \, /) is a GBL-algebra 1 27. = {f : R → R | f ≤ y =⇒ f (x ) ≤ f (y )} Let A(R) x Prove that is 1-1 and onto and A(R) = (A(R), ∧, ∨, ◦, − , id ) is a lattice-ordered 1 group with f ◦g = the composition of f and g f −1 the inverse function of f , the identity function as id , f ∧g dened by (f ∧ g )(r ) = min(f (r ), g (r )) f ∨g dened by (f ∨ g )(r ) = max(f (r ), g (r )) and 28. Theorem [Holland and McCleary 1979]: Every equation that fails in some `-group fails in A(R), and there is an algorithm to decide if an equation holds or fails in A(R) Use this result to decide if y −1 x = (x −1 y )−1 .] `-groups are prelinear. [Hint: 29. Direct decomposition of GBL-algebras Theorem [Galatos and Tsinakis 2006]: Every GBL-algebra is isomorphic to a direct product of an `-group and an integral GBL-algebra Use this result to prove that x (y ∧ z ) = xy ∧ xz in every GBL-algebra ∧ y = x (x \y ) = y ∧ x = y (y \x ) show that xy ∧ xz ≤ x (y ∧ z ) Hint: use the fact that x xy \z = y \(x \z ) to and 30. A Sequent Calculus for RL Show that the following quasi-identities hold in all residuated lattices: ≤ z and uyv ≤ z =⇒ u (x ∨ y )v ≤ z x ≤ y =⇒ x ≤ y ∨ z , x ≤ z =⇒ x ≤ y ∨ z x ≤ y and x ≤ z =⇒ x ≤ y ∧ z uxv ≤ z =⇒ u (x ∧ y )v ≤ z , uyv ≤ z =⇒ u (x ∧ y )v ≤ z x ≤ y and z ≤ w =⇒ xz ≤ yw x ≤ y and uzv ≤ w =⇒ ux (y \z )v ≤ w x ≤ y and uzv ≤ w =⇒ u (z /y )xv ≤ w xy ≤ z =⇒ y ≤ x \z , xy ≤ z =⇒ x ≤ z /y (xy )z = x (yz ), x 1 = x , 1x = x , x ≤ x . uxv 31. A decision procedure for RL Theorem [Okada and Terui 1999] An inequality s (x1 , . . . , xn ) ≤ t (x , . . . , xn ) 1 holds in all residuated lattices if and only if there is a proof using only the quasiequations from the previous slide Moreover it is decidable if such a proof can be found Use this result to show that x (y ∧ z ) ≤ xy ∧ xz residuated lattices but xy ∧ xz ≤ x (y ∧ z ) does not holds in all The lattice of subvarieties of (bounded) RL Draw two diagrams, one with bounded RL at the top, the other with RL at the top, and the variety of one-element algebras at the bottom Then ll in all the varieties from these slides to show how they are related to each other Some References For more hints and background see e.g. some of the following (available from my website; search for jipsen): I P. Jipsen and C. Tsinakis, A survey of residuated lattices, in Ordered Algebraic Structures (J. Martinez, editor), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002, 1956 I N. Galatos and P. Jipsen, A survey of Generalized Basic Logic algebras, in Witnessed Years: Essays in Honour of Petr Hajek", ed. P. Cintula, Z. Hanikova, V. Svejdar, College Publications, 2009, 305331 I N. Galatos and P. Jipsen, Residuated frames with applications to decidability, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, in press