Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CLINICAL CASE CASE REPORT Men 68 years old Healthy Outpatient Clinic Right Scrotal Discomfort 2 months evolution No Fever No urethral discharge No other constitucional symptoms Physical Examination: Hard nodule at right spermatic cord (independent from testis), no painfull, no local inflamatory signs RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION INGUINO-SCROTAL ULTRASSONOGRAPHY “Solid nodule, heterogeneous; 2 cm´s…” “…difuse hyperreflectivity, with no evidence of collections…” Right Side QUESTION 1 NEXT STEP… 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION – X-RAY; CT; MRI PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY EXCISIONAL BIOPSY – INGUINAL APPROACH TESTICULAR TUMOR BIOMARKERS OTHER... RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION CHEST X-RAY QUESTION 2 DIAGNOSIS HYPOTHESIS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. TESTICULAR CANCER LIPOSARCOMA SPERMATIC CORD LEIOMIOSARCOMA SPERMATIC CORD INFECTIOUS DISEASE PULMONARY NEOPLASM OTHER QUESTION 3 NEXT STEP… 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION – CT; MRI PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY EXCISION BIOPSY – INGUINAL APPROACH RADICAL ORQUIDECTOMY OTHER... SURGERY RIGHT RADICAL ORQUIDECTOMY 28th May 2009 PATHOLOGY “…tumor 1.9 cm in diameter… irregular but clear boundaries, fibroelastic consistency. Not observed any relation to the testicle. Testis with 7x3, 5x3, 5 cm in size without changes in the macroscopic study ...” ” “… neoplasm of large cells, clear cytoplasm, small oval nuclei, some with monotonous prominent nucleoli, a pattern of solid growth…” “…Immunohistochemical study: immunoreactivity for cytokeratin CAM 5.2, vimentin, and CD10” SPERMATIC CORD METASTASIS FROM RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IMAGIOLOGIC STAGING “…pulmonary nodular formations observed numerous solid pericentimetrics dimensions of metastatic nature. ... right kidney shows nodule with approximately 55 mm, heterogeneous, infiltrating the renal sinus. ... " QUESTION 4 NEXT STEP… 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. NEO ADJUVANT THERAPY + RN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY + ADJUVANT THERAPY RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY EMBOLIZATION OTHER... SURGERY RIGHT RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY right spermatic vein drained directly into the renal vein 6th August 2009 PATHOLOGY CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA with 5,5 cm x 4,5 cm x 3,5 cm in the middle third of the right kidney, nuclear grade 3/4 with invasion of perinephric fat and renal vein STAGING AND PROGNOSIS International TNM/ American Joint Commitee on Cancer 2002 pT3NxM1 Performance Status ECOG Grade 0 – active, normal life, without restrictions Performance Status Karnofsky > 90 % – Normal activity, some signs of disease QUESTION 4 PALIATIVE/ADJUVANT TREATMENT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SUNITINIB – 50 MG ID IL-2 HIGH DOSE TEMSIROLIMUS SORAFENIB OTHER... PALIATVE THERAPY SUNITINIB; 50 mg; id; oral – 4 weeks + 2 weeks off CLINICAL EVALUATION Before treatment… CLINICAL EVALUATION No Hypertension No Cardiac Problems or Congestive Heart Failure No Vascular Pathology – including transient cerebral vascular attack No Seizures No Kidney problems No Liver problems No Depression History No Hypothyroidism No Anemia No dermatologic lesions (including keratosis) No Medication (ocasionally or dietary supplements) LABORATORY EVALUATION Before treatment… LABORATORY EVALUATION Before treatment… LABORATORY EVALUATION Before treatment… CARDIOLOGIC EVALUATION Before treatment… STAGING AND PROGNOSIS MSKCC Model * * “Validation and Extension of the Memorial Sloan- Kettering Prognostic Factors Model for Survival in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma “ STAGING AND PROGNOSIS MSKCC Model * * “Validation and Extension of the Memorial Sloan- Kettering Prognostic Factors Model for Survival in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic RenalCell Carcinoma “ ADJUVANT/PALIATIVE THERAPY SUNITINIB ; 50 mg; id; oral – 4 weeks + 2 weeks off Initiated 4 weeks after surgery Adverse Effects Fatigue/Asthenia Diarrhoea Nausea Vomiting Stomatitis Hypertension Hand-Foot Syndrome Hematologic Alterations 1 2nd Yes; Grade I-II 1 Yes; Grade I-II Yes; Grade I-II Yes; Grade I-II Yes: Grade I 2 No No Yes; Leucopenia; G I week after initiation 2 2nd week; alleviated at 2 weeks off EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP After 6 Cycles of therapy with SUNITINIB No Grade III-IV adverse effects PS > 80% Grade I-II adverse effects Diarrhoea Vomiting Nausea Astenia Tolerable without discontinuation EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 Criteria EVALUATION OF TARGET LESIONS COMPLETE RESPONSE PARCIAL RESPONSE PROGRESSIVE DISEASE We achieved STABLE Disappearance of all target lesions Redution in all pathologic LN to <10 mm »30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions »20% increase in the sum of target lesions and 5 mm´s absolute increase of target lesions DISEASE after 3 cycles of Sunitinib EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 Criteria Begin After 6 cycles - SUNITINIB EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 Criteria We achieved PARCIAL RESPONSE after 6 cycles of Sunitinib Begin After 6 cycles - SUNITINIB THERAPEUTICS DURATION ? WHEN TO STOP? OBRIGADO