Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Difficulties of Preventing and Controlling the Spread of Norovirus ‘The most common cause of infectious gastroenteritis’ (Pubic Health England, 2013) Author: Rebecca Duncan, Student Environmental Health Officer at Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council What is Norovirus? Research Project- 2014 According to Public Health England (2013) norovirus is ‘the most common cause of infectious gastroenteritis’ in England and Wales. Prystajecky et al (2011) characterise Norovirus as vomiting, watery diarrhoea and fever. Although sufferers normally recover within two to three days, it has a high infectious rate with only 20 viral particles needed to infect someone. Transmission usually occurs from eating infected food or drink, touching contaminated surfaces or, most commonly, from close contact with someone infected (Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention, 2013). The delayed symptoms, usually 24- 48 after initial exposure can cause a problem for all ages, unlike other gastrointestinal illness. In addition, symptoms usually last for 48 hours but it is still contagious for up to 48 hours after this point, despite sufferers feeling well. In 2014, I carried out a Research project titled “What Influences the Scale and Impact of Norovirus Outbreaks in Health Care Settings?” A survey was disseminated via social media to the general public with ten questions relating to norovirus and hygiene practices. A total of 100 responses were collected with an age range of 18-61. From the results, a major difficulty found of controlling Norovirus is the lack of education and awareness in a domestic setting. Those who work in healthcare settings knew more about Norovirus and the correct hygiene practices than those who didn’t. The following graph reflects the fact that the majority of people do not know the correct enteric precautions to prevent the spread of Norovirus. In particular, this focuses on the 48 hour exclusion period necessary to prevent further transmission to anyone else, most important if you are a healthcare work or a food handler. The Scale and Characteristics of Norovirus The extent as to which norovirus affects the UK is uncertain. Public Health England (2008) estimates that 600,000 to a million people are affected by norovirus, in the UK every year. However, as Weinstein et al (2008) state, the short-term symptoms and lack of clinically diagnosed cases, means that the reported number of cases is likely to differ greatly from the true number. Reliance is often placed on outbreaks that occur in healthcare settings for an estimate. In comparison to other pathogens, norovirus outbreaks tend to be worse, as norovirus is able to survive in the environment for up to four weeks, reflecting its persistence and difficulty to control. In addition, as a virus it cannot be treated with antibiotics like bacterial infections can. Furthermore, it has a much lower infectious dose compared to other infections, rapidly increasing the spread of the pathogen in the case of an outbreak. Current Guidance Due to the impact of norovirus, the British Infection Association (BIA) (2012) produced a guidance document that aimed to help with management of norovirus in healthcare settings with the necessary action to take; an example of support that health care workers receive. Lopman et al (2004) estimate that norovirus costs the NHS over £100 million a year. Due to the infectious characteristics of Norovirus, sufferers need to be isolated to prevent transmission to other patients who are immune-compromised and are likely to incur complications if infected (Green, Bok, 2012). The guidance document lays down procedures to minimise the scale of a norovirus outbreak such as isolation and strict hygiene practices. in a leaflet provided by Public Health England (October, 2013) advice is given to sufferers not to visit the GP or hospital, in order to prevent the spread of the infection, particularly as there is no treatment available. In addition, the leaflet also advises people to wash their hands using soap and water when preparing food and not to rely on alcohol gels; only effective against bacteria. However, it is difficult for people to follow such guidance as they may believe they could be suffering with another illness instead of norovirus that is potentially treatable. This is particularly as norovirus symptoms are similar to so many other illnesses. Therefore, they may seek GP consultancy regardless of advice due to the fact it ‘might not be norovirus’ and ‘it might be treatable’. By ignoring advice they are increasing the risk of spreading Norovirus further. Possible Way Forward? An intervention not attempted yet, is the dissemination of new advice through campaigns. Many norovirus cases go unreported as sufferers are told not to seek medical advice . By offering different advice that asks sufferers to contact their local doctor or a health line to report symptoms of norovirus, it allows both accurate monitoring of cases and prevents sufferers from physically visiting their GP or hospital. This way, we can improve the accuracy of scaling the spread. In addition, a stool sample should be collected at the home. If the results are positive, enteric precautions can be enforced to prevent transmission to others, despite no treatment available for them. Conclusion The majority of people are aware of norovirus but do not carry out all the recommended hygiene precautions. In particular they do not take the necessary time off work to prevent transmission to others, posing a greater risk to those who are immune-compromised and vulnerable. Health workers are more likely to take off the necessary time from work than food handlers and individuals from other work sectors, but this is not sufficient to minimise the scale of a norovirus outbreak. Interventions targeted at health workers, food handlers and those in domestic premises will provide the greatest outcome, minimising the transmission between individuals and thus minimising the scale and impact of future norovirus outbreaks. References Public Health England. (2013). Norovirus. Available: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1195733743985. Last accessed 29th Oct 2013. Prystajecky N, Wong J, Auk B, Gamage B, Archer J, Fung J, Wong B, Isaac-Renton J,. (2011). Norovirus infections in health care settings. BC Medical Journal. 53 (3), 119 Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention (2013) Norovirus Transmission [Online] Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/norovirus/about/transmission.html Accessed on 14/04/2014 Public Health England (2008) Norovirus Toolkit A set of resources for staff in schools and nurseries [Online] Available at: http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1227851390634 Accessed on: 15/03/2014 Weinstein R, Said M, Perl T, Sears C (2008) Gastrointestinal Flu: Norovirus in Health Care and Long-Term Care Facilities. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 47 (9), 1202-1208. British Infection Association (2012) Guidelines for the management of norovirus outbreaks in acute and community health and social care settings [Online] Available at: http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1317131639453 Accessed on: 15/03/2014 Lopman BA, Reacher MH, Vipond IB, Hill D, Perry C, Halladay T, Brown DW, Sarangi J (2004). Epidemiology and cost of nosocomial gastroenteritis, Avon, England, (20022003).Emerging Infectious Diseases. 10 (10),1827-34 Bok,K, Green,K. (2012). Norovirus Gastroenteritis in Immunocompromised Patients. The New England Journal of Medicine. 367 (1), 2126. Public Health England. (October, 2013). Stop norovirus spreading this winter. Available: http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1317140036373. Last accessed 29th Oct 2013.