Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Samba Reddy D.: Recent Advances in Hormonal Contraceptives for Women 199 Recent Advances in Hormonal Contraceptives for Women D. Samba Reddy, Ph.D., R.Ph. Associate Professor, Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics College of Medicine Texas A&M University Health Science Center 228 Reynolds Medical Building College Station, TX 77843, USA ABSTRACT: Currently, Contraceptive agents play a key role in family planning in India. Hormonal contraception is the marketed most common birth control option in women. An estimated 100 million women throughout the world use hormonal contraceptives for prevention of pregnancy. This article briefly describes the recent advances in hormonal contraceptive strategies that may minimize side effects while optimizing effective contraception. There are four types of hormonal contraceptive agents available for birth control. They include oral contraceptives pills (combined and mini-pills), contraceptive patches, hormonal implants, intrauterine devices and hormone injection agents. Oral contraceptives (OCs) are among the most widely used agents because they are highly effective when used properly. Generally, OCs are designed to simulate the 28 days of the menstrual cycle by daily intake of steroid hormones consisting of an estrogen and/or a progesterone. The primary mechanism underlying OC action is inhibition of ovulation. This action is achieved using a variety of OCs with substantially different components, doses, and side effect profile. Two types of OC pills are widely available: combination pills; and progesterone only pills. The combined daily OC pill is composed of low dose of synthetic estrogen and progesterone. They are usually taken for 21 days with a 7 day gap during which menstruation-like bleeding occurs. Recently, there are several new OCs that have been approved to minimize the frequency and/or extent of breakthrough bleeding while achieving reliable means of contraception for the avoidance of unplanned pregnancies. KEYWORDS: Oral contraceptives, estrogen, progesterone, birth control, drug interactions, epilepsy Introduction Contraceptive management in women is critical for family planning and the prevention of unplanned pregnancies. Oral contraceptives (the “pill”) were introduced more than 40 years ago, and presently they are the most popular method of preventing unwanted pregnancy. An estimated 15 million women in the United States and 100 million women throughout the world use hormonal contraceptives (Hatcher and Nelson, 2004). In India, contraceptives have proven to be most important method for family planning and also as dominant tools in population control by avoidance of unplanned pregnancies. Despite the availability of over 50 hormonal contraceptive products, there are very few guidelines for their effective use for birth control purposes. Standard guidelines for women with various backgrounds and health status should be considered as key points for achieving effective use of contraception methods. In order to ensure adequate efficacy and safety of both classes of drugs, health practitioners prescribing contraceptives must be aware of various conventional and newer preparations, potential benefits and risks, potential interactions between hormone contraceptives and other drugs. The objective of this article is to describe the clinical pharmacology of hormonal contraceptives and recent advances in contraceptive preparations that are designed for effective contraception while minimizing side effects in women. Hormonal Contraceptives There are two distinct categories of birth control options for women: hormonal and non-hormonal methods (Crawford, 2003; Oakeley, 2004). Non-hormonal contraceptive methods include barrier methods such as diaphragms, cervical caps, and the rhythm method. Most barrier methods provide protection against HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. The rhythm method or other methods that depend on hormonal changes are not reliable methods of birth control for women. Hormonal contraceptives are preparations that contain at least one natural or synthetic steroid hormone. A wide range of hormonal methods of contraception are available (Table 1). There are four categories of hormonal contraceptive agents available in the United States and in many countries (Table 1). They include oral contraceptives pills (combined and mini-pills), contraceptive patches, hormonal implants, intrauterine devices and hormone injection agents. They provide a convenient, affordable and consistent means of contraception in women. The efficacy of hormonal contraceptives is highly dependent on correct use and individual lifestyles. 199 200 International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology Types of Oral Contraceptives Oral contraceptives (OCs, also known as “birth control pills”) are among the most widely used agents since these preparations are highly effective in preventing pregnancy. When used properly, OCs are more than 99% successful. (Drey and Darney, 2002; Kaunitz, 2005). Designed to simulate the 28 days of the natural menstrual cycle, most OCs consist of an estrogenic and/or a progestogenic agent. A variety of OCs with substantially different components, doses, and side effects are available (Table 2). The primary mechanism underlying OC action is the inhibition of ovulation. They prevent the release of eggs from the ovary and thereby prevent the pregnancy. Although they Volume 1 • Issue 3 • October - December 2008 essentially act by suppression of gonadotropins by feedback actions of estrogenic and/or progestogenic components, other alterations include changes in cervical mucus (which increase the difficulty of sperm entry into the uterus), and the endometrium (which reduce the likelihood of implantation) (Oakeley, 2004; O’Brien and Guillebaud, 2006). Two major types of OC pills are widely available: combination pills (these pills contain both progestin and estrogen); and Mini-pills (these pills contain only the hormone progesterone) (Table 2). Unlike barrier methods, the use of OCs do not protect women from sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV, herpes and gonorrhea. Table 1. Categories of hormonal contraceptive preparations. Category 1: Oral contraceptives Combination pills; Progesterone-only pills Category 2: Non-surgical agents Contraceptive patch (Ortho-Evra); Contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) Category 3: Surgical device agents Progesterone implants; Progesterone intruterine devices Category 4: Injection preparations Progestogen injection (Depo-Provera) Table 2. List of oral contraceptive drug substances. Product Name Progesterone (mg) Estrogen (mg) (A) Combination pills: Monophasic Alesse Cryselle Demulen Desogen Loestrin Nordette Ortho-Novum Norinyl−1/50 Ortho-Cyclen Ovcan-35 Ovral Yasmin Yaz Levonorgestrel (0.1) Norgestrel (0.3) Ethynodiol diacetate (1) Desogestrel (0.15) Norethindrone acetate (1) Levonorgestrel (0.15) Norethindrone (1) Norethindrone (1) Norgestimate (0.25) Norethindrone (0.4) Norgestrel (0.5) Drospirenone (3) Drospirenone (3) Ethinyl estradiol (0.02) Ethinyl estradiol (0.03) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035) Ethinyl estradiol (0.03) Ethinyl estradiol (0.02) Ethinyl estradiol (0.03) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035) Mestranol (0.05) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035) Ethinyl estradiol (0.05) Ethinyl estradiol (0.03) Ethinyl estradiol (0.02) Desogestrel (0.15) Levonorgestrol (0.15) Ethinyl estradiol (0.02/0.01) Ethinyl estradiol (0.05/0.01) Norgestimate (0.18/0.215/0.25) Norethindrone (0.5/0.75/1) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035/0.035/0.035) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035/0.035/0.035) Levonorgestrel (0.05/.075/0.125) Norethindrone (0.5/1/0.5) Ethinyl estradiol (0.03/0.04/0.03) Ethinyl estradiol (0.035/0.035/0.035) Norethindrone (0.35) Norgestrel (0.075) − − Biphasic Mircette Seasonale Triphasic Ortho Tri-Cyclen Ortho-Novum−7/7/7 Tri-Levlen Tri-Norinyl (B) Progesterone only pills: Micronor Ovrette Samba Reddy D.: Recent Advances in Hormonal Contraceptives for Women Combination Oral Contraceptives The combined daily OC pill is composed of low dose of synthetic estrogen and progestogen. They are usually taken for 21 days with a 7 day gap (usually filled with either sugar or iron pills) during which withdrawal bleeding occurs. The two major synthetic estrogens used in OCs are ethinyl estradiol and mestranol. Mestranol is a prodrug, and hence is inactive until it is converted to ethinyl estradiol in the body. The main synthetic progestogens include norethindrone, levonorgestrel, norgestimate, norgestrel, desogestrel and drospirenone (Drey and 201 Darney, 2002; Wilbur and Ensom, 2000; Teal and Ginosar, 2007). Pharmacological studies have shown that these synthetic progestogerone analogs have high progestational activity with minimal intrinsic androgenicity. Chemical structures of estrogens and progesterone analogs used in OCs are shown in Fig.1. Currently, the combined OCs available in the market can be divided into three types: monophasic (only one dose of estrogen and progestogen during the 21 days); biphasic (varying doses of estrogen and progestogen); and triphasic (varying doses of estrogen and progestogen) (Table 2). Ethinyl estradiol Levonorgestrel Mestranol Desogestrel Norethindrone Norgestimate Fig 1. Chemical structures of synthetic estrogens (ethinyl estradiol and mestranol) and progesterones (levonorgestrel, desogestre, norethindrone, and norgestimate) that are components of oral contraceptive pills. 202 International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology Monophasic OCs: In monophasic combinations, the progestogen and estrogen are present in fixed amounts and hence the blood levels of hormones rise and fall together. Consequently, fixed amounts of the estrogen and progesterone are present in each monophasic pill, which is taken daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-days with placebo (sugar) pills or iron preparations. The most frequently used monophasic OCs are listed in Table 2. Biphasic OCs: Biphasic combinations are developed to mimic nearly physiological levels of steroid hormone fluctuations. In the biphasic regimen, the progestogen dose is increased during the last 11 days of the cycle. The biphasic preparations contains 21 pills of fixed amounts of estrogen (0.02 mg ethinyl estradiol) and progesterone (0.15 mg desogestrel) and 2 placebo pills (rather than the regular 7 placebo pills), and 5 pills of low dose estrogen (0.01 mg ethinyl estradiol). The FDA approved biphasic OCs are listed in Table 2. Triphasic OCs: The triphasic regimen consists of progestogen/estrogen regimen that is changed 3 times. Triphasic combinations are developed to closely mimic physiological levels of steroid hormone fluctuations. The triphasic OCs provide 3 different pills containing varying amounts of estrogen and progesterone (7 days each regimen), to be taken at different times during the 21-day cycle. The FDA approved triphasic OCs are listed in Table 2. There are several key points about use of OCs. Women should follow complete instructions on the patient prescription labeling. Many physicians instruct women to start taking their OC pills on the first Sunday after their cycle. Some women start taking their pills on the first or fifth day of their cycle or as directed by their physician. However, women who use OCs should take the pill at the same time every day to maintain hormone levels. If they miss a dose, they should take a pill as soon as they remember, but the next pill should be taken at regular time. Progesterone-Only Oral Contraceptives The progesterone-only pill, also referred as “mini-pill” contains a progestogen without estrogen and is taken Volume 1 • Issue 3 • October - December 2008 continuously without gaps. Currently there are two progesterone-only OCs: Micronor and Ovrette (Table 2). The mechanism of action of progesterone-only pills is inhibition of ovulation and progesterone actions in the cervix. Contraceptive efficacy appears to rely mainly on their progestogenic effect of thickening the cervical mucus and thereby reducing sperm viability and penetration (Glasier, 2006). Since the contraception is based on progesterone alone, these agents are slightly less effective than combination OCs. However, due to lack of the oestrogen of combined pills, mini-pills are not associated with increased risks of cardiovascular diseases. Newer Oral Contraceptives OCs that were approved in 1970s are referred as “firstgeneration” because they often contain high dose estrogen. These original OC agents were associated with significant side effects and complications. In 1988, the FDA recommended the withdrawal of all OCs with mestranol 0.05 mg. Advancements in the dosage optimization of estrogen is made based on the rationale that “low-dose” estrogen containing OCs are associated with minimal side effects. Today, most oral contraceptives contain a mixture of low-dose estrogen and/or progestin. The estrogen content of OCs ranges from 0.02 to 0.05 mg. OCs containing 0.035 mg or less of an estrogen are generally referred to as low-dose or “second-generation” OC pills (see Table 2). Recently, the FDA has approved nonconventional formulations of OCs that change the hormone-free-interval by reducing the number of hormone-free days for each cycle, increasing the time period between hormone-freeintervals, supplementing the hormone-free-intervals with low-dose estrogen, or a combination of these strategies (Anderson et al., 2006) (Table 3). These new OCs, which change the hormone-free-interval, may decrease the incidence of hormone fluctuations experienced by women using OCs, reduce withdrawal bleeding, and maximize ovarian follicular suppression (Terrie, 2008). Overall, the new OCs appears to cause fewer and/or shorter hormone withdrawal periods. Table 3. Overview of newer oral contraceptive preparations. Product name Seasonique Active ingredients (mg) Levonorgestrel (0.15)+ ethinyl estradiol (0.03) x 84 days, followed by 7 days of low-dose ethinyl estradiol (0.01) pills Hormone-free interval (bleeding) 4 cycles per year, median 3 days per cycle Seasonale Levonorgestrel (0.15) + ethinyl estradiol (0.03) x 84 days, followed by 7 days of placebo. Levonorgestrel (0.09) + ethinyl estradiol (0.02) 4 cycles per year, median 4 days per cycle Lybrel No scheduled withdrawal Median of 4-5 days per regimen period; 28-day Samba Reddy D.: Recent Advances in Hormonal Contraceptives for Women In women taking OCs, the menstrual bleeding is due to withdrawal of hormones during the hormone-free-interval and is not a natural menstrual period. During each natural cycle, a woman’s body is preparing for a potential pregnancy—ovulation occurs and the uterine lining builds up. When pregnancy does not occur, hormone levels drop and the lining of the uterus sheds. During use of OC pills, ovulation is prevented and build-up of the uterine lining is minimized. Just as in a natural cycle when hormones are withdrawn, the uterine lining sheds (Terrie, 2008). A number of OC products that extend the cycle or alter the hormone-free-interval are available (Table 3). The first approved extended regimen, Seasonale, uses a 91-day regimen (84 days of active pills followed by 7 days of placebo). Seasonale consist of 84 tablets containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol, followed by 7 days of placebo pills. Seasonique also uses a 91-day regimen, with the addition of 7 days of low-dose estrogen during the hormone-free-interval. The only continuous use product currently available is Lybrel, which is a continuous-use, low-dose OC containing levonorgestrel 90 mcg and ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg in a 28-day pack with all active tablets. In several developed countries, there is emerging interest in menstrual suppression in many women. More than 50% of women reportedly disliked having a menstrual cycle and would consider using an OC that would temporarily halt menstruation (Andrist et al., 2004). Although the extended-regimen OCs are developed to meet the growing interest in menstrual suppression, there is no clear evidence on the long-term consequence of menstrual suppression on reproductive function (Anderson et al., 2006). Extended-regimen OCs may result in unscheduled bleeding and/or spotting during the early stages of therapy, which tend to decrease as therapy continues. The continuous use of OCs without any break has been shown to incrementally induce amenorrhea in about 60% of women taking a continuous regimen for 1 year. Emergency Oral Contraceptives Emergency contraception involves preventing pregnancy after unprotected sexual intercourse. Combined and progesterone-only pills are taken in high doses for emergency contraception −referred as the "morning-after pill" or “postcoital pills”. There are two preparations for postcoital contraception: Plan-B (levonorgestrel) and Preven (levonorgestrel+ethinyl estradiol). They are effective (~75%) if taken within 72 hours after coitus. Plan-B is proven to have a better safety profile than the Preven regimen. The FDA has recently approved Plan-B as behind-thecounter drug that is available from pharmacies without a prescription for women 18 and older. A prescription is needed only for women under 17 and younger. Plan-B is composed of two (levonorgestrel, 0.75 mg) progestin-only tablets. It reduces the chance of pregnancy by up to 89% when taken as directed within 72 hours after unprotected 203 intercourse, contraceptive failure, or sexual assault. However, Plan-B is more effective the sooner it's taken, especially within the first 24 hours.1 The first tablet should be taken within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse, and the second tablet 12 hours later. Plan-B is believed to exert its therapeutic action by preventing ovulation or fertilization. In addition, it may inhibit implantation; however, it is not effective once the process of implantation has begun. Thus, levonorgestrel is indicated for use as an emergency contraceptive to prevent pregnancy following unprotected intercourse or a known or suspected contraceptive failure. Plan B does not protect against sexually transmitted diseases and it won't terminate an existing pregnancy. Non-oral Hormonal Contraceptives Non-oral hormonal contraceptive preparations include transdermal patches (“Ortho Evra”), vaginal rings (“NuvaRiing”), sub-cutaneous implants and intra-uterine devices containing progesterone, and progestogen injections administered every three months (“DepoProvera”). The Ortho Evra patch provides monophasic combination of norelgestromin (6 mg) and ethinyl estradiol (0.75 mg) delivered via a transdermal system (once patch per week for 3 weeks and then no patch for one week). Ortho-Evra is the first transdermal system approved for birth control in the United States. Once-weekly application may improve overall compliance and provide longer-acting birth control. Norplant is a contraceptive system consisting of levonorgestrel (progesterone) formulated within small, silastic-covered rods. These rods are placed under the skin of the inside of the lower arm. The progesterone is slowly released and the system protects against pregnancy for up to 3 years. Other hormonal contraception methods, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) depot injection and implantable hormonal contraceptive (Norplant) or hormone releasing intrauterine system, offer potential benefits such as greater compliance and minimal drug interactions (Wilbur and Ensom, 2000). The non-oral hormonal contraceptives may provide alternative options for some women for better compliance. Side Effects and Drug Interactions Currently available OCs are considered generally safe in most healthy women. The use of combination OCs is associated with untoward effects involving several major systems. Some side effects observed are adverse cardiovascular effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, venous thrombosis and embolism. Consequently, OCs are contraindicated for women with certain conditions such as history of thromboembolic disease, coronary artery disease, suspected carcinoma of the breast or other reproductive tract organs. 204 International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology OCs may cause a number of endocrine and metabolic effects as well as carcinoma of the reproductive organs, breast, and liver. Women who take oral contraceptives and smoke cigarettes increase their risk of developing heart attacks, blood clots, and strokes. Based on the FDA pregnancy drug use categories, hormonal contraceptives are category X drugs (contraindicated during pregnancy). However, there are some non-contraceptive health benefits with the use of OCs. There is clear evidence that OCs may lower the risk of cancer of the ovaries or uterus, as well as pelvic inflammatory disease. Oral contraceptives interact with a variety of drugs with a devastating impact on the clinical outcome of drug therapy when given concurrently. Estrogens and progesterone are both susceptible to drug interactions because of common drug metabolizing enzymes (Guengerich, 1990; Lin et al, 2002). Cytochrome P450 (CYP) is a group of enzymes that metabolize many drugs to a more water-soluble form, rendering them available for renal excretion. Steroid hormones such as estrogens and progesterone are metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, especially CYP3A4 enzyme system (Fig. 2). Therefore, pharmacokinetic type drug interactions are expected as many drugs that are eliminated via CYP3A4 enzyme system. A number of drugs – such as antibiotics (rifampin, griseofulvin), St. John’s Wort and antiepileptic drugs (barbiturates, phenytoin, carbamazepine, felbamate, oxcarbazepine, topiramate) – could reduce the efficacy of OC due to pharmacokinetic interaction (Sabers et al, 2003; Sarlis and Gourgiotis, 2005). Some drugs increase activity of CYP3A4. Induction of the 3A4 system increases the metabolism of both the estrogenic and progesterone components of OCs and Volume 1 • Issue 3 • October - December 2008 reduces their circulating levels. This could lead to reduced efficacy of OCs and thereby could lead to pregnancy or menstrual irregularities. Therefore, enzyme-inducing drugs can decrease serum levels of the OC steroids leading to increased risk of contraception failure. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay for the treatment of seizure disorders in women with epilepsy (Reddy, 2007) However, many AEDs can influence the performance of hormonal contraceptives which poses a serious risk because of potential AED-induced teratogenicity (Back et al., 1980; Fattore et al, 1999; Harden and Leppik, 2006). Studies indicate that OCs failures are the cause of one in four unplanned pregnancies in women with epilepsy (Fairgrieve et al., 2000). The failure rate for OCs in women with epilepsy was 3.1 per 100 woman-years compared with 0.7 per 100 woman-years in the general population (Kaneko, 1998). AEDs such as phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin, felbamate, topiramate, promidone, and oxcarbazepine are mainly metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme system (Crawford, 2002), which is also the primary enzyme metabolizing estrogens and progesterone. These AEDs can increase activity of CYP3A4. Induction of the 3A4 system increases the metabolism of both the estrogenic and progestogenic components of OCs and reduces their circulating levels by as much as 50% (Back et al., 1980, Crawford et al., 1990). This could lead to reduced efficacy of all hormonal contraceptives such as the low-dose daily intake pills and low releasing subdermal progestogen implants. Therefore, enzyme-inducing AEDs can decrease serum levels of the OC steroids leading to increased risk of contraception failure. Fig 2. Drug interactions between steroid hormone components of oral contraceptives (OCs) and other drugs by common metabolic pathway via cytochrome P-450 enzyme system. Samba Reddy D.: Recent Advances in Hormonal Contraceptives for Women Conclusions There are several options for birth control including hormonal and non-hormonal agents. Hormonal manipulation is an effective method of preventing pregnancy. Hormonal contraception is the most common birth control option in women throughout the world. Contraceptive management in women is critical to promote effective contraception and to reduce drug interactions. Oral contraceptives are highly effective for pregnancy prevention. Two types of OC pills are widely available: combination pills; and progesterone only pills. Newer contraceptive agents may be more suitable who experience severe breakthrough bleeding with the conventional 28-day regimen. Several drugs can interact with OCs and thereby reduce the efficacy of hormonal contraception. This is thought to result from the induction of CYP34A metabolism of estrogen/progestogens and also from increased synthesis of sex hormone-binding globulins. This reduced efficacy is evident with all forms of hormonal contraceptives. Women on OCs and enzyme-inducing drugs such as some antiepileptic drugs concurrently should report breakthrough bleeding to their physician. New extended-forms of OCs may provide suitable method of contraception for women who prefer to limit menstrual frequency. Non-hormonal methods of contraception such as intrauterine contraceptive device or barrier methods can be considered as alternate or additional methods. References Anderson FD, Gibbons W, Portman D. Long-term safety of an extended-cycle oral contraceptive (Seasonale): a 2-year multicenter open-label extension trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195: 92-96 (2006). Andrist LC, Arias RD, Nucatola D, et al. Women's and providers' attitudes toward menstrual suppression with extended use of oral contraceptives. Contraception. 70: 359-363 (2004). Back DJ, Grimmer SFM, Orme MLE, Proudlove C., Mann RD, Breckenridge AM. Evaluation of committee on safety of medicine yellow card reports on oral contraceptive-drugs interactions with anticonvulsants and antibiotics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 25: 527-532 (1980). Crawford P, Chadwick DJ, Martin C, Tjia J, Back DJ, Orme M. The interaction of phenytoin and carbamazepine with combined oral contraceptive steroids. Br J Clin Pharmacol 30: 892-896 (1990). Crawford P. Best practice guidelines for the management of women with epilepsy. Epilepsia 46 (Suppl. 9): 117-124 (2005). 205 Crawford P. Family planning and contraceptive choice. In: Women with epilepsy: A handbook of treatment issues. Morrell MJ, Flynn K L, eds. Cambridge University Press. 197-202 (2003). Crawford P. Interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraception. CNS Drugs 16: 263-272 (2002). Drey EA, Darney PD. Recent developments in hormonal contraception. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 3: 257-265 (2002). Fairgrieve SD, Jackson M, Jonas P, Walshaw D, White K, Montgomery TL, Burn J, Lynch SA. Population based, prospective study of the care of women with epilepsy in pregnancy. BMJ 321: 674-675 (2000). Fattore C, Cipolla G, Gatti G, Limido GL, Sturm Y, Bernasconi C, Perucca E. Induction of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel metabolism by oxcarbazepine in healthy women. Epilepsia 40: 783-7 (1999). Guengerich FP. Mechanism-based inactivation of human liver microsomal cytochrome P-450 3A4 by gestodene. Chem Res Toxicol 3: 363-371 (1990). Glasier A. Contraception, In: DeGroot LJ and Jameson JL (eds.): Endocrinology, 5th edition, Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, pp-2993-3003 (2006). Harden CL and Leppik I. Optimizing therapy of seizures in women who use oral contraceptives. Neurology 67(Suppl 4):S56-S58 (2006). Hatcher RA, Nelson A. Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Methods. In: Hatcher RA, ed. Contraceptive Technology, 18th Edn, Ardent Media, New York, pp-391-460 (2004). Kaneko S. Pregnancy and quality of life in women with epilepsy. Clin Therap 20 (Suppl A): A30- A47 (1998). Kaunitz AM. Beyond the pill: New data and options in hormonal and intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynec 192: 9981004 (2005). Lin HL, Kent UM, Hollenberg PF. Mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 3A4 by17α-ethynylestradiol: Evidence for heme destruction and covalent binding to protein. J Pharm Exp Therap 301: 160-167 (2002). Oakeley P. Choices of contraception. Curr Obstet Gynecol 14: 68-71 (2004). O’Brien MD, Guillebaud J. Contraception for women with epilepsy. Epilepsia 47: 1419-1422 (2006). Reddy DS. Perimenstrual catamenial epilepsy. Women’s Health 3: 195-206 (2007). HEC1 206 International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology Sarlis NJ, Gourgiotis L. Hormonal effects on drug metabolism through the CYP system: perspectives on their potential significance in the era of pharmacogenomics. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 5: 439-48 (2005). Sabers A, Öhman I, Christensen J and Tomson T. Oral contraceptives reduce lamotrigine plasma levels. Neurology 61: 570-571 (2003). Volume 1 • Issue 3 • October - December 2008 Teal SB, Ginosar DM. Contraception for women with chronic medical conditions. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 34: 113-126 (2007). Terrie YC. Extended Regimens—The New Standard for OCs? Pharmacy Times, June issue (2008). Wilbur K and Ensom MHH. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between oral contraceptives and second-generation anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 38: 355-365 (2000).