Download Punctal occlusion may improve visual acuity for - Beaver

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Visual impairment wikipedia , lookup

Vision therapy wikipedia , lookup

Keratoconus wikipedia , lookup

Blast-related ocular trauma wikipedia , lookup

Corrective lens wikipedia , lookup

Visual impairment due to intracranial pressure wikipedia , lookup

Cataract wikipedia , lookup

Contact lens wikipedia , lookup

Human eye wikipedia , lookup

Dry eye syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Eyeglass prescription wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ELECTRONICALLY REPRINTED FROM JULY 2014
Special Section: CONTACT LENS
Punctal occlusion may improve
visual acuity for contact lens patients
Reduced wearing time? Plug them!
By Marc R. Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO
A
healthy ocular surface is critical
for the visual acuity and comfort
of soft contact lenses. Despite this,
treating dry eye is often an afterthought. Instead, contact lens practitioners
may make multiple changes to the lens material, lens modality, and/or cleaning solution in an attempt to improve comfortable
wear time and avoid dropout. By the time patients reach their 50s and
60s, I’ve found that very few want to continue wearing contact lenses. I’m convinced
that dropoff in the contact lens correction
curve has more to do with increasing ocular surface concerns than with the onset
of presbyopia. Subjective questionnaires, combined with
new diagnostic tests, such as tear osmo-
FIGURE 1
larity, offer a real opportunity for identifying patients who are struggling with dryness before they complain of symptoms
or drop out of lens wear altogether. Then,
we can proactively inform our patients of
the signs of dry eye and devise a plan for
addressing the problem.
Anecdotally, I have seen improvements
from treating dry eye in contact lens wearers with punctal occlusion, but I recently
undertook a prospective study to test the
impact of this relatively simple, low-cost
intervention.
Study design
Fifty patients were recruited from my contact lens-wearing population. The patients
were established soft contact lens wearers without any formal diagnosis of dry
eye. None of them was using any topical
% of eyes gaining or losing lines of V/A
Effect on visual acuity 1 month after uniocular punctal occlusion
67
57
Control Eye
eye drop, other than artificial tears or rewetting drops. The lower punctum in one eye of each
patient was occluded with a medium-size
Parasol® silicone punctal plug (Beaver-Visitec
International, formerly Odyssey Medical),
with the fellow eye serving as a control.
This plug was chosen because it is easy
to insert, fits almost every eye, and has a
92 percent retention rate.1 The eye to be
occluded was randomly selected. Osmolarity testing, tear break-up time
(TBUT), visual acuity, and corneal and
conjunctival staining were performed at
baseline and 30 days after punctal occlusion. Subjective analysis of the patients
was evaluated by a pre- and post-occlusion questionnaire regarding the comfort
of the lens throughout the day, as well as
the perceived visual acuity. The Ocular
Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was also utilized for further subjective analysis.
Subjects continued wearing their habitual lenses and were instructed to continue
cleaning their lenses with the same care
solutions and using re-wetting drops as
needed, just as they had before insertion
of the plugs. Punctal Occlusion Eye
Results
33
19
5
0
2-Line Loss
9
0
1-Line Loss
No Change
1-Line Gain
0
5
2-Line Gain
0
5
3-Line Gain
Nearly one-quarter of the unoccluded, control eyes lost one or more lines of vision
during the study, and only nine percent
gained a line. In the punctal occlusion
group, however, 43 percent of the eyes
gained at least one line and none of the
eyes lost any visual acuity (Figure 1). Special Section: CONTACT LENS
FIGURE 2 Osmolarity 1 month
after punctal occlusion
FIGURE 3 Change in OSDI scores
Mean OSDI Score
Osmolarity (mOsms/L )
304.96
298.66 298.45
17.2 mOsms/L
reduction
Severe
27.6
Moderate
16.04
287.76
Mild
Normal
Control Eyes
Baseline
Punctal Occlusion
Baseline
1 Month
Osmolarity was reduced by an average of
17.2 mOsms/L in the occluded eyes, compared to only 0.21 mOsms/L in the control
eyes (Figure 2). TBUT in the occluded eyes
increased by two seconds, from 7.2 to 9.2
seconds, while the control eyes had a reduction in TBUT of 0.2 seconds (8.35 to
8.15 seconds). We saw a 68.8 percent reduction in corneal staining and a 37.5 percent reduction in conjunctival staining in
the occluded eyes, compared to increases
of 13 percent and 25 percent, respectively,
in the control group. Subjects were asked to rate their perceived comfort and visual acuity at different times of the day using a one to 10 scale,
both at baseline and at the 30-day visit.
Reported afternoon comfort improved by
26 percent and evening comfort improved
by 38.4 percent after one month of punctal
occlusion. There was no change in morning comfort. Subjective visual acuity im-
30 Days after
Punctal Occlusion
proved by 13.9 percent, 22 percent, and
22.3 percent respectively, for the morning,
afternoon, and evening.
The average OSDI score at baseline was
27.6, which is in the moderate range for
dry eye. At the one-month mark, OSDI
scores had dropped considerably, down
41.8 percent to an average of 16.04, which
falls in the mild dry eye range (Figure 3).
At the conclusion of the study, when
patients were given the option of a plug
in the fellow eye, 90 percent chose to undergo additional punctal occlusion.
Discussion
These patients weren’t tremendously dry
prior to the study, but they had significant symptoms, per the moderate OSDI
scores. Punctal occlusion is an underutilized opportunity to improve comfort in
our contact lens wearers. A plug helps to
keep the ocular surface well lubricated,
which reduces the potential for inflammatory mediators to depress tear production
and cause injection and chemosis.
In this study, one month of punctal occlusion improved all subjective and objective measures in a typical contact lens
population, without regard for etiology of
the dryness symptoms. Particularly notable
is the 43 percent of eyes that gained lines
of visual acuity. To me, this is important
validation of something we don’t focus
on enough—the degree to which contact
lens-related dryness affects vision in addition to comfort. This study demonstrates that punctal
occlusion with high-quality, reliable punctal plugs can improve comfort and visual
performance in contact lens wearers. This
should extend patients’ comfortable wearing time, increase satisfaction with contact lens wear, and help prevent contact
lens dropout.ODT
Reference
1. M
cCabe C. Plugs Reduce Dry-Eye Symptoms,
Improve Vision. Rev Ophthalmol. 2009
Nov;16(11):55-8.
Author Info
Marc R. Bloomenstein,OD,
FAAO, is director of optometric
services at Schwartz Laser
Eye Center in Scottsdale,
AZ. He received a grant from
Beaver-Visitec International
for this study. E-mail him at
[email protected].
411 Waverley Oaks Road
Waltham, MA 02452
Tel: 866.906.8080
www.beaver-visitec.com
Posted with permission from the July 2014 issue of Optometry Times ® www.OptometryTimes.com.
Copyright 2014, Advanstar Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
For more information on the use of this content, contact Wright’s Media at 877-652-5295.
113690