Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Human Reproduction vol.12 no.5 pp.1021–1023, 1997 CASE REPORT Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour in an infertile patient after stimulated ovulation Hung-Hsueh Chou1,3, Ying-Ming Lai1, Chyong-Huey Lai1, Swei Hsueh2 and Yung-Kuei Soong1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China 3To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Medical School, Linkou Medical Center, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, KweiShan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan 10591, Republic of China A 36 year-old infertile female developed a stage IV (FIGO) ovarian carcinoma consisting of a poorly differentiated Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour after receiving one course of ovulation induction with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) followed by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa). The patient died of liver metastasis and hepatic failure 412 months after first diagnosis, despite aggressive treatment consisting of debulking surgery and aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy. Key words: ART/infertility/Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour/stimulated ovulation Introduction Ovarian stimulation is the preliminary procedure of all assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in infertility treatment. Several articles have reported the presence of ovarian cancers in infertile females receiving clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophin. There has been much debate on the ‘incessant-ovulation and ovarian cancer of epithelial origin’ hypothesis. Nevertheless, the relationship between ovarian cancer and stimulated ovulation still remains uncertain. In literature reports concerning association between ovarian carcinomas and stimulated ovulation, serous adenocarcinoma has been the second most common histological type (Atlas et al., 1982; Carter et al., 1987; Kulkami et al., 1989; Dietl, 1991; Goldberg et al., 1992; Lopes et al., 1992; Balasch et al., 1993). Willemsen (1993) described 12 granulosa-cell tumours, this being the second most common type. Other investigators have presented cases of mucous cystadenoma (Grimbizis et al., 1995) and endometroid ovarian carcinoma (Bamford et al., 1982). To our knowledge, this is the first report of a Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour in an infertile female receiving ART. © European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Case report A 36 year old female entered our protocol of ART following the diagnosis of primary infertility for 15 years. Due to anovulation and asthenozoospermia (motility 27.8%) and consideration of her age, she received one cycle of ovulation induction with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Metrodin, Serono Laboratories, Rome, Italy), human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; Pergonal, Serono) and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa; leuprolide acetate, LA, Lupron, Abbott Australasia PTY Ltd., Kurnell, NSW, Australia) (long protocol, 1 mg/day 3 10 days in the mid-luteal phase). Two oocytes were retrieved from the left ovary and inseminated in vitro. Unfortunately, the oocytes did not show two pronuclei 24 h after insemination. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ISCI) was performed to re-inseminate the unfertilized oocytes, but in vain. During the course of stimulated ovulation, an ovarian cyst, 3.232.5 cm, was observed in the right ovary. During oocyte retrieval, a chocolate-like fluid was drained from the right ovarian cyst, which confirmed the diagnosis of endometrioma. Danazol 800 mg was administered daily to treat the endometriosis for 1 month. The regimen was changed to leuplin depot 3.75 mg s.c. injection once a month in the following 2 months. Ten days after the second dose of leuplin depot, she was admitted and operated for a right adnexal solid tumour and massive ascites, associated with multiple liver nodules and pleural effusion. During the laparotomy, we found massive ascites and a right side solid ovarian tumour entrapping the sigmoid colon, posterior aspect of uterus and left side ovary presenting as a frozen pelvis. The size of the right ovarian tumour was 15 cm in diameter. Diffuse multiple metastatic nodules were seen in the liver. A solitary tumour of irregular surface was also found in the area of the junction of the caecum and appendix. Optimal debulking surgery (residual tumour ,1 cm) was performed. Pathological examination showed the tumour to be mainly composed of Sertoli tubules which had arisen from the gonadal stromal cells with rare Leydig cell clusters (Figure 1). The Sertoli cells focally had pleomorphic and anaplastic nuclei. Immunochemical study showed that the Sertoli tubular cells were positive for αfetoprotein and focally for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), rarely for vimentin and negative for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). The gonadal stromal cells and Leydig cell clusters were positive for vimentin only. These findings established the diagnosis of Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour of intermediate grade. Despite two courses of chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2), etoposide (100 mg/m2, D2,3,4) and bleomycin (25 mg/m2, D2,3,4), the patient died of hepatic failure. 1021 H.-H.Chou et al. Figure 1. The tumour is mainly composed of Sertoli cell tubules with rare Leydig cell clusters. Discussion Fathalla (1967) and Stevenson (1970) first reported that patients with endometriosis had a higher incidence of ovarian cancer. Despite extensive study of ovarian cancers, no definite aetiology has been established. However, several risk factors and protecting factors for ovarian cancer have been found in previous research. Patients with infertility have a higher incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer (Lingeman, 1983; Negri et al., 1991). In contrast, pregnancy and the use of oral contraceptives are thought to have protective roles (Heintz et al., 1985; Wu et al., 1988). Fathalla (1971) proposed the hypothesis that ovarian cancer was related to incessant ovulation. Zajicek (1977) also observed the association between ovarian cystomas and ovulation. This supported the possibility of the malignant transformation of ovarian surface epithelium and follicle lining epithelium during repeated trauma and repairing. Meanwhile, oral contraceptive pills and pregnancy can protect the ovary by suppression of ovulation (Scott, 1984). Whittemore et al. (1992) reported that infertile females using fertility drugs were 27 times more likely to develop ovarian cancer than a fertile female. These results were reappraised by Balasch et al. (1993), who disputed the relationship between ovarian cancer and fertility treatment. The cause of increased risk of ovarian cancer in infertile patients may be the underlying disorder, rather than the use of fertility drugs. In the current case, the long protocol of GnRHa plus FSH (metrodin, 150 IU38 days), HMG (Pergonal, two ampoules39 days) followed by HCG (10 000 IU) was used for one cycle. Before initiating ovulation induction, a small cyst diagnosed as endometrioma was noted and persisted through stimulated ovulation to oocyte retrieval. During oocyte retrieval, transvaginal sonographic examination demonstrated an endometrioma in the right ovary, the diagnosis being proved by the chocolate-like content. No abnormal mass implying ovarian tumour or Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour was found in the same scan. The relationship between fertility drugs and Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour was not definite. 1022 Leuplin depot is a type of GnRHa which reduces the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and FSH by downregulation. Immediately after administration of GnRHa, a period of up-regulation occurs which usually lasts 4–6 days. Feldberg et al. (1989) reported ovarian cyst formation in five of the 22 patients in the period of up-regulation after buserelin (900 mg, days 1–3; Superfact, Hoechst A.G., Frankfurt, Germany) administration. Whether or not the repeated up-regulation of GnRHa is one of the factors inducing the malignant transformation of a silent tumour remains uncertain. Reviewing the case reports, ovarian cancers associated with infertility were predominantly serous adenocarcinoma or granulosa cell carcinoma. To our knowledge, no case of Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour has been reported similar to the current one. Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours are usually divided into three groups based on the differentiation: good, intermediate and poor. The survival rate is significantly higher in patients in the good differentiation category, as compared to patients in the moderate and poor differentiation categories (Scully, 1979; Roth et al., 1981; Zaloudek et al., 1984; Young et al., 1985). The current case was a poorly differentiated stage IV disease. The interval between diagnosis to mortality was 412 months despite aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy following debulking surgery. Although no direct connection can be found between fertility drugs and ovarian cancer, a tumour of rapid growth is noteworthy. It should be kept in mind that ascites occurring in patients receiving ovulation induction may indicate a diagnosis of ovarian cancer other than ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Patients with endometrioma should be closely followed up with CA-125 measurement and sonography performed through the course of ovulation induction and even after oocyte retrieval. Moreover, cells retrieved during oocyte retrieval should be subjected to cytological examination to rule out the possibility of malignant change. Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour after stimulated ovulation References Atlas, M. and Menczer, J. (1982) Massive hyperstimulation and borderline carcinoma of the ovary. A possible association. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 61, 261–263. Balasch, J. and Barri, P.N. (1993) Follicular stimulation and ovarian cancer? Hum. Reprod., 8, 990–996. Bamford, P.M. and Steele, S.J. (1982) Uterine and ovarian circinoma in a patient receiving gonadotropin therapy – case report. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 89, 962–964. Bonfirraro, G., Sanna, B., De Marco, A. et al. (1995) Use of a GnRH analogue in the treatment of certain forms of endometrial hyperplasia associated with menometrorrhagia. Minerva Ginecol., 47, 467–470. Carter, M.E. and Joyce, D.N. (1987) Ovarian carcinoma in a patient hyperstimulated by gonadotropin therapy for in vitro fertilization: a case report. J. In Vitro Fertil. Embryo Transfer, 4, 126–128. Dietl, J. (1991) Ovulation and ovarian cancer. Lancet, 338, 445. Fathalla, M.F. (1967) Malignant transformation in ovarian endometriosis. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 74, 85–92. Fathalla, M.F. (1971) Incessant ovulation – a factor in ovarian neoplasia? Lancet, ii, 163. Feldberg, D., Yeshaya, A., Ashkenazi, J. et al. (1989) Ovarian cyst formation: a complication of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. Fertil. Steril., 51, 42–45. Goldberg, G.L. and Runowicz, C.D. (1992) Ovarian carcinoma of low malignant potential, infertility, and induction of ovulation – is there a link? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 166, 853–854. Grimbizis, G., Tarlatzis, B.C., Bontis, J. et al. (1995) Two cases of ovarian tumours in women who had undergone multiple ovarian stimulation attempts. Hum. Reprod., 10, 520–523. Heintz, A., Hacker, N. and Lagasse, L. (1985) Epidemiology and etiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Obstet. Gynecol., 66, 127–135. Kulkarni, R. and McGarry, J.M. (1989) Follicular stimulation and ovarian cancer. Br. Med. J., 299, 740. Lingeman, C.H. (1983) Environmental factors in the etiology of carcinoma of the human ovary: a review. Am. J. Intern. Med., 4, 365–379. Lopes, P., Julou, V., Mensier, A. et al. (1992) Cancer de l’ovaire et procréation medicalement assistée. Contracept. Fertil. Sexual., 20, 797–798. Negri, E., Franceschi, S., Tzonou, A. et al. (1991) Pooled analysis of 3 European case-control studies: I. Reproductive factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 49, 50–56. Roth, L.M., Anderson, M.C., Govan, A.D.T. et al. (1981) Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours: a clinicopathological study of 34 cases. Cancer, 48, 187–197. Scott, J.S. (1984) How to induce ovarian cancer: and how not to. Br. Med. J., 289, 781–782. Scully, R.E. (1979) Tumors of the ovary and maldeveloped gonads. In Atlas of Tumor Pathology, second series, Fascicle 16, Bethesda Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, pp. 190–208. Stevenson, C.S. (1970) Malignant transformation in ovarian endometriosis. Nature, treatment, and report of two cases. Obstet. Gynecol., 36, 443–457. Whittemore, A.S., Harris, R., Itnyre, J. and the Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group (1992) Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. I. Methods. Am. J. Epidemiol., 136, 1184–1203. Willimsen, W., Kruitwagen, R., Bastaliaans, B. et al. (1993) Ovarian stimulation and granulosa-cell tumour. Lancet, 341, 986–988. Wu, M.L., Whittemore, A.S., Paffenbarger, R.S. et al. (1988) Personal and environmental characteristics related to epithelial ovarian cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol., 128, 1216–1227. Young, R.H. and Scully, R.E. (1985) Ovarian Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours: a clinicopathological analysis of 207 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 9, 543–569. Zaloudek, C. and Norris, H.J. (1984) Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 64 intermediate and poorly differentiated neoplasms. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 8, 405–418. Zajicek, J. (1977) Ovarian cystomas and ovulation, a histogenetic concept. Tumori, 63, 429–435. Received on November 22, 1996; accepted on February 5, 1997 1023