Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Infusion Fluids as Culture Media E. P. CRICHTON, M.B., CH.B., F.R.C.P.(C) Department of Bacteriology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver 1, B.C. ABSTRACT Crichton, E. P.: Infusion fluids as culture media. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 199-202, 1973. Septicemia is a possible complication of the administration of intravenous infusions. T h e infection may be derived from the skin or from contaminated infusion fluid. T h e risk to the patient from contaminated infusion fluid depends on the number of organisms present and, therefore, on the nutrient properties of the fluid. A number of commonly used infusion fluids were tested for their growth-promoting abilities for a variety of bacteria. Some fluids did not support the growth or survival of any of the test organisms, whereas other fluids offered selective advantages to different organisms and permitted growth at different rates and even at a pH as low as 3.5. T H E DANGER OF INFECTION as a possible complication of intravenous therapy is well recognized. T h e emphasis in retrospective and prospective investigations has been placed on skin care, catheter care, and duration of catheterization. Relatively low infection rates have been attributed to adherence to a strict set of regulations for skin preparation and catheter and skin maintenance. 1 - 8 Clearly, however, infection can also arise from contaminated infusions. T h e work usually referred to is that of Michaels and Ruebner, 4 who in 1953 reported two cases of pyrexial reaction caused by bacterial growth in the solution during infusion. They also demonstrated that their two isolates of a coliform bacillus could grow in physiologic saline solution and in Hartraann's solution with 5% dextrose under conditions simulating an infusion, but not in physiologic saline with 5 % dextrose or in 5% dextrose alone. They attributed this failure to grow in the latter solutions to Received March 17, 1972; accepted for publication April 20, 1972. the low p H of the solutions, which were 4.3 and 4.1, respectively. More recently, several cases of fatal septicemia were traced to contamination of the intravenous infusions at the manufacturer's plant. In one hospital, 2 35% of the infusion sets were found to be contaminated during use and 7 1 % of these were judged to be in unsatisfactory working condition, thus indicating preventable circumstances. But even with great care the risk of contamination of the intravenous set or infusion fluid at the time of changing the bottle or adding medication is very real. T h e degree of danger to the patient will depend on host factors and the nutrient properties of the fluid. As scientific data describing these nutrient properties are not readily available, a small study was undertaken in an attempt to define more accurately the type of solution which might serve as a culture medium and lead to massive injection of organisms. A knowledge of these growth-promoting properties would also serve as a guide to the frequency with which intravenous bottles and tubing should be changed. 199 200 CRICHTON Method A variety of organisms was selected for the test. They were: Klebsiella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus albus, and a Pseudomonas cepacia isolated from an infusion bottle and blood of a baby with septicemia. The organisms were grown on a Mueller-Hinton plate. The colonies were touched on the surface and suspended in distilled water. This mixed inoculum was standardized to the Kirby-Bauer opacity standard and diluted 1:10 in distilled water, since distilled water is the purest practical vehicle. A sample of this inoculum (0.05 ml.) was injected through the rubber stopper into a standard intravenous infusion bottle (Cutter Laboratories, Inc., Berkeley, Calif. 94710, USA). After 15 min., fluid was withdrawn from the bottles using a different Old Tuberculin syringe for each bottle, and two drops were seeded onto a Mueller-Hinton plate. The bottles were left at room temperature to simulate "in use" conditions and cultured again at 7 hr., 24 hr., 48 hr., and 144 hr. T h e plates were incubated overnight and the numbers of colonies counted and recorded. The types of organisms that multiplied were identified by colonial morphology. When an infusion showed an overgrowth of Gram-negative bacilli, an aliquot was inoculated onto a mannite salt agar in order to detect the presence of staphylococci. Additionally, Staphylococcus aureus and 5. albus were inoculated into the fluids alone and together to determine whether these cocci could multiply in the absence of interference by Gram-negative bacilli. The pH of the solution was measured with a glass electrode before and immediately after inoculation. The test series was done on three different occasions. Results The findings in the diree tests were similar. Only minor discrepancies occurred and A.J.C.P.—Vol. 59 the less favorable findings are recorded in Table 1. Significant increases in bacterial numbers occurred at different time intervals with different solutions. Also, the solutions provided selective advantages to different organisms, and the organisms which were recognizable morphologically are recorded. In most cases in which growth occurred, Serratia was present, but in 10% invert sugar in water the Pseudomonas cepacia multiplied much better. Staphylococci, however, could not be isolated from any of the fluids with a growth of Gram-negative bacilli. Staphylococci did not multiply when they were inoculated into the fluids alone, and from most of these fluids the two-drop culture was negative after 72 hr. The pH of the solution was not changed by the addition of one drop of suspension, and some of the bacilli grew well in solutions of low pH, as indicated. Discussion The testing system attempts to simulate "in use" conditions, but by necessity the inoculum had to be larger. The organisms were selected as representatives of likely contaminants and isolates from patients with bacteremia or septicemia. It is interesting that the Staphylococci did not multiply in any of the fluids. This would explain the repeated observation that Gramnegative bacilli are isolated from contaminated infusions more frequently than Gram-positive organisms; the original contamination may have included Gram-positive organisms, but they did not survive. It is also tempting to speculate that, in the absence of other host infection, colonization of the catheter tip by Gram-positive cocci arises from skin organisms or contamination at the skin site, whereas Gramnegative bacilli may originate in the infusion fluid. Noteworthy findings are the different rates of multiplication of different organisms in different solutions, indicating the February 1973 INFUSION FLUIDS AS CULTURE MEDIA 201 Table 1. Nutrient Properties of Intravenous Solutions G•owth afterf OverpH growth* Distilled water NaCl inj. Lactated Ringer's M/6 Na Lactate inj. Z\% Dextrose + 0.3% NaCl 3J% Dextrose + 0.3% NaCl + KC1 5% Dextrose + 5% alcohol 5% Dextrose electrolyte 48 5% Dextrose in saline 5% Dextrose in H20 5% Dextrose in lactated Ringer's inj. 5% Dextrose + 5% protein hydr. in H20 10% Dextrose in saline 10% Dextrose in H20 10% Dextrose + 6 mEq. KC1 + 8 mEq. NaHCOa 20% Dextrose U.S.P. 50% Dextrose in H20 10% Invert sugar in H20 10% Invert sugar in NaCl 10% Invert sugar in electrolyte 2 10% Invert sugar + 0.3% KC1 + 0.45% NaCl 5% NaHCOs in H20 Polysal (bal. replacement electrolyte) Polysal + 5% dextrose Rheomacrodex 10/W/V in N saline Rheomacrodex 10/W/V in dextrose Amigen 5% in 12.5% levugen, 2.4% alcohol Intralipid 10% Polyonic M 900 15 min. 7 hr. 24 hr. 48 hr. 72 hr. 144 hr. CD CD CD CD CD CD — 4 CD CD 4 — 18 21 17 11 7 1 6 18 11 16 17 4 9 20 11 13 17 9 14 C D 6 46 4 37 4 CD 1 2 4 14 6 1 16 C D 14 8 11 6 8 6 16 10 C C C C C C D D D D D D — 9 2 CD 15 6 4 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD — 3 CD CD 8 6 CD CD 8.0 S, K, Ps 3.7 3.4 3.5 Pb, S 3.2 4.5 40 16 17 26 21 5 28 C D 5 3 1 5 3 8 2 16 5 8 CD — 5 6 — 5 CD — 4 CD — 3 — — CD — 6 3.3 7.9 5.8 5.4 4.2 S, K 4.1 S, K 16 11 7 12 22 14 5 1 10 10 15 5 7 8 16 C D 60 21 2 10 5 13 CD CD — 10 8 13 CD CD — 3 1 9 CD CD 5.1 6.5 S, K, Pb 3.8 2 9 17 3 1 9 CD I 1 — CD — — CD — — CD — 7.0 6.1 6.6 6.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.6 5.1 4.1 4.4 Pb,S S, K S,Ps S S s S, K s s s CD. * K = Klebsiella, S = Serratia, Ps = Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pb = a Pseudomonas cepacia from a baby with septicemi t The arable numerals indicate the number of colonies cultured per plate. The + symbols indicate increase in growth beyond a countable number (approximately 100) and the number of positives the relative amount of increase, with (j^jj) representing confluent growth. 202 CRICHTON need to test a variety of organisms, and the growth of Serratia and the Pseudomonas cepacia in a pH as low as 3.5 and in commercial distilled water. The findings apply only to the solutions tested without any further additions, and only to the organisms tested. Contamination problems and prevailing organisms vary from area to area and time to time, and no test system of this nature could be comprehensive. The practical conclusions apply to the need for changing not only the bottle but the tubing. The tubing is important, as it has been shown that multiplication of organisms can occur even if the bottles are changed to sterile solutions.4 If multiplication of bacteria did not occur in the fluid, then there would be no need to change the tubing. If, on the other hand, the infusion A.J.CP.—Vol. 59 fluid is a good nutrient, then the decision to change the administration set would depend on the rate of increase of organisms and the likelihood of contamination of the fluid, which again would depend on the care with which the set was handled and the number of times the circuit had been broken or medication had been injected. Acknowledgment. Miss E. Underhill provided technical assistance. References 1. Corso JA: Maintenance of venous polyethylene catheters to reduce risk of infection. JAMA 210:2075-2077, 1969 2. Duman RJ, Warner JF, Dalton HP: Septicaemia from intravenous infusions. N Engl J Med 284: 257-260, 1971 3. Fuchs PC: Indwelling intravenous polyethylene catheters. JAMA 216:1447-1450, 1971 4. Michaels L, Ruebner B: Growth of bacteria in intravenous infusion fluids. Lancet 1:773-774, 1953