Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Simposio de Metrología 2016 19 al 23 de Septiembre de 2016 DESIGN OF A DIGITALLY ASSISTED BRIDGE FOR COMPARING FOURTERMINAL IMPEDANCES A. H. Pacheco Estrada, J. A. Moreno Hernández, and F. L. Hernández Márquez Centro Nacional de Metrología km 4.5 Carretera a Los Cués, Municipio El Marqués, Qro. C.P. 76246 México Tel. +52 442 211 05 00 (3361), [email protected] Abstract: With the goal of establish the ohm-farad traceability chain at CENAM, it is being developed a Digitally Assisted Bridge for Comparing Four-Terminal Impedances. This paper exposes the main parts of the bridge and presents the model which describes the on balance bridge impedances ratio. The advantages against Classic Impedance Bridges are discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION signals to balance the bridge instead of networks of passive electromagnetic devices. The PSS is controlled by a PC program which can adjust the phase and amplitude of the signals, which varies the in-phase and quadrature components of the bridge balance signals automatically. The PSS also provide the reference signal of the Bridge. The Digitally Assisted Impedance Bridge (DAIB) under development at CENAM is a measurement system that compares two impedance standards at 1:1 and 10:1 ratios. This kind of bridge combines the accuracy of an Inductive Voltage Divider (IVD), which provides the reference ratio of the bridge [1], and the versatility of the Programmable Sinewave Synthesizer (PSS) to provide balance signals to the bridge [2]. Figure 1 shows a simplified diagram of the Bridge, which consists of five voltage signals from the PSS (Va, Vb, Vc, Vd and Vw), injection transformers (Tb, Tc, Td and Tw), impedances to be compared (Rx and Rs), detection transformers (T2, T3 and T4), a null detector to measure four balance nodes (n1, n2, n3 and n4), a power supply transformer Tp, a Kelvin Inductive Divider Tk and an IVD (TI). Furthermore, coaxial chokes are distributed on each loop of the bridge to suppress magnetic coupling and ground loops. For many years, Classic Impedance Bridges have been designed using complex networks of passive electromagnetic devices (IVD, resistance decades, capacitance boxes, etc.), performing the most accurate impedance ratio measurements [3]. The introduction of PSS allows to perform an automatic bridge balance in a short time allowing to use the bridge on a wide range of frequency and reducing construction costs. At CENAM, it is necessary to establish the traceability chain between the ohm and the farad. With the DAIB it will be possible to calibrate individually two 100 kΩ resistors using as reference standard a 10 kΩ Calculable Resistor constructed at CENAM [4] at a frequency of 1592 Hz. These resistors will be used in a Quadrature Bridge at 1592 Hz to calibrate two 1 nF standard capacitors [2]. Because the Calculable Resistor is calibrated with traceability to the Quantum Hall Resistance (QHR) then the capacitance calibration will be traced to the QHR also. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE ASSISTED IMPEDANCE BRIDGE Fig. 1. Scheme of the Digitally Assisted Impedance Bridge in a 10:1configuration. DIGITALLY The main difference between a Classic Impedance Bridge and a DAIB is the use of PSS to introduce 1 Simposio de Metrología 2016 2.1. 19 al 23 de Septiembre de 2016 and a are the amplitude and phase of the voltage signal Va. Description of the Bridge The voltage signal Va from the PSS give the reference signal to the bridge and supply current to the transformer Tp. The transformer TI is a two stage IVD that generates the ratio of the bridge, and it is powered directly by Tp. The high potential taps of the resistance standards are connected to the ends taps of TI, the high current taps are connected to Tp, the low currents taps are connected together and the low potential taps of the impedances are connected to the ends taps of the Kelvin Inductive Divider Tk. This divider together with the voltage signal Vd and the injection transformer Td, provide the main balance of the bridge and avoid the drop of potential of the low current taps of the impedances. The four pair impedance conditions [3] are achieved applying voltage signals with Vb and Vc by means of the injections transformers Tb and Tc, and measuring the currents of the potential leads of the bridge through the null detector and the detection transformers T2 and T3. The Wagner balance [3] is achieved by the introductions of a voltage signal on the reference ground node of the bridge by means of Vw and Tw and measuring cero current in the reference node of TI by the null detector. The main balance is measured by the detection transformer T4 and the null detector. 3. With the DAIB is expected the calibration of 100 k resistors at a frequency of 1592 Hz with an uncertainty lower than 50 n/. This uncertainty can be achieve thanks to the performance of TI [1]; however, the use of this kind of passive electromagnetic devices limits the frequency scope of the bridge in the 10:1 ratio measurements because the 10:1 error of TI depends on the frequency. So, the calibration of TI at 1592 Hz has to be done in order to establish the ohm-farad traceability chain. The Classic IVD Calibration Systems requires expensive complex networks of electromagnetic devices and an experienced metrologist to perform the long time measurements, at only one frequency. For this reason, it has been considered to develop a Digitally Assisted IVD Calibration System using the PSS. This may allow performing the IVD calibration automatically and at many frequencies in the audio range. 4. REFERENCES [1] G A. Kyriazis, J. A Moreno, J Melcher, “A TwoStage, Guarded Inductive Voltage Divider with Small Ratio Errors for Coaxial Bridge Applications“, ACTA IMEKO, December 2011, issue 0, 5 – 9. [2] L Callegaro, V D’Elia and B Trinchera, “Realization of the farad from the dc quantum Hall effect with digitally assisted impedance bridges,”Metrologia 47, pp. 464-472, 2010 [3] B P Kibble, and G. H. Rayner, “Coaxial AC Bridge”, (Bristol: Adam Hilger), 1984 [4] A H Pacheco, J A Moreno and F L HernandezMarquez, “Development of Calculable Resistors at CENAM”, CPEM 2016 Digest, to be published. Model of the Bridge The model that describes the impedance ratio of the bridge is in function of the type of impedances to be measured. For now, the bridge aims to measure resistance ratios. Equation 1 expresses the calibration value of resistance Rx when the bridge is on balance. RX =RS D 1 1-D 1+ RS (nAd cos (θd -θa )) CONCLUSIONS The design of a DAIB, the model for a resistance calibration, advantages and disadvantages of the bridge have been exposed. This bridge will be used to calibrate a 100 k resistor at a frequency of 1592 Hz in order to get the ohm-farad traceability chain. At this point, it can be seen that for each balance measure node, there is one voltage signal that balances the node: Vd for n4, Vb for n2, Vc for n3 and Vw for n1. Each of these balances is performed though a PC program adjusting the amplitude and phase of the PSS signals in function of the null detector measurements. 2.2. DISCUTION AND FUTURE WORK (1) 1-D Aa where Rs is the value of the reference standard, D is the complex ratio of TI, n is the number of windings of the injection transformer Tb, Ad and d are the amplitude and phase of the voltage signal Vd, and Aa 2