Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Title: The ABC of Craniosynostosis Repair: A (air embolus), B (blood loss), C (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation) Moderators: M. Concetta Lupa, Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina Karene Ricketts, Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina Goals: After completion of the PBLD, the participant should be able to discuss the anesthetic management for craniosynostosis repair including potential problems such as venous air embolism and blood loss / replacement / conservation a. b. the revised 2010 Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support guidelines Case history: A 15-month old male with craniosynostosis scheduled for repair. His past medical history is significant for prematurity at 29 weeks, shunted hydrocephalus, chronic lung disease and developmental delay. Questions: What is craniosynostosis? What are the implications of syndromic vs. non-syndromic craniosynostosis? What are the anesthetic implications of prematurity? What is chronic lung disease? How can it affect your anesthetic plan? Would you obtain more information based on his history of prematurity/chronic lung disease? What other preoperative workup would you want in preparation for his craniosynostosis repair? What do you include in your informed consent? What specific risks and possible complications should be disclosed to the patient’s parents? Does your institution require a separate written anesthesia consent? Case history and physical examination (continued): Preoperative assessment includes Hgb 11.9 mg/dL and type / cross. Parents wish to be directed donors for blood transfusion. Questions: What monitors would you want in proceeding with this case? Why? Would you place a central venous line? If so, where? Does location matter? What blood conservation techniques would you utilize? What pharmacological agents? Amicar? Tranexamic Acid? What anesthetic techniques? Discuss risks/benefits of each. What does your institution use? Do the surgeons at your institution employ preoperative therapies to help decrease the impact of anticipated blood loss Are these evidence-based therapies? What about directed donated blood from family members? Is it beneficial? What are the risks? Preoperative studies/results: The type and cross showed the presence of anti-kell antibodies. The surgeon is eager to start his case. A senior colleague suggests that by the time your lines are set-up, a match is likely to be available. Questions: Would you start the case without identifying available blood products for the case? How much blood would you want to be available before starting the procedure? Do you think it is necessary to have the blood in the room prior to the induction of anesthesia? What is involved in a type and cross? What are some common antibodies? Why would this child be likely to have the presence of antibodies? Intraoperative course: Standard monitors, arterial line, and peripheral intravenous access established. Amicar infusion 10 mg/kg/hr was initiated prior to incision. Questions: Is there evidence in pediatrics that Amicar (Aminocaproic acid) is useful in preventing blood loss in craniosynostosis repair? In other procedures? How is it dosed? Are there risks in giving pharmacologic agents (i.e. antifibrinolytics)? What are contraindications to using these types of therapies? At what point in the surgery is blood loss most likely to occur? Intraoperative (continued) Acute hypotension, oxygen desaturation, and decrease in ETCO2 during surgical exposure of the dural sinuses raises concern for venous air embolism. Questions: What are some unique concerns to intracranial procedures….concern for venous air embolism? How would you address/prepare for potential complications? What is a venous air embolism? How does it develop? What other surgical procedures are high risk for venous air embolism? What are the signs of a venous air embolism? How should it be managed? Role of PEEP? Role of anesthetic technique? Echo vs. precordial Doppler for detection? Intraoperative (continued): After covering the surgical field, intravenous epinephrine, and fluid bolus the patient stabilizes and surgery proceeds. During craniectomy, progressive hypotension secondary to profound blood loss, results in pulseless electrical activity. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiated. Questions: What is pulseless electrical activity? What are the causes? What is the recommended therapy per current PALS guidelines? How do these guidelines differ outside of the operating room in a non-intubated patient? Summarize the new PALS changes as they relate to airway, breathing, and circulation. Why were these changes implemented? Is the data substantial enough for these new recommendations? What is the recommended chest compression rate/depth in children of this age? If the patient was in the prone position, would this change your management? Postoperative Care: A stable rhythm was obtained and the surgery proceeded uneventfully. The surgeon asks what your plans are for extubation. The patient has had good urine output, is not requiring pressor support, and ventilation is stable. Questions: Would you attempt extubation in this patient? What are your criteria for extubation? Does the amount of blood transfused/IV fluids given play a role? What other factors play a role in your decision How would you explain the intraoperative events to the parents? Craniosynostosis is the result of premature closure of the cranial sutures during the development of an infant’s skull growth. There are many different types of craniosynostosis, depending on which and how many sutures are involved. Therefore, presentation can be varied from patient to patient A common classification is between syndromic and non-syndromic craniosynostosis, mostly because non-syndromic craniosynostosis involves usually only one suture, and syndromic craniosynostosis may present in a more complex fashion, thereby necessitating a more involved repair. The reasoning behind surgical correction of craniosynostosis is not solely cosmetic. Operations are performed early in life in an attempt to allow for normal brain growth and cognitive development. Preoperative assessment of the patient is generally the same as any basic pediatric preoperative assessment, with consideration of the patient’s other medical conditions as well as current state of health. There are a few points, however, that need to be addressed specifically to the patient presenting for craniosynostosis repair. One should assess for the presence of increased ICP, although it is fairly uncommon. In syndromic patients, it may be common to see other abnormalities, such as congenital heart disease and/or difficult airway, and therefore history and physical exam should be directed towards such. The surgical procedure often results in major blood loss, and so a CBC and coagulation profile, as well as a type and cross, should be obtained. Parents should be made aware of the increased risk of transfusion. Another risk in this patient population is the risk of venous air embolism, and therefore preparations should be made to detect and treat in case of emergency. Intraoperatively, standard monitoring, as per the American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines, and an arterial line for blood pressure measurement are indicated. A central venous line is not routinely established for pressure monitoring, but should be strongly considered if peripheral access is inadequate (2 large bore IVs is most common) or if there is a great concern for venous air embolism. Venous air embolism is a complication seen in craniosynostosis repair, with a reported incidence of 83%, although most are without hemodynamic symptoms. Routine use of a precordial Doppler to increase the chance of early diagnosis is recommended. A balanced anesthetic of opioid and inhalation agents is most often utilized. Intraoperative blood loss management is the most challenging part of the anesthetic management for craniosynostosis repair. Elevation of the vascular periosteum is usually the most significant source of bleeding and accurate assessment of the blood loss is difficult because a significant percentage is lost on the surgical gowns and drapes. The dural sinuses are another potential source of bleeding and generally require immediate fluid resuscitation or transfusion. The usual strategies for decreasing homologous transfusion, such as preoperative autologous donation, are generally not feasible in children (especially those less than 3 years of age) because of their small blood volume and the difficulty donation would pose without sedation. There are also potential risks if parents wish to be directed donors because transfusion of parental blood has raised concerns of chimerism and graft-versushost diseases (GVHD). Induced hypotension is not a widely accepted blood saving technique for craniosynostosis repair because of the increased risk of venous air embolism and the potential hemodynamic instability associated with blood loss. There is evidence to support use of perioperative blood salvage, but there are associated risks to consider including coagulopathy, hemolysis, bacterial contamination, and damage to platelets. Recently, several investigators have shown that intraoperative tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in children undergoing surgical correction of craniosynostosis. Postoperative management varies by surgeon and institution. In most circumstances, the patient can be extubated at the end of surgery and transported to the perioperative anesthetic care unit or pediatric intensive care unit where the hemodynamic and volume status, hematologic, and coagulation profiles are closely monitored. Patient outcome is usually excellent with proper preoperative planning and careful attention to intravascular volume status. References: 1. 2. Perioperative management of pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. Koh JL, Gries H. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Sep;25(3):465-81, viii. Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, Atkins DL, Berg RA, Berg MD, Bhanji F, Biarent D, Bingham R, Coovadia AH, Hazinski MF, Hickey RW, Nadkarni VM, Reis AG, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Tibballs J, Zaritsky AL, Zideman D; Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Chapter Collaborators. Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S466-515. 3. Intraoperative tranexamic acid reduces blood transfusion in children undergoing craniosynostosis surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Dadure C, Sauter M, Bringuier S, Bigorre M, Raux O, Rochette A, Canaud N, Capdevila X. 4. Anesthesiology. 2011 Apr; 114(4):856-61. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in pediatric craniosynostosis surgery: a double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Goobie SM, Meier PM, Pereira LM, McGowan FX, Prescilla RP, Scharp LA, Rogers GF, Proctor MR, Meara JG, Soriano SG, Zurakowski D, Sethna NF. Anesthesiology. 2011 Apr; 114(4): 862- 5. 71. Preoperative Methods to Improve Erythropoiesis. Bacuzzi A, Dionigi G, Piggaretti G, Tozzi M, Del Romano M, Guzzetti L, Paracchini F, Villa F, Cuffar S. Transplantation Proceedings. 2011 Jan.: 43 (1): 324-326