Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Abstract preview EGF 2008 Does effect of selection history influence the cattle’s vegetation and plant preferences? Sæther N. 1, Sickel H. 2, Norderhaug A. 3, Sickel M. 4 and Vangen O. 5 1 Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre, N-1432 Ås, Norway 2 Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Løken, N-2940 Heggenes, Norway 3 Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Kvithamar, N-7500 Stjørdal, Norway 4 Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, N-1332 Østerås, Norway 5 Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Science, N1432 Ås, Norway Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract In this project plant and vegetation preferences of two Norwegian dairy cattle breeds with different selection history were studied. The Norwegian dairy breed Blacksided Trønder and Nordland Cattle (STN) has never been selected efficiently for higher milk production. The other breed, however, the Norwegian Red (NR), has mainly been selected for this. Two herds both consisting of STN and NR cows, were studied. To examine the animals’ plant preferences, faeces samples were collected and analysed for plant fragments. Vegetation maps were also used to find possible differences in grazing preferences. Breed differences with regard to recorded plant fragments in the faeces samples were significant for Nardus stricta, a species characteristic for nutrient poor but mostly species rich vegetation types in the studied areas, vegetation types of high importance for the biodiversity especially in one of the areas. STN had the highest share of Nardus stricta. Altogether the results of the study indicate that a higher producing cattle breed might prefer to graze more nutrient rich vegetation areas compared to a lower yielding cattle breed, when grazing less nutrient and base rich - but species rich grasslands. Keywords: semi-natural grasslands, grazing, cattle, breed differences, vegetation preferences Introduction The areas of species rich semi-natural grasslands have been considerably reduced during the last 50 years in Norway. Maintenance of these valuable habitats depends on traditional use or special management to prevent regrowth succession and loss of species (Norderhaug et al, 1999; Sickel et al, 2004). A survey conducted by Sæther & Vangen (2001) revealed that farmers utilizing the low yielding Norwegian dairy breed STN expected this breed to utilize extensive grasslands better than cows of the high yielding NR. Approximately 97 % of Norwegian dairy cattle are NR, while 0.1 % belongs to the STN breed. Average yearly milk yield for the two breeds are 6, 200 kg and 4, 000 kg, respectively. Several studies have shown that breeds and/or lines selected for high production intensity generally show lower levels of activity, for references see Sæther et al (2006). Furthermore, when given the choice between hardly and easily accessible fodder, they tend to choose easily accessible fodder at a higher rate than breeds and lines not selected for the same high production intensity. This study therefore addresses the following question: Will genetic high yielding cows focus more on nutrient rich plant species and vegetation types than genetic low yielding cows when grazing extensive, species rich semi-natural grasslands? 1 Abstract preview EGF 2008 Materials and methods Two dairy cattle herds, one farm in Skåbu and and one farm in Valdres, were studied. Both farms have long, continuous summer farming traditions based on semi-natural grasslands in the mountains. The herds had nine purebred cows each, five and six STN cows, and four and three NR cows, respectively. The dominating bedrocks in Skåbu are base-rich bedrocks with a high weathering capacity, giving rise to nutrient and base rich soils. In Valdres the bedrock consists entirely of a less basic phyllite type, and the soils are poorer than in Skåbu. Today the studied areas have a low grazing pressure. The nomenclature for plants follows Lid & Lid (2005). On average the herds on each farm were observed 9 hours daily, with a span of 7-13 hours per day, during one week in July and one in August. In total, 49 faeces samples were randomly collected across weeks, study sites and animals and prepared for microhistological analyses, following the procedures of Garcia-Gonzalez (1986). Fragments from 28 plantspecies, -genera and -groups, were found in the faeces samples, however, only the 14 with higher mean values than 2 % of total recorded fragments are included in the statistical analyses. In the statistical analysis the possible effects of breed (STN & NR), farm (Skåbu & Valdres) and month (July & August) are included as fixed effects together with the interaction breed * farm. The effect of cow within breed is included as a random effect to adjust for variation between individuals within breed. Results and discussion Both study sites had species rich grasslands. In total, 123 species were found. Of these, 51 species were only found in Skåbu and 20 species only in Valdres. The most common grassland vegetation type in Valdres was characterised by many common and small-sized grasses and herbs with low to medium demands of base rich soil. Nardus stricta and other drought-resistant species often grew on the top of small elevations, while species indicating better moisture conditions, e.g. certain Carex species, dominated on lower and more humid parts of the grasslands. Vaccinium myrtillus was also often found here. Another grassland type found in the Valdres area is dominated by Nardus stricta as a result of too heavy grazing for many years. The vegetation in Skåbu was characterised by many base demanding species. Forests, protecting small elevations and knolls against wind and drought, surrounded the grasslands. Thus, moisture conditions and the distribution of plant species in the grasslands were more uniform here. The results from the microhistological analyses showed that the cows had most grass fragments (76 %). In addition to a group of unidentified grass species, 13 grass species and genera were recognised. Avenella flexuosa (25 %) and Deschampsiacespitosa (15 %) dominated. Also several herbs and Carex spp. are valuable grazing plants. Together herbs and Carex spp. constitute almost 16 % of the observed fragments. Only the dominating grazed grass species, and the species or plant groups contributing significantly to the interpretation of the results, are included in the statistical analysis presented below. Table 1. Results from the statistical analyzes on the plant fragment residues observed in the faeces samples. The figures are given as percentage of total fragments. Plant species, genera or group Vaccinium myrtillus Nardus stricta Carex spp Total grass Deschampsia cespitosa Avenella flexuosa Farm ** ** ** ** ** ** Breed * - LSLSLSLSInteraction Average means means means means STN NR Skåbu Valdres Month Farm/breed value * 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.8 1.3 3.8 5.1 3.8 1.7 7.2 8.4 8.4 9.5 4.4 13.5 ** 76.1 77.7 75.8 74.0 79.4 25.5 27.0 25.1 19.3 32.9 ** 15.1 15.0 14.9 19.8 10.2 2 Abstract preview EGF 2008 Table 1 shows that the effect of breed was only significant for Nardus stricta, a species characteristic for nutrient poor but mostly species rich vegetation types in the studied areas. The STN breed had a higher share of Nardus stricta fragments in the faeces samples than the NR breed. The interaction between farm and breed was significant for Vaccinium myrtillus and the plant group “total grass”. The effect of farm was significant for all tested species and plant groups; however, within farm the results showed that when grazing in areas with nutrient and base rich soil and species rich vegetation types, as in Skåbu, the two breeds mostly graze the same vegetation and plant species. In Valdres, however, where the soil is less fertile, and the plant species distribution less uniform than in Skåbu, the results indicate that the NR cows graze more in patches where Carex spp. grow than the STN cows. STN also graze more Carex spp. in Valdres than in Skåbu, but the increase is less than for NR. Both breeds graze less Vaccinium myrtillus in Valdres, but NR decrease less than STN. In Valdres Vaccinium myrtillus occur in the same vegetation type as some Carex spp. that are defined as valuable grazing plants (Rekdal 2001). Studies by Garmo (1986) state that Carex spp have a higher content of crude protein and less content of crude fibre than grass species during the entire grazing season, indicating that Carex spp in general have a higher nutrient value than grass. This may explain why NR cows seem to graze more in patches where Carex spp. grow and Vaccinium myrtillus occur. Both breeds graze more Nardus stricta in Valdres than in Skåbu, probably because this species is more common in Valdres. This grass species has low digestibility and stiff, narrow leaves. It is therefore not seen as a valuable or preferred grazing species. It may, however, be grazed to a certain extent when it occurs in vegetation types preferred by the grazing cattle. STN has a higher increase in Nardus stricta than NR, indicating that the STN cows graze more in nutrient poor but species rich areas where this species is common in Valdres. Conclusions Results from this study indicates that a cattle breed selected for high milk yield might prefer to graze more nutrient rich vegetation areas compared to a lower yielding cattle breed, when grazing less nutrient and base rich but species rich grasslands. When managing semi-natural grasslands, the effect of grazing therefore might be different when choosing a low instead of a high yielding dairy cattle breed. This possible difference ought to be taken into consideration when managing extensive grasslands as loss of biodiversity by re-growth of less nutrient rich but species rich vegetation types seems to be smaller when using a lower yielding breed. References Garcia-Gonzales, R. 1984. L‘emploi des épidermis végétaux dans la detremination du regime alimentaire de l’isard dans le Pyrénées occidentales. Documents d’Ecologie Pyrénéenne, 3-4:307-313. Garmo, T. H. 1986. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of indigenous mountain pasture plants in different plant groups (Preliminary report). Rangifer, 6 (1): 14-22. Lid, J & Lid, D.T. 2005. The Norwegian Flora. Det Norske Samlaget 7 . edition by Reidar Elven (ed.). Norderhaug, A., Austad, I., Hauge, L. & Kvamme, M. (ed). 1999. The book of management for cultural landscapes in Norway. Sickel, H., Ihse, M., Norderhaug, A. & Sickel, M. 2004. How to monitor semi-natural key habitats and grazing preferences of cattle in mountain summer farming areas. An aerial photo and GPS method study. Landscape and Urban Planning 67 (2004): 67-77. Sæther, N. H. and Vangen, O. (2001) Motives for utilizing the Blacksided Trønder and Nordland: A native cattle breed in Norway. Animal Genetic Resources Information 31, 15-26. Sæther N.H., Sickel H., Norderhaug A., Sickel M. and Vangen O., (2006) Plant and vegetation preferences for a high and a moderate yielding Norwegian dairy cattle breed grazing semi-natural mountain pastures. Anim.Res. 55, pp 367-387. 3