Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
development offer little potential for superior treatment but are mainly designed to fight a rearguard action against the emergence of antibiotic resistance.3 The current crisis in antibiotics is not due to a new phenomenon but rather reflects the inability and reluctance of the pharmaceutical industry to continue to invest in new antibiotics to treat resistant infections. Unfortunately, patients and their loved ones have the mistaken idea that pneumonia is a preventable and treatable complication of mechanical ventilation or hospitalization. Multiple studies have demonstrated that this is only partially true, particularly in the treatment of VAP. Only the recent appearance of articles about extremely drug-resistant and pan-drugresistant bacteria in the lay press and the presidential executive orders regarding the crisis in antibiotic resistance4 have raised awareness that pneumonia has not necessarily been a treatable infection. However, the idea that pneumonia should be treatable drives a reluctance to shift to more comfort care measures in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation.5 To expect new antibiotics, optimized pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamic protocols, and antibiotic stewardship to lead to improved outcomes for patients with HAP/ VAP meets Einstein’s definition of insanity, paraphrased as “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Although each of these measures may have an important role in slowing the development of resistance, they are unlikely to decrease morbidity or mortality. Aerosolized antibiotics are not the only possibility to take HAP/VAP treatment to a different level. Adjunctive passive immunization with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies, extremely narrow-spectrum antibiotics that are effective against a single pathogen while leaving the remainder of the normal respiratory microbiome intact, and availability of rapid accurate diagnostic platforms with improved determination of antibiotic susceptibility offer other exciting potentials. What is clear is that we need to keep searching for better therapies for patients with HAP/VAP until the verdict for one of these “not (yet) proven” therapies is reversed. References 1. Kollef MH. Counterpoint: Should inhaled antibiotic therapy be used routinely for the treatment of bacterial lower respiratory tract infections in the ICU setting? No. Chest. 2017;151(4):740-743. 2. Fink MP, Snydman DR, Niederman MS, et al. Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe 744 Point and Counterpoint Pneumonia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994; 38(3):547-557. 3. Tommasi R, Brown DG, Walkup GK, et al. ESKAPEing the labyrinth of antibacterial discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015; 14(9):529-542. 4. Report to the President on Combating Antibiotic Resistance. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology: Executive Office of the President, September 2014. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/ files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_carb_report_sept2014.pdf. Accessed December 2, 2016. 5. Martin-Loeches I, Wunderink RG, Nanchal R, et al. Determinants of time to death in hospital in critically ill patients around the world. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1454-1460. Rebuttal From Dr Kollef Marin H. Kollef, MD, FCCP St. Louis, MO Antibiotic resistance in multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria has emerged as one of the most important determinants of outcome in patients with serious infections, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). In the United States, more than 700,000 healthcare-associated infections, many of which are caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB), occur annually, with almost half of these occurrences in critically ill patients.1 In Europe, there is an increasing prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, in particular with the rapid spread of carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase-48 and New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.2 Escalating rates of antibiotic resistance add substantially to the morbidity, mortality, and costs related to infection in hospitalized patients.3 Given these worrisome trends, it is appealing to consider the use of aerosolized antibiotics for the treatment of VAP, especially when dealing with highly resistant pathogens, inadequate delivery of systemic antibiotics to the lung, or toxicities related to the use of parenteral agents such as aminoglycosides and polymyxins. However, it is also important to consider AFFILIATIONS: From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine. FINANCIAL/NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: The author has reported to CHEST the following: This work was supported by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation. M. H. K. was a principal investigator in the Cardeas study. CORRESPONDENCE TO: Marin H. Kollef, MD, FCCP, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Ave, Campus Box 8052, St. Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: [email protected] Copyright Ó 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.005 [ 151#4 CHEST APRIL 2017 Downloaded From: http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/chest/936160/ on 06/15/2017 ] Increasing Antibiotic Consumption Greater Infection Related Patient Morbidity and Mortality Greater Emergence Of Antibiotic Resistance Increased Administration of Inappropriate Initial Therapy Figure 1 – Circular nature of increasing antibiotic administration leading to greater resistance and higher rates of inappropriate antibiotic therapy, morbidity, and mortality attributed to bacterial infections. the potential downside of the increasing use of aerosolized antibiotics for VAP. A recent consensus statement from the Antimicrobial Stewardship and Resistance Working Groups of the International Society of Chemotherapy recommended as a key point for antibiotic use that clinicians “prescribe drugs at their optimal dose, mode of administration and for the appropriate length of time, adapted to each clinical situation and patient characteristics.”4 Unfortunately, many patients are treated with antibiotics for suspected VAP or tracheal colonization when pneumonia is not present. Additionally, inadequate delivery of antibiotic concentrations to the lung due to insufficient parenteral dosing or augmented renal clearance can result in a greater likelihood of treatment failures when VAP is present, as noted by Dr Wunderink.5 The indiscriminate use of aerosolized antibiotics in environments in which parenteral antibiotics are not optimally administered, especially without clear data indicating ideal aerosolized antibiotic selection, dosing, delivery mechanism, and duration of therapy, is likely to simply drive further resistance. It is also important to consider the availability of new parenteral antibiotics for the treatment of VAP. Two new antibiotics targeting MDR GNB (ceftolozanetazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam) have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and over the next 3 to 5 years, several other new antibiotics directed against MDR GNB are likely to become available including meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, relebactam, brilacidin, BAL30072, aztreonam-avibactam, carbapenem combined with ME 1071, and S-649266, a novel siderophore cephalosporin. These agents will potentially provide enhanced activity against b-lactamase producers, carbapenem-resistant bacteria, and in some cases even metallo-b-lactamase-producing bacteria. Therefore, the use of aerosolized antibiotics needs to be considered against the backdrop of these novel agents. In addition to new antibiotics, there has been progress in the development of vaccines and immunotherapies directed against MDR GNB. A vaccine candidate targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa is in clinical development, and the results from a phase II/III clinical trial in patients in the ICU who require mechanical ventilation should be available soon.6 Similarly, the development of monoclonal antibodies targeting virulence factors in MDR GNB, such as the type 3 secretion mechanism in P aeruginosa, hold promise for future nonantibiotic therapy for VAP.7 In summary, aerosolized antibiotics for the treatment of VAP are likely to be a valuable addition to our therapeutic armamentarium, especially for the treatment of infections attributed to MDR GNB. However, the use and delivery of aerosolized antibiotics should be guided by indications supported by appropriately designed clinical trials and should only be used to treat salvageable patients with true infections given the variability of documented practices.8 Only in this way can we be sure to optimize the use of these new agents without further promotion of global antibiotic resistance (Fig 1). References 1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13): 1198-1208. 2. Albiger B, Glasner C, Struelens MJ, et al. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: assessment by national experts from 38 countries, May 2015. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(45). 3. Maragakis LL, Perencevich EN, Cosgrove SE. Clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6(5):751-763. 4. Levy Hara G, Kanj SS, et al. Ten key points for the appropriate use of antibiotics in hospitalised patients: a consensus from the Antimicrobial Stewardship and Resistance Working Groups of the International Society of Chemotherapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;48(3):239-246. 5. Wunderink RG. Point: Should inhaled antibiotic therapy be used routinely for the treatment of bacterial lower respiratory tract infections in the ICU setting? Yes. Chest. 2017;151(4):737-739. 6. Knisely JM, Liu B, Ranallo TR, Zou L. Vaccines for healthcareassociated infections: promise and challenge. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(5):657-662. 7. François B. New targets for new therapeutic approaches. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):669. 8. Solé-Lleonart C, Rouby JJ, Chastre J, et al. Intratracheal Administration of antimicrobial agents in mechanically ventilated adults: an international survey on delivery practices and safety. Respir Care. 2016;61(8):1008-1014. journal.publications.chestnet.org Downloaded From: http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/chest/936160/ on 06/15/2017 745