* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 14. Stellar Structure and Evolution
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Corona Australis wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Corona Borealis wikipedia , lookup
Star of Bethlehem wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Auriga (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Cassiopeia (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Dyson sphere wikipedia , lookup
Planetary habitability wikipedia , lookup
Star catalogue wikipedia , lookup
Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Stellar classification wikipedia , lookup
H II region wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup
Hayashi track wikipedia , lookup
Standard solar model wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 14. Stellar Structure and Evolution The four equations of stellar structure discussed in Chapter 12, along with the principles of nuclear energy generation (and opacity, which we did not discuss in detail and postpone to a more advanced course) are the elements of stellar structure theory. The equations need to be solved by a computer...they have no analytical solution. There are also free choices or “parameter” that the modeler must make to generate a specific model. These include the mass of the star that it is desired to model as well as the chemical composition. Fortunately, we have found that the chemical composition of stars does not vary too much from one to another. Basically, stars are (initially) composed of about 73% H and 25% He. The other 2% is all the other elements, which astronomers lump together under the term “metals”. The “metal content” or “metallitcity” of stars can range from nearly (although not precisely) zero to about 2%. Most stars in the vicinity of the Sun have the 2% value and are referred to as Population I stars. Stars that are deficient in metals are referred to as “metal poor” and are called Population II stars. We shall see later that they are also older stars that were formed earlier in the history of the Galaxy before a lot of metals had been created by supernovae. 1. Main Sequence Stars: Hydrogen Core Burning When a star first forms it is chemically homogeneous and composed mostly of Hydrogen. The temperature and density must be highest at its core to provide the pressure needed to support the full weight of the star. Naturally, it is deep in the core, then, that conditions first become suitable for thermonuclear fusion. Also, naturally, it is Hydrogen that begins to fuse first, since it is most abundant and has the smallest Coulomb barrier. The particular reactions that occur were described in the last chapter and are either the p-p chain or CNO cycle. It turns out that the p-p chain produces more energy in the lower mass stars (below about 2 solar masses) while the CNO cycle produces of the star’s energy for the higher mass stars. Once the nuclear fusion turns on, the star can stabilize and is no longer forced to contract to re-supply the energy it is constantly radiating from its surface. The star stabilizes at a constant radius and enters its longest-lived phase of stellar evolution, the so-called “main sequence”. During this phase, it gains its energy through conversion of H to He in its core. That energy, in the form of photons, takes about a million years to random walk its way to the surface, where it is radiated to space as the star’s luminosity. The set of stars in this phase of evolution define the main sequence on the H-R diagram. What sets one apart from the other is primarily the mass of the star. Chemical composition plays only a minor role because there is not much variation in initial chemical composition among stars –2– – they are all mostly H and He in the same basic proportions. The range of stellar masses is set by two conditions. The upper mass limit is about 50-100 solar masses and is set by the luminosity of the star. Very massive stars are so luminous that the radiation pressure from their luminosity is sufficient to stop further mass from falling on them. They therefore are self-limiting in terms of the mass to which they can grow. Low mass stars, on the other hand, can be so small in mass that they do not get their central temperatures high enough to start nuclear fusion of Hydrogen. The lower mass limit is about 0.07 solar masses. Lower than that limit, objects are called “brown dwarfs”. They can be seen for billions of years, shining with very low luminosity that is generated entirely by their collapse and release of gravitational potential energy. Eventually their cores become dense enough to support the star and they become like a massive planet (e.g. Jupiter is an example). Main sequence stars “burn” the Hydrogen in their cores (fuse it actually) at a rate that depends on their mass. Since the luminosity of a star depends to a high power of its mass on the main sequence (basically, L ∝ M 3.3 ), the lifetime of a star on the main sequence depends strongly on its mass. Higher mass stars (e.g. O stars with masses above 20 solar masses) will burn out the H in their cores in a period of 10-100 million years or less. They evolve rapidly by astronomical standards. A star like the Sun (G-type of 1 solar mass) will take around 10 billion years to exhaust the H in its core, since its rate of energy production and, therefore, luminosity is so much smaller. The very lowest mass stars (M-type of, say, 0.1 solar mass) can last for trillions of years, much longer than the age of the Universe (13.7 billion years). Hence, O and B stars are all relatively recently formed and do not last long – there are also not that many of them. – whereas every M star that ever formed in the Universe is still with us as a main sequence star. By far, the most common stars in the Universe are M-type stars with masses of only a few tenths of a solar mass. There are roughly 100 million M stars for every O star. On the other hand, the stars that we see at night and that light up a galaxy are predominantly the O and B stars, as well as the supergiants and giants (see below). It is the rare, massive stars that provide most of the light of a galaxy and the common, low mass stars, that provide most of its mass. We turn now to a discussion of the evolution of low mass stars (i.e. those with initial masses of around 3-5 solar masses or less). The evolution of higher mass stars is similar up to the point where a planetary nebula forms. Higher mass stars do not form planetary nebulae, but explode as supernovae. This difference in their evolution will be discussed in the next chapter. Here we first describe how most stars (i.e. low mass stars – the common form of star) evolve. –3– 2. Hydrogen Exhaustion and the Red Giant Branch (RGB) Inevitably a star will exhaust the H in its core, having converted it to He. The Sun is about half way through that process. In the core of the Sun, we believe the present composition is about 50% He. As the He is created, the core of the star must move to slightly higher temperatures and pressures to keep up its pressure (see next chapter on ideal gas law). When the Hydrogen is completely exhausted in the core, it becomes difficult for the core to support the star and the compression is rather dramatic. Somewhat paradoxically, the compression of the core, actually leads to a great expansion (and, therefore, cooling) of the outer parts of the star. This is because the compressing core allows H-rich material in the vicinity of the core to come closer in and reach higher temperatures and densities, therefore increasing the rate at which nuclear fusion reactions occur. In other words, the star transitions from producing most of its energy in its core to producing most of its energy in a H-rich shell around the He-rich core. It enters a phase of “H shell burning”. The increase luminosity of this phase, accompanied by the greatly extended outer envelope of the star (and its cooler surface temperature) moves the star on the H-R diagram to the regime of red giants. The star becomes an RGB (Red Giant Branch) star. Its core begins to be supported by electron degeneracy pressure (see next chapter). Helium cannot yet be used as a fuel because the Coulomb barrier is so high and because the 4 He atom is such a stable structure that it will not fuse with another 4 He atom to produce a more stable atom. The 8 Be atom actually has less binding energy per nucleon (proton or neutron) than the 4 He atom, so a star cannot gain any energy by fusing two 4 He atoms. Its core must continue to contract and heat until it reaches temperatures near 100 million K and extreme densities. Finally the star can undergo a set of nuclear reactions that gains it some energy! This is called the Triple-alpha process. 3. Horizontal Branch (HB) Stars: Core Helium plus Shell Hydrogen Burning Physicists studying radioactive elements noted that there were two types of particles that were emitted by radioactive isotopes. One is called the β particle and is now known to be an electron. Electrons are, therefore, still often known as Beta-particles. The other type of particle emitted commonly in radioactive decays is a 4 He atom. These were called Alpha particles and, therefore, their fusion in a 3-body reaction is known as the Triple-α process. The reaction can be written as follows: 4 He + 4 He + 4 He → 12 C + γ –4– When this reaction finally turns on, at the high luminosity “tip” of the red giant branch (RGB), it has a major and rapid effect on the structure of the star. The star moves rapidly on the H-R diagram to a position characterized by lower luminosity and higher surface temperature. That is because, again somewhat paradoxically, the new energy source within the core, expands the inner regions of the star a bit and lowers the amount of energy that the star gets through H-shell burning. This more than offsets the gain from He-core burning, so the star’s luminosity drops. Also, since there is less energy input going into heating the envelope of the star, it contracts inward and, therefore, heats. This leads to a smaller radius but higher surface temperature. Hence the star moves to the location of the so-called “Horizontal Branch (HB)” on the H-R diagram. It is getting its energy at this state from core He-burning plus shell H-burning. In addition to the triple alpha process, that is creating Carbon from Helium, some of the C goes through an additional reaction with He to form Oxygen, ie. 4 He + 12 C → 16 O + γ. 4. Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) Stars: Shell Helium plus Shell Hydrogen Burning During the HB phase, the star begins to deplete its He in the core and gradually transitions to a core that is composed almost entirely of Carbon and Oxygen. As was the case with Helium, the temperature and density are not high enough to burn C and O into higher elements, because the Coulomb barrier is to steep. So the inner core continues to compress as it cannot generate enough energy to support the weight of the star above it. This likewise brings the He-burning shell and H-burning shell to higher densities and temperatures, pushing up the luminosity of the star. The outer envelope begins to go through the same kind of transition as during the Red Giant phase. It expands outward and cools. The star follows a path on the H-R diagram that takes it close to the RGB, but a bit above it. This is referred to as the Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) phase of evolution. AGB stars have Carbon/Oxygen cores in which nuclear fusion is not taking place, as well as He-burning and H-burning shells that produce the star’s luminosity. Eventually, the luminosity from these shells becomes so great that radiation pressure lifts the envelope right off of the star and expands it into space, forming the beautiful phenomenon known as a “planetary nebula” (see slides on that lecture or Google it!) The envelope of the star, containing a good fraction of its mass, is gradually diffused back into the interstellar medium (gas and dust between the stars). The He and H burning shells are gradually quenched and the Carbon-Oxygen core settles down into the final phase of a (low mass) star’s evolution – a white dwarf. –5– 5. Testing Models of Stellar Evolution: Cluster H-R Diagrams What we have described above is our understanding of stellar evolution that arises from the computer models of stars created on the basis of the physical laws discussed. All theories such as this need to be tested empirically against the data that we can observe in nature. Since the evolution of any one star takes millions to billions (to trillions, in some case!) of years, we obviously cannot test the models by watching any one star evolve. In practice, we make use of the fact that there are whole clusters of stars, containing up to 1 million stars, that can be found around the sky. A cluster represents a group of stars of varying mass that have all formed together and, hence, have the same age. Since the rate at which stars evolve depends strongly on their initial mass, clusters have stars at all different evolutionary stages, depending on their initial mass. A cluster H-R diagram, therefore, looks almost like the evolutionary track of a single star (but not exactly). What we actually compute to compare with cluster H-R diagrams are so-called isochrones. This is a set of models of stars of different mass but the same age. Comparing the isochrones generated by the models with the cluster H-R diagrams we can test the models and get an accurate idea of the age of the cluster. 6. Testing Models of Stellar Evolution: Solar Neutrinos Another, more direct, way of testing our ideas of stellar evolution is to try to look directly into the core of the Sun by detecting the neutrinos that are predicted to be created by the nuclear reactions there. In the slides accompanying the lectures there are pictures of some of the neutrino detectors that we have on Earth. As noted in class, neutrinos have very little interaction with normal matter and, therefore, unlike the photons do not have to random walk their way out of the Sun. They come directly out and if they can be captured by the neutrino detectors they can be useful. (Only a very tiny fraction can be captured, but it is enough to detect them and test the models.) The first neutrino detector was installed in a gold mine in South Dakota and comprised of a huge tank of “cleaning fluid”. It made use of the following reaction to capture neutrinos: ν + 37 Cl → 37 Ar + e− Initially not enough neutrinos were detected to match the models. But this turned out to be because of the physics of neutrinos, not because of a failure of the solar model. It turns out that neutrinos can actually oscillate between three different forms – electron, muon and tauon – and this experiment is only sensitive to electron neutrions. That accounts for the paucity of neutrinos detected. –6– 7. Testing Models of Stellar Evolution: The Main Sequence Finally, we note that the models of stellar evolution discussed do an excellent job of explaining the location of the main sequence on the H-R diagram. As noted above, this is the locus of stars that are in their core Hydrogen-burning phase of evolution. Since this is where they spend most of their lives, as stars, this is where the main sequence of stars is on the H-R diagram. Recall that higher mass stars, also known as “early type” (of O, B, A and F type) use primarily the CNO cycle to burn their H, while lower mass stars, so-called “late-type” stars (of G, K and M type) use the p-p chain. The nice match that occurs between the details of the shape of the observed main sequence and the predictions based on the models gives us confidence that the models are reasonably good. Of course, when looked at in detail, there are always lots of little things that can be changed and improved and many factors need to be ignored (such as rotation and magnetic fields). But, basically, the models of stars at least low mass stars through most of their evolutionary lives are in good shape.